If you were going to expand your business to another country, which would you choose and why? What legal, ethical, and cultural issues should you be aware of? Explain.
">
Annotation on the article “Documenting queer(ed) punk histories: Instagram, archives, and ephemerality ” by Shoshana Rosenberg and Megan Sharp. The annotation must describe or summarize the principal topic of the peer-reviewed book or journal article. Annotation needs to explain, summarize, or otherwise critically evaluate the main point or argument addressed. Annotation explains the theoretical or interpretive framework (in some cases this is simply the purpose of the work, or a critical review of the means by which other scholars have addressed the topic under consideration). Must have Chicago style citation.
This assignment is based on the sythesis of 3 articles that i did. The instructions for the assignment are as follows: Dissemination is the translation and transmission of the findings, the evidence, to your audience. In this case, you are disseminating your findings to the clinical arena (other providers). Instructions: Using the completed synthesis worksheet, revisit the PICO question and scenario, and develop a product that disseminates the findings to other providers in the practice. Be creative. Consider a [MAX] 5 minute lunch and learn powerpoint presentation (3-4 slides with typed notes/ narration) that you may share with colleagues in a practice. Or, develop an infographic, video, or wall poster that could translate the information for providers. What information is most important to take away from this small body of literature? How will this translate to clinical practice? Be sure to include evidence of critical appraisal and synthesis of the articles, as well as any caveats necessary for the limited review of literature. I was thinking that a infograph or a wall poster should be created. I have attached a copy of the synthesis from which the information for the poster or infographic should be based on. The pico question that should be included is: n children with autism spectrum disorder, how does equine-assisted therapy compared with standard care therapy affect irritability, social interaction and/or communication? The scenario is: Accompanied by a parent, you are seeing A.R, a 11 year old male for a routine annual pediatric exam. A.R. has autism spectrum disorder. A.R. is comanaged with several specialists and is currently stable on his regime. His parent asks you to write a note to allow A.R. to participate in an established horse camp for autistic youth, beginning in one month. The parent wants to know what type of benefits A.R. might experience from the horse camp. You tell the parent that you are going to check the literature and get back with results. i have attached a copy of the synthesis and the appraisal tools used for the articles that have to mentioned in the assignment.
Hide
write a reflection that highlights their experiences at Pfizer. This document should be at least 2 paragraphs and include their personal insights into the rotation, and key learnings and take-away messages. The student should apply the learnings from their experiences to their future career plans as appropriate. The student may also comment on their perception of the pharmaceutical industry and whether it has changed since the beginning of their rotation. The student may discuss what they learned about medical professionalism during the rotation.
Annotation on “Trust and Society: Suggestions for Further Development of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Trust” by Christian Morgner. The annotation must describe or summarize the principal topic of the peer-reviewed book or journal article. Annotation needs to explain, summarize, or otherwise critically evaluate the main point or argument addressed. Annotation explains the theoretical or interpretive framework (in some cases this is simply the purpose of the work, or a critical review of the means by which other scholars have addressed the topic under consideration). Must have Chicago style citation.
The Stanford Prison Experiment: Phil Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of the most famous studies in social psychology. In this study, young men were put into a prison simulation, randomly assigned to the role of prisoners or guards. What happened over the course of the experiment ignited controversy and raised important questions about the power of the situation to shape our behaviors. Watch the documentary describing the research: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIUlBrvqyyo Read about the study on the official website: https://www.prisonexp.org/ Your Assignment: Choose two of the external factors that affect reasoning that you believe can help explain the events of the SPE. Choose two from the following list: Conformity (including normative or informational conformity) Obedience Cialdini’s principles of persuasion (do not need to use all 7 in your essay) Group biases Cognitive dissonance Confirmation bias Fundamental attribution error For each of the two external factors you select, you must: Describe the specific element or elements of the SPE that you wish to discuss. It could be a specific aspect of the experiment’s procedure or an event that occurred during the course of the study. You may consider the actions not only of the prisoners and guards, but also of others involved in the study (e.g., the volunteers’ families who visited, the researchers themselves). Do not provide too much detail in summarizing the events of the SPE – You can assume your reader is familiar with the SPE, so just provide enough information to orient your reader. Describe how the external factor you have identified can aid in understanding the event(s) above. Make sure to explain why this external factor is useful in understanding this event.
Hide