Author: chris

Introduce your choice and indicate why you chose it.

Introduction You will introduce your choice and indicate why you chose it. Body 1 • Who made this invention and where and when did it happen? • What was invented before this? • How was it made and what difficulties were faced in the design/invention process? • How were these difficulties overcome? Body 2 • How did this invention revolutionize its area? • How does it makes things better, easier, possible? • How has it changed since it was invented? • How is the latest version better than the original? Body 3 • How has this invention changed your life? • How would your life be different if it had not been invented? • Why did you choose to write about this invention? Please write more detail here to justify your choice. Conclusion: Here you should conclude on your topic and briefly reiterate why this invention is So important.

Write a well developed comparison/contrast paper – topic -– compare yourself to one of your relatives per the in class directions.

ESSAY #2 TOPIC DE ENGLISH 1301 Fall 2015 Write a well developed comparison/contrast paper – topic -– compare yourself to one of your relatives per the in class directions (i.e. review the comparison sample handout and read this essay hand-out carefully). Length of paper: 750-1,000 typed words — courier new 12 point font, double-spaced. You may focus on differences and/or similarities. Per the essay 2 comparison sample handout, it is important to develop subject A and subject B equally. For this assignment, it is appropriate to utilize first person, but try to avoid beginning each sentence with “I” to make your writing stronger. Each paragraph should include specific examples to support your assertions. Students need to narrow their topics for the entire essay to two or three main points of comparison. Be sure to remember that you are developing a “single” point of comparison per each body paragraph – do not merely list several points of comparison. An example of a single point of comparison would be the following: personality, career choice, appearance, religious preference, hobbies, musical preference, educational background, educational choices, lifestyle choices, etc. – present only ONE point of comparison in each topic sentence that you explain in full detail in your comparison body paragraph. You will be graded on the strength of your topic sentences. Proofread each topic sentence to verify you have included a transitional word or phrase, the specific point of comparison, and the two subjects being compared (for this paper, the two subjects are you and your chosen relative). Also, make an effort to incorporate transitional words or phrases throughout your essay which indicate comparison. You will also be graded on whether you demonstrate equal development of both subjects. Be sure to use MLA Style format and proofread carefully for grammar errors. Do not use outside sources or information to complete this assignment – the goal of this paper is to write a comparison paper based on your own original ideas. Plagiarism software will be used to check student papers — plagiarized papers will receive a grade of “zero”

Select a specific DSM/ICD diagnosis and explore the available research concerning the extent to which the disorder is caused by biological-hereditary factors versus environmental influences.

B. Select a specific DSM/ICD diagnosis and explore the available research concerning the extent to which the disorder is caused by biological-hereditary factors versus environmental influences. Describe the assessment techniques that might be employed to determine the extent and the cause of the disorder. Case study examples are encouraged. Journal articles, Internet research, books, magazines, or other resources should be used to describe and summarize the information relevant to your subject. The paper should be 7 to 10 pages in length, typed or printed from word processor (double-spaced, 12 point type). Review and integrate your findings into a coherent summary. Please follow APA format to the greatest extent possible. You must include a cover page and a bibliography and be sure to cite all sources. You must submit your paper electronically as an attachment to an e-mail, and it must be in Word or rtf format. Papers will be graded on relevance, understanding of the facts involved, originality, organization, and clarity (grammar and spelling reflect effort and will influence your grade).

Write a research paper on the use of Extranets.

Write a research paper on the use of Extranets. The paper must be in APA 6th Edition format. The “body” of the document (excluding title page, abstract, references, tables and figures) should be between 4-6 double spaced pages long. You must have at least 1 figure. You must have at least 4 references, with no more than 2 of them being internet references.

Explain the relationship between social structure and shared meanings for both Durkheim and Weber.

Both Durkheim and Weber offer historical accounts demonstrating how a change in the structure of society is accompanied by a change in our shared meanings and beliefs. However, each theorist offers us a different perspective on the relationship between these changes. Drawing on examples from course readings, lecture and discussion, explain the relationship between social structure and shared meanings for both Durkheim and Weber. Does one cause the other, do they each happen independently, or is it something else? As you offer your response, make sure to think through how each author works out this relationship between change in social structure and shared meanings or beliefs in specific terms. What aspects of social structure and what expressions of shared beliefs or meanings do they highlight? How do they argue these pieces fit together, exactly? Pinning things down in this way will allow you to explore how the relationship between social structure and shared beliefs and meanings really operates in each theorist’s work, and will help keep you on track in writing your response. (3.) The evaluation of written work We’ve gone over all of the parts of this in class at different times, but I wanted to put it all in one place, since we’re still receiving questions. The rubric of evaluation for response papers and for take-home exams identifies three components we focus upon: responsiveness to the question; support drawn from the text, lectures and discussions; ; and clarity of the argument you offer. To further assist in understanding these three components, let me say a little more about each. –Responsiveness gets at the notion of actually answering the question asked, including all of its parts. –Support in the sense we’re using it here involves identifying central claims a theorist makes regarding particular processes, phenomena or outcomes of interest AND laying out how the theorists contends those processes work or those phenomena/outcomes arise–both why they unfold as they do, and the logic by which they unfold. In this sense, you’re supporting the theorists’ contentions about what they say is going on, by identifying and working through why and how they say it works this way. You can draw from the texts themselves, from lecture and class discussions, or from outside sources as you lay out these claims made by theorists. Two additional notes: (i.) If you draw from outside sources, be certain to use them appropriately as support for your claims about how to understand a theorist’s work; and (ii.) all quotations — from the text or outside sources — need to be EXPLAINED or INTERPRETED by you, in your words, so that you bring it into the paper as support. Quotations DO NOT speak for themselves. –Offering an argument means making a claim about how you’d like us to understand the theorists’ work in terms of the question asked. This is YOUR ARGUMENT about the theorists’ writing. It does not require you use ‘I think’ formulations; but nonetheless, this is YOUR statement about what you think is important, AND it involves YOUR ANALYSIS of the theorists’ work. A clear argument includes a direct statement of what you’d like the reader to take away or understand; movement through the parts of YOUR ARGUMENT that brings the reader along and makes your claims about the theorists’ work understandable; and discipline–that is, all of the parts of the paper should advance your argument in some way