Favorite Speaker Analysis Form
There are eight categories to this speaker analysis form. Please choose four out of eight of the categories to describe the speaker that you chose as your favorite speaker and the speech that they delivered. Please make sure that you cover category three in detail. Once you have addressed all of the questions in the four sections that you selected, section three being MANDATORY, proceed to typing a 250 word critique of the speaker and speech that you watched on page 6 of this document.
Printed In-Class Submission is Due: Check the Syllabus
Format for paper:
Times New Roman
12 point font
Double Spaced
Black Ink
Name, Date, Class, Section Number and Dr. Grimble in the top left hand corner.1.) The Speech Objectives
Knowing the speakers objective is critical to analyzing the speech, and should certainly influence how you study it.
What was the primary message being delivered?
Why was this person delivering this speech? Were they the right person?
Was the objective achieved?2.) The Audience and Context for the Speech
A speaker will need to use different techniques to connect with an audience of 1500 than they would with an audience of 15. Similarly, different techniques will be applied when communicating with teenagers as opposed to communicating with corporate leaders.
Where and when was the speech being delivered?
What were the key demographic features of the audience? Technical? Students? Elderly? Athletes? Business leaders?
How large was the audience?
In addition to the live audience, was there an external target audience? (e.g. on the Internet or mass media)3.) Speech Content and Structure
The content of the speech should be selected and organized to achieve the primary speech objective. Focus is important extraneous information can weaken an otherwise effective argument.Before the Speech
Were there other speakers before this one? Were their messages similar, opposed, or unrelated?
How was the speaker introduced? Was it appropriate?
Did the introduction establish why the audience should listen to this speaker with this topic at this time?
What body language was demonstrated by the speaker as they approached the speaking area? Body language at this moment will often indicate their level of confidence.The Speech Opening
Due to the primacy effect, words, body language, and visuals in the speech opening are all critical to speaking success.
Was a hook used effectively to draw the audience into the speech? Or did the speaker open with a dry Its great to be here today
Did the speech open with a story? A joke? A startling statistic? A controversial statement? A powerful visual?
Did the speech opening clearly establish the intent of the presentation?
Was the opening memorable?The Speech Body
Was the presentation focused? i.e. Did all arguments, stories, anecdotes relate back to the primary objective?
Were examples or statistics provided to support the arguments?
Were metaphors and symbolism use to improve understanding?
Was the speech organized logically? Was it easy to follow?
Did the speaker bridge smoothly from one part of the presentation to the next?The Speech Conclusion
Like the opening, the words, body language, and visuals in the speech conclusion are all critical to speaking success. This is due to the recency effect.
Was the conclusion concise?
Was the conclusion memorable?
If appropriate, was there a call-to-action?4.) Delivery Skills and Techniques
Delivery skills are like a gigantic toolbox the best speakers know precisely when to use every tool and for what purpose.
Enthusiasm and Connection to the Audience
Was the speaker enthusiastic? How can you tell?
Was there audience interaction? Was it effective?
Was the message you and we-focused, or was it I- and me-focused?Humor
Was humor used?
Was it safe and appropriate given the audience?
Were appropriate pauses used before and after the punch lines, phrases, or words?
Was it relevant to the speech?Visual Aids
Were they designed effectively?
Did they complement speech arguments?
Was the use of visual aids timed well with the speakers words?
Did they add energy to the presentation or remove it?
Were they simple and easy to understand?
Were they easy to see? e.g. large enough
Would an additional visual aid help to convey the message?5.) Use of Stage Area
Did the speaker make appropriate use of the speaking area?6.) Physical Gestures and Eye Contact
Did the speakers posture display confidence and poise?
Were gestures natural, timely, and complementary?
Were gestures easy to see?
Does the speaker have any distracting mannerisms?
Was eye contact effective in connecting the speaker to the whole audience?7.) Vocal Variety
Was the speaker easy to hear?
Were loud and soft variations used appropriately?
Was the pace varied? Was it slow enough overall to be understandable?
Were pauses used to aid understandability, heighten excitement, or provide drama?Language
Was the language appropriate for the audience?
Did the speaker articulate clearly?
Were sentences short and easy to understand?
Was technical jargon or unnecessarily complex language used?
What rhetorical devices were used? e.g. repetition, alliteration, the rule of three, etc.8.) Intangibles
Sometimes, a technically sound speech can still miss the mark. Likewise, technical deficiencies can sometimes be overcome to produce a must-see presentation. The intangibles are impossible to list, but here are a few questions to consider:
How did the speech make you feel?
Were you convinced?
Would you want to listen to this speaker again?
Were there any original ideas or techniques?
