Describe the artwork in great detail using formal vocabulary covered in the book, especially the visual elements and the Principles of Design–listing them is not sufficient, you need to describe how they are present in the artwork.

Describe the artwork in great detail using formal vocabulary covered in the book, especially the visual elements and the Principles of Design–listing them is not sufficient, you need to describe how they are present in the artwork. Tell something relevant/significant about the artist. What movement or style would the artwork fit into? Make sure that you give your opinion of the artwork. Be sure to cite sources for where your information was found. A decent essay will be at least 300 words long, if not longer.

Please discuss how you believe the history of African Americans Michelle Alexander relates has contributed to the current phenomena of the The New Jim Crow.

Our study of CJ policy this semester has focused on whether the policy produces the desired effect intended by the policy, or produces unintended consequences that work against the intended goals of the policy. Based on the readings and discussions in class, explain how theory and research work to influence policy? Provide current examples.2. Michelle Alexanders book The New Jim Crow focuses on the history of African Americans in the United States and develops this history into her thesis that contemporary criminal justice policy has resulted in a new Jim Crow. Please discuss how you believe the history of African Americans Michelle Alexander relates has contributed to the current phenomena of the The New Jim Crow.

Select the theory you think is true in the context of the torture issue, and explain why.

If you have not done so, stop now and read that material.The ethical issue: One of the ethical controversies of recent times is the practice of using torture to obtain information from suspected terrorists or those with knowledge of terrorist activities. Some believe that the current threat of terrorism warrants such drastic means, while others believe that torture is never a justifiable manner of handling prisoners of war.The scenario: Suppose a situation presents itself in which there are strong reasons to believe a major attack on U.S. soil is immanent and that many lives will be put in danger. Security forces have captured a terrorist and they have very good reasons to believe he has vital information that can lead to thwarting this attack. They have tried the usual means of obtaining information from the prisoner and none of them have been successful; his resolve not to talk is quite strong. However, security forces are now considering torturing the prisoner. They believe, with a high degree of probability, that torture will break his resolve and he will supply the needed information.The question: Should they torture the prisoner?Your thread (at least 350 words) must consist of 2 parts: From your understanding of Holmes discussions, explain how each one of the following theories might answer the question of torture described in the scenario: utilitarianism, Kantian duty-based ethics, virtue ethics, and Christian-principle based ethics.

How would these three womens experiences in the courtroom vary? In what ways would they be similar?

Imagine three different women, each of whom is trying to obtain a divorce from her
husband. The first is a woman from a poor family living in an Anatolian province of the Ottoman
Empire in the sixteenth century. The second is an Algerian woman living in nineteenth-century
Algiers, then under French-colonial rule, who wants to divorce her husband on the grounds of his
impotence. The third is a Swahili woman in Kenya today, who claims that her husband is
abusive. How would these three womens experiences in the courtroom vary? In what ways
would they be similar? What do these differences tell us about transformations in Islamic law
over time and in relation to different social and political contexts? And what do their experiences
tell us about gender orders and womens negotiation with different legal actors and institutions?
Option 2: What is legal pluralism? How have polities differed in their management of
religious and legal difference? What is the relationship between Islamic law and legal pluralism?
And how has this relationship changed over time and space? In writing your answer to this
question, you should provide specific examples from the various historical and contemporary
contexts we have studied in this class. Consider the operation of legal pluralism in the Ottoman
Empire, in various semi-colonial and colonial contexts in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries,
and in postcolonial contexts today that include both Muslim-majority and Western-liberal states,
such as Canada.
Option 3: In the last class of the term, we discussed the question, put by University of Toronto
legal scholar, Mohammad Fadel: Can Islamic law and secular politics co-exist? In some ways,
this is the latest iteration of a question that Muslims have been asking since the late-eighteenth
century. Another way to put this question is: How should Islamic law relate to modern life and
the modern state? In your response to this question, consider how different actors have
responded to this challenge, from pro-ijtihad reformers like Muhammad Abduh and Jamal ad-
Din al-Afghani, to Westernizing secularists like Mustapha Kemal Ataturk, to modern Salafists
like the Muslim Brotherhood, to Islamic feminists like Kecia Ali and Amina Wadud, and finally
to contemporary scholars like Fadel and Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na`im. Your answer should: lay
out their respective positions in relation to this question, map their relation to each other, and
finally offer some of your own reflections in light of your study of their various positions.

Justify why the cultural practice of eating seal blubber among many indigenous populations in the Arctic is both an evoked culture and a transmitted culture.

Justify why the cultural practice of eating seal blubber among many indigenous populations in the Arctic is both an evoked culture and a transmitted culture.On Planet Belia, two civilizations (the Edinia and the Elash) have coexisted for centuries in the same environmental context. Both civilizations have marriage rituals (for this question, assume that marriage rituals can only be either monogamous or polygamous). You know that Edinians believe that polygamy is generally better than monogamy, so there are more polygamists than monogamists in Edinia. To determine whether evoked culture or transmitted culture plays a bigger role in affecting marriage rituals, you visit Edinia and Elash and try to find the proportion of marriages that are monogamous versus polygamous. Draw a bar graph of what your data would look like if evoked culture plays a bigger role than transmitted culture.
Cultural Psychology (Third Edition)
Steven J. Heine
W. W. Norton & Company, 3rd Edition, 2015
ISBN-10: 0393263983
ISBN-13: 978-0393263985

Describe the stakeholders and the nature of their dependence on the process.

RESOURCE ALLOCATION: LINEAR PROGRAMMING
SLP General Background
The fundamental reference for all four SLP assignments is the Continuous Process Improvement Transformation Guidebook. You should acquaint yourself with its contents before beginning the first SLP, refer to it throughout the course, and cite relevant portions as you prepare each SLP assignment.
This SLP assignment continues the analysis of the process described in the Moduel 1 SLP assignment. For this assignment, please write an essay describing:
The end users of the process output. How dependent are they upon the output? If the output were interrupted or delayed, how affected would they be? Do they have alternative suppliers? Could they substitute other goods or services for the process output?
The process stakeholders. These are all the entities (people, groups, organizations, etc.) affected in some way by the process. Obviously, the end users are stakeholders. Other stakeholders are the people who perform the process, the suppliers, and the entities who are dependent upon them. Describe the stakeholders and the nature of their dependence on the process.
The process touch points (places, or points in time, where something specific happens). They may involve different entities or people. Consider, for example, assembling an auto engine. Three (of the many) touch points are installing pistons, mounting the crankshaft, connecting the piston tie rods to the crankshaft.
SLP Assignment Expectations
1. There are no page limits. Write what you need to write, neither more nor less. Make each sentence count! (Having said that; its unlikely that one page would be enough, and very likely that eight pages would be too much.)
2. Ensure that your answer reflects your detailed understanding of the theory and techniques taught in this module.
3. References and citations are required. This requirement can be satisfied by citing the module Home page, and (for the SLP) the DOD CPI Guidebook.
4. Follow the instructions in the Writing Style Guide.

Discuss the significance of this imaginative journeying in the novel. To Yu-hua, fugui, and the reader, what does it mean to live and to remember?

Topic: One of the Major themes in Yu-Hua’s “To Live” is the journey, or process of journeying, into history — both personal and public. For Yu- hua as well as fugui, however, history is never merely the past recalled, nor is it a data bank subject to retrieve. It’s an imaginative process through which the past is revisited, relived and reconstructed. Discuss the significance of this imaginative journeying in the novel. To Yu-hua, fugui, and the reader, what does it mean to live and to remember? In what way does fugui’s personal history become part of the public history of modern china? if as joyce believes, ” in the particular is contained the universal,” what universal meanings can be derived from fugui’s life lived in that particular country during those particular times?Novel needed is Yu-Hua’s To Live

Analyze in detail Husserl’s “Introduction to Formal and Transcendental Logic” (see week 11) by pointing out the most important ideas (cite), and conclude by explaining in detail if you agree or not with Husserl’s view on the relation between sciences and truth.

Analyze in detail Husserl’s “Introduction to Formal and Transcendental Logic” (see week 11) by pointing out the most important ideas (cite), and conclude by explaining in detail if you agree or not with Husserl’s view on the relation between sciences and truth.