Author: best-essay

Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum. As a nursing leader you will be required to implement many proposals. This is an exercise to help you learn the processes or steps required for implementation. You may have created a plan in a previous course, such as BSN415 Management Orientation Proposal, on the job or have an idea for such a plan. This assignment represents an implementation action plan. Include an analysis of your action plan to present the proposal and the process for implementation at the site for which it was developed or your current place of employment. You will be addressing key elements of implementation according to the rubric requirements; however, please note that there is no expectation that you will implement this plan. If you are using a plan from a previous course, you must make significant changes to your paper or cite yourself. Using previously graded work is self-plagiarism. Address the following points: Summary of the plan you wish to implement and the clearly defined location Identify 3 outcomes for the proposed plan Propose an action plan with timeline for presenting and implementing the plan Identify the measures of success used to evaluate the effectiveness of the plan Grading Rubric Competency 10 points 5 points 1 points 0 points Total Points Develops a well-organized introduction paragraph discussing the importance of developing proposals/plans. Ends the paragraph with a clearly worded purpose statement. Develops a well-organized introduction paragraph discussing the importance of developing proposals/plans. Ends the paragraph with a clearly worded purpose statement. Introductory paragraph minimally describes the importance of developing proposals/plans. Some details are missing. The purpose statement is unclear or not identified. Introductory paragraph does not explain the importance of Some content is missing. No purpose statement. No paper submitted or content missing. /10 Provides a detailed summary of the proposed plan for implementation Provides a detailed summary of the proposed plan for implementation Gives a general description of the proposed plan for implementation Vaguely (lists) describes the proposed plan for implementation Does not describes the proposed plan or no paper submitted /10 Identifies 3 outcomes for the proposed plan Identifies 3 outcomes for the proposed plan Identifies 2 outcomes for the proposed plan Identifies 1 outcomes for the proposed plan Does not identify outcomes for the proposed plan or no paper submitted /10 Describes in detail the benefits of the plan to the institution Describes in detail the benefits of the plan to the institution Describes some of the benefits of the plan to the institution Vaguely (lists) describes the benefits of the plan to the institution Does not describe the benefits of the plan to the institution or no paper submitted /10 Discusses in detail the resources needed to implement your plan and the potential budget requirements Discusses in detail the resources needed to implement your plan and the potential budget requirements Identifies some of the resources needed to implement your plan and the potential budget requirements Vaguely (lists) discusses the resources needed to implement your plan and the potential budget requirements Does not identify the resources needed and the potential budget requirements or no paper submitted /10 Proposes a detailed timeline for implementing the plan, with rationale and discusses who will be involved in the proposal and the implementation phases Proposes a detailed timeline for implementing the plan, with rationale. Who will be involved in the proposal and the implementation phases Proposes a timeline for implementing the plan, weak rationale or does not discuss who will be involved in the proposal and the implementation phases Proposes a timeline for implementing the plan, no rationale or does not discuss who will be involved in the proposal and the implementation phases Does not propose a timeline for implementing the plan. Content missing. /10 Identifies 4 specific measures of success used to evaluate the effectiveness of the plan Identifies 4 specific measures of success used to evaluate the effectiveness of the plan Identifies 2-3 specific measures of success used to evaluate the effectiveness of the plan Identifies 1 specific measures of success used to evaluate the effectiveness of the plan Does not identify specific measures of success used to evaluate the effectiveness of the plan or no paper submitted /10 Ends paper with a separate paragraph (with Conclusion as heading) and summarizes key points in paper. Ends paper with a separate paragraph (with Conclusion as heading) and summarizes key points in paper. Ends paper with a separate paragraph (with Conclusion as heading). Conclusion paragraph is unclear. Some key points are missing. Conclusion paragraph is missing some content. No paper submitted or conclusion is missing. /10 Competency 5 points 2 points 1 point 0 points Organization Organization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic. Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support. Organization minimally effective; problems in approach, sequence, support and transitions. Organization does not meet requirements. /5 Grammar Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English. Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good mostly consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understanding. Grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage distracting and often interfere with meaning or understanding. Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage interfere with understanding. /5 Competency 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points References References are relevant, authoritative and contemporary. Adequate references. Minimal use of appropriate references. Poor use and/or selection of references not relevant. /3 Competency 7 points 3 points 1 point 0 points APA Format Demonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA. Minimal APA errors. Many APA errors. Complete lack of understanding. /7 Total Points Possible /100
Hide

Please write about Hurricane Maria (Puerto RICO,2017) and the medias response to the natural disaster, and why they ignored the aftermath of the hurricane. This specific natural disaster did not get nearly as much coverage as any other hurricane , including Harvey and irma that occurred just before it. why does the media ignore hurricane Maria ? Please use 3 outside sources to support your argument. ( I found many google articles on why the media pays attention to some natural disasters over others , and specifically why they ignored hurricane Maria , including trump)

2. Compare and contrast two cultures using information contained at http://www.geert-hofstede.com/hofstede_dimensions.php (If the Hofstede website is not working, please do your best with the summary information in the book, or other sources you may find). 3. Use Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity as the foundation to form an opinion concerning whether the developing global economy will cause ethics and social responsibility to become more similar or more distinct across cultures? Be certain to explain why and how and provide examples.

Write a Persuasive essay, that people should have the right to die.

You are writing a Classification/Division essay about a Discourse Community that you are a member of or were a member of in the past. The discourse community is based on a researcher named Swales ideas and has 6 areas of division. Common Goal Methods of Intercommunication Feedback/Correction Types/Roles Jargon Experts/Novices In your paper, you will have a minimum of 7 paragraphs. Remember to write your paragraphs in the order that is given. Introduction: Your introduction should include: A hook to introduce how you became a part of the discourse community A short history of how you became a part of the discourse community The goal for your discourse community. The goal of the discourse community should be the last sentence in your introduction paragraph as it is the thesis. *You SHOULD include I- language or personal pronouns (I, you, we, he, she, etc.) in the introduction. Body: The body starts with #2 of Swales discourse community criteria. In the body there should be at least 5 paragraphs. These questions are guiding questions. Do not respond to them directly. Think of how to incorporate the questions into your paragraphs. You SHOULD NOT include I- language or personal pronouns (I, you, we, he, she, etc.) in the Body: Methods of Intercommunication How do you communicate in the community verbally, phone, e-mail, text, or social media? Why and how do these communication methods differ? For example, when do you text as opposed to e-mail? Why? Feedback/Correction How do members of the community get better? Are there meetings, conferences, reading materials, chat rooms, YouTube, etc? What do you do if someone does something wrong or right? Are there rewards? Are there penalties? Types/Roles What are the different types or roles within your community? For example, if it were a sports team, what positions are played? If it is a group, who is in the group and how would you describe their role? What are their responsibilities? For each role/position you name, you need to give details and descriptions of what they do that supports the goal. Jargon Is another word for slang. You must first list 5 or phrases that are used in your discourse community. Highlight them with either bold, italics, or quotations. For example, tattoo gun, tattoo gun or tattoo gun. Experts/Novices How do you know if someone is an expert or a novice? What does someone have to do to become an expert? What are errors or rookie mistakes that novices make? Conclusion: The final paragraph of the paper should include: The most important aspect(s) of your community Your final thoughts about being in a discourse community. This should be around 4 sentences. DO NOT include new information! REMINDERS: Include a hook in the introduction. Use personal pronouns (I, you, we, he, she, etc.) After the introduction paragraph, do not use personal pronouns (I, you, we, he, she, etc.) If you do, use them extremely sparingly. You SHOULD include subheadings. You do not have to include them. You MUST write in the categories in order. You MUST include an outline with the final draft.
Hide

Define study objectives and hypothesis (3 points) Define variables to measure (include operational definitions) (3 points) Decide on a target population (3 points) How will you recruit them?Select appropriate research strategy (3 points) Detail how you will carry out the study (5 points) What would you hope to learn from the results? (3 points)

Assignment: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies Critiquing the validity and robustness of research featured in journal articles provides a critical foundation for engaging in evidence-based practice. In Weeks 5 and 6, you explored quantitative research designs. In Week 7, you will examine qualitative and mixed methods research designs. For this Assignment, which is due by Day 7 of Week 7, you critique a quantitative and either a qualitative or a mixed methods research study and compare the types of information obtained in each. To prepare: Select a health topic of interest to you that is relevant to your current area of practice. The topic may be your Course Portfolio Project or a different topic of your choice. Using the Walden Library, locate two articles in scholarly journals that deal with your portfolio topic: These need to be single studies not systematic or integrative reviews (including meta-analysis and metasynthesis). You may use research articles from your reference list. If you cannot find these two types of research on your portfolio topic, you may choose another topic. Locate the following documents in this weeks Learning Resources to access the appropriate templates, which will guide your critique of each article: Critique Template for a Qualitative Study Critique Template for a Quantitative Study Critique Template for a Mixed-Methods Study Consider the fields in the templates as you review the information in each article. Begin to draft a paper in which you analyze the two research approaches as indicated below. Reflect on the overall value of both quantitative and qualitative research. If someone were to say to you, Qualitative research is not real science, how would you respond? To complete this Assignment: Complete the two critiques using the appropriate templates. Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following: Contrast the types of information that you gained from examining the two different research approaches in the articles that you selected. Describe the general advantages and disadvantages of the two research approaches featured in the articles. Use examples from the articles for support. Formulate a response to the claim that qualitative research is not real science. Highlight the general insights that both quantitative and qualitative studies can provide to researchers. Support your response with references to the Learning Resources and other credible sources. As you complete this Assignment, remember to: Submit your paper to Grammarly and SafeAssign through the Walden Writing Center. Based on the Grammarly and SafeAssign reports, revise your paper as necessary. Reminder: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The School of Nursing Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available from the Walden University website found in this weeks Learning Resources). All papers submitted must use this formatting. Combine all three parts of this assignment into one Word document including both critique templates and the narrative with your references. Submit this combined document. Learning Resources Note: To access this weeks required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus. Required Readings Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Chapter 21, Qualitative Research Design and Approaches This chapter introduces qualitative research designs. It provides an overview of the different types of qualitative research and then describes each one in greater detail, outlining how and when they should be used. Houghton, C. E., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2010). Ethical challenges in qualitative research: Examples from practice. Nurse Researcher, 18(1), 1525. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article explores ethical challenges associated with qualitative research. Specifically, the authors examine the challenges of informed consent procedures, the researcher-participant relationship, risk-benefit ratio, confidentiality, and the dual role of the nurse-researcher. Pringle, J., Hendry, C., & McLafferty, E. (2011). Phenomenological approaches: Challenges and choices. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 718. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article examines the dilemmas faced by a researcher looking for appropriate methods and approaches for investigating the experiences of stroke survivors. In addition, this article reviews the challenges of using phenomenology as a research method. Ryan-Nicholls, K. D., & Will, C. I. (2009). Rigour in qualitative research: Mechanisms for control. Nurse Researcher, 16(3), 7085. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. The authors of this article provide recommendations for improving the control mechanisms of methodological rigor in qualitative research methods. The text establishes the basis of criticism on the rigor of qualitative work, ways of demonstrating methodological rigor, and the definition of rigor. Smith, J., Bekker, H., & Cheater, F. (2011). Theoretical versus pragmatic design in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 3951. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article assesses the benefits of using a generic qualitative approach to design studies for understanding user and caregiver perspectives. The authors assess these benefits in the context of a qualitative study that focused on parents experience of living with children with hydrocephalus. Walker, W. (2011). Hermeneutic inquiry: Insights into the process of interviewing. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 1927. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article examines the process of interviewing from a research perspective. The authors supply personal and theoretical insights into using the research interview, along with a guide to the practicalities of interviewing. Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202207. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article highlights the importance of qualitative evidence to mental health clinicians. The author stresses that critically appraising evidence is crucial to the EBP process and provides guidelines for appraisal. Wuest, J. (2011). Are we there yet? Positioning qualitative research differently. Qualitative Health Research, 21(7), 875883. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article focuses on the shifting role of qualitative research in the past two decades. The author discusses the merits and detriments of concrete distinctions, the hurdles of flexibility and convergence, and the need to develop a complete research toolbox for improving health. Media Laureate Education (Producer). (2012l). Qualitative and mixed methods research designs. Baltimore, MD: Author. Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 8 minutes. This video features Dr. Kristen Mauks overview of how she applied qualitative research designs and methods to her doctoral dissertation work. Dr. Mauk explains the advantages of qualitative research as well as strategies for increasing credibility when conducting qualitative or mixed methods research.

Create three written communications one for each of three audiences you identified using the appropriate type of writing for each context. (Each written communication should be approximately 2 paragraphs long).
Explain why different types of writing are appropriate for different audiences/stakeholders. Provide specific examples.

Case Study for Issues in K-12 Education
The materials in this case study are a combination of authentic public domain
documents and simulated documents that were created specifically for the case
study that draw on authentic research and data from government and scholarly
sources, and from the opinions of experts in the field.
The mention of your state is a generic reference intended to be inclusive for any
background.
Scenario
Your state is considering a required set of education standards that all schools
must adopt. You have been nominated to serve on the statewide committee to
inform the legislature as to which standards, if any, should be adopted. You will
have the opportunity to take a stand on the following issue; does a set of required
standards improve or limit education for all students (e.g., general education
students, special education, English language learners, gifted learners) in state
schools?
Consider the following questions: How can standards be implemented to improve
the quality of education for all students in all levels, and types, of classrooms
(e.g., general education, special education, vocational)? Is it more effective to
adopt district standards, state-specific standards, or national standards?
Once you decide which standards to adopt, what materials, supports, and
training will be needed to implement them? How do different stakeholders (e.g.,
policy makers, government leaders, principals, teachers with various specialties
and points of view, students, parents) feel about the issue of standards adoption
and implementation?

Assignment 1: DiscussionWorking with BudgetsBudgets are the driving force behind all organizations. Whether a manufacturing organization, or a service organization such as a medical or public accounting firm, budgets are used not only for planning purposes but also for performance monitoring and evaluation of areas within an organization.More than likely, you are often required to work with budgets within your organization. Using the module reading and the Argosy University online library resources, research budgets including multiple budgets.
Respond to the following:Describe in detail the budgets that you work with.
In your description, what was the objective of the budget i.e., to motivate employees or control costs? (A budget could have more than one objective.) Was the use of the budget successful in achieving the objective?

Assume your organization has multiple budgets and you are to work with these. Explain how these budgets should be linked together.
By the due date assigned, post your response to the Discussion Area. Through the end of the module, review and comment on at least two peers responses.Write your initial response in 300500 words. Your response should be thorough and address all components of the discussion question in detail, include citations of all sources, where needed, according to the APA Style, and demonstrate accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuationDo the following when responding to your peers:Read your peers answers.
Provide substantive comments by
contributing new, relevant information from course readings, Web sites, or other sources;
building on the remarks or questions of others; or
sharing practical examples of key concepts from your professional or personal experiences
Respond to feedback on your posting and provide feedback to other students on their ideas.
Make sure your writing
is clear, concise, and organized;
demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and
displays accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Assignment 1: DiscussionApplying Balanced ScorecardIn many cases, managers end up in trouble as they direct their focus exclusively on cost savings. Cost cutting is always emphasized, but other impacts, such as decreased quality, can be overlooked. These overlooked impacts can have a significant effect on the revenue and profitability of an organization. The balanced scorecard is a measure to assure that management is not exclusively driven by cost, but balanced with other measures that also can significantly influence the performance of an organization.Using the module readings and the Argosy University online library resources, research balanced scorecard and its application.Select a service industry organization of your choice. Complete the following for the selected organization:Recommend at least two performance measures in each of the balanced scorecard categories.
Explain each of your recommendations.

By the due date assigned, post your response to the Discussion Area. Through the end of the module, review and comment on at least two peers responses.Write your initial response in 300500 words. Your response should be thorough and address all components of the discussion question in detail, include citations of all sources, where needed, according to the APA Style, and demonstrate accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuationDo the following when responding to your peers:Read your peers answers.
Provide substantive comments by
contributing new, relevant information from course readings, Web sites, or other sources;
building on the remarks or questions of others; or
sharing practical examples of key concepts from your professional or personal experiences
Respond to feedback on your posting and provide feedback to other students on their ideas.
Make sure your writing
is clear, concise, and organized;
demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and
displays accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.