Determine what the contemporary production keeps from the original productions text and historical moment and what it changes.

Oregon Shakespeare 2016 (Lisa Petersen) (Rock n Roll)Collect the following:
At minimum, three different reviews of the production.
At least three examples of archival evidence (artifacts — video, photographs, interviews, biography, playbill, program note, advertisement, press release, website, costume or set rendering, etc.) PLEASE NOTE Although you only NEED three reviews and three artifacts, you have to describe the production in this essay. The more sources you find, the EASIER this task will be.
Submit an annotated bibliography is due on Friday, October 19th (submitted online). Youll follow MLA guidelines to format the document and include after each entry a simple description of the source and a prediction of how this source will help you build your argument.
Use your textbooks, the script, and our class discussions as resources to compare Shakespearean/Elizabethan public theater staging practices to the more modern production.
Prepare a short report that describes how the recent production of Hamlet engages past historical practices while creating a new production designed for a specific contemporary moment. Make an argument about whether or not to support the company, and back up your opinion with specific evidence.
Remember you essay makes an argument about whether or not you should include your assigned production in the Shakespeare Preservation Trust Archive. You will answer some of the following questions about the production:
What did this particular production look/sound/feel like? What specific artistic choices did the team make? What themes/motifs/ideas were they trying to address and/or embody? (This is the production description. Everyone will answer this question.)
How were past practices recreated, reimagined, rejected, or embraced?
What elements from the plays original historical context or production might the contemporary audience have experienced?
Did the theatre artists aim for so-called historical accuracy? How so?
Did the contemporary artists emphasize parallels or differences between the past and the present? How so?
Did it work? What did the critics think? (Everyone will include this part – it’s one obvious place where you use your reviews.)
The types of questions you will consider will vary depending on which production you are researching. Some of the questions you might ask include, but are not limited to:
What did this particular production look/sound/feel like? What specific artistic choices did the team make? What themes/motifs/ideas were they trying to address and/or embody? (Everyone will answer this question.)
What worked to bring this very old text to life? What didnt work?
How were past practices recreated, reimagined, rejected, or embraced?
What elements from the plays original historical context or production might the contemporary audience have experienced?
Did the theatre artists aim for so-called historical accuracy? How so?
Did the contemporary artists emphasize parallels or differences between the past and the present? How so?

Analyze and interpret the character of Josef. Who is Josef and what is his role in the story? Why is he important to the novel?

What is his importance in terms of educating Yolen’s readers? In an interview with Yolen, the interviewer said, “Portions of Briar Rose containing homosexual content are one of the reasons it’s on the banned books lists.” Yolen replied, “The homosexual content is slight compared to ‘homosexual’ books. That is, there are no real sex scenes, and one bedroom scene that is really about politics, not sex. But I did not make up the pink triangle camps. Briar Rose deals pretty directly in one section with the infamous ‘Pink Triangle camps’ in which the Nazis’ incarcerated known or suspected homosexuals. In fact the “Prince” character is a gay man . . . . Because there is a homosexual character in the book, the novel has been banned in some places, and actually burned in Kansas City on the steps of the Board of Education by a right-wing religious group. I do not believe they read the book.” (Given that the Nazis burned books, the Kansas group’s actions are pretty ironic.) Your discussion of Josef’s importance in the novel could also involve a discussion of book censorship. Remember that a thesis statement asserts a debatable point–it doesn’t merely state a fact or factoid.
This essay must be a minimum of 1,000 words. There is no maximum limit on words or sources. See the Grading Rubric for information on how your essay will be evaluated.The essay must be in MLA format, with in-text citations and a works cited page. All sources must be on the works cited page, including the novel itself. You don’t need in-text citations for summaries or paraphrases from works of fiction. All you need in the citations for direct quotations from the novel are the page numbers since it is a given that Yolen is the author. I want you to base this essay on your own ideas and interpretations, but be sure to cite any outside sources if you use them and include them on your works cited page.Be sure to use reputable information sources, and use scholarly sources if you cite experts.You must submit this essay to Turnitin before you submit it for grading. Do so enough in advance that you can catch and fix any potential plagiarism or attribution problems.Be sure to refer to specific passages in the novel. You need to demonstrate that you have read, thought about, and understood Briar Rose. Don’t assume that a few quotations here and there will suffice. Integrate discussion of the novel into the points that you make. As the Basic Paper Guidelines state, “Always keep your imagined audience in mind. Dont imagine only your instructor or classmates; imagine the general public. Dont assume that your audience is familiar with all of your examples or sources. When writing about a source, do not assume that everyone has read it. Ask yourself what your readers will need to know to understand the points that you are making. When we write something, we know what we mean to say. Therefore, it seems clear to us when we read it overafter all, weve just digested our own source material. But the people we should be imagining havent read everything that we have.”When you refer to passages in the novel and use quotations from the novel, be sure to give context. Your imagined audience is a diverse group of people, most of whom have probably never read the novel. Your essay must be clear to them. You need to introduce the characters to your audience and give everything you write enough detail to make it understandable. Some of the general audience may also not know much about the Holocaust. Tell your readers what they would need to know to understand the arguments that you are making. Every semester I get a few essays that have only vague, and often random seeming, quotations and references to events in the novel, with most of the rest of the essay not drawing upon the novel at all. These give the impression of students who haven’t read the book but feel that by reading the cover notes, the study questions, and bits and pieces in the book, they can fake it. These essays simply aren’t any good, and the grades they earn reflect that. Inspiration for the novel:In an interview, Jane Yolen was asked, What inspired you to write the story as a novel/fairy tale about the Holocaust? She replied,I had thought about doing a book on the Holocaust for a long time, but quite frankly the idea overwhelmed me. Finally one of my editors, who was a rabbi’s wife, persuaded me the time had come to confront the task. Writers and storytellers are the memory of a civilization, and we who are alive now really must not forget what happened in that awful time or else we may be doomed to repeat it.I ended up writing a young adult novel called The Devil’s Arithmetic (another Holocaust novel). The research and writing of The Devil’s Arithmetic took me several years. When I was done, I swore to myself I would never write another book on the Holocaust because it was such an emotionally difficult task.However, I did!The idea for an adult novel on the subject [of] “Briar Rose” had come to me when I was watching the documentary Shoah, in which the concentration camp Chelmno was describeda camp in a castle. Castle, barbed wire, and the gassing of innocent folk. It suggested the fairy tale “Sleeping Beauty” in a horrible way. Yet I did not want to get into that awful world once again. It took another editor to persuade me this book needed to be written.http://www.underdown.org/yolen.htm
Helpful Hints and Reminders:Briar Rose is a novel. Don’t refer to it as a “story.” “Short story” is the technical term for a short work of fiction. A novel is a book-length work of fiction. (Anything too short to be a novel and too long to be called a short story is categorized as a “novella.”)Write about the ongoing events in a work of fiction in present tense. Write about historical events in past tense.Use an author’s entire name the first time you mention him or her, and simply use the last name after that. Do not refer to authors by their first names. Do not add titles like “Mrs.” or “Mr.” in front of people’s surnames.Introduce expert sources, but don’t introduce them by naming the titles of their articles or books in the body of a paper. That information is on the Works Cited page and it does not tell your audience why these people are experts whose assertions can be trusted. Tell you readers what an expert’s credentials and areas of expertise are.Discussion of Briar Rose must be an important part of your essay, no matter which of the topics you choose. Don’t just make a couple of passing references and spent the rest of the time talking about current or other historical events. Demonstrate that you have read and understood the novel.Always keep your imagined audience in mind. Dont imagine only your instructor or classmates; imagine the general public. Think of a diverse group of people with different experiences and valuesmost of whom probably have never read Briar Rose. Not all of them may even be familiar with the motifs of the classic “Sleeping Beauty.” Dont assume that your audience is familiar with all of your examples or sources. When writing about a source, do not assume that everyone has read it. Ask yourself what your readers will need to know to understand the points that you are making. When we write something, we know what we mean to say. Therefore, it seems clear to us when we read it overafter all, weve just digested our own source material. But the people we should be imagining havent read everything that we have. Don’t simply start talking about Gemma, Becca, Josef, the Avenger, and others as if your readers have any idea of what you are talking about. Don’t say things like “In chapter 9 . . . .” This means nothing to the general audience. Explain. Identify. Give context. Don’t assume your readers know what Chelmno is, and remember–it was not typical camp–victims didn’t “live” there. And give all of your quotations context, as well.Don’t refer to yourself, your experiences, or your feelings. Don’t use first person singular (I, me) unless you are quoting someone.Don’t use second person (you, your). Use first person plural (we, us, our) or third person (they, them, their) instead.Try to come up with an interesting title, not simply Essay Two or Briar Rose Essay. Keep a general audience in mind. Have an informative title.Avoid “empty adjectives.” These are words like “interesting,” great,” “wonderful,” “good,” “brilliant,” “entertaining,” “amazing,” and so on. All these words mean different things to different people. What is wonderful to you could be boring or even awful to someone else. Use concrete adjectives–words that have specific meanings, no matter who the reader is. Adjectives like “controversial,” for example, are specific–“controversial” means that something has caused controversy. It is a concrete term–it refers to something factual that can be verified.Avoid informal language and slang. Avoid terms like “kids,” “moms,” dads,” and so on–even if some of your sources use them. We all know how to be informal–being formal (without being pompous) in writing is a skill most students need to develop for this and future classes–and even for the workplace, depending on the profession. Don’t use the abbreviation “etc.”Avoid exclusionary language like “mankind.” Use “people,” “society,” “human beings”, and so on. Don’t refer to all people as “he” or “him.”Avoid slashes in academic and other formal writing. For example, don’t write “and/or”; use either “and” or “or,” as appropriate.

Gregor Samsa is an outsider. He just doesnt fit in. How would you explain why he is going through what he is going through? Do you find his experiences unusual? Did he deserve it? Is he someone you can feel sorry for or do you find it hard to empathize with his situation?

Gregor Samsa is an outsider. He just doesnt fit in. How would you explain why he is going
through what he is going through? Do you find his experiences unusual? Did he deserve it? Is he
someone you can feel sorry for or do you find it hard to empathize with his situation?

Choose a common theme such as marriage, death, conflict, male/female relationships, reality vs. illusion, freedom/oppression, or justice, and use that theme to analyze the topic using A Doll’s House with a debatable, analytical thesis statement with key points.

Additional options for topics are available below. Locate at least three academically valid sources to support the main points in your essay. This essay must be formatted using MLA Style and contain a Works Cited page. The expected length is approximately five to seven pages.Remember, your analysis also needs to include the following elements:
An introduction with thesis statement; a body of points explored; and a conclusion.
Close reading of passages from the play to support your analysis.
Three secondary sources to further reinforce your points.
Development and organization of analysis within 5-7 pages.
Clear grammar and style.
Adherence to MLA format.
A Works Cited page, not your annotated bibliography.
Topic OptionsOption 1
Compare and contrast the play with significant aspects of Isbens life. What influenced his writing of the play and what social or historical events or trends was he critiquing through the depictions of his play? Review the section on Biographical Criticism (1313-1315) in the Norton for more guidance. Also, refer to compare and contrast strategies that you encountered in 111, particularly a point-by-point one to help structure your analysis.
Option 2
Compare and contrast A Doll’s House to one of the following assigned readings from this semester:
Faulkners A Rose for Emily
Chopin Story of an Hour
Hemingway Hills White Elephants
Glaspells Trifles
Focus your attention towards gender and social roles, and how both works look into exploring and critiquing these notions. Refer to the Gender studies section in the Norton for more guidance (1325-1326), as well as to the compare and contrast sections on strategies that you encountered in 111, particularly a point-by-point one to help structure your analysis.
Option 3
If you have a topic of your own you wish to pursue, please email me for approval detailing what your aim and thesis is, as well as explaining why your topic would be suitable.
Option 4
Toward the end of the Norton is a section titled Critical Approaches detailing various methods toward analysis. These help provide critics (those who analyze literature, like the authors of the secondary sources you will find) a lens from which to explore meaning in a piece of writing, often called a text or work. Review ONE of the following via the Critical Approaches section at the end of the Norton and apply it toward an analysis of A Doll’s House:
Feminist
Marxist
Psychoanalytic; this is also broke down in three areas to focus.
Poststructuralist/Deconstruction
Feminist-Marxist (a combination of the two since many within these camps feel the at women are both a gender and a socio-economic class)
Approaches to Avoid
It is easy to make the following common mistakes so steer clear of these approaches:
Summary of the play and sources, which should only be found in your annotated bibliography that is due in week 7.Compare/contrast analysis that shows how the play is different than the world today.
Personal responses.

Find a current article that discusses the strategic necessity for workforce planning as a critical human resource function.

a. This article can focus on the general use of workforce planning in industry or can be about the use of workforce planning of a particular company. 2. In the discussion forum, a. Summarize the article and post its reference information. b. Provide an analysis of how workforce planning, as discussed in the article, is a critical component of strategic planning. 3. Post your responses in the discussion forum titled 2.2 Workforce Planning Article Discussion.

analyze A Doll’s House using a common theme such as marriage, death, conflict, male/female relationships, reality vs. illusion, freedom/oppression, or justice.

The use of three secondary sources is required. For this assignment, write an annotated bibliography for the three secondary sources you will use in the research essay, as well as the primary source. Go to the library databases and find three secondary sources on the topic you are analyzing. Provide an MLA style citation for each source. Under that, write an annotation with the following elements:A summary statement of the source, followed by an in-text, parenthetical citation (authors name).
A statement that explains how the source will be useful in your analysis.
A statement about why your reader should trust that this is an academically credible source.

Based on the reading for this week and your research, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using internal sources versus external sources to fill job vacancies in an organization.

a. Reflect on which source is used most often in your organization or an organization you know well, and why. b. Analyze if the processes appear to be effective. i. Why or why not? 2. Post your responses in the discussion forum titled 2.3 Pros and Cons of Recruiting Methods Discussion.