Briefly describe your methods for conducting your secondary research, including how you selected your sources & why they are credible.

* Essential Background (optional): Provide definitions of terms, if needed, and any historical information or other background information that readers need to understand the topic and why it’s especially important now
* Issues and Conclusions: Develop and support your position, presenting information from your research and explaining its relevance. Include at least one paragraph that addresses a likely objection to your recommendations.
* Closing statement/call to action: A short discussion of next steps

After reflecting on what you learned from the activities described above, write a coherent, well organized essay 3-5 pages identifying 1) at least three significant observations about grant seeking or proposal writing that these experiences have made clear to you, and 2) what changes you plan to make to your own proposal as a result of having completed this exercise.

The following prompts are offered as food for thought for your reflection, rather than specific instructions (dont attempt to answer them!). Or you may want to identify your own ah-ha! revelations about grant seeking in this reflection. In any case, be sure to support your main points with examples or explanations, and credit external sources as necessary following APA style guidelines.
What criteria were important to you when playing the role of a funder, and why? What was most useful to you as a reader to see in the proposals you reviewed? What does that imply for grant seekers? Did you notice any strategies or techniques that would have improved the quality of the proposal that you submitted, and if so, what were they? How do these align with recommendations offered by the grantmakers panel? What didnt work in proposals you reviewed, and why was that information or approach not compelling or helpful? What are some examples of what the real grant makers said not to do in a funding request? Were your perceptions similar to the professionals’? What difficulties might grantmakers run into when trying to respond to so many worthy proposals? What can grant seekers do to help the funders better understand and remember their proposals, and what can they do to make their requests stand out from the rest?

Describe the Truman Doctrine. What was its principal objective? Would you contend that it was consistent, or conflicted with, making the world safe for democracy?

What did Presidents Clinton and Bush offer as a replacement for the Truman Doctrine? Was it an appropriate response to the realities of the period? Explain. What has President Trump proposed that might constitute a Trump Doctrine? Explain. Provide a case study to illustrate your view.2. We have discussed a number of presidential doctrines. How would you characterize a Trump Doctrine? Of the previous doctrines that we have discussed, which would you suggest it is closest to? Explain. Which is it furthest from? Explain. Considering the constitutional distribution of power, what are the prospects for a Trump Doctrine being realized? Explain.3. Select any current event. Which level of government, federal or state, would you suggest has been the most influential for that issue? Explain. Which branch of government has been the most influential? Explain. Which branch of government has responsibility for checking and balancing the one that you have selected? Explain. Has it been able to adequately perform that function? Why/why not?4. Discuss realist and idealist philosophies regarding foreign policy. Which approach would you suggest would be best for the US currently? Explain, citing an area of foreign policy as a case study. Was that the approach used the last four years? Account for any similarities or differences.5. Presently, the US Congress is deliberating over legislation aimed at tax reform. Describe, in general, the plan that has been proposed. What fiscal policy philosophy would you suggest this approach represents? Explain. Do you support that philosophy, or, not? Explain. Suggest a more suitable approach. Explain why your approach would make an improvement over the current one. Provide a constitutional basis for the present process.6. Who would you name as the most effective president of the last 70 years? Explain being sure to consider his ability to wrest power from the Congress. Who has been the least effective? Again consider relations with Congress. The question does not ask who you approve of the most or least. It has to do with effectiveness. 7. Select a policy enacted by President Trump and/or the Congress since Inauguration Day. Plug that policy into the policymaking process. Can it be legitimately defended from a process standpoint? Explain. What role do you imagine issue networks played in that process? Explain.8. There has been considerable debate in the last few years regarding religious rights v. civil liberties. The present wedding cake issue, being heard by the Supreme Court right now, is an example. Discuss any case where these two issues have collided. Cite contending constitutional positions on both sides. Cite contending ethical positions. In the end, explain which side of the debate on your issue you support and why.9. Consider the matter of the Californias declaration of itself as a sanctuary state. Discuss what you believe to be the salient constitutional and ethical discussions on both sides of the debate over whether or not California should resist federal attempts to get the state to rescind that declaration. Which side do you think should prevail? Why. Discuss the constitutional bases for Californias claim that federal government is guilty of overreach. Provide a constitutional basis for the claim of the feds that they are not guilty of overreach.

Why do research problems have to be specific? Provide examples of poor research problem definitions and solid research problems.

Find two peer-reviewed journal articles from the EBSCO library on a business topic of your interest. Make sure the topic is narrow enough for this assignment. Compare the research methodology used in these two articles. Provide critical thought to which article is easier to understand and follow from a methodology perspective. The intent of this activity is to introduce you to scholarly writing. Examine the concisely written sections and frequent use of citations that illustrate the synthesis of previous research. Be sure to use quantitative studies for this course.

Describe the intended and possible unintended effects of the proposal on the target, client, and service system indicating the potential impact on each. Attempt to shed light on any potential ripple effects of the proposal on existing administrative rules, guidelines, companion policies, etc.

analyze a social welfare proposal currently being considered at the federal level. Rely on information in text, information gained in class, and other resources found outside of class.
The paper should follow the outline below. It should be approximately 6-10 pages, following the rules for written work found in the syllabus. It should contain no less than 5 outside sources, 2 of which must be scholarly (peer-reviewed).
1. Statement of Policy Proposition/Provisions: approx. page (5 pts)
Begin with a clear, uncluttered and brief statement of the law, rule, proposition or guideline that is being proposed: make it as uncomplicated as possible, stating the proposal in as few sentences as possible, free of jargon so that most people can understand it.
2. Identification of the Proposer(s): approx. page (5 pts)
Clearly identify the person(s) and/or group(s) sponsoring the proposal, including their formal titles and (as appropriate) their organizational affiliations.
3. Identification of General Concepts: approx. 1 – 2 pages (25 pts)
Clarify and enumerate the concepts that relate to the proposal. Include, as appropriate, a summary of the shape and nature of the problem that has led to this proposal; describe the proposal being offered in conceptual terms; bring out background factual information while focusing on central issues.

Choose four policy analysis processes and apply each one to a policy case (you may use a previous weeks case) or choose from the list below: Trans Pacific Partnership AgreementPreview the document Policy response to the problem of suicide in Australia (Links to an external site.)

Final Policy Research Paper The final policy paper is cumulative and covers Chapters 1 – 16 of McLaughlin and McLaughlin (2014) textbook. To complete the final assignment you are required to use at least eight peer-reviewed sources with at least two from Ashford University Library. Click to watch Kaiser Permanente Overview of U.S. Health Policy (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Links to an external site. Cross-national analysis of expenditure changes in 27European nations 19952011 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Proposition 63: Should Other States Follow Californias Lead? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Provide details on the other policy processes that were not utilized in your research. How could they be applied? Why would they be applicable? All applicable information from previous weeks must be included. A conclusion MUST be included at the end of the paper summarizing the key aspects of health policy. Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper: Must be 10 to 15 double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Consider what you feel was the main driving force behind American history.

1. Using all 3 books, (David R. Roediger, The Wages of Whiteness book – Howard Zinn, A peoples History of The United States and Eric Foner, An American History, SEAGULL 5E) – consider what you feel was the main driving force behind American history. Examples might be political, economic/class. Put another way, do you think American history is/ was driven by the will of political leaders, the monied interest of one group or another, or social/cultural influences? I realize it is all of the above, but I want you to reflect upon this by choosing to emphasize one idea over the others. Whatever you choose, use good examples from EACH of the books listed to prove your point. *Argument style. (350 word minimum, times new roman, 12 pt. 2.0 line spacing Chicago Turbine Style) please cite within text, (author page number).

select two events from the Australian History Timeline. One event must be pre-1967 and the other post-1967. This will enable you to investigate the evolution of approaches to Australian policy for Indigenous Australian peoples.

Over module two you responded to critical questions to reflect on how social, institutional, and historical forces explicitly and implicitly construct knowledge of Self and Others. In Task 3 you will use this as a basis but extend into a critical analysis of Australian policy and historical events in relation to Indigenous Australian peoples. You are required to select two events from the Australian History Timeline. One event must be pre-1967 and the other post-1967. This will enable you to investigate the evolution of approaches to Australian policy for Indigenous Australian peoples, the way in which Indigenous Australians are positioned to rationalise approaches, and the presumed relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians as a consequence. You are required to describe and analyse each policy/event in relation to: Goals of each policy or event. How Indigenous Australians are positioned (e.g., do they have a role in decision-making, are their views represented, are they constructed as a ‘problem to be resolved’). The relationship between Indigenous Australians and wider Australian society (e.g., is there a social or cultural norm evident? Are Indigenous Australians constructed as ‘different’ to or divergent from the norm?); including a reflection of the influence of these policies and events on your own cultural competence. What are the similarities and differences evident in the goals, positioning of Indigenous Australians, and the implied relationship between Indigenous Australians and wider Australian society? Rationale back to top This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s: be able to critically reflect on the factors that have shaped historical and contemporary engagement with Indigenous communities and Indigenous peoples and critique deficit paradigms as they relate to Indigenous Australians. be able to critically examine how racialised power and privilege influence historical and contemporary structures of Australian society and its institutions. This task extends on Task 1 and 2 to meet the following IKC101 Learning Outcomes: LO 3: Be able to critically reflect on the factors that have shaped historical and contemporary engagement with Indigenous communities and Indigenous peoples and critique deficit paradigms as they relate to Indigenous Australians; LO4: Be able to critically examine how racialised power and privilege influence historical and contemporary structures of Australian society and its institutions. In Task 1 and 2 you reflected on your knowledge and the factors that influence what you know, and how you come to know about Indigenous Australians and Australians more generally. You undertook further reflection in a critique of two media articles. You began to consider how knowledge can be taken-for-granted or assumed to be true because powerful institutions like schools, churches, government, the media (and social media) reinforce them over time. In Task 3 you will analyse evidence of the social, institutional, and historical framing, reproduction, and reinforcement of particular kinds of knowledge and associated issues of power and privilege. back to top Essay requirements This assignment is to be completed in essay format. Include an introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion. Develop an overall position and ensure each paragraph contains a specific point that is demonstrated and supported in the paragraph. You must use third-person for the academic analysis; you are able to use first-person [“I” statements] in the reflective aspects of the task only. Information relating to writing essays can be found at: https://student.csu.edu.au/study/guidesandtips/writing-at-uni The essay should be your own original work. This assessment task will be put through Turnitin to identify plagiarism. Reference requirements Use at least seven (7) reference sources in total. References are not included in the word count. You must use a minimum of five (5) required readings from the IKC101 modules. You must cite and reference two (2) additional sources that you have located yourself. These texts must be of academic standard, such as a journal article, text book, text book chapter or conference paper proceeding. Assess the quality of content in web sources very carefully. In general, website references are unlikely to provide reliable, researched information suitable for this task. * Articles from The Conversation are written by academics and are appropriate to develop your understandings and to refer to. However, as these articles are not peer-reviewed they do not count as a formal reference. Do not reference sources such as Creative Spirits, Wikipedia, Skwirk/Red Apple, or Australians Together as these are unreliable sources. Do not cite or reference the module. You may cite and reference the readings linked to in the module. The written information contained in the modules are not academic sources and are not to be used in your essay. Use in-text citations to identify other peoples ideas and words. These in-text citations must follow APA (6th Edition) referencing style. Quotes must be in quotation marks and the in-text citation must include the page number. Formal and respectful language requirements This assessment task must be in professional and formal language. This means there should be no abbreviations or slang. Care must be taken to avoid spelling, grammar and punctuation errors. Respectful and appropriate terminology must be used when referring to and writing about Indigenous Australian people and cultures.
Hide

There is a commonly held and oft-stated belief that early L2 learning leads to better language learning and that L2 learning success declines with age. To what extent is this assumption justified by research evidence? Given this evidence, what in your view is the optimum age for L2 learning?

There is a commonly held and oft-stated belief that early L2 learning leads to better language learning and that L2 learning success declines with age. To what extent is this assumption justified by research evidence? Given this evidence, what in your view is the optimum age for L2 learning?