Define one of these terms in an extended definition: loyalty, vanity, motivation, ethics.

Use your extended definition to say something fresh and relevant about this abstract and commonly used term. For your chosen topic, you should add to or work against the ready, accepted definition. You might, for example, decide that the usual definition of vanity is too narrow, and that you can extend the definition to include actions or attitudes that you feel society should be more concerned about than it is.I also need to submit one draft (slightly different) from the final essay, this why I’m assuming the final project would have around 1375 words (draft + final essay).

Research and develop a plan for how you think the prison system should be organized in the future.

Use information from both the textbook and from outside resources such as the Internet and library resources.Step 2
Create a PowerPoint presentation.
Create a five- to eight-slide PowerPoint presentation. Your presentation should describe what you think the prison system should look like in the future. Give thought to the various elements of prisons and the subcultures that might exist in prisons. Also, consider the future goals of the criminal justice system and any alternative programs for offenders that might be established. Include speaker notes for each slide.

How does Harris define “discourse” and “discourse community” in his article?

ome questions to consider for your responses:HarrisAccording to Harris, how can a person feel both a part of and separate from a community all at once? How do you see this in your own life?

How do the terms “interpretative communities” and “speech communities” help enhance the concept of “discourse communities?”
What roles do “borders” and “privilege” play in community and student writing?
What are some discourse communities that you are a part of? What are some insights from Harris that you see in your own life?
Writing Style Best Practices: How does Harris use ethos/pathos/logos in his argument to convince us that awareness of discourse community is important?
ObarskiWhat are important features of “discourse communities” according to Obarski’s experience?
How does Obarski’s description of bagging at Publix Supermarket demonstrate the rhetorical analysis strategies we studied in Unit 2?
What new ideas does Obarski bring to the table in regards to research, rhetorical analysis, writing, etc.?
What is the value of analyzing a discourse community, according to Obarski?
Writing Style Best Practices: How does Obarski bring different types of research together to support their argument?

Using the two job resources below find 2 internship postings that you are interested in:https://careerservices.wvu.edu/http://www.careershift.com/?sc=westvirginia (access code: wvsenior)

For the assignment write a 1-2 page paper that includes the following information:Points of interest about each company (what does the company do? mission statement? Locations)
A description of intern duties.
The materials required with application.
The deadlines for applications.
Why are you interested in these particular internships?
Compare your qualifications to the job posting. Are you a good match? If so, how, and if not, write about what you can do to improve your qualification.
Include a screenshot of the company homepage.I can do $40 for this

What claim is Pollan supporting in the essay? What type of claim is it?

In our textbook, Elements of Argument :A Text and a Reader, actively read, “Chapter 1: Approaches to Argument”(Pp. 3 – 33). Pay close attention to The Toulmin Model on pages 24-28.
Read Michael Pollan’s essay “Food Fight” in Chapter 21 about our topic, Food Matters in our textbook (Pp. 513-516).
Now, practice The Toulmin Model. (You may refer to the annotated article “In Health, We’re Not No. 1″by Robert J. Samuelson in chapter 1 on pages 29-31 as an example) Analyze Michael Pollen’s essay, “Food Fight” by answering the following questions:

What is Pollan’s primary type of support?
Do you find Pollan’s argument convincing? Why? Why not?

What reasons to trust, believe, and feel were given for the argument?

The assignment is for English but it pertains to environmental issues such as food waste. This is an rhetorical analysis on an that i have picked out. The instructions for this assignment goes as follows:
The rhetorical analysis must use the main text and supplementary text to answer questions such as:Who wrote the argument?
In what context was the argument written and who was it written for?
Where was the argument published or viewed?

What evidence was given to support the reasons?
Based on the analysis, how effective was this argument for its intended readers?
The rhetorical analysis will be 1,000-1,750 words long, typed on double-spaced pages and use MLA formatting and citation.You must use the terms from ‘controversies’ in your analysis! You must identify the component parts of reasons to trust (knowledge/appropriate response/community membership/demonstration of goodwill), to feel (images/values/language), and to believe (proof/conclusion/assumption).Provide the context in which this viewpoint argument was made (the audience, the circumstances, or the speaker)/////You must answer questions such as:/Who wrote the argument?//In what context was the argument written and who was it written for?//Where was the argument published or viewed//Does this venue have a certain bias?//Have you done research the author and/or the media outlet?Outcome Evidence
What evidence was given to support the reasons? What different kinds of evidence did your source use? You must use the proper terms from the ‘controversies’ book.This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Overall evaluation of the argument
Based on the analysis, how effective was this argument for its intended readers? Is it strong or weak? Why? What parts are weak? What parts are strong?This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Format, Style, Citations
Have you properly used MLA style? Are you sources cited correctly? Do you have a bibliography? Is your writing clear and free of typos?

Examine the background of your selected leader and explain how he developed the skills to be a transformational leader.

Determine the key transformational qualities the leader possesses.
Based on your research, explain the impact the leader has had on his or her organization.

What are the components of being a transformational leader? Thinking about yourself, determine if you are a transformational leader based on these components.
Next, examine your potential as a transformational leader and suggest ways for you to develop this type of leadership skill. What would need to happen in order to become a transformational leader?
Directions:
Write a three-part essay (i.e., an essay that includes an introduction paragraph, the essays body, and a conclusion paragraph) that addresses the assignments guide questions. Do not address the questions using a question and answer format.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
Be three to five pages in length, which does not include the title page, abstract or required reference page, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles unless the assignment calls for more.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.