Author: best-essay

The post should be well constructed and free of grammatical errors, and be between 250 and 300 words. You do not need to undertake outside research in order to answer the question; although you may, if you like. It is a wise strategy to create your response as a Word document (that way, you have a copy for yourself). You must cite your sources both in your response and below it (Bibliography), using the Chicago Style citation format. Students who do not cite their work can expect to receive only a minimum grade of 60% for this assignment. It is expected that our textbook by Shi and Tindall will be a source and should likewise be accessed and cited. Late responses will be penalized at 5% per day. Choose one (1) question.1. What were the affects of the Second World War on American society?2. What were the major factors that enabled the United States and its allies to win the war in Europe?3. How did President Franklin Roosevelt and the Allies work to shape the postwar world?

write a position paper in which you will choose and support a policy change which reinforces the role of the nurse as a leader in ensuring access to quality health care in developed and underdeveloped countries. You should approach this assignment from the perspective of your specialty track. Information which may be helpful in selecting a proposed policy change can be found in your textbook Health Policy and Politics: A Nurses Guide The word count for your position paper will be 1000 to 1600 words. You must support your work with at least eight scholarly peer reviewed articles. Your paper must include the following topics: Current nursing issues related to globalization of healthcare The proposed policy change Agenda setting strategies (Process by which your proposal will gain attention of stakeholders and/or the public) A model or theory that can be used to bring about the change Design strategies Implementation strategies Evaluation strategies Conclusion Assignment Requirements Before finalizing your work, you should: be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above); consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors. Your writing Assignment should: follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.); be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful; display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and use APA formatting and citation style.
Hide

Directions For this Assignment, you will examine the stakeholders impacted by the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Your paper must include the following topics: Differentiate between at least three groups of stakeholders impacted by the ACA. Examine the financial impact of the ACA on each group of stakeholders. Summarize benefits of the ACA on each group of stakeholders. Summarize drawbacks of the ACA on each group of stakeholders. The word count for your paper, excluding the title page and references page, will be 800-1200 words. You must include a minimum of (5) different scholarly references. Assignment Requirements Before finalizing your work, you should: be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above); consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors. Your writing Assignment should: follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.); be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful; display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and use APA formatting and citation style.
Hide

Research Essay on Pride and Prejudice (OUT OF 25% I REQUIRE 23% TO PASS THE SUBJECT REQUIREMENTS AND ITS MY LAST ATTEMPT….. I SHALL BE VERY THANKFUL IF YOU HELP ME OUT) PLEASE AVOID REPETITION OF WORDS Introduction This research essay of no less than 950 words and no more than 1,000 words contributes 25% toward your final grade for the course. This assignment requires you to use secondary sources. Please note your secondary sources may include the essays in the Criticism section of your Norton Critical edition. You must include at least three secondary sources in your essay. Since you will be using quotations and paraphrases from both your primary source (Pride and Prejudice) and secondary sources (articles and books on Pride and Prejudice), you must include parenthetical in-text citationsafter the quotation in your essay, provide the page number(s) for print sourcesand a Works Cited list. Also, remember to include the Norton Critical edition of Pride and Prejudice in your Works Cited list. Consult Chapter 34, section 34a of the Harbrace Handbook for Canadians for specific instructions about citing particular kinds of sources. If, for example, you quote from one of the essays included in the Criticism section of your Norton edition of Pride and Prejudice, look for the instructions on citing articles or essays first published elsewhere. Whether your research for Assignment 4 is extensive or narrowly focused, remember to avoid turning your essay into a patchwork of quotations from different articles and books. Your thesis should be the controlling feature of your essay. Research Essay Topics Choose just one of the following topics: 1. Discuss the function and importance of letters in Pride and Prejudice. 2. Does Pride and Prejudice reinforce or erode sexist stereotypes of women? 3. Time and space are small in Pride and Prejudice. Discuss the significance of critic Dorothy Van Ghents comment on the novels setting. Instructions Your essay should have three parts: an introductory paragraph, a body containing fully developed paragraphs, and a concluding paragraph. Following is a general guide for what to include in each section of your essay. In your introductory paragraph: Introduce Pride and Prejudice and its author. Identify clearly your essay topic. Include a strong thesis statement on the topic. Forecast the main stages of your analysis. In your analysis in the body of your essay: Make effective use of topic sentences to identify the main ideas of your analysis. Support your comments with evidence (paraphrase and direct quotations) from the novel. Explain the significance of each piece of evidence you present as it relates to your thesis. Identify the sources of all your quotations with parenthetical in-text citations. Contribute to your readers understanding of the novel as a whole. In your concluding paragraph: Summarize the main stages of your analysis. Restate your thesis in different words *Quotations count toward the word length, but Works Cited items listed at the end do not.
Hide

Budgeting and allocating resources do not occur in a vacuum. Leaders of organizations take stock of their revenues and expenditures, their assets and holdings, their clients and competitors, and their overall strategic thinking. While some aspects of these deliberative processes are internal, others may be shared publicly for variety of reasons. In this Assignment, you evaluate the relationships among documents that provide evidence of the outcomes of these deliberative processes and financial analyses. You may wish to rely upon personal and professional experience reading financial statements, strategic vision and mission statements, and budget reports. Consider what you would expect to get from each of the document types if you were the leader of an organization, and how you might use these items individually and holistically. After reading the assigned articles, consider how having an understanding of different models of thinking can make you a more effective manager. With that thought in mind, review the following three resources and answer the questions associated with each: 1. Evaluate the role of strategic planning, budgeting, and financial statements in an organization 2. Compare how strategic planning, budgeting, and financial statements in an organization differ. Resources: Shim, J. K., Siegel, J. G., & Shim, A. I. (2012). Budgeting basics and beyond (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 1, “The What and Why of Budgeting: An Introduction” Chapter 2, “Strategic Planning and Budgeting: Process, Preparation, and Control” Chapter 3, ” Administering the Budget: Reports, Analyses, and Evaluations” Chapter 22, “Zero-Base Budgeting: Priority Budgeting for Best Resource Allocation” Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The four basic financial statements [Interactive media]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Rubrics: Student provides a thorough and detailed evaluation of the role of each element in an organization or business (strategic planning, budgeting, and financial statements). Relevant sources and examples support thinking. Student provides a thorough and detailed analysis comparing how each element in an organization or business differs. Relevant sources and specific examples support thinking. Student exhibits evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments. New questions may be presented based on synthesis of ideas and input. Writing is clear, logical, well-organized and appropriate. Work is free from spelling and grammar/syntax errors. Tone is professional and free from bias (i.e., sexism, racism). There are no errors. Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly or credible reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution and references. There are no APA errors.
Hide

The statement of the problem and any subproblems (this relates to and ties in to your chosen health care area of interest, which you decided on in Unit 1) The hypotheses A review of any related literature you from the AIU Library Research methodology

Assignment: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies Critiquing the validity and robustness of research featured in journal articles provides a critical foundation for engaging in evidence-based practice. In Weeks 5 and 6, you explored quantitative research designs. In Week 7, you will examine qualitative and mixed methods research designs. For this Assignment, which is due by Day 7 of Week 7, you critique a quantitative and either a qualitative or a mixed methods research study and compare the types of information obtained in each. To prepare: Select a health topic of interest to you that is relevant to your current area of practice. The topic may be your Course Portfolio Project or a different topic of your choice. Using the Walden Library, locate two articles in scholarly journals that deal with your portfolio topic: 1) Select one article that utilizes a quantitative research design and 2) select a second article that utilizes either a qualitative OR a mixed methods design. These need to be single studies not systematic or integrative reviews (including meta-analysis and metasynthesis). You may use research articles from your reference list. If you cannot find these two types of research on your portfolio topic, you may choose another topic. Locate the following documents in this weeks Learning Resources to access the appropriate templates, which will guide your critique of each article: Critique Template for a Qualitative Study Critique Template for a Quantitative Study Critique Template for a Mixed-Methods Study Consider the fields in the templates as you review the information in each article. Begin to draft a paper in which you analyze the two research approaches as indicated below. Reflect on the overall value of both quantitative and qualitative research. If someone were to say to you, Qualitative research is not real science, how would you respond? To complete this Assignment: Complete the two critiques using the appropriate templates. Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following: Contrast the types of information that you gained from examining the two different research approaches in the articles that you selected. Describe the general advantages and disadvantages of the two research approaches featured in the articles. Use examples from the articles for support. Formulate a response to the claim that qualitative research is not real science. Highlight the general insights that both quantitative and qualitative studies can provide to researchers. Support your response with references to the Learning Resources and other credible sources.
Hide

Provide an analysis on how the company handled the situation drawing on at least three communication and management theories and strategies. One obvious choice will be to look at Critical Incident Communications in general and then possibly take a closer look at parts of the process undertaken (or not undertaken) in terms of management and communication theories/strategies, ethics, disclosure etc. 1. Evidence of research. 2. Evidence of understanding the course content and the question posed. 3. Evidence of analysis and consideration of alternate points of view. 4.Evidence of directly seeking to address the topic and providing a substantive point of view utilising the various course components. 5.Use of facts and information to develop and substantiate analysis and argument utilising the various (most importantly from credible sources other than media and company reports). 6.Use of logic and clarity of thought in presenting your arguments. 7.Use of correct punctuation, grammar and spelling acknowledgement and citation of sources. 8. Incite referencing 9. The inclusion of a bibliography. This unit uses the Harvard referencing and citation style.
Hide

Develop a 15 slide analytical PowerPoint presentation that evaluates the effectiveness of policies designed to respond to disasters. In this presentation, address the following: Identify measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of disaster response effort policies Apply those measures to specific policies. Provide examples and details. Analyze and then evaluate the effectiveness of those policies. Are they working, based on the measures you used? If not, why not? Answer the following questions based on your analysis and evaluation: Are DHS and FEMA properly organized to effectively deal with natural and technological disasters? Should FEMA be removed from DHS and made an independent agency reporting to POTUS? How effective are federal government disaster response polices?

PART 1: Given the NSS coupled with its discussion of the strategy in a regional context, pick a regional security issue within the Indo-Asia-Pacific region and explain how one of the following IR concepts might inform and guide U.S. policy, consistent with the goals and objectives of the NSS:Polarity and Power Transition
Democratic Peace
International Political Economy
International LawPART 2: Considering the NDS and its strategic assessment, goals and objectives, as well as the USPACOM commanders military assessment of the region, describe how that informed policy (from Part I) invites or constrains the cooperative and/or coercive employment of Airpower (air, space, & cyber) to address the issue within the Indo-Asia-Pacific region.Main sources
1) NSS – Read the Introduction (pages 1-4) and The Strategy in a Regional Context (pages 45-53);
2) NDS Read entire document (pages 1-11);
3) Military Assessment of the Security Challenges in the Indo-Asia-Pacific Region – (pages 1-17).The essay must:
– 1400 – 1700 words;
– Support your developed position with sound evidence and critical analysis;
– Address all elements of the Part 1, 2 question(s);
– Display critical thinking, thorough analysis, and logical argument;
– Be well written throughout, including grammar, organization, and presentation;
– Include a cover page and endnotes (Chicago…not included in word count).