Explain what enables Haslam to change and form a connection with his great-grandmother, and how his use of symbolism reflects this changing relationship.

Writing DirectionsIn “The Horned Toad,” Haslam must adjust to living with Great Grandma, who has come to live with the family. Although the relationship between the two is strained at first, their relationship changes and grows over time.Write an essay in which you make a claim about what Haslam learns as a result of his relationship with his great-grandma.In the body of your essay:Discuss how Haslam initially reacts to his great-grandma’s arrival, how he perceives and interacts with her, and how she, in turn, perceives and interacts with him.

In your conclusion, describe why Haslam’s experience with his great-grandma made such a lasting impression on him and why the lesson he learned is especially significant.In writing your essay, clearly address all parts of the writing task, support your main ideas with evidence from the text, use precise and descriptive language, and proofread your paper to correct errors in the conventions of written English.

In the first part of your essay, explain why the courts decided that the statutes in Robinson and Martin violated the Constitution whereas the statute in Powell did not violate the Constitution.

This essay assignment challenges you to express comprehension, application, and evaluation of the laws prohibition on punishing status as a crime. As described in more detail below, the assignment asks you to explain how the law defines status as distinct from conduct, and how courts have applied that definition in different cases. Next the assignment asks you to apply the law to a different hypothetical scenario. In doing so, you will be challenged to think critically about the underlying reasons for why the law prevents punishing status as a crime. Begin by reviewing the cases of Robinson v. California [Robinson] and Powell v. Texas [Powell] in your book. Also read the shortened version of the recent case, Martin v. City of Boise [Martin], that I have provided below. You do not need to do any additional reading, and you should not cite any outside sources in your essay. The assignment here is focused on critical thinking and writing about the source provided not on outside research.
Your answer should clearly state what part of the Constitution the courts relied upon, specify exactly what was being punished as a crime in each case, and explain the difference between status and conduct. Your answer should explain what features of the Martin case made the Court of Appeals see Martin more like Robinson than like Powell.In the second part of your essay, consider the following hypothetical scenario.Imagine there is a town called Poise that is exactly the same as the City of Boise described in Martin, except the city has 10 homeless shelters that have more than enough beds for all the homeless people in the city. All the shelters in Poise, however, turn away homeless people if they fail a breathalyzer test for alcohol or a urine test for narcotics. If you were a judge, would you rule that the Camping and Disorderly Conduct statutes in Poise violate the Constitution as they did in Boise?Why or why not?Then explain what you think is the best counterargument to your position that the other side could make, and respond to that counterargument.

What is especially important is for you to explain WHY you were persuaded by the evidence (in the for and against sections and/or the summary/ballot language section). It is not enough to simply provide the information.

A9: Genre Writing on a Ballot Question – Long Form
Knowing what a genre is used for can help people to accomplish goals (Dirk 253).Please compose a persuasive message that encourages a particular audience to vote the same way you would on your chosen ballot question. Choose the audience you will write for as well as the genre you will write in. The genre of your message should suit your purpose and should be appropriate for the audience you are writing to. In fact, depending on who your audience is, you may need to encourage them to vote in the first place. Be sure to make choices about which parts of your position statement you can adapt for your current rhetorical situation. First consider WHO you want to write to. In real life, we rarely write something without caring who the audience is. For this assignment, consider who may care about the particular ballot question you have chosen. Or consider someone who doesnt plan to vote and who know nothing about the ballot question? You may think of someone you care about and who you want to engage in a discussion with. Be sure it is a specific person/people and not a general voter. You should adhere to the conventions of a particular genre, so choose a genre that you have some familiarity with: email, letter, blog, opinion/editorial (op-ed) piece, pamphlet, speech or another one of your choosing. Be sure to imagine your audience as you write. What is the best way to talk to them?

This assignment asks you to communicate to someone (a friend, relative, teacher, classmate etc.) and to explain your thinking. Your purpose is to persuade; however, meaningful rhetoric and debate about important issues is an attempt to share ideas and persuade another person/people to see things the way that you do. You goal is not to manipulate. Be a generous writer by composing logical paragraphs, which provide clear and specific ideas/evidence from the Information for Voters booklet or other source texts (remember to tell your reader where you got your information). Dont forget to consider that you have to provide context. You just have to decide how much context to provide. How much context does a reader need? You dont need to explain the question to your dad who is politically active. However, you will have to provide more context to a friend who knows nothing about the ballot question. You must help the reader to understand why the ideas/evidence you discovered impacted you. Source: “Massachusetts Anti Discrimination”

Is College Core Curriculum Necessary?

This assignment is about what my 5 stakeholders opinions are on the issue of whether college core curriculum (english, math, science, history, etc.) is necessary. Their opinions need to be backed up by sources ( only academic journals and peer reviewed articles allowed) Each stakeholder needs 3 sources each. Each stakeholder is a paragraph and each paragraph should be 6-8 sentences long. Each stakeholder should have stasis. This essay overall needs active strings, topic strings, and embedded topic strings.

. Using the topic of drowning, you will select the group of students you are going to teach about the anatomy and physiology of the topic from Week 1(drowning).

You are teaching normal structure and function to the student. You have 30 minutes to teach the class with 5 minutes for questions. I – You will create your class by: a. Developing at least 3 and no more than 5 objectives for the class See below for two helpful websites that will help write the objectives; use the cognitive domain verbs. Only one verb should be used per objective. Refer to the objectives from your current and past courses to get a sense of how objectives can be written. – Bloom’s Taxonomy – A Model of Learning Objectives — Designing a one page, colorful and attractive handout to leave for the students once you are done. Remember, you learned in a previous class that the average reading level for Americans is at the 8th or 9th grade level. In other words, use language that your students will understand. Pictures speak a thousand words, so use of pictures is a good thing. KISS- Keep It Simple, Students! – Remember to cite all sources correctly, using APA format and provide a reference list.
Hide

WRITE minimum of 250 word response:1) How do you decide when and where to deploy argumentation?

What do you need to know about context to make an effective argument, and why?2) Consider Roxane Gays argument in support of social media as alternative to traditional journalism; do you see similar potential for getting your own views out? What mediums do you interact with that could serve as ways to make your ideas known?3) Response to Peer Post (100 words minimum)

-Describe a character from your novel (Jack). Include physical, personality, and how they change throughout the novel. Cite textual evidence from the novel.

-Describe the symbol(the Mask) associated with your character. Include a physical description, symbolic description, and why it is associated with that character. Ensure you describe how the symbol changes, both physically and figuratively, from the beginning to the end of the novel.
-Choose a theme from your list (loss of identity) and explain how the theme is associated with your character. How does the character/symbol develop the theme throughout the novel?You also have to implement quotes from any of these three articles.
-Bullying in Early Adolescence by Dorothy L. Espelage (2002)
-Online Identity by CommonLit Staff(2014)
-Why Do People Follow The Crowd? by ABC News(1/12/2006)

Transgender Anti Discrimination

A9: Genre Writing on a Ballot Question – Long Form
Knowing what a genre is used for can help people to accomplish goals (Dirk 253).Please compose a persuasive message that encourages a particular audience to vote the same way you would on your chosen ballot question. Choose the audience you will write for as well as the genre you will write in. The genre of your message should suit your purpose and should be appropriate for the audience you are writing to. In fact, depending on who your audience is, you may need to encourage them to vote in the first place. Be sure to make choices about which parts of your position statement you can adapt for your current rhetorical situation. First consider WHO you want to write to. In real life, we rarely write something without caring who the audience is. For this assignment, consider who may care about the particular ballot question you have chosen. Or consider someone who doesnt plan to vote and who know nothing about the ballot question? You may think of someone you care about and who you want to engage in a discussion with. Be sure it is a specific person/people and not a general voter. You should adhere to the conventions of a particular genre, so choose a genre that you have some familiarity with: email, letter, blog, opinion/editorial (op-ed) piece, pamphlet, speech or another one of your choosing. Be sure to imagine your audience as you write. What is the best way to talk to them?

This assignment asks you to communicate to someone (a friend, relative, teacher, classmate etc.) and to explain your thinking. Your purpose is to persuade; however, meaningful rhetoric and debate about important issues is an attempt to share ideas and persuade another person/people to see things the way that you do. You goal is not to manipulate. Be a generous writer by composing logical paragraphs, which provide clear and specific ideas/evidence from the Information for Voters booklet or other source texts (remember to tell your reader where you got your information). Dont forget to consider that you have to provide context. You just have to decide how much context to provide. How much context does a reader need? You dont need to explain the question to your dad who is politically active. However, you will have to provide more context to a friend who knows nothing about the ballot question. What is especially important is for you to explain WHY you were persuaded by the evidence (in the for and against sections and/or the summary/ballot language section). It is not enough to simply provide the information. You must help the reader to understand why the ideas/evidence you discovered impacted you.
Source: “Massachusetts Ballet Question”
Should be Question 3
you can search Booklet online

It is generally acknowledged that there are situations when it may be ethical for political leaders to lie to the public. What might those situations be? Please provide Canadian examples to illustrate when lying is ethical and when it is unethical.

It is generally acknowledged that there are situations when it may be ethical for political leaders to lie to the public. What might those situations be? Please provide Canadian examples to illustrate when lying is ethical and when it is unethical.