Different people have different reactions to various life circumstances. Discuss this statement
">
In any team, problems will arise and team members will have questions about the conflict and how to resolve it. Members across departments must collaborate and contribute to the resolution of any unhealthy form of team conflict. Based on “Case One: ElectriGov” (found on page 177 in your textbook), answer the following questions:
Why is it important for team members to know their roles on a team?
Is competition within a team a good or bad thing? Explain your response.
Why is it important to set short- and long-term goals when planning a meeting regarding conflicts? Provide examples.
What is an unhealthy agreement? Why is it significant for leaders to understand how to resolve conflict and avoid unhealthy agreements?
Your case study should be in APA style with a minimum of two pages (not including the title and references pages).
2) In the chapter, Markets and Morals, Sandel describes the decisions of the two courts in the case of Baby M. Summarise the two contrasting judgements of Judge Harvey Sorkow and of Chief Justice Robert Wilentz. With which judgement do you agree and why? (5 marks) [Your answer should be no more than 600 words in lengthfor question two check the attached files for the text
Explication of a Shakespeare Sonnet (4-8 pages) Choose any sonnet by William Shakespeare and write an explication of its meaning. Also show in what ways the author has used mythic elements. Dont simply paraphrase the meaningthough you will need to do some paraphrasing but examine and comment on the particular details of imagery, tone, sound, diction, and worldview that help shape its meaning.
Learner Guide to APA Writing Feedback Rubric [PDF].
In Unit 2, you selected one standardized test that has relevancy to your academic and professional goals to be the focus of your course project. Your Unit 2 assignment focused on the first four elements of the Code for selecting a test. For this assignment, you will complete a deeper analysis of the technical quality of your selected test by focusing on the fifth element of the Code, which states that the test user will “evaluate evidence of the technical quality of the test provided by the test developer and any independent reviews.” To complete this assignment, you will draw upon the knowledge you gained in Units 3 and 4 about psychometrics in general and reliability and validity in particular.For this assignment, you will use the test you selected for your project in Unit 2. Locate and summarize a minimum of seven articles related to the technical qualities of the selected test. You are encouraged to use the PSY7610 Library Research Guide, linked in the Resources, to assist your search.For each article:List the APA reference for each journal article (a minimum of seven).
Identify if the article addresses reliability or validity.
Discuss if the article addresses sources of error variance, reliability estimates, evidence of validity, or bias and fairness.
Identify the specific type of reliability or validity (for example, test-retest reliability, predictive validity, et cetera).
Submit your analysis as a paper using the outline provided in the section “Organize Your Paper” below.Guidelines for Selecting the Literature
Use the most current sources you can find. Do not use sources older than 8 years. (You may cite older sources if they are classics, if you want to show the chronology of something, or if you have another good reason. If you choose to use older sources, you will need to explain why.). Use current, peer-reviewed journal articles. Do not use sources without an author or a publication date. Do not use quotes; use only your own words. Please see the Plagiarism in Coursework document in the resources for concerns with high content matching in papers. Evaluate whether or not the results supports the use of your test as appropriate for your field and populations to be served.Note: The articles you need to complete this assignment should be available inside the library collection. In future courses, you may use the library’s Interlibrary Loan service to obtain articles outside of the collection, but you should not have to use the service for PSY7610. In the event that you cannot find articles covering a newer test edition, please refer to the List of Tests by Type, linked in the Resources. Note which tests have been designated as acceptable for searching prior test editions.Organize Your Paper
For your paper, use the following headings:Title page (required).
Abstract (optional).
Introduction.
Identify the standardized test you selected in Unit 2.
Describe briefly the publisher’s stated purpose for its use.
Identify briefly a population or psychological condition that is within the standardization of the test.
Technical review article summaries. Each article is to be directly related to your chosen test and one aspect of its technical quality. Note: Use an annotated bibliography for evaluative information format (see the resources for additional information available at Capella about annotated bibliographies).
List the APA reference for each journal article (a minimum of seven).
Identify if the article addresses reliability or validity.
Explain how the article addresses sources of error variance, reliability estimates, evidence of validity, or bias and fairness.
Identify the specific type of reliability or validity (for example, test-retest reliability, predictive validity, et cetera).
Identify the overall results of the research including any psychometric or statistical outcome.
Conclusion.
Synthesize the information from all the articles you reviewed about reliability.
Synthesize the information from all the articles you reviewed about validity.
Evaluate if your test continues to be deemed as appropriate for your planned use in the field and with the population to be served.
References (required, use current APA format and style).
Submit your draft to Turnitin prior to uploading it to the assignment area.Additional Requirements
Your paper should meet the following requirements:References: A minimum of seven journal articles (textbooks, Web pages, literature reviews, and the MMY book reviews do not count for these references).
Length of paper: Evaluation must be at least five pages in length for content (not including title page, abstract, or references).
Reference
Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (2004). Code of fair testing practices in education. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/fair-testing.pdfNote: Your instructor may also use the APA Writing Feedback Rubric to provide additional feedback on your academic writing. The writing feedback rubric does not affect your assignment grade, but its feedback may factor into the grading criteria, if professional communication and writing is a course competency. Evaluate your own work using this rubric. Refer to the Learner Guide for instructions on viewing instructor feedback.
All slides count toward the required length.The content should focus on some aspect of social media use in the workplace. Potential examples include the importance of companies embracing social media, advertising through social media, policies involving social media, proper professional communication through social media platforms, or any number of other angles.The presentation must be submitted in .PPT or .PPTX format. Any other submission formats will be returned ungraded. The PowerPoint presentation must adhere to the following requirements: Content:
Address some aspect of social media use in the workplace.
Organize the presentation in a clear, logical manner.
Provide between 12-18 total slides.
Assume your target audience is familiar with the overall concept of social media.
Format:
Follow the design requirements from Chapter 12-3 (pages 218-223) in BCOM9.
Format the PowerPoint presentation with headings on each slide, and two to three (2-3) relevant graphics (photographs, graphs, clip art, etc.) throughout the presentation (not per slide), ensuring that the presentation is visually appealing and readable from 18 feet away.
Open with an engaging introduction (including one title slide and one introduction slide).
For the body of your presentation, cover the main points of your subject. Create slides that reinforce and illustrate your main ideas.
For your single closing slide, finish with a memorable wrap-up statement that refocuses on the purpose of your presentation.
Slides should cite any relevant outside sources using footnotes on relevant slides (the source should be clearly visible to the audience) OR in SWS format (in-text citations on slides and an included references page at the end of the presentation). Choose one method or the other (do not mix both).
Clarity / Mechanics:
Focus on clarity, writing mechanics, and professional language/style requirements.
Run spell/grammar check before submitting.Your assignment must be completed in PowerPoint (using either .PPT or .PPTX format). Your professor may provide additional instructions.Assignments must be submitted through the online course shell only.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Plan, create, and evaluate professional documents.
Write clearly, coherently, and persuasively using proper grammar, mechanics, and formatting appropriate to the situation.
Deliver professional information to various audiences using appropriate tone, style, and format.
Develop presentation skills for use in the professional environment.
Describe the type of podcast it will be. ( The topic is the international student life in United States, if you have more interesting idea you can write whatever you want.Introduction for the podcast Closing for the podcast including what the listener can expect in the next episode.Provide a synopsis for 1 Episode describe it in detail (What will be discussed? Who are the guests?)First Episode Be prepared to present to the class your podcast AND the first episode of the podcast. Try out your approach and what youve written.