Author: best-essay

Develop a training plan for one of the role groups in the organization that will be responsible for implementing practice guidelines under the new organizational policy you presented in Assessment 3. Prepare an agenda for a two-hour workshop, and summarize your strategies for working with this group, the expected outcomes of the training, and why you chose this group to pilot the change.
Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Training and educating those within an organization who will be responsible for implementing and working with changes in organizational policy is a critical step in ensuring that prescribed changes have their intended benefit. A leader in a health care profession needs to be able to apply effective leadership, management, and educational strategies to ensure that colleagues and subordinates will be prepared to do the work that is asked of them. This assessment offers you an opportunity to develop and implement such strategies.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
o Competency 2: Analyze relevant health care laws and regulations and their applications and effects on processes within a health care team or organization.
Describe changes to policy or practice guidelines to be implemented in an organization.
o Competency 3: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.
Identify training activities and materials that support learning and skill development, and prepare a specific group to successfully apply a new policy or practice guidelines to its work.
Justify the importance of an institutional policy or practice guidelines to improve the quality of care or outcomes related to a specific group.
o Competency 5: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.
Develop strategies for engaging with a specific group to ensure buy in, support, and preparedness to implement changes in policy and practice guidelines.
Advocate for the importance of the role a specific group will play in implementing changes in policy and practice guidelines.
o Competency 6: Apply various methods of communicating with policy makers, stakeholders, colleagues, and patients to ensure that communication in a given situation is professional, clear, efficient, and effective.
Interpret complex policy considerations or practice guidelines for a specific group with respect and clarity.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
When trying to implement a change in how people will be doing their work, it is important to ensure that they not only understand what they are expected to do and how they should go about it, but also to create buy in so that stakeholders willingly embrace policy, process, and practice changes.
Consider a group of health care workers, in your current or prospective organization, for which you might employ selected training strategies to address internal policy or practice changes.
o What training strategies would you use?
o How will these strategies help the target group implement the internal policy or practice changes?
o Have those training strategies been applied successfully in a similar context?
o How might these strategies help to create buy in and support from the group?ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
In this assessment, you will build on the policy presentation work you completed in Assessment 3.
Preparation
Your policy proposal presentation secured buy in and support from the stakeholder group you addressed. They are enthusiastic about implementing your proposed policy and practice guidelines. In an effort to help ensure a smooth roll out and implementation of your proposal, senior leaders have asked you to create and lead a training session for one of the role groups in the organization that will be responsible for enacting the new policy and practices.
In addition, senior leaders have asked you to develop and submit a training plan for review and approval before conducting the requested training session. They have also requested that you cite 24 credible sources that support your proposed training strategies, your intended approach to generating buy in and support from the group, and your plans for working with the group to facilitate implementation of the policy and practice changes.
As outcomes of this training session, participants are expected to:
o Understand the organizational policy and practice guidelines to be implemented.
o Understand the importance of the policy to improving health care quality or outcomes.
o Understand that, as a group, they are key to successful implementation.
o Possess the necessary knowledge and skills for successful implementation.
Training Plan Requirements
Note: The tasks outlined below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide.
As key elements of your training plan, senior leaders have asked that you:
o Develop strategies for engaging with the selected role group to ensure the group’s buy in, support, and preparedness to implement the changes in policy and practice guidelines. In a brief summary:
Describe your evidence-based strategies for engaging with the group during the training session.
Explain how you will ensure the group’s buy in, support, and preparedness.
Explain why you chose this group to pilot your proposal.
o Identify the training activities and materials needed support learning and skill development and to prepare the group to successfully apply the new policy or practice guidelines to their work.
Create an annotated agenda and outline for a two-hour training workshop.
Explain how each proposed activity and individual item of training material in your workshop will support learning and skill development.
o Describe the policy and practice guidelines changes to be implemented.
How will these changes affect the group’s daily work routines and responsibilities?
What examples, activities, or materials could you provide to help illustrate or clarify the nature and scope of the changes in policy and practice guidelines?
o Justify the importance of the changes in policy or practice guidelines to improving the quality of care or outcomes that are related to this role group.
Why are these changes important?
How will these changes help improve the quality of care or outcomes?
How could you help to illustrate the importance of improved quality of care or outcomes for the role group you will be training?
o Advocate for the importance of the role the group will play in implementing the changes in policy and practice guidelines.
Why is the group’s buy in and support important in implementing the changes?
Why is this group’s work important in implementing the changes?
How could you help the group feel empowered by their involvement in implementing the changes?
o Interpret complex policy considerations or practice guidelines for the role group with respect and clarity.
Does your training plan clearly lay out the expected outcomes of training for this role group?
o Communicate your strategies for engaging and training the role group in a professional and persuasive manner.
Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
o Integrate relevant sources to support your arguments, correctly formatting source citations and references using current APA style.
Did you cite an additional 24 credible sources to support your strategies for engaging and training the role group? Suggested Resources
Training Strategies for Policy Implementation
This study evaluated differences in the implementation and results achieved with a variety of strategies.
o Dannapfel, P., Poksinska, B., & Thomas, K. (2014). Dissemination strategy for lean thinking in health care. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 27(5), 391404. THIS WILL BE IN ADDITIONAL FILES
This resource is helpful for understanding the consequences of introducing change, how to best implement new procedures and techniques, and how to evaluate success and to improve the quality of patient care.
o Grol, R., Wensing, M., Eccles, M., & Davis, D. (Eds.). (2013). Improving patient care: The implementation of change in health care (2nd ed.). Somerset, England: Wiley-Blackwell. THIS WILL BE IN ADDITIONAL FILES
Chapter 10, “Development and Selection of Strategies for Improving Patient Care.”
Chapter 11, “Dissemination of Innovations.”
Engaging Specific Groups in Policy and Practice Change
This study evaluates how the ways in which health care employees conceptualize patient-centered care affects their implementation of transformational initiatives, and will be helpful in developing strategies for specific groups.
o Fix, G. M., VanDeusen Lukas, C., Bolton, R. E., Hill, J. N., Mueller, N., LaVela, S. L., & Bokhour, B. G. (2018). Patient-centred care is a way of doing things: How healthcare employees conceptualize patient-centred care. Health Expectations, 21(1), 300307. THIS WILL BE IN ADDITIONAL FILES
This article provides an example of specific group engagement by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), which convened a health care innovation summit to inform their ACC Health Policy Statement that intends to advocate, inform, and guide health care policies and programs related to new health care innovations.
o Bhavnani, S. P., Parakh, K., Atreja, A., Druz, R., Graham, G. N., Hayek, S. S., . . . Shah, B. R. (2017). 2017 roadmap for innovationACC health policy statement on healthcare transformation in the era of digital health, big data, and precision health. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 70(21), 26962718. THIS WILL BE IN ADDITIONAL FILES
This article discusses data displays and four quality improvement tools as strategies for change initiatives specific to hospital intensive care units.
o Gershengorn, H. B., Kocher, R., & Factor, P. (2014). Management strategies to effect change in intensive care units: Lessons from the world of business part II: Quality-improvement strategies. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 11(3), 444453 THIS WILL BE IN ADDITIONAL FILES

Prepare a presentation of the policy proposal you developed in Assessment 2 for one of the stakeholder groups identified in your proposal. Inform the group about the future of organizational policy and practices, the current performance shortfalls, and the rationale for why the new policy and practices are needed. In addition, explain how the group will benefit from this change in order to obtain their buy in and support.
Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
An important aspect of change leadership is the ability to address diverse groups of stakeholders and create buy in and support for your ideas and proposals for change. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate and hone these skills.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
o Competency 1: Analyze the effects of health care policies, laws, and regulations on organizations, interprofessional teams, and personal practice.
Explain how a proposed change in institutional policy or practice guidelines related to an existing health care policy or law would affect a stakeholder group.
o Competency 3: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.
Propose an institutional policy or practice guidelines related to an existing local, state, or federal health care policy or law.
Explain how proposed change in policy or practice guidelines would improve the quality of work and outcomes for a particular stakeholder group.
o Competency 4: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, for health care policies and law for patients, organizations, and populations.
Interpret for stakeholders the relevant benchmark metrics that illustrate the need for a policy or practice guidelines.
o Competency 5: Develop strategies to work collaboratively with policy makers, stakeholders, and colleagues to address environmental (governmental and regulatory) forces.
Propose strategies for collaborating with a stakeholder group to implement and apply proposed institutional policy or practice guidelines related to a local, state, or federal health care policy or law.
o Competency 6: Apply various methods of communicating with policy makers, stakeholders, colleagues, and patients to ensure that communication in a given situation is professional, clear, efficient, and effective.
Apply persuasive and effective communication strategies when presenting to a group of stakeholders.CONTEXT
Improving quality and outcomes is a key focus for health care organizations. With a focus on quality, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publish publicly reported data online and update it quarterly, which allows patients to compare hospitals on a wide range of metrics. These metrics can also be used to inform policy changes at local, state, and federal levels.
It is important that health care leaders be able to clearly articulate policy positions and recommendations and garner buy in and support from stakeholder groups for policy and practice changes in their organizations. Unfortunately, there is often a lack of effective communication. Consequently, it is important for health care leaders, when leading change, to ensure that clear and open communication is ongoing and informative. QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
o How would you ensure that a policy proposal you are presenting to stakeholders is effective for obtaining their support?
o What strategic planning model would you adopt for setting compliance, quality improvement, and implementation goals for your proposed policy? ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
In this assessment, you will build on the policy proposal work you completed in Assessment 2.
Preparation
The policy proposal you developed was well received by senior leadership. As a result, they have asked you to put together a presentation for one of the stakeholder groups that you identified in your proposal.
Your deliverable for this assessment is a slide deck to support your presentation. You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or any other suitable presentation software. Please use the notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and reference your sources, as appropriate.
If you choose to use PowerPoint and need help designing your presentation, a link to Microsoft tutorials is provided in the Supplemental Resources. An additional PowerPoint guide is linked in the Resources.
The design and organization of your presentation will determine how many slides you need. However, in this instance, senior leaders have suggested that 812 slides is a reasonable expectation for this presentation.
Presentation Requirements
Note: The tasks outlined below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide.
In your presentation, in an order that makes sense for your presentation, senior leaders have asked that you:
o Interpret for stakeholders the relevant benchmark metrics that illustrate the need for a change in organizational policy and practice.
Provide a brief review of the metrics you are trying to improve for this stakeholder group, based on the dashboard benchmark evaluation you completed in Assessment 1.
Be sure to interpret the dashboard metrics in a way that is understandable and meaningful to the stakeholder group to which you are presenting.
o Explain your proposed change in policy and practice guidelines and how it relates to applicable local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.
What specific changes are you proposing?
How will these changes help drive performance improvement?
Why are policy and practice guidelines important, from an organizational standpoint?
What is the overall goal of the proposed policy or practice guidelines?
o Explain how your proposed change in policy or practice guidelines will affect the tasks and responsibilities of the stakeholder group to which you are presenting.
How might your proposal change what tasks the stakeholder group performs or how they currently perform them?
How might your proposal affect the stakeholder group’s workload?
How might your proposal alter the responsibilities of the stakeholder group?
How might your proposal improve working conditions for the stakeholder group?
o Explain how your proposed change in policy or practice guidelines will improve the quality of work and outcomes for the stakeholder group to which you are presenting.
How will your proposed changes improve the group’s quality of work?
How will your proposed change improve outcomes for the group?
How will these improvements enable the stakeholder group to be more successful?
o Explain your strategies for collaborating with the stakeholder group to implement your proposed change in policy or practice guidelines.
What role will the stakeholder group play in implementing your proposal?
How could the stakeholder group collaborate with you and others during the implementation of your proposal?
Why is the stakeholder group’s collaboration important to successful implementation of your proposal?
o Design your presentation to be persuasive and effective in communicating with the stakeholder group.
Is your presentation logically organized, clear, and professional?
Presentation Design
Being able to effectively address any audience is a necessary leadership skill. Remember that you are the speaker, not a projectionist. Your purpose is not to present a slide show. Your audience is there to listen to what you have to say, not read your slidesor worse, listen to you read them. Design your presentation slides to compliment and reinforce your message and engage your listeners.
The following tips will help you create presentation slides that work to your advantage:
o Focus on the content of your presentation and the development of your main points. Remember that your purpose is to deliver a message on ethics that is clear, well organized, and engaging.
o Consider your intended audience and how best to communicate effectively with them.
o Create slides that support your presentation. They should not be your presentation.
Use a professional presentation template, or one used in your organization.
Ensure that your slide background provides sufficient visual contrast for your text and graphics.
Avoid filling your slides with text. Use speaker notes to record the details you want to communicate to your audience.
Be judicious in your use of bulleted lists. Consider a separate slide for each point.
Use images and graphics, when appropriate, to illustrate information and make your points. Presentation slides are a visual medium. Images are more effective than text at capturing viewers’ attention.
Avoid using images that are simply decorative. They can be a visual distraction and do not contribute to your message.
Avoid using flashy slide transitions and animations. They can be both distracting and annoying. Keep your slide transitions consistent throughout the presentation.
Add a slide to the end of your presentation to prompt questions from the audience.RESOURCES Suggested Resources
Communicating and Collaborating With Stakeholders
This media simulation provides information on the preparation and communication steps that should be completed prior to delivering a presentation to a group of stakeholders. It also provides an opportunity to reflect on stakeholders’ wants and needs, as well as how to craft a message that will resonate with specific stakeholders.
o Building Buy-In and Communicating with Stakeholders | Transcript. THIS WILL BE IN ADDITIONAL FILES
This article explores Health in All Policies (HiAP) as a framework for stakeholder collaboration in the public health sector to help leaders incorporate the principles of health, well-being, and equity into policy development and implementation.
o Pepin, D., Winig, B. D., Carr, D., & Jacobson, P. D. (2017). Collaborating for health: Health in all policies and the law. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 45(S1), 6064. THIS WILL BE IN ADDITIONAL FILES
This study showed that there are different degrees of stakeholder acceptability between policy interventions and future funding options as well as perceptions of their feasibility.
o Tordrup, D., Angelis, A., & Kanavos, P. (2013). Preferences on policy options for ensuring the financial sustainability of health care services in the future: Results of a stakeholder survey. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 11(6), 639652. THIS WILL BE IN ADDITIONAL FILES
This study advocates for the use of research implementation strategies for promoting evidence-informed policy and management decisions in health care.
o Sarkies, M. N., Bowles, K.-A., Skinner, E. H., Haas, R., Lane, H., & Haines, T. P. (2017). The effectiveness of research implementation strategies for promoting evidence-informed policy and management decisions in healthcare: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 12(132), 120. THIS WILL BE IN ADDITIONAL FILES
o

Please refer to – Investigating White Collar Crime by Tom Bazley. Ph. D. (2008) and BAILOUT by Neil Barofsky An Inside Account of How Washington Abandoned Main Street While Rescuing Wall Street when referencing question responses. Unfortunately I do not have the book. Each response should be no less than a full paragraph with full response to the question. Question 1 Barring ( actually it is called “Debarring”) or suspending a vendor, contractor or supplier for fraudulent activity is a tool that is intended not only to punish the wrongdoer but also to deter others from acting in a similar fashion. How effective a deterrent do you think such actions are and who is likely to be deterred? Question 2 Why is it that some Inspector General offices have the power to subpoena documents from the party that possesses such documents even though the documents may contain incriminatory language (generally speaking), yet the same I.G. office cannot subpoena the actual individual to come into the IG office for questioning or to give testimony? Question 3 What do you see as the most serious threat to an IG’s independence? Question 4 What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of search warrants vs. subpoenas? Question 5 Why is there no 5th Amendment protection concerning written word of incriminatory documents written by a target/ suspect/ defendant (generally speaking) when such protection would exist regarding the spoken word …the right to remain silent etc… Question 6 Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bailout detail Barofsky’s frustration in attempting to get a prosecutorial agency to actually prosecute the parties whose criminal activity the office of the IG has uncovered. What is your opinion of this limitation on the IG’s office to act as an investigator and recommender of action rather than being the actual enforcer? Can you see any advantage for IG’s in playing this more limited role?
Hide

How and why did national politics change between 1820 and 1850? What caused these changes? What were the ramifications of these changes on our nations development?

Section III. Short Essay Questions.
This section consists of eight (8) short answer questions. You are only required to respond to one (1) of the eight questions below. Your response to each of your one chosen questions will be worth a maximum of ten (10) points. Your thoughtful, organized and well-written responses must be in proper paragraphs, a minimum of 2-3 paragraphs for each response and must contain complete and coherent sentences.
C. Socrates admonished everyone to know thyself. Compare/contrast Aristotles view of the human person with the Christian view of the self. Assess which view most fully or accurately represents the truth about the human person.
D. Explain the importance of entelechy to Aristotles Efficient Cause and to the Good Life in general.
E. Explain how Aristotle viewed happiness and the defining importance of virtue and vice to Aristotle in that regard.
F. Explain the importance of the Simile of the Sun to Plato’s philosophy and describe the purposes and relationship between the Sun and the Good.
G. Explain the philosophical concept of ontology and describe how two philosophers studied asserted an ontological argument to demonstrate the existence of God.
H. Explain what Natural Theology is and explain how the concept is used by St. Thomas Aquinas in asserting his arguments for Gods existence by Gradation or by Design.

Watch the entire BBC documentary on Iran and the West (part 1 – 3; see youtube for parts 2 and 3). The write up should be a minimum of four pages (double space). Proper citation, using APA or Chicago or MLA should be adhered to (including but not restricted to citations from the documentary and the textbook).More importantly, use the points below as a rough outline for your analysis. You may or may not follow them sequentially – they are just help organize your response. What is not acceptable is bullet points responses.As an analytical exercise, feel free to demonstrate your insight, argue for a particular point of view, and provide support to back up your claims.1. Summarize what you consider to be the core US foreign policy. 2. Based on the documentary, provide a brief political and diplomatic history of US-Iranian relations. 3. Based on your reading of the chapter on Domestic and Foreign policy (chapter 14), describe the extent to which the US has been consistent or inconsistent in its relationship with Iran.4. Based on the documentary, did the US make the right calls before and in the immediate aftermath of the Iranian revolution? If not, where did US go wrong? Explain your answer.5. What lessons, if any, should be taking from this episode in US-Iranian relations? Could such lessons be generalized in an effort to understand American foreign policy?

With regard to available income streams and commercial possibilities within the performing arts environment, compare and contrast the potential opportunities open to the creative music artist of 1999, to that of the creative music artist of 2018. Your response should offer scenarios for each era and consider the degree of ownership, agency and scope for individual control of copyright/IP which are/would have been applicable. The discussion offered should also engage with relevant theories and concepts as a means of further articulating the key issues that emerge from such a comparison. The question asks you to compare and contrast two periods where the music-creative environment was framed by changing forms of IP/Copyright legislation and/or free market activity. The different business models discernible during the two periods can also be said to symbolize a paradigm shift in monetising opportunities for the creative musician. Your response should briefly articulate why this change took place, and then provide a comparative analysis of the two periods, by endeavouring to explore if the creative-musician is better served by the IP/Copyright environment and scope for monetising their creative output in 1999 or in 2018. Rather than trying to cover every aspect of the evident changes between the two eras, focus on only three of the key elements (such as Record Deals, Branding & Sponsorship, Live Music etc.). By providing a hierarchy of the significant factors that underpin each element, this process allows you to evaluate both periods in a linear manner. This comparison should encompass the significance that IP/Copyright held during each era and, as a matter of course, engage with key academic texts, as well as informative articles from reliable sources, all of which enable incisive analysis. This engagement should then be articulated within the discussion that provides a critical evaluation-comparison of the two periods. A clear mapping process should also be included within the Introduction, which sets out the path which the response will follow, along the lines of, This essay will provide a critical evaluation-analysis of three key factors which show that the creative musician of 2018 is better served by the fragile nature of contemporary Copyright/IP legislation. Each section should contain some form of projection as to what will be contained in the discussion to follow, as well as being briefly summarised, with these summaries being encapsulated within the Conclusion of the essay. This process not only facilitates a flow for the discussion, but also accommodates a narrative that functions to engage the reader. As mentioned, all points made within the discussion should be substantiated by evidence from key academic or informed sources, and the dialogue should be persuasive, but objective, as opposed to opinionated and subjective. Please consider the three topics I chose (650 words each) for the 1999-2018 comparative analysis: 1) Music Piracy: how the phenomenon of piracy has altered the numbers for recorded music sales. A comparison between the modalities, physical means and revenue streams of music sales until 1999 (with explicit numerical indications), and today’s principal monetisation opportunities for contemporary creators’ remuneration. Also, mention how piracy has gradually been integrated into our common sense as a legitimate way to possess and consume music. 2) Music Licensing: how agreements have changed for the synchronisation of copyrighted music. Wheather royalties rates and collecting modalities have changed. Advent of 360 deals and consequences on music licensing. Shift in the role of licensing as the only chance for lesser-know artists to gain notoriety. 3) Music Plagiarism: how its legislation has changed,whether it has increased with music piracy, introduction of Fair Use. Please contact me before considering to change any of the previous topics.

The post should be well constructed and free of grammatical errors, and be between 250 and 300 words. You do not need to undertake outside research in order to answer the question; although you may if you like. It is a wise strategy to create your response as a Word document (that way, you have a copy for yourself). You must cite your sources both in your response and below it (Bibliography), using the Chicago Style citation format. Students who do not cite their work can expect to receive only a minimum grade of 60% for this assignment. It is expected that our textbook by Shi and Tindall will be a source and should likewise be accessed and cited. Late responses will be penalized at 5% per day.Choose one (1) question. What major challenges faced the federal government in reconstructing the South after the Civil War during the period from 1865 to 1877?
How and why did Reconstruction policies change over time?
In what ways did white and black southerners react to Reconstruction?
What was the significance of Reconstruction for the nation’s future?

Your first paper assignments asked you to write interpretative essays. This assignment asks for the same kind of literary interpretation. However, in addition to a close reading of the literary text, you are also required to incorporate at least three secondary sources into your essay.
The topic of your essay is open.
Acceptable forms of secondary research include: scholarly articles (many of which are available through the MLA International Bibliography on the librarys webpage) and scholarly books (the library has a good selection, but Google Books is also a wonderful resource).
Please cite secondary sources using MLA style guidelines.Describe and compare the role of females in Shakespeare books
Hamlet
Romeo and Juliet
Othello
etc.Your essay will be assessed based on the following:
Your goal is to persuade the reader that your interpretation is correct. Therefore, the essay should have a clear thesis followed by supporting paragraphs in which you demonstrate the validity of your interpretation.
Does the essay critically analyze the text(s)? The essay should attempt to shed light on an important aspect of the text. As a result, your goal is to analyze and interpret the text, rather than to summarize it. An analysis considers relationships, patterns, thematic trajectory, and consequences of actions and ideas within the text in order to demonstrate the validity of ones argument.
Does the essay use textual evidence? In supporting your argument, you should use examples from the text to make your point. Quote and discuss specific textual examples that illustrate your point and support your argument.
Does the essay engage with other scholars and incorporate at least three secondary resources?

Write a 3 page research paper talking about crimes of 3 categories social categories (upperclass crimes; middle class crimes/working class crimes And lower class crimes.the research paper will have to have more then 4 credible sources. and example of each category of crimes.