identify and then summarize 4 different authors interpretations of the event.

This paper is a historiographical paper and a term paper. you must identify and then summarize 4 different authors interpretations of the event. SO my topic is slavery reforms, but in investing the lives of women during the anti-slavery movement. then you will critique each historian works and at the end of the paper with an argument or idea about what historians should do next in order to gain more knowledge of the topic under study. 4 books to develop the paper: 1)Their Right to Speak: Women’s Activism in the Indian and Slave Debates by Alisse Portnoy 2)Signatures of Citizenship: Petitioning, Antislavery, and Women’s Political Identity by Susan Zaeske 3)The Great Silent Army of Abolitionism: Ordinary Women in the Antislavery Movement 1st Edition by Julie Roy Jeffrey 4)Proslavery: A History of the Defense of Slavery in America, 1701-1840 Paperback – September 1, 2004 by Larry Tise also needs a clear thesis and build an argument to support your thesis and need 12 point font and create footnotes using Chicago style citation.

Describe and explain scenes that apply to the social theme.

An American television program that you know contains a social inequality or social class theme (e.g. racism, sexism, social class categories). Provide a brief introduction that includes the program’s title, describes the type of program, and explains which social theme you are addressing. Describe and explain scenes that apply to the social theme. Aside from verbal language, identify all observed body language, facial expressions, gestures, posture stances, modes of dress, nonverbal cues, symbols, and any other means by which inequalities are displayed. Explain your interpretation of the meanings of the identified nonverbal communications and symbolism. Summarize how these interpretations are important to the sociological understanding of your chosen social inequality or social class theme. Provide a conclusion that summarizes the key points in your analysis.

Explain how fighting words are different than ordinary language.

Answer the questions below in no less than one page and no more than two pages. The assignment should be submitted on Microsoft Word with default margins, using 12 point Times New Roman black font, be double-spaced, and be in essay format. Use your textbook as a reference to complete this assignment. 1. What is the ‘clear and present danger’ test used to allow the government to restrict speech? Provide one example when the test would come into play. 2. Explain how fighting words are different than ordinary language. Provide one example of what would be considered ‘fighting words. 3. Provide a fictitious scenario where an assembly becomes ‘unlawful’ due to the use of ‘fighting words’ and the police determining a ‘clear and present danger’.