What is the theme of Robert Hayden’s “Those Winter Sundays” poem?

Robert Hayden’s “Those Winter Sundays” 1. What is the theme of this poem? Again, state the theme in a complete sentence. Avoid merely giving the subject of the poem, and avoid summarizing the poem. Also avoid giving the theme as a partial or ambiguous idea. 2. Give a brief quote from the poem that describes a character or moment in the story/poem. Be sure to format the quote appropriately, using MLA format. Tell me what your quote tells us about the character. Explain, through an interpretation of this brief quote (focus in on specific words and phrases), HOW it tells us that. For example, if you quote that the character “had eyes as blue as a cloudless sky”…you might interpret that to mean that we are meant to think of this character as happy and untroubled (like a cloudless sky…). Once again, quote NO MORE THAN TWO LINES of the poem. Remember to tie individual words and phrases to your ideas. By phrase, I mean no more than two or three words. Interpret the words and phrases of your quote on as many different levels as possible. Avoid being purely literal.

Develop an epidemiological research proposal on a topic in Immunology.

Research Paper must be to develop an epidemiological research proposal on a topic in Immunology. Please formulate this epidemiological study on any topic in immunology that you would like. Epidemiology Research Proposal • Please double space and either type or word process your research proposal. • The paper should have a title page (your name, title of the paper, BIO340/540, date). • The paper must have the following elements: • Summary or Abstract-A one to two paragraph synopsis of your proposal • Introduction-Background literature search of the research that you propose to study • Study Proposal-How will the study be conducted— • Where will the study take place • Who will be in the study • How many will be in the study • How long will the study take • What will be the study formulation (cross-sectional, case-control, etc.) • Who will manage the study (doctors, nurses, epidemiologists, etc.) • What results are expected to be achieved (what is the hypothesis) • Concluding Remarks

Write an essay comparing and contrasting three therapeutic interventions used to treat this disorder.

Write a 2,450- to 3,500-word paper comparing and contrasting three therapeutic interventions used to treat this disorder. Compare measures of effectiveness, such as validity, efficacy, symptom and behavior management, and recidivism. One therapy should be cognitive in nature, one should be pharmacological in nature, and the third should be an alternative therapeutic treatment. Identify common symptoms associated with your disorder and rates of symptom reduction or management as reported with the three treatments. Based on your research, what would be your approach to treating the condition? Identify which treatments you would use. Explain why. Analyze the neurophysiological underpinnings of diseases and disorders. Examine contemporary attitudes toward the three treatments you selected. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Include 7 to 10 peer-reviewed sources.

Critically analyze the primary features of the American national government.

America’s Democracy: Your Report Card The primary goal of your last assignment is to critically analyze the primary features of the American national government. The results of your analysis will indicate what you have learned over the last five weeks. In order to accomplish this task, it is important to critically evaluate the key facets of our American democracy. You have been preparing for this final assignment each week by constructing a detailed outline of the Final Paper’s main points through the weekly Learning Activities. In addition, you have read the course text and course readings, reviewed videos, and researched additional material for each week’s assignments and for this paper. This week, you will put all of those outlines, readings, reviews, and research together into a one summative paper. As we wrap up our course, reflect back on what you have learned about the key structures, systems, roles, and processes that embody our national government. Focus on the strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages, and positive and negative impacts of these aspects of our democracy. Use what you have learned so far to evaluate our national government and recommend ways to enhance what works and repair what is not working well. Construct a six-page paper based on the detailed outlines that you created over the last four weeks. Scaffold your paper around the following outline: Title page Introduction (half page): Describe the paper’s overall thesis. Provide an overview of main points. The Constitution (1-1.5 pages) (Week 1): Describe one strength and one weakness of the U.S. Constitution. Recommend one option to maintain the strength and one to correct the weakness. Federalism (1-1.5 pages) (Week 2): Describe one advantage and one disadvantage of a national policy that must be implemented by one agency of the federal bureaucracy. Recommend one option to maintain the advantage and one to improve the disadvantage. Branches of Government (1-1.5 pages) (Week 3): Describe one strength and one weakness of one branch of our government: Executive, Legislative, or Judiciary. Recommend one option to maintain the strength and one to correct the weakness. Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Elections (1-1.5 pages) (Week 4): Describe one positive impact and one negative impact of one of the following: political parties, interest groups, or federal elections. Recommend one option to accentuate the positive impact and one to lessen the negative impact. Conclusion: Review your main points. Review your overall thesis. References page Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper: Must be at least six double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. Must use at least eight scholarly resources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University Library. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Analyze opinion articles written by Roger Cohen, The New York Times, with the goal of understanding how this author markets a personal brand.

Students will analyze opinion articles written by Roger Cohen, The New York Times, with the goal of understanding how this author markets a personal brand. Personal branding involves writing about a certain range of topics, writing to a particular audience, adopting a certain voice/tone, and habitually using certain rhetorical devices or modes of persuasion. The only 3 sources that can be used in this paper are the articles from New York Times, including Little Syria in Lesbos, Europe’s Deepest Debt, and An Unreliable German and the Volkswagen Debacle. Incorporating quotes from three articles are needed to support the points that are making

Write a report for your employer explaining the pros and cons of using a primarily e-learning approach to corporate education.

Pretend you work for a company that is investigating the possibilities of using online courses for their corporate training. Conduct research on trends & success rates on adult e-learning. Write a report for your employer explaining the pros and cons of using a primarily e-learning approach to corporate education. Conclude the report with a recommendation. Divide your report into four parts. Begin each section with a subheading: I. Introduction/Overview II. Analysis of Advantages/Disadvantages of E-Learning III. Conclusions IV. Recommendations (Use APA format–title page, double-spaced text, and references at the end (which are cited in the body of the report). There is no need for an abstract.

Write a 10-12 page paper where you discuss a specific policy area using the policy process model discussed in class and in your textbook.

Policy Paper As part of the requirements of this class you will each be required to write a 10-12 page paper where you discuss a specific policy area using the policy process model discussed in class and in your textbook. The policy areas from which you may choose are listed below. Economic policy Energy policy Environmental policy Foreign policy Healthcare policy Tax policy Welfare Policy For each policy area, you will need to specify which particular element of the policy you plan to discuss. Your paper should include a discussion of the following elements (examples of some questions you may want to answer appear in parentheses beside the element): • An introduction to your policy. (What area does it pertain to? What’s the problem or issue? Why is it important?) • A discussion of how your policy made it onto the government’s agenda. (Who were the policy entrepreneurs? Was there a particular event that galvanized public support, etc.? What caused this policy issue to be chosen?) • The key factors in its formulation. (Were there hurdles? If so, what were they? What method of policy formulation was used?) • The specifics of its implementation. (Which level of government was responsible for implementing the policy? Why? What were your policy’s outputs?) • An evaluation of your policy. (Did your policy work? If not, why? Was it due to formulation or implementation problems? What were your policy’s impacts?) • Whether or not you feel a change in policy is necessary. (Should the policy be changed? Terminated? If so, why?)

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper discussing the current view that race is a social construction supported by political realities.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper discussing the current view that race is a social construction supported by political realities. Include the following: How does this view compare with the traditional, biological view of race? How did the traditional view assist or inhibit the assimilation of underserved groups into the overall American majority? Which approach – assimilation, melting pot, fusion and/or pluralism – matches most closely to the new definition of race in contemporary America? Which definition of race do you support? Why?