Describe how switching to a more dynamic database will give Falcon Security a competitive advantage.

Instructions
For decades, relational databases remained essentially unchanged; data was segmented into specific chunks for columns, slots, and repositories, also called structured data. However, in this Internet of Things (IoT) era, databases need to be reengineered because the very nature of data has changed. Todays databases need to be developed with the needs of IoT in mind and have the ability to perform real-time processing to manage workloads that are dynamic. For example, relational databases should be able to work with real-time data streaming and big data (an example was presented in the Unit III Lesson).Scenario: Falcon Security wants their customers to be able to view security video footage in real-time and provide customers with the ability to query video footage for viewing. Choosing a database solution such as MongoDB would allow Falcon Security to store customer video footage in the same database as the metadata.To do this, Falcon Security needs a way to manage the demands of real-time data streaming for real-time analytics. Conduct some research for a NoSQL database application, such as MongoDB or Cassandra, that could meet this need. How would switching to a real-time database solution help Falcon Security remain competitive? Create a PowerPoint presentation that includes the components listed below.Provide a brief introduction to IoT.
Present the argument to the Falcon Security CEO that switching to a more dynamic database structure (NoSQL real-time database) will meet the demands of IoT.
Introduce some features of the database you chose, whether it is MongoDB, Cassandra, or another database.

Your presentation must be a minimum of six slides in length (not counting the title and reference slides), and you must use at least two academic resources. Any information from a resource used must be cited and referenced in APA format.

Re-describe the history of a murder case

The main website for this essay: http://www.iowaunsolvedmurders.com/beyond-1965-selected-unsolved-iowa-murders/spring-break-killer-murder-of-sarah-ann-ottens-1973/ Re-describe this murder case in descriptive language, this will be used as a broadcast script. Thank you If you have any question please let me know

Choose a topic related to technology that would (hypothetically) interest you to conduct research. Think of topics that interest you (Cars, computers, the environment, space travel etc) and find a related question you’re curious about.

You will NOT be conducting research for this assignment. You will be PROPOSING the kind of research you’d like to do as if I am the authority that will tell approve or deny your research. Title or Cover Page
Name, Institution and title of project
Introduction
Identifies the research question to be answered/studied
Provides background information regarding the research that will be conducted
Should be written for general audience/less expert audience
Literature review (utilized three credible sources)
**This is to show that you have an understanding of the area you propose to research**
Summary of previous research conducted in this particular area
Reference contributions of other researchers
Research Design or Methodology
This should lay out your plan of how research will be conducted
This section should include the procedures you will take for conducting your research (could include a summary of participants, materials, procedure, timetable etc.)
Describe problems you anticipate encountering and your attempts you will take to solve them
You may include sub-headings in this section to break up the content somewhat

summarize the content of the source and also to explain briefly how the article being summarized falls within the scope of your investigation and how it will be of use. In this case, you begin with a brief description and follow with a specific form of evaluation. These are called combination annotations.

You will be writing an annotated bibliography in the combination style. This style combines (a) a short summary with (b) a short evaluation, drawing on what you learned in modules 4 and 5, of the utility of the resource to your project. So, before you begin, it might be worth your while to review the relevant sections of these modules. However, now that you have most of the resources you will need to make your argument, you should review them again not only to make sure that they are relevant to your topic but also to provide you with the information you need to support your argument.
If you are convinced that the sources you found are of value, you can now write your annotated bibliography following the general guidelines (given below) for the first part and second part of your summary:
Guidelines for the first part of the summary (sometimes the first paragraph):
1. Just as with the summary, write your annotation from an objective third-person point of view.
2. Be brief in your summary. Remember from Module 3 that you do not have to provide the fine details of the argument, such as a restatement of the evidence, but you do need to give the main thesis, the claims, and the conclusions.
3. Your summary should indicate the ethos of the author (his or her authority) and the viewpoint he or she takes.
Guidelines for the second part of the summary (sometimes written as a second paragraph):
1. Provide an evaluation of the overall merits of the source: its strengths and weaknesses.
2. State why you think this work is suitable for your topic. What information does it provide that will help you forward your argument? Remember that this, too, should not contain any I statements. For example, rather than writing, I feel this article is good because…, you should write, This article is particularly useful because it focuses on the social aspects of drug use.

Explore the life history of your object (Where and how is it manufactured? Exchanged? Used? Stored or thrown away?) This may require some online or library research, be sure to track and cite your sources.

In this assignment, you will carefully examine the physical and symbolic aspects of a material object in relation to at least one of the core themes of this course. The object you select may be new or old, spectacular or mundane, big or small, mobile or stable, or something that you use every day or only on the most special of occasions. The point is to pick someTHING you have direct experience with and access to so that you may study and write about it ethnographically.
Then you will research (and detail the following in your write up, in whichever order makes most sense for you and your object). Plan to write about 1.5 pages for each section detailed below:

2) Examine your own experience with this object through participant observation (How, when, why do you use or not use it? Has your use of it changed over time? What might your use, possession, or discard of this object signify to yourself and to others?) Consult the instructions for your first Mini- Ethnography for a refresher on participant observation as needed.
3) Consider the life history of your object and insights from your own participation in relation to one of the core themes of this course, and cultural anthropology more broadly. (For example: What might wearing a leather jacket made in Italy to class or a party tell us about sexuality? What might a Macbook made in China from Congolese minerals used in West Lafayette to research where and with what materials Macbooks are made tell us about power and the global economy? What might drinking a bottle of kombucha or taking dose of Sudafed tell us about health and healing?)