Author: best-essay

In order to adequately assess the chest region of a patient, nurses need to be aware of a patient’s history, potential abnormal findings, and what physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted to determine the causes and severity of abnormalities. Post an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.

Health Care Policy For Part 3 of the Final Project, you will provide an analysis of the policy issues surrounding the health care policy issue you selected. This requires significant research of policy analysis and economic, business, consumer and other policy factors related to your selected policy. The Assignment (23 pages) For this component of your Final Project, describe how the health care policy issue you selected is related to policymaking from different broad perspectives, including social, economic, business, and cultural. Include this assignment labeled as Part 3 with a header in your combined file.

In two paragraphs (totaling at least 400 words) discuss the ways in which Willy and Shelly are alike or not alike, looking especially at the way their problems fit into ideas of modernism or postmodernism.

For this Case study, we will be looking at a fictional case of a manager caught between a rock and hard place. Nick Cunningham is a manager at Synergon, a high-powered company involved in purchasing poorly managed companies and then restructuring them to become more profitable. However, Synergon has now purchased Beauchamp, Becker, and Company, which is a well-managed and highly profitable company.
Nick is in an awkward position because he is in charge of managing this merger, but he also knows that the success of the merger is dependent on Beauchamps managing director and other top leaders remaining in their positions and continuing their solid work. However, Nicks bosses are not known for taking a conciliatory approach towards companies they purchase and usually force major changes on any company that they acquire. Predictably, Nick is faced with a threat of retirement by Beauchamps managing director Julian Mansfield due to Synergons strict policies and approach.
Before beginning the Case Assignment, make sure you have thoroughly reviewed the tutorial and textbook readings from the background materials. Pay special attention to readings on causes of conflict, types of conflict, and conflict management styles. For this assignment you will need to apply concepts from the background materials to this fictional case.
Once you have finished reviewing the background materials, take a look at this following article and think about how the concepts from the background materials apply to this fictional case:
Cliffe, S. (1999). Can This Merger Be Saved?Harvard Business Review,77(1), 28-44. [EbscoHost]
Then write a 4- to 5-page paper addressing the following questions:
1. Do you think this conflict that Nick Cunningham faces is functional or dysfunctional? Explain your reasoning, and cite Bauer and Erdogan (2011) or Luthans et al. (2015) in your answer.
2. What is the source of this conflict? Use the terminology from Bauer and Erdogan (2011), or Luthans et al. (2015) in your answer. For example, is this conflict a result of relationship/interpersonal issues? Or from tasks/roles? Other?
3. Of the five styles of conflict management discussed in Shearhouse (2011) or Bauer and Erdogan (2011) which one do you think would be the best approach for Nick Cunningham to take?
4. What other advice would you give Nick Cunningham based on the concepts discussed in any of the background readings?

A systematic review of syntactic transfer studies in third language acquisition*Read the example of systematic review attached* The paper focuses on morphosyntactic transfer. Use it as a guide for writing a proposal as I am aiming to produce a dissertation very similar to this one, but focusing on syntactic transfer only. The example consists of 71 studies. For a proposal, at this stage I am expecting more than 10 relevant studies. Outline1. Proposed title
2. Introduction
This section sets the stage and frames your project and research question(s)
3. Preminary literature review
It is critical that your literature supports your research question(s), and the aims and goals of your project. This is not a book report. All literature used must clearly tie into your project. It should show that you are familiar with the key works in the area. Explain how the currect literature addresses the issue you have identified, give summary of recent debates in the area and explain the current shortcomings in the existing scholarship.
4. Motivation
Justification of project on theoretical and practical grounds and in terms of personal interest. Explain how your research will address the gap or shortcomings in knowledge, why it is original and why further research in the area is important.
5. Research questions that the review is intended to answer
6. Proposed methodology systematic review of literature
7. Search strategy for identification of studies specify the search terms that you used to find articles. * see attached example flow chart * Specify how you went from articles searched in databases, first review of papers to how many papers remain (expecting more than 10 relevant studies).
8. Materials
Specify where you searched for articles e.g. journal databases, library catalogue, subject specific professional websites, newspapers database, etc.Methods of identifying potentially relevant studies
– Searching multiple bibliographic databases
– Scanning references lists of existing reviews and eligible studies
– Scanning conference proceedings
– Hand-searching key journals
– Forward citation searching of seminal articles
– Contacting scholars in the area
– Searching the internetCriteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies in the review specify the criteria that were used to determine which studies are included in, or excluded from, a systematic review. Common inclusion criteria: set timeframe or publication date range, language or national context, main focus of the paper, explicit methodology, outcome measurements.Reasons for inclusion/exclusion criteria to be recorded9. Procedure
Method to extract data – define how the information required from each primary study will be obtained. If the data require manipulation or assumptions and inferences to be made, the protocol should specify an appropriate validation process. Method to synthesise the extracted data define the synthesis strategy for combining the results of studies. This should clarify whether or not a formal meta-analysis is intended and if so what techniques will be used. If no meta-analysis is to be conducted, give reason.10. Proposed data analysis
The discussion should follow the basic format. What are the similarities and key differences between the articles in terms of methods, findings, results and conclusions? Are there any emergent themes? If yes, what are they? If not, why not? Do any idiosyncratic issues appear? If not, are all the articles harmonious with respect to conclusions and outcomes? If not, why not? Could be due to methodology, research questions, depth, type of data, etc. The goal is to think critically about the batch of articles that you have chosen and to systematically review them. This is not a book report where each article is a separate and complete paragraph, but an integrated systematic discussion. The key to writing a good critical review of literature paper is to identify and discuss common themes and or threads between the papers as well as critical differences.11. Limitations describe any anticipated limitations
12. Ethical Issues
How information was obtained must be obtained lawfully
Accurate reporting of information must be reported accurately
Confidentiality it may be necessary to protect the identity of people / organisations that you discuss
13. Reference page Harvard referencing style only
14. Word countHow will my proposal be evaluated?Organisation and presentation, style, referencing, etc.
Writing style, spelling and grammar
Followed formatting and departmental referencing guidelinesPlease cite and reference all resources used in the proposal.

Make 4 argument maps. Use the free Mindmup tool at https://app.mindmup.com/map/new. You can use this without signing up for the website. The default settings are not quite what we want, so when you open up a new map, you should immediately select two options. First, under ‘View’ and then ‘Map Theme’ select Top Down Standard. Second, under ‘View’ select Start Argument Visualization. The additional files has an example of an argument map and the topics of which 4 have to be chosen to do 4 argument maps individually.

research project work that has partialy been written, 3000 words. It’s to creat a campaign for breastfeeding (please refer to files for instruction). Some sections need improving but the result and discussion should be completed. The results need to be compared with other studies and refere to lit review and research question. But, the other parts which are listed below should be written and match the research question. Please refer to files for full guidance. Title page

Acknowledgments AbstractContents pageResearch questions or hypothesis Conclusions and suggestions for further work

ASSIGNMENT DETAILSWrite a 3- to 5-page paper which includes the following: Using Rogers (2003) theory as a foundation, outline how you would approach the meeting with the nurses. Be specific as to the types of information or activities you could provide to address each area and include how you would respond to resistance. Analyze the role of nurses as change agents in facilitating the adoption of new technology.ASSIGNMENT INFORMATIONEverett Rogers, a pioneer in the field of the diffusion of innovations, identified five qualities that determine individual attitudes towards adopting new technology (2003). He theorized that individuals are concerned with: Relative advantage: The individual adopting the new innovation must see how it will be an improvement over the old way of doing things.
Compatibility with existing values and practices: The adopter must understand how the new innovation aligns with current practices.
Simplicity: The adopter must believe he or she can easily master the new technology; the more difficult learning the new system appears, the greater the resistance that will occur.
Trialability: The adopter should have the opportunity to play around with the new technology and explore its capabilities.

Observable results: The adopter must have evidence that the proposed innovation has been successful in other situations.
For this Assignment, you assume the role of a nurse facilitator in a small hospital in upstate New York. You have been part of a team preparing for the implementation of a new electronic health records system. Decisions as to the program that will be used have been finalized, and you are now tasked with preparing the nurses for the new system. There has been an undercurrent of resistance expressed by nurses, and you must respond to their concerns. You have a meeting scheduled with the nurses 1 week prior to the training on the new EHR system. Consider how you can use the five qualities outlined by Rogers (2003) to assist in preparing the nurses for the upcoming implementation.

Discuss the Impacts of a lobbys interior design on customers satisfaction: A case study of Accor Hotels

Section 1
1. Discuss the difference between an arrest and a custodial interrogation. When must Miranda be given to an individual?
2. Discuss how the court determines if a confession should be admissible or not. What does the court look for to determine if a confession is voluntarily given?
3. Discuss when an individual has the right to counsel. Is this right absolute? What other safeguards does the Sixth Amendment afford a criminal defendant? Section 2
There are various identification methods used in the criminal justice system. There are also two different types of evidence used, physical evidence and circumstantial evidence.
1. Discuss the various identification methods used in the criminal justice system. Discuss some of the flaws with eye witness identifications?
2. What is the difference between physical evidence and circumstantial evidence? Which do you believe is more reliable to a jury? Discuss why.
3. What are some of the benefits and drawbacks to relying on DNA evidence in a criminal case?250+ words required per section. 1 source per section also required, for a total of 2 sources.