Identify, (and possibly consult) relevant stakeholders and actors to get a sense of different perspectives, interests, values and ideas

You will be making adjustments to the attached work and follow the comments given on the document. Please follow the annotations TO THE LETTER!First, you will identify a sustainability challenge that is something you would like to change in people, organisations, cultures, a neighbourhood or community, a business or company, classroom or school, or a unit or another audience that you would like to focus on. You will need to describe the nature of the challenge is it a simple, complex or wicked problem?This change will need to contribute to sustainability as you come to understand it. It could be related to peoples behaviour, lifestyle, values, competencies at a more individual level or at a more collective level or to broader societal and material structures. The change that you envision could be in a more formal setting like a school, a hospital, a care home, a university, a community, or more informal within programs, projects or movements where people are doing something together to change something (e.g. creating a community garden, off-the grid energy systems, local food systems) and need to learn together.It really depends on your own interest what you might take as the focus for your project. Ideally, you will find a challenge that you can get involved in at some level, or where you have access to the people trying to make something more sustainable so that you can actually do a bit of research (e.g. by interviewing people, observing what is going on). But this is not strictly necessary you can also use this project as a survey of the literature or the field in order to build your own understanding of the change you feel is needed.Key requirementsIdentify a sustainability challenge, discuss why it is a sustainability challenge – including a short history of the challenge and the nature of the challenge (problem), and articulate why you are drawn to the challenge

Discuss relevant theoretical concepts and literature that you have encountered during the course
Outline an educational plan of action that addresses your sustainability challenge
Critically reflect on educational opportunities and challenges in relation to your plan
Critically analyse the chosen challenges
Use formal referencing conventions and academic writing
Length: Between 2000-4000 words (or 5-10 pages in a word doc.)

Please describe your personal relationship with Jesus Christ, including the moment you trusted him as your personal Lord and Savior.

Question 2:Reflect on the Scripture passage below. What does it mean to you? Can you connect this passage to a recent event or circumstance in your life? How? “Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God — this is your spiritual act of worship. Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is — His good, pleasing and perfect will.” Romans 12:1-2 (NIV)

Project Quality Assurance, Human Resources & Communication

For your written assignment assume that Wings Cafe is expanding beyond LUCT (shopping mall). Create a Cause & Effect Diagram (Fishbone Diagram) For a delay faced in the construction of the new Wings Cafe outlet in the new Shopping mall. After Creating the Cause & Effect Diagram, explain in detail the each component of the charter.

How can she deal with these concerns without giving up too much control? Use well known executive examples as appropriate to support your opinions

Samantha Parks is the owner and CEO of Sparks, a small
New York agency that develops advertising, promotions, and
marketing materials for high-fashion firms. Parks has tended
to keep a tight rein on her business, overseeing most projects
from start to finish. However, as the firm has grown, she
has found it necessary to delegate more and more decisions
to her associates. Shes recently been approached by a hairstyling
chain that wants a comprehensive redefinition of its
entire marketing and promotions look. Should Samantha
try to manage this project in her traditional way, or should
she delegate major parts to her employees?
Most managers confront this question at some point in
their careers. Some experts propose that top executives
need to stay very close to the creative core of their business,
which means that even if their primary responsibility
is to manage, CEOs should never cede too much control
to committees of creative individuals or they can lose sight
of the firms overall future direction. Moreover, executives
who do fall out of touch with the creative process risk being
passed over by a new generation of plugged in employees
who better understand how the business really works.
Others offer the opposite advice, saying its not a good
idea for a CEO to sweat the small stuff like managing
individual client accounts or projects. These experts advise
executives to identify everything they can outsource
to other employees and to delegate as much as possible.
By eliminating trivial tasks, executives will be better able
to focus their attention on the most important decisionmaking
and control aspects of their jobs, which will help
the business and also ensure that the top executive maintains
control over the functions that really matter.
These pieces of advice are not necessarily in conflict
with one another. The real challenge is to identify what
you can delegate effectively without ceding too much
power and control away from the person with the unifying
vision. That is certainly easier said than done, thoughQuestions1. If you were Samantha Parks, the owner, how would you prioritize which projects or parts of projects to delegate? Explain.2. I hire good people, creative people to run these projects, and I worry that they will see my oversight and authority as interfering with their creative process. .3. What are some tasks in an organization that a top executive should never delegate to others? Explain why

research of the topic of interest (should cover an explanation of issues, the context of the topic/position you are presenting, research evidence for support, evidence counter to your argument with rebuttal, and conclusion, and a reference list in APA format, and writing quality.

research of the topic of interest (should cover an explanation of issues, the context of the topic/position you are presenting, research evidence for support, evidence counter to your argument with rebuttal, and conclusion, and a reference list in APA format, and writing quality.Grades will be based on the following rubric:No clear attempt was made to glean information from the sources and fully integrate the ideas into the paper premises- 0 pointsAn attempt to include research was made, but links to premise were weak or missing -5 pointsAn attempt to include research was made, but lacked applicability, or contained significant holes in supporting arguments10 pointsApplicable research was used, but was lacking enough detail to fully support the paper premises15 pointsApplicable research was used, but more detail would have supported the premises put forth in the paper17.5 points