Evaluate the author guidelines to determine which elements of your DRP manuscript will need to be adjusted or edited prior to submission.

Dear writer: Please address the following discussion in complete APA format, with proper citation and reference. Discussion: Of the three journals identified in the M1 Journal Ranking Discussion (WRITER: That document is uploaded for your reference), select the journal most appropriate to the DRP project (WRITER:I selected the Journal of Nursing Care Quality, verify if its appropriate if not select another one). Locate the author guidelines from the journal website. Submit a copy of the authors guidelines and address these three discussion points: 1) Share a brief rationale that suggests your DRP project is a good fit for the journal. 3) Present questions or concerns about this preparation and submission process for your peers.

Analyze the ways in which the author articulates the subject matter and how that contributes to your understanding of the African traditional thoughts and philosophies.

Analyze why this topic is important in the study of Africa and her peoples from your own understanding. Engage the article and articulate arguments well. Raise some key questions in the paper. Provide a short conclusion. Reflections will be graded based on the synthesis, interpretation, and analysis of the readings.

select 3 New Intiatives, from 3 different political parties(Amongst: The Progressive Conservatives, Liberals,New Democratic party and Green Party) and examine their financial implications in terms of costs, benefits and wealth redistribution. Essay should conclude with a personal discussion about the overall effect of government financial decisions: Do budget decisions lead to positive sum gain?

select 3 New Intiatives, from 3 different political parties(Amongst: The Progressive Conservatives, Liberals,New Democratic party and Green Party) and examine their financial implications in terms of costs, benefits and wealth redistribution. Essay should conclude with a personal discussion about the overall effect of government financial decisions: Do budget decisions lead to positive sum gain?

analyze the strategies of competitors, to track market trends, to review the safety and effectiveness of products, and so forth. For this project, you will do a comparative analysis of the social media strategies of two non-profit organizations, and prepare a case study that outlines your analysis of the strategies as well as your critiques and recommendations.

analyze the strategies of competitors, to track market trends, to review the safety and effectiveness of products, and so forth. For this project, you will do a comparative analysis of the social media strategies of two non-profit organizations, and prepare a case study that outlines your analysis of the strategies as well as your critiques and recommendations.

use ACT to explain what these results mean as a reflection of US society at large and whether/why these results represent a social problem needing to be addressed.

There is a four-page (double-spaced) length requirement (less
than 3.5, more than 4.5 will mean points deducted). Reference the assigned readings for in-text
citations, and review your lecture notes to help you make a well-constructed responses to the prompt
you choose. When you incorporate in-text citations, make sure they are in ASA citation style.Using the Impressions from Events exhibit on the Affect Control Theory website, interpret both
the female and male impressions and emotions of an event you choose that represents an event
that either you witnessed as a bystander or one where you were directly involved. Start your
response by briefly describing the event. This includes labeling all three components of the event:
actor, behavior, and object-person. From there, define the following concepts and use them to
explain the Impression from Events results: EPA, deflection, fundamental sentiments, transient
impression.

Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data. Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.

EVALUATION PROCESS In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page), develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise: Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability. Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results. Describe implications for practice and future research. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section G: Evaluation” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section. PLEASE KINDLY FOLLOW THE RUBRIC AND FOLLOW THE ALIGNMENTS OF APA FORMAT Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Section G: Evaluation of Process 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 80.00% 3 Satisfactory 88.00% 4 Good 92.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 100.0 %Evaluation 100.0 %Develop an evaluation plan. Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data, the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives were achieved, and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability. Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results and the implications for practice and future research. Evaluation plan presents the method used in the measurement of the outcomes but does not align the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. Modification strategies as well as the impact to future research may or may not be present with minimal details. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Evaluation plan presents the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. The information presented is ambiguous. Modification strategies as well as the impact to future research may or may not be present with minimal details. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented may lack cohesiveness and details. Possible project modifications when outcomes do not provide expected results are listed. The implications for practice and future research are broadly described. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. Validity, reliability, and applicability are briefly addressed. Strategies for project modification when outcomes do not provide expected results are outlined. Implications for practice and future research are broadly described. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Evaluation plan presents the rationale and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented is aligned, comprehensive, and addresses validity, reliability, and applicability. The plan formulates clear and precise strategies for project modification when outcomes do not provide expected results. An informed position on the implications for practice and future research is developed and explained. Clarity and specificity of comprehension is demonstrated and all relevant information is synthesized. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 100 %Total Weightage
Hide

discuss the key challenges that can threaten the outcomes of such efforts and how these challenges should be (have been) addressed in order to maximise the continuous improvement of the quality and safety of health service provision?

Assignment Focus From your study throughout the semester, you have been introduced to a number of strategies that can be implemented to maintain and improve the quality and safety of health services provided by individual organisations and by the system as a whole. Two of the strategies focusing on strengthening the following areas: effective communication between practitioners and patients effective communication within the organisation which may include a timely reporting mechanism and no blame culture To make the strategies effective and successful in improving the quality and safety of services provided by healthcare organisations, a multi-level approach is required involving efforts in all four levels: government/system, organisation, team and individuals working in the organisation. Please discuss the current efforts that have been put into strengthening the above two factors in the system level (if you are not working for an organisation) or organisation, team and individual levels (if you are currently working for an organisation).

Discuss the mindfulness-related experience, and academic study of mindfulness or other wisdom traditions, that have influenced your decision to apply to the Mindfulness masters degree program.

Write 2 admissions essays. Use 12 point font Single-spaced Submit both essays at the same time in one (Word) document. Essay 1: Written Personal Statement Write a 7501250 word statement. Reflect on your personal and professional history. Describe your mindfulness or contemplative practice and the ways you apply your practice in your life. Do you have experience with other forms of contemplative practice (other meditation practices, yoga, tai chi, etc.)? Discuss your long-term professional goals (new directions, opportunities, interests, skills, professional renewal, and work advancement) that you believe would be advanced or created by this program. Essay 2: Answer 3 Questions Answer these 3 questions in 500 words. As you review the Mindfulness Studies program of study (https://lesley.smartcatalogiq.com/en/2015-2016/Graduate-Catalog/Graduate-School-of-Arts-and-Social-Sciences/Mindfulness-Studies/degree), what aspects are attractive to you? How might you apply mindfulness in your daily life and professional practice? Discuss your skills as a critical learner, your ability to write research papers, and your ability to participate in a low-residency/online environment. Use this as an opportunity to discuss your academic strengths and weaknesses. Is there other information you think would help the admissions committee understand you better? Examples: Retreat experience Special accomplishments Awards and honors Unique career path Academic achievements Publications Special interests Experience in other contemplative practices such as yoga or Tai Chi
Hide

How do writers and filmmakers adapt original source material? If you choose this writing option, youll explore this question by writing your own adaptation.

From our discussion board and in-class discussions, we noted that artists and filmmakers such as Orson Welles and Steven Spielberg altered the story, setting, and characters for a modern audience. Like Welles and Spielberg, youll modernize the story specifically for an audience of your time and place. Unlike Welles and Spielberg, however, youll retell only one key scene (one moment in a story) from The War of the Worlds.
Since this is a creative retelling, be creative in your format. Throw the five paragraph essay formula out the window! Theres no need for an introduction, thesis, body, and conclusion. Instead, imagine that youre writing your own science fiction story (based on Wells original source material), and youre writing one key moment in that story. The scene should be 2 pages long (after two pages, youll be on your way to writing a whole story).
The first step for this writing option is to go back to Wells novel. Choose one critical moment in the text, a critical scene (for instance, the narrator meeting Ogilvy in the observatory or the townspeople gathering around the crater in Book I). Look at the way he uses first person narration to reveal the story and information about the characters (such as the narrator himself, Ogilvy or the curate) and events in the scene that youll be retelling. This doesnt mean, though, that you have to use first person narration, too. You can use whatever point of view suits your creative retelling of the scene. Experiment with third person point of view. Try second person point of view, and see how that works. The point is to return to the original source material so youll get a sense of how the author tells his story. Then, youll be able to decide the best way to adapt the scene to speak to a modern audience.
The second step is to retell the key scene from Wells story, making the necessary changes to the plot, setting, characters, etc. to fit the story youd like to tell. While the storytelling format encourages you to break away from the five paragraph essay formula, you should still follow some of the basic elements of the MLA format, using Times/New Roman 12 pt. font, double-spacing your work and using one inch margins, and storytelling conventions (i.e. the formatting of dialogue in a story, the consistency of tenses and point of view, etc.). Also, make good use of the storytelling elements (literary devices), such as narration, characterization, dialogue, and exposition (the telling of facts and information that are important to the story). Without these elements, your creative retelling wont be a story!
The third step is to write a 1 page reflection on the choices you made as a writer adapting a key scene from Wells novel. The reflection might talk about why you chose a certain point of view and setting, why you chose that particular scene from the novel, why you made certain changes to the characters, why you decided to include dialogue, and so on. In other words, the reflection gives you the space to consider your intentions for this adaptation and what you hope to achieve with your creative retelling. If you choose this option, your entire product will be 3 pages, including the creative retelling (2 pages) and the reflection essay (1 page).
RUBRIC
Structure/Organization – The key ingredients, such as the introduction with a specific, debatable thesis, body paragraphs with topic sentences, textual evidence and explanations of the evidence, and conclusion work together to create a coherent whole piece of writing.Content Development – Uses appropriate, relevant, poignant, and compelling content to illustrate the mastery of the subject, conveying the writers understanding of the material and giving new insight to the audience.Context and Purpose for Writing(Includes considerations of audience, purpose, and the circumstances surrounding the work) – Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience and purpose that not only responds to the assignment but approaches it in a new way, enlightening the readers with a new perspective.Genre and Disciplinary Conventions(Formal rules inherent in the expectations for writing in particular genres, such as the literary analysis, and for a particular discipline, such as the Humanities) – Demonstrates successful execution of a wide range of conventions particular to the literary analysis, and successfully employs the formal rules of an academic essay, adhering to the MLA rules.Control of Syntax, Grammar and Mechanics – Outstanding use of graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency and is virtually error free.