what the studies reveal about the current state of knowledge on the question that you developed

This is a continuation of the Course Project presented in Week 2. Before you begin, review the Course Project Overview document located in the Week 2 Resources area.The literature review is a critical piece in the research process because it helps a researcher determine what is currently known about a topic and identify gaps or further questions. Conducting a thorough literature review can be a time-consuming process, but the effort helps establish the foundation for everything that will follow. For this part of your Course Project, you will conduct a brief literature review to find information on the question you developed in Week 2. This will provide you with experience in searching databases and identifying applicable resources.To prepare:Review the information in Chapter 5 of the course text, focusing on the steps for conducting a literature review and for compiling your findings.Using the question you selected in your Week 2 Project (Part 1 of the Course Project), locate 5 or more full-text research articles that are relevant to your PICOT question. Include at least 1 systematic review and 1 integrative review if possible. Use the search tools and techniques mentioned in your readings this week to enhance the comprehensiveness and objectivity of your review. You may gather these articles from any appropriate source, but make sure at least 3 of these articles are available as full-text versions through Walden Library’s databases.Read through the articles carefully. Eliminate studies that are not appropriate and add others to your list as needed. Although you may include more, you are expected to include a minimum of five articles. Complete a literature review summary table using the Literature Review Summary Table Template located in this week’s Learning Resources.Prepare to summarize and synthesize the literature using the information on writing a literature review found in Chapter 5 of the course text.To complete: Point out inconsistencies and contradictions in the literature and offer possible explanations for inconsistencies.Preliminary conclusions on whether the evidence provides strong support for a change in practice or whether further research is needed to adequately address your inquiryYour literature review summary table with all references formatted in correct APA style

Analyze the 2014 California Gubernatorial election results.

Make an educated projection for the 2018 Gubernatorial election.
This years election 2018 will be a midterm election. Midterm elections happen every 4 years in-between presidential election years. During these election years, we elect 1/3 of the US Senate and the US House of Representatives and state and local level public servants. During the last midterm election (2014) California voter turnout was at 42% for the November general election. Of the 24.3 million eligible California voters, 17.8 million were registered to vote in 2014. In 2010 turnout was at roughly 60% during the midterm election. Californias population has stayed at roughly 38 million people over the last 5 years. In this upcoming election 2018 we will elect a Governor of California. In the 2014 Gubernatorial election, Jerry Brown(D) secured 60% of the vote while Neel Kashkari(R) captured 40%. This years race for the Governor is between Gavin Newsom (D) and John Cox (R). Step 1: Make a pie chart in which you show the percent of the California population that elected Governor Brown in 2014. Step 2: Looking at the registration trends table and public opinion poll, make a prediction about this years Gubernatorial election. If you were on Newsoms election campaign staff, what would you tell him to do? If you were on Coxs election campaign staff what would you tell him to do?here is an exampleStep1: In 2010 total California pop = 37.5 million eligible voter pop = 23.5 million Registered to vote = 17.2 million Turned out to vote = 10.3 million or 60% of registered Voted for Jerry Brown = 5.4 million or 53.8% of vote Voted for Meg Whitman= 4.1 million or 40.9% of votePie chart of 2014 voteJerry Brown was elected by 14.4% of the total population of California.*All Data collected from the Ca Secretary of State’s Statement of the Votehttps://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/sov/2010-general/complete-sov.pdf (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Step 2:Brown has consistently polled at 40+% throughout the campaign, where Whitman has struggled at an average of 35% throughout.

To what extent are people free to adopt voices and or/identities?Your response should be five pages in length, and reference both articles throughout.

Zadie Smith suggests that possessing and using multiple voices is a kind of gift, evidence of freedom and empathy rather than fraudulence, while Hua Hsu argues that the affectation of Asian identities by white writers is perverse. Given the circumstances that Smith and Hsu respectively cite, these positions are not necessarily irreconcilable, but rather suggest a complex relationship between ideas of race, power, identity, and voice. You should have a thesis that directly responds to the above question, offering a specific, clearly reasoned answer that does not repeat the wording of the question. Ideally both authors will be quoted in all, or almost all body paragraphs, in conversation with one another.