Analyze the major characteristics of the cybersecurity incident, including-
* type of breach
* how the breach occurred
* losses of confidentialiaty, integrity, and availability
*technological improvements that would help prevent recurrence
You will log into https://icampus.strayer.edu/login enter your campus User Account: C9552306026 password it has logged you in you will click on access Blackboard. This will open another window, click on the law, ethics and corp. link that is located under my courses. Once you are in you will click week 6 on the left to access assignment # 3 case study. Textbook used fro this course is: Halbert, T., & Ingulli, E. (2009). Law & ethics in the business environment: 2010 custom
edition (6th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Assignment # 3 case study Employer’s Duty of Care-View the video by clicking on the link in the course shell. There is also a link that will allow you to print the script of the video. Write a three to five (3) page report that answers the following:
• Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.â€
• Explain whether or not Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury.
• Explain whether or not Jake should be paid the overtime.
• Explain the rights Jake and Herman have individually in this scenario.
The format of the report is to be as follows:
Typed, double spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one inch margins on all sides, APA format.
Type the question followed by your answer to the question.
In addition to the three (3) page required, a title page is to be included. The title page is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date.
NOTE: You will be graded on the quality of your answers, the logic/organization of the report, your language skills, and your writing skills.
For Week 6 discussion questions 1 and 2, you will retrieve the information from http://www.cengagebrain.com/shop/index.html, login is murphylaquan@yahoo.com and password will click under my course and material to access chapter 6 for all discussion questions.
Week 6 discussion 1 question
1.(a) explain what, according to Locke, gives a person their right to property.
Though the earth, and all inferior creatures, is common to all men, yet every man has a property of his own person: this nobody has any right to but himself. The labor of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, is properly his. Whatsoever then he removes out of the state that nature hath provided, and left it in he hath mixed his labor with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. He that is nourished by the acorns he picked up under an oak, or the apples he gathered from the trees in the wood, has certainly appropriated them to himself…. What fish anyone catches in the ocean, that great and still remaining common of mankind… is by the labour that removes it out of that common state nature left in, made his property…As much land as a man tills, plants, improves, cultivates, and can use the product of so much is his property. Nor was the appropriation of any parcel of land, by improving it. any prejudice to any other man, since there was still enough, and as good left…(p.209) Halbert/Ingulli.
1(b). Identify any limitation on the right to own property.
If man in the state of nature be so free, as has been said; if he be absolute lord of his own person and possessions, equal to the greatest, and subject to no body, why will he part with his freedom? Why will he give up his empire, and subject himself to the dominion and control of any other power? To which it is obvious to answer, that thought the state of nature he hath such a right, yet the enjoyment of it is very uncertain, and constantly exposed to the invasion of others: for all being kings as much as he… and the greater part no strict observers of equity and justice, the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very unsecured. This makes him willing to quit a condition, which, however free, is full of fears and continual dangers: and it is not without reason that he seeks out, and is willing to join in society with others…(p.210) Halbert/Ingulli.
1©. Discuss why Locke believes people form government.
If the man of nature be so free, as has been said; if he be absolute lord of his own person and possessions, equal to the greatest, and subject to no body, why will he part of his freedom? Why will he give up his empire, and subject himself to the dominion and control of any other power? To which it is obvious to answer, that though in the state of nature he hath such aright, yet the enjoyment of it is very uncertain, and constantly exposed to the envasion of others: for all being kings as much as he… and the greater part no strict observers of equity and justice, the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very unsecured. The supreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent: for the preservation of property being by the end of government, and that for which men enter into society, it necessarily supposes and requires, that the people should have property, without which they must be supposed to lose that, by entering into society, which was the end for which they entered into it, to gross an absurdity for any man to own. (p. 210) Halbert/Ingulli
2.Week 6 discussion 2 question
Review “Lucas v. South Carolina Costal Council†in Chapter 6. Please respond to the following:
2.(a) The image of David Lucas that emerges from majority Justice Scalia’s description is strikingly different from the one that Justice Blackman creates in his dissent. Identify the two contrasting stories in this case.
2(b) Explain why you think that when Lucas bought the land at issue, in 1986, he did or did not have reason to know that by building on it he would be the owner of a “pig in a parlor.â€
2(c) Discuss the two types of regulatory action that, according to the majority, automatically triggers compensation as takings, without a court needing to examine the circumstances in a case-specific manner.
Write a paper where you are raising and countering objections regarding the decision to get an MBA.
Support your point of view as part of countering objections with research. Examples include department of labor statistics, fairly current articles on the impact of education, especially graduate education on earnings. You can also cite a source to support your use of objections as well; for example, show the objection is documented as a valid concern.
Identify the criteria you used to evaluate the credibility of sources of information you selected.
Discuss how raising and countering objections has helped inform your own decision to get an MBA and the reason(s) you have decided to go back to school. Your paper should cite and reference at least two sources.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Human Nature Exam 2
Directions: Answer one of the following questions in a 4-5 page argumentative essay. Be sure to consider objections to your position. Upload the completed exam to the Exam Two Drop Box by July 21 at 9:00 PM.
1. Must an account of goodness attempt to demonstrate a convergence between happiness and justice? Answer this question with reference to Plato, St. Thomas, Marx, and Kant.
2. Can morality be construed as anything other than a categorical imperative? Discuss Aristotle, Marx, Sartre, and Kant in your answer.
3. Rousseau argues that man in his natural state is superior to man in his civilized state, while Aristotle and Locke disagree. Addressing these thinkers, determine what role society plays in moral formation and whether that role is good.
4. What role should reason, freedom, and the passions play in our understanding of the just life? Compare Kant, Epictetus, Sartre, and Rousseau.
5. Does the best theory of justice place individual rights over social goods or social goods over individual rights? Answer this question with reference to Locke, Plato, and Marx.
6. One of Dostoevsky’s characters suggests, "Without God, everything is permissible." Is this true? Answer the question by considering whether an account of human nature divorced from any conception of the divine could offer morally binding principles of conduct. Refer to at least three of the philosophers we’ve studied in your answer
Magda is a 43-year-old Pakistani female. She has gone to her local bank to take out a loan for a small business. Magda was dressed in a Burqa, which covers her body and face. The bank owner asked Madga to take off the headwear because it is bank policy that one’s face is not covered. Madga refused to remove her head scarf and cited religious reasons. Because the bank owner could not see her face completely, as only her eyes were visible, he found her to be a threat and asked her to leave. Magda has gone to the news and called the actions of the bank an atrocity.
In a 2-3 page paper, address the following:
Whether the actions of the bank were appropriate or inappropriate.
The legal aspects in this case and whether or not Magda was discriminated against.
please read this article and make a response ( I mean give your opinion about this topic and what did you like and you did not ), I do not need a summary for the article I need just response. please be aware that i am an international student so please use simple words and phrases . here you are the article .
We must pursue research on embryonic stem cells
With the life expectancy of average Americans heading as high as 75 to 80 years, it is our responsibility to do everything possible to protect the quality of life of the present and future generations. A critical factor will be what we do with human embryonic stem cells. These cells have the potential to cure diseases and conditions ranging from Parkinson’s and multiple sclerosis to diabetes and heart disease, Alzheimer’s, Lou Gehrig’s disease, even spinal-cord injuries like my own. They have been called the body’s self-repair kit.
Their extraordinary potential is a recent discovery. And much basic research needs to be done before they can be sent to the front lines in the battle against disease. But no obstacle should stand in the way of responsible investigation of their possibilities. To that end, the work should be funded and supervised by the Federal Government through the National Institutes of Health. That will avoid abuses by for-profit corporations, avoid secrecy and destructive competition between laboratories and ensure the widest possible dissemination of scientific breakthroughs. Human trials should be conducted either on the NIH campus or in carefully monitored clinical facilities.
Fortunately, stem cells are readily available and easily harvested. In fertility clinics, women are given a choice of what to do with unused fertilized embryos: they can be discarded, donated to research or frozen for future use. Under NIH supervision, scientists should be allowed to take cells only from women who freely consent to their use for research. This process would not be open ended; within one to two years a sufficient number could be gathered and made available to investigators. For those reasons, the ban on federally funded human embryonic stem cell research should be lifted as quickly as possible.
But why has the use of discarded embryos for research suddenly become such an issue? Is it more ethical for a woman to donate unused embryos that will never become human beings, or to let them be tossed away as so much garbage when they could help save thousands of lives?
Treatment with stem cells has already begun. They have been taken from umbilical cords and become healthy red cells used as a potential cure for sickle-cell anemia. Stem-cell therapy is also being used against certain types of cancer. But those are cells that have significantly differentiated; that is, they are no longer pluripotent, or capable of transforming into other cell types. For the true biological miracles that researchers have only begun to foresee, medical science must turn to undifferentiated stem cells. We need to clear the path for them as rapidly as possible.
Controversy over the treatment of certain diseases is nothing new in this country: witness the overwhelming opposition to government funding of AIDS research in the early ’80s. For years the issue was a political football–until a massive grass-roots effort forced legislators to respond. Today, the NIH is authorized to spend approximately $1.8 billion annually on new protocols, and the virus is largely under control in the U.S.
While we prolong the stem cell debate, millions continue to suffer. It is time to harness the power of government and go forward
1. Will the traditional delivery systems – television, Internet, radio, telephone and print – adequately disseminate terrorism related information.
2. What are the budgetary and other challenges that impede the creation of a DHS program at the state and local levels? Is the extent of involvement dependent on funding, personnel resources, the status of the emergency management director’s position—full-time, part-time, or volunteer—and so on?
3. What nontraditional agencies have now been included under the homeland security and emergency management umbrella? Describe the historical versus the current (pre- and post 9/11). Did the new structure address an all-hazards multidisciplinary approach
Review and research current literature to develop an analysis paper that explores the major sources and programs of needs-based and scholarship-based financial assistance for students
What are the most common terrorist qualities? What are the primary motivations driving the terrorists to commit terrorist acts? Why is it difficult to deter this motivation?
Make certain that all of your sources (including your textbook) are referenced at the end of the written response and that directly quoted information within your written response is cited to show the difference between your ideas and the exact words of your sources.
General encyclopedias are prohibited sources. They are NOT to be used.
Examples of prohibited sources include, but are not limited to, Wikipedia, Encarta, and World Book.
It is suggested (although not required) that these references and citations be put in APA Style
I need a 7 minute speech on the benefits of vibram five fingers sneakers over regular sneakers. I cannot have less than 2 main points or more than 4 main points. It needs an attention getter, and introduction and a creative ending. I need you to find and specifically use three different valid sources for the speech information. It is an informative speech, not a persuasive speech.