describe the positive results if society does what u think is right and the negative results if society dsn’t.

it’s a persuasive paper on any topic of your choice. it (i’m) surpposed to persuade an audience to agree with my opinion( it shouldn’t be a topic that everyone will automaticaly agree with) let it be something debatable.cite atleast one authority. the introduction to include a thesis statement that clearly expresses ua opinion on the issue.the nxt paragraphs should have evidence(facts, statistics, expert testimony, personal experiences, or 1st hand observation) that support ua opinion. include also one quotation in which u cite an authority whose statement supports ua stand(correctly cited in APA format.you must use a minimum of 2 credible sources) the last paragraph should reaffirm ua main point. you may please remember to use logical appeals(logos) emotional appeals(pathos) and ethical appeals (ethos) to argue your point. at the end of essay include a reference page using correct APA format. thanx

Law school admission presentation letter

Applicants must submit a 500 word essay referred to as the Personal Statement.What is the purpose of the Personal Statement?The Personal Statement is your moment to showcase the unique aspects of your motivations, your background, and your personality that make you a compelling candidate for our program.The Admissions Committee relies on the Personal Statement to understand the factors that motivate you to pursue a legal education, the particular meaning that the study of law holds for you, and the reasons for your interest in our program. In addition, your Personal Statement shows the Admissions Committee your writing style, your ability to present your ideas in English and/or French, and your maturity and judgment as shown through your writing.What is the Admissions Committee looking for in reading your Personal Statement?The Admissions Committee is interested in hearing why you want to study law, why you are interested in McGill in particular, and what you will bring to our learning community. The Committee looks for indicators of intellectual curiosity, community engagement, political/social insight, leadership skills, ability to work with others, openness to diversity (cultural, linguistic and otherwise), maturity, judgment, and potential for development through opportunity or adversity.The Personal Statement should be a product of your own reflection. We truly value a wide range of backgrounds, identities, and future aspirations. Whether you wish to become a practicing lawyer or you have other ideas about your career path following a legal education, your application, and specifically your Personal Statement, should show thoughtful consideration of your reasons for studying law, and at our Faculty in particular.Practical TipsDo some research on our law faculty and others. Law faculties all tend to have their own strengths and particularities. Doing some research may help you identify and articulate why you are interested in studying at McGill in particular.Read our Admissions Policies to get a sense of what we look for in our admitted students.Before writing, reflect critically on your motivations, your interests, and your convictions, and their connection to our program. The Personal Statement should not be used as a vehicle for narrating or repeating your CV. You have a limited amount of writing space; make it count. Do not repeat aspects of your candidacy that the Committee will see in other documents unless these aspects are directly linked to your interest in studying law at McGill. Be authentic. Be yourself. Don’t be afraid to be original, but be careful not to sacrifice substance.You may submit your Personal Statement in English, French, or both. It is important that you write the statement in whatever of the two language(s) you are most comfortable expressing yourself. It is not recommended to use the Personal Statement as a way to establish your bilingualism unless you are very comfortable expressing yourself in the other language.

explain the cultural challenges in Russia.

APA style a. Cultural Challenges -Language -Religions: practiced and their impact on advertising -Tradition: (manners) appropriate ways of behaving, speaking, and dressing. -Customs: habits or ways of behaving in specific circumstances that are passed down through generations -Individualistic or collectivist culture: attitudes Provide a minimum one sentence response for each element in the outline along with a MINIMUM of two resources (the Global Edge resource can serve as one of your sources) for your paper.

Analyze the differential by using the pertinent findings from the history and physical to argue for or against a diagnosis.

Date of visit: November 7, 2017 A 56-year-old Caucasian female presents to the office today with complaints of fatigue. Upon further questioning you discover the following subjective information regarding the chief complaint. History of Present Illness Onset “about 2-3 months” Location Generalized Duration Constant Characteristics Progressively worsening since onset, feels tired all of the time, sleeps 8hrs per night but does not feel well rested. “No energy to do anything I normally can do” Aggravating factors Exertion Relieving factors None identified Treatments None Severity Denies pain; missed 1 day of work 2 weeks ago because “couldn’t get out of bed” Review of Systems (ROS) Constitutional Denies fever, chills, or recent illnesses. +5lb. weight gain since last visit 6 months ago. Eyes No visual changes or diploplia ENT Denies ear pain, coryza, rhinorrhea, or ST. Had tonsillectomy as child Denies snoring or history of sleep apnea. Neck Denies lymph node tenderness or swelling Chest Denies cough, SOB, DOE or wheezing Heart Denies chest pain Abdomen Denies N/V/D. + Constipation Endocrine Denies polyuria, polydipsia. + cold intolerance. Menopause status x 5 yrs. Skin No changes in skin, hair or nails Psych Reports worsening of depressive symptoms but thinks it is because she is so “unproductive” lately and tired all of the time. -Suicidal or homicidal thoughts. Sleeping 8-9hrs per night (no changes), but not feeling rested. Musculoskeletal Generalized weakness and intermittent muscles cramping in calves History Medications Multivitamin, B-Complex, Prozac 20mg, Bisoprolol-HCTZ 2.5mg/6.25mg, Calcium 500mg + Vit D3 400IU. PMH HTN, Depression, Postmenopausal status PSH Tonsillectomy Allergies Iodine dyes Social Married; Works full time as office manager of an internal medicine office; 2 kids (grown) Habits Denies cigarettes or drug use. +Occasional glass of wine (1-2 per month). FH Maternal GM & GF deceased with CHF, T2DM and HTN; Mother alive (age 82) +HTN, +Hyperlipidemia, +T2DM; Father alive (age 84) +HTN, +Hyperlipidemia, +T2DM, +ASHD (s/p CABG 2 years ago). Also had +CVA at time of CABG (work-up revealed +DVT and +PFO; remains anticoagulated); Oldest child (26) with seasonal allergies Youngest child (24) with Bipolar depression and ADHD, and anxiety Physical exam reveals the following: Physical Exam Constitutional Middle aged Caucasian female alert, oriented and cooperative VS Temp-98.2, P-74, R-16, BP 146/95, Height: 5’7″, Weight: 180 pounds Head Normocephalic, atraumatic Eyes PERRLA Ears Tympanic membranes gray and intact with light reflex noted. Nose Nares patent. Nasal turbinates without swelling. Nasal drainage is clear. Throat Oropharynx moist, no lesions or exudate. Surgically removed tonsils bilaterally. Teeth in good repair, no cavities. Neck Neck supple. No lymphadenopathy. Thyroid midline, small and firm without palpable masses. Cardiopulmonary Heart S1 and s2 noted, no murmurs, noted. Lungs clear to auscultation bilaterally. Respirations unlabored. No pedal edema Abdomen Soft, non-tender. BS active Skin Skin overall dry, hair coarse and thick, nails without ridging, pitting or discoloration Psych Mood pleasant and appropriate. Musculoskeletal Strength full throughout Neuro DTRs 2+ at biceps, 1+ at knees and ankles Briefly and concisely summarize the H&P findings as if you were presenting it to your preceptor using the pertinent facts from the case. Use shorthand where possible and approved medical abbreviations. Avoid redundancy and irrelevant information. Provide a differential diagnosis (minimum of 3) which might explain the patient’s chief complaint along with a brief statement of pathophysiology for each. Rank the differential in order of most likely to least likely. Identify any additional tests and/or procedures that you feel is necessary or needed to help you narrow your differential. All testing decisions must be supported with an evidence-based medicine (EBM) argument as to why it is necessary or pertinent in this case. If no testing is indicated or needed, you must also support this decision with EBM. Note: Please ensure you all questions and follow all given instructions in the attached grading. Also, ensure you follow the given instructions in the attached file “Expectations for use of scholarly sources”
Hide

This is a critical review of the listed article. Please see paper details.

After reading thoroughly the linked article, you need to: (1) summarize the authors explanations (objective description); (2) construct your reflection on the reading (subjective analyses) http://www.csiss.org/SPACE/workshops/2007/UCSB/docs/ertmer_newby1993.pdf (Links to an external site.) Grading criteria: command of topic (5pts); analytic development (5 pts); organization (5 pts); syntactic variety and language (5 pts); & control of mechanics (5 pts):

d.) How do you think this can impact a business specifically in the hiring area?

1.) Please watch: Paradox of Choice (Links to an external website)(https://www.ted.com/talks/barry_schwartz_on_the_paradox_of_choice/transcript) Write a short (4 paragraph) essay answering the following questions. a.) Is there such a thing as too many choices?
b.) What do you think of the Paradox of Choice?
c.) Do you think Social Media creates a bigger Paradox of Choice?