(External Examiner Feedback) 1. Chapter 1: No mention of Pert-Statistics as method to control delay. 2. Chapter 3: Section 3.3 need to revisit for better argument. 3. Chapter 4: a. Page 49: Majority of responses from the owner side. Is this fact effect the results? b. Page 53: What are others? I thought this is mainly focus on O & G projects. c. Table 9 Page 75: needs more elaboration also Table 10, 11. d. Page 82: no mention of Act of God. 4. Chapter 5: a. New samples for the model need more explanation. b. Table 22 Page 95: How you compare the results of model with previous research. c. Page 104: values? This is not mentioned/measured (Internal Examiner Feedback) 1. The researcher failed to answer explicitly to the research questions in a precise and concise way in the conclusion. Therefore, I would suggest that the researcher rewrite the first part of the conclusion. 2. In chapter 3, the researcher opted for the use of the Relative Importance Index and Frequency Adjusted Importance Index without strong arguments. Therefore, the researcher should motivates this choice
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]