Author: best-essay

Based on the company/product developed in your business proposal and using your best business writing skills and tone, draft the three following brief emails: 1. Acknowledgement: A potential customer/client has requested information about your business. Provide the requested information. Remember, you are trying to obtain an individual or company’s business. Note: simply referring the potential client/customer to a website or brochure is insufficient. 2. Adjustment Email: Respond to a client complaint regarding your business/product. Note: offering an (ex: 50% off coupon) on the next visit is ok but insufficient. 3. Follow-up email: A follow up to the Acknowledgment email. In the follow-up, you have not received a response from #1 (Acknowledgement Email), follow-up in a professional manner. Reinforce the value of your company or product. So you do not lose the potential customer/client!

On April 2, 1998, Monica and James Johnson, ages 28 and 32 respectively, visit the Kettering Clinic in hopes of determining why they are having such a difficult time conceiving a child. After testing, it is determined that James is afflicted with low sperm motility and it will be very difficult for the couple to conceive naturally. Therefore, Monica and James make the decision to undergo in vitro fertilization. Monica begins daily hormone injections and then has her eggs removed for fertilization. After waiting and hoping for several weeks after the implantation procedure, Monica discovers that she has not become pregnant. Undeterred, Monica and James decide to try again. They try four more times before they decide that the pressure to have a baby and the up and downs from the hormones have placed to great a strain on their marriage to continue. James and Monica move into separate residences and get a divorce. At the time of the divorce, there are 10 frozen embryos being stored at the Kettering Clinic that were never used by James and Monica, and these embryos are all but forgotten in the divorce settlement. On June 24, 2008, Monica marries David, and they have two happy, healthy twin girls. James remarries Jessica, in May of 2009. Unfortunately, James and Jessica experience the same difficulty with James sperm that he and Monica experienced, as well as additional complications with Jessicas ability to produce eggs. The couple is told that it will be next to impossible to conceive naturally, and almost as difficult to conceive using in vitro fertilization. After several failed attempts, James called Monica and asks if he may use the embryos that they have created to allow Jessica to become pregnant. Monica refuses, explaining that she has two happy little girls, and does not want to be the mother to any additional children, especially with a man who is no longer her husband. Additionally, she does not want to have children that she will not have a say in parenting. James sues Monica for the property rights to the embryos. In his complaint, he contends that he should gain custody of the embryos because he is the person with the most compelling need for them, as he cannot become a father without them. You are the judge in this case. As a judge, you should consider legal precedent in determining your ruling. In your decision, please discuss the precedent in this case, please include the likely legal arguments presented by both parties, the legal status of the embryos in question, and your ultimate decision on who should obtain custody of the embryos.

This assignment is a take-home essay consisting of 3 questions, 2 pages total, to test knowledge and assimilation of the course objectives. Please exclusively use the course materials to support each answer. To answer these questions paraphrase, do not use quotations.
Please answer all three questions below in a paragraph format by listing the number followed by your answer. I recommend using the MEAL plan to organize your paragraphs. For more information, please check out this link. Please cite your sources using in-text citations; a reference list is not needed. Please review your work for errors before submitting it and ensure that it is grammatically correct. Your submission should be no more than 2 pages in length.1. Explain what Zewei’s article from the week 4 reading was all about. Be sure to identify the thesis and conclusions.2. What are the main ideas in Steinbergs article?3. Based on the Cragg, Arnold, and Muchlinski article from week 6, when and why did “business and human rights” become an international topic? What explains the delay?

The Supreme Court in In re Quinlan discussed Karens right to privacy at length. What documents and precedent did the Court look to in order to establish Karens legal right to privacy? How did the Court evaluate the interests of the state in light of Karens right to privacy? Because Karen could not assert her rights, how did the Court ultimately reason that these rights should be asserted?

On November 24, 1996, Gregory enters the St. Anns Hospital emergency room screaming that his leg hurts and he needs morphine. Dr. Able takes him to an examination room, and after a cursory exam, discovers no cause for such pain. She makes the determination that Gregory has come to the hospital seeking drugs under the guise of pain, and discharges him. Two hours later, Gregory is back at St. Anns screaming that he is in severe leg pain and needs morphine. Dr. Able is with another patient, so Dr. Braxton takes Gregory to an exam room and after a cursory examination, determines that Gregory has pulled a muscle. He advises rest, ice, relaxation and elevation and sends Gregory on his way. Two days later, Gregory returns to St. Anns, irate, and screaming that he is in severe leg pain and needs morphine. Drs. Able and Braxton are seeing patients, so Dr. Cameron takes Gregory to an exam room. Gregory, in horrible pain and fearing that he will be sent away, grabs a syringe of pain medication and attempts to inject it himself. Dr. Cameron calls for two orderlies who tackle Gregory to the ground, breaking his ankle. While Dr. Cameron is having his ankle examined, she decides to run some tests on the leg Gregory has been complaining about, just to be thorough. The tests reveal that Gregory has an infarction in his left thigh. The infarction has restricted the blood flow to the muscle, leading to muscle death. Gregory is, indeed, in a great deal of pain. Gregory undergoes surgery to remove the dead tissue and restore circulation to his leg. During the surgery, Dr. Cameron removes slightly more muscle tissue then is necessary just to make certain that all the dead tissue is gone. When Gregory awakes from surgery, he finds he only has partial use of his left leg, as much of the muscle mass has been removed. Please discuss the medical responsibilities that existed with respect to Gregory and indicate if any of those medical responsibilities were breached.Then, please discuss any potential negligence actions that Gregory could bring against Drs. Able, Braxton, Cameron or St. Anns Hospital.Finally, please discuss any potential intentional tort actions that Gregory could bring in this scenario.

Basic Security Considerations Please note you will not engage in Milestone work for Part VI of your final project, Basic Security Considerations. However, you will have an opportunity to work through the information that will inform this part of your project in Module Seven as well as to ask your peers and instructors any questions you have in the topic. At this point you should be able to finish this part of your final project and submit the completed draft with all pieces.

Final Submission: Business Systems Analysis In Module Seven, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.

Question 3 (500 words). Read the New York Times article about the New Socialism (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and The Millennial Socialists are Coming (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Also read the article , A Slow Motion Catastrophe: On The Road in Venezuela, 20 Years After Chavezs Rise. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. USE ONLY THE THREE LINKS PROVIDED BELOW!!Many college students supported Bernie Sanders in the last presidential election and are fans of Alexandra Ocasio Cortez, both avowed socialists.Given what you have learned in this class, are Sanders and Cortez supporters naive?You can argue either side but your argument must be backed up by economic theory and history covered this semester.LINKS https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/24/opinion/sunday/what-socialism-looks-like-in-2018.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/30/opinion/democratic-socialists-progressive-democratic-party-trump.htmlhttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/06/on-the-road-venezuela-20-years-after-hugo-chavez-rise

Based on what you have learned about emotional intelligence and cultural and generational awareness, what recommendations would you make to improve interpersonal and team dynamics? Explain the rationale behind your recommendations.Part B: Respond to two of your peers

How has race been constructed throughout US history? Choose at least three examples and trace the different ways in which race has been legally and socially produced. Possible topics to explore include slavery, voting rights, immigration and naturalization laws, labor struggles, discrimination against various immigrant populations, anti-miscegenation laws, forced assimilation of Native Americans, and internment of Japanese Americans.
Use at least three readings.1st reading:
(located in Additional Files)2nd reading:
(located in Additional Files)3rd reading:
(located in Additional Files)

Final Paper. MUST REQUIRE Milton Friedman “Free to Choose: A Personal Statement” BOOK!! ANSWER MUST BE BASED OFF BOOK AND THEN GIVE EXAMPLESThe 20th century has been characterized by an increase in wealth broadly applied. An increase in wealth that has not just made the rich richer but caused the material condition of the poor, near poor, and average person to be vastly improved. The bottom class of most societies are richer and more prosperous today than ever before.In addition to improvements in material welfare, the 20th century has seen the spread of political freedom and societies that respect human rights and the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness enshrined in the U.S. Declaration of Independence.Brutal oppressive dictatorships still exist in Communist China, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela and other countries but for other large swaths of humanity in Western Europe, the United States, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, etc., stable democratic societies have been created or preserved which respect the rights of individuals to live consistent with their own values, determine their own fates, and live in peace and harmony with their neighbors.These societies have without exception adopted a free market capitalist economic system–maximum freedom societies where individuals are left free to pursue their self-interest as they define it.Question 1. Explain Milton Friedmans theory about how free markets produce wealth and political freedom. What is Friedman’s positive statement? What is the A and B in his “If A then B”? Has Friedmans theory accurately predicted the world?Cite examples.Question 2. A component of the increase in material welfare is the improvement in technology that has occurred in the 20th century. Railroads, nuclear power, the internal combustion engine, genetically modified animals and plants, vaccinations, etc. are examples of some of technological innovations that have improved lives in the 20th century. Explain how a free market system distributes the benefits of technological innovation to the poor, near poor, and the average person. On balance, is a free market capitalist system better or worse than other systems at insuring the benefits of technological innovation are widely distributed among all classes of society.