Author: best-essay

Using what we discussed in class (i.e., background materials) and the website The Sentinel Watch (https://www.americansentinel.edu/blog/), discuss nursing’s role in the opioid crisis. You may discuss nursing’s role as contributing to the problem, helping to solve the problem, or both. o Your writing will draw on young adult theory (psychosocial development), the concept of addiction, and one EBR/EBNR source, (i.e., published, peer-reviewed, evidence-based research (preferably nursing research)). o Papers should be 3-5 pages in length with APA formatting (plus a title page and a references page). o Refer to the NSG Writing Rubric Background material: o The Heroin Epidemic [PPT outline] ? Reference info for multiple New York Times news articles, plus CDC addiction stats, that were reviewed and discussed in class. o Textbooks: ? Kudzma, E. C. (2018). Young adult. In C. L. Edelman, & E. C. Kudzma (Eds.), Health Promotion Throughout the Life Span, (9th ed., pp. 560586). St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. ? Elgie, R. (2017). Addiction. In J. F. Giddens (Ed.), Concepts for Nursing Practice, (2nd ed., pp. 357366). St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.

As you read the description two separate documents are needed in correct APA format. A technical summary and Research paper see below for details. In a page or two, provide a technical summary of the issue (see topic of choice below), including the science behind the issue. You may use your textbook as the initial source of information, but you must include at least 3 other scientific sources. The sources should be peer-reviewed, scientific journals, not merely sites on the Internet. There are many sources to choose from; for example, Scientific American, Nature, National Geographic, Science, etc. Document your sources correctly in APA style. Living in the Environment , 17th ed., by G. Tyler Miller, Jr., and Scott E. Spoolman (Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole CENGAGE Learning, 2012). ISBN-13: 978-0538735346 In addition to the technical summary prepare a paper of approximately 10 pages (approximately 2500 words). This paper should effectively provide an answer to the question you chose (see topic of choice below). Include in your paper a critique of the four sources of information you researched. Do you agree or disagree with their position(s) on the topic? The topic of choice for this project is as follows: NUCLEAR POWER Is nuclear power a clean, safe, energy choice that could be the predominant source of electricity in 2020? What impact, if any, have the two most serious accidents–accidents at Three Mile Island in 1979 and Chernobyl in 1986–had on the viability of nuclear power now and in the future? Since 1986 there havent been any significant nuclear power plant accidents reported. In fact, many countries, most notably France, have embraced the use of nuclear power as their principal fuel source. What is your opinion regarding the feasibility of using nuclear power? Provide a summary of the process as well as an analysis of the advantages as you argue your position.
Hide

Prepare and submit a strategic plan for becoming a more responsible citizen. your project should be between 2000 and 2500 words in length. Your paper should answer all the following questions. Be sure your responses are complete and that your writing is organized, clear, and grammatically correct. Properly cite any outside sources of information, including your textbook, in proper APA style. Chappell, Z. (2012). Deliberative democracy: A critical introduction. Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN-13: 978-0230252165. Encyclopediasespecially Wikipediaand dictionaries are unacceptable sources. Your paper should answer all the following questions. Be sure your responses are complete and that your writing is organized, clear, and grammatically correct. Properly cite any outside sources of information, including your textbook, in proper APA style. 1. In the introduction to your paper, provide an historical overview and theoretical foundation for the practice of deliberative democracy and its responsible expression in civic action. 2. Use Written Assignment 5 (the midterm assignment) (attached) and any feedback that you have received from your mentor as the basis for your final project. Describe an agenda for your individual engagement, as a responsible citizen, in the process of democratic deliberation (domestically) or global citizenship (internationally). The issue-area that you have selected should be of national or global importance and should involve social action aimed at improving a situation or supporting an existing effort. 3. Perform outside research (citing at least two reputable sources) and use it to describe your issue-area or target organization. Present the problems that might be solved or the positive benefits of your participation. 4. Describe how you can exercise your right of civic participation. What resources can you use? Define the field of action for your engagement and your goals. Connect your proposed social action to the content of this course, including its relationship to both concepts of democratic governance and the principles and processes of deliberative democracy. Explain how accomplishing this plan would help you become a more robust global citizen. 5. Finally, discuss both the challenges and opportunities that exist in the issue-area of your choice. These may be challenges to deliberative democracy, to responsible and engaged citizenship, or to civic participation. Discuss ways of dealing with these challenges.
Hide

Use the free Mindmup tool at https://app.mindmup.com/map/new. You can use this without signing up for the website. The default settings are not quite what we want, so when you open up a new map, you should immediately select two options. First, under ‘View’ and then ‘Map Theme’ select Top Down Standard. Second, under ‘View’ select Start Argument Visualization. The additional files has an example of an argument map and the topics of which 4 have to be chosen to do 4 argument maps individually.

Write 2 paragraphs that outline the connection between the two artworks below.The Four Crowned Martyrs, Nanni di Banco (fig 19-8, pg603) Equestrian Statue of Erasmo da Narni (Gattamelata), Donatello, (fig 19-11, pg 605) ( the link of the artwork: http://www.bluffton.edu/homepages/facstaff/sullivanm/italy/padua/gattamelata/0003.jpg)Question: What were the roles of guilds and the wealthy for art in Florence and how do these pieces reflect that? How did this help Renaissance art develop?

Format: 1012 pages, excluding referencesThe Final Project is an ethical reflection paper that will give you the opportunity to reflect on your personal and professional moral and ethical development. You will also have the opportunity to reflect on case studies that you reviewed throughout the term. Topics from the case studies should come from the Stone (2017) textbook and should include; confidentiality, record keeping and reporting, boundaries, and vulnerable populations. You will also have the opportunity to apply content that you have learned throughout the course and reflect on how this course has contributed to your overall development as an ethical school counselor. Finally, you will have the opportunity to reflect on how becoming an ethical school counseling practitioner will allow you to engage in advocacy and to influence positive social change. There are four major sections to your Final Project:I. Influences on my moral and ethical developmentII. Case Studies and reflectionIII. Enhancing Ethical Decision MakingIV. Summary ReflectionSection 1: Personal reflection: Influences on my moral and ethical developmentSome examples of questions/issues that you can address: You may share how you developed a sense of right and wrong. Who/what influenced your moral and ethical development? What experiences contributed to your personal and professional beliefs? Are your personal and professional beliefs congruent? What is your idea of right and wrong? Are there absolutes or are there shades of gray? Do the same guidelines apply in all circumstances? What are some of your basic values that guide your work and your life? What experiences have potentially influenced your decision making? What aspects of your personality and work ethic are most compatible with the counseling field? Which aspects are the least compatible? Was there a time, in your personal or professional life, when you felt that your confidentiality was violated, that you were involved in a dual relationship in which you felt uncomfortable, or perhaps an issue resonated unexpectedly with you (e.g., transference)?Section 2: Case studies and reflectionA. Provide a brief overview of four (4) case studies that you read and/or discussed earlier in the term from the Stone, C. (2013) textbook. The cases reviewed should include the following ethical and legal issues; confidentiality, record keeping and reporting, boundaries, and vulnerable populationsB. Reflect on your initial responses to the ethical scenarios making sure to highlight the strengths and limitations in your initial responses.Section 3: Enhancing Ethical Decision MakingC. Explain how you will enhance your ethical decision making and subsequent actions in future ethical situations. Make sure to explain how relevant ethical codes, laws, and policies will aid you in enhancing your skills. Also be sure to discuss how supervision and/or consultation will enhance your ethical decision making skills.D. Address the ethical and legal challenges in each case that you highlighted. Briefly discuss and apply an Ethical Decision Making Model (EDM), making sure to highlight relevant ASCA Ethical standards and/or ACA ethical codes, to the ethical challenges in each case. Explain the strengths and limitations related to your response to the scenarios.Section 4: Summary ReflectionA. Discuss how this assignment contributes to your overall development as an ethical school counselor. Explain how you have changed because of your work in this course. Describe personal and ethical values you have reexamined because of your work in this course.B. Discuss how practicing as an ethical school counselor will allow you to serve as an advocate for students and influence positive social change within schools and communities?

Write a letter to your staff explaining and justifying the standards of objectivity to which they should aspire. Please provide an outline for the essay. as well. Thank youCitation style
The Oxford University Standard for Citation Of Legal Authorities (OSCOLA) is to be used for footnotes and the bibliography.Please use the handout attached.II – Structure
1. Introduction
Cut to the chase right off by saying what the specific problem of the essay is and why it is a problem.
People call sexual practices perverse all the time, but it is hard to figure out what the criteria for perversion are and what difference it makes whether those practices are perverse or not.
Avoid long-winded, flowery and vague introductions such as: Philosophy has been studied for a long time.
Give your thesis up front, saying in the first paragraph exactly what position youre going to be arguing for.
Set out how you understand and will use the key terms in your essay, especially any that are used in the question itself.
2. Argument. Go for a methodical, point-by-point presentation. The reader should know in each part of the essay what the essay is trying to prove, and how it is trying to prove it.
(The reader should be able to use all of his or her brain-power learning from the essay and assessing whether its arguments are plausibleand should be able to spend no brain-power trying to figure out what the essay is trying to prove.)
3. All essays should include critical evaluation of the topic under discussion. Its not enough just to describe what others have said. By the end the readers should understand the arguments that have led you to your own conclusions about the topic.
4. Conclusion. Avoid glib conclusions such as this is a very difficult subject and there are arguments on both sides. Your reader knows that, especially as you should have presented just those arguments. Your conclusion should be a considered response to the arguments you have given, challenged and evaluated.
At this point, dont be afraid to give your own personal response to the question, so long as it is based on and follows from the material you have discussed. The examiner does want to see that you have engaged with the material rather than simply regurgitated it.
III – Style and economy
1. Clarity is the main virtue of a philosophy essay. Its better to write a clear boring essay than a muddled entertaining one.
2. Simplicity: Simpler words and short sentences are often clearer. Dont go for fancy terms or complex sentences unless you absolutely have to. (Note: One almost never has to.)
3. Define the essays main terms with precision early on (you may have done this in the introduction).
a. E.g. Act utilitarianism is the thesis that an action is right if and only if it is the action that produces the most utility.
4. Focus: Dont lay out more of a view than you need to. There are no marks for simply repeating everything you know about a subject. On the contrary, there are higher skills marks available for knowing how to leave out irrelevant material.
a. E.g. if your problem is that utilitarianism may be too demanding, you may not have to discuss in the essay the different interpretations of what utility is (whether there is a distinction between higher and lower pleasures, etc.).
Focusing appropriately on the question at hand is one of the best ways to get marks in philosophy. Meandering aimlessly is a very fast way of losing them.
5. Depth: Go in depth concerning the problem specified by the essay topic; you dont need to say everything about everything. Better to explore one subject in detail than two subjects superficially.
6. If youre arguing against someones position, present your opponents arguments as sympathetically as possible. Your arguments are only as strong as the arguments they defeat.
7. These essays may not need to use many (or even any) quotes from the readings.
8. Very rarely will you need to discuss the work of more than two or three philosophers in any detail in an essay. It is better to pick representatives of the positions you are discussing and evaluating these in depth than to rattle off a dozen names that you barely mention again.
9. Avoid starting sentences by I feel or I believe. The point of the essay is to convince others using good arguments, not simply to express oneself.
10. Avoid sweeping and unsupported statements that may be controversial, e.g., There are no right answers in morality.Tips:
Answer the questions clearly and in a focus way
Say one thing very clearly, or if questions asks for two then two things
Dont want a general setting out of theory, pick the way that you want, say there are other ways but talk about the most important ones. Get marks for what you leave out just as much as what you leave in.

Stage 1: AnalysisMovie: Snow White and The Seven DwarfsYour analysis must address the following components (noted in bold below):*Contextual Information In this area, you will provide some of the basic identifying information of the film. This includes:
– Title
– Director, cinematographer, major actors/actresses. Be sure to describe their roles in the overall design process.
-Year of release
-Type of film (blockbuster, indie, documentary, etc.)
-Genre*Story/Plot In this area, you should offer a brief summary of the film, and then show how it was deployed in the narrative structure of the film. Explain the difference between the films story and its plot. This area can be addressed as a separate paragraph, or can be threaded throughout your analysis of the film.*Aesthetic Choices In this area, you will assess the efficacy of specific techniques and design elements employed in the film as they apply to the overarching narrative and theme of the film. These elements include:
-Mise en scne (e.g., lighting, sound, composition of frame, costuming, etc.)
-Editing (e.g., cuts and transitions, shots used, angles, etc.)
-Technology (i.e., analyze the impact of any notable technological effects: film stock, targeted release venue, special effects, etc.)*Social/Personal Impact In this area, you will critically address the following questions: -What impact did this film have on society (i.e., politically or culturally, positive or negative)? The impact can be as major as
inspiring political or social changes or as minor as inspiring the production of toys or lunchboxes.
-How did society affect this film (i.e., what currents in society led to the creation of the film)?
-If you are unable to find any information about the social impact of the film, explain the personal impact it has had on you.Note: Not every bullet point under the four listed components will necessarily apply to your movie. However, you will still need to discuss each of the four main components thoroughly, which means that you may need to explain a concept even if it cant be directly applied to your movie.Your paper should be organized around a thesis statement that clarifies what you will attempt to accomplish in your paper, and how you will proceed. Additionally, you must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph. Review the Final Film Critique sample, which provides an example of a well-developed analysis as well as insight on composition.Stage 2: ReflectionAfter completing your movie analysis, you will reflect on the analysis process and how you have learned to more thoroughly analyze film as well as how rigorous study of film enhances your development as a student and thinker. In this 300- to 600-word reflection, review your initial post from the Post Your Introduction discussion in Week One, and consider how your ability to analyze movies has changed or grown. Append your reflection to the analysis portion of your paper and submit as one document. Your reflection should be personal and exploratory in nature.Address the following questions in your reflection: -What can be gained through analyzing film?
-How has this changed the way you view movies?
-How are you able to use film theory and criticism to find and interpret meaning in movies?
-In what ways has this course changed your understanding of how movies are related to society?
-What skills have you developed during this course, and how might those skills be applied to your major, profession, and/or life?
The Final Film CritiqueMust be one document that is 1800 to 2400 words in length, comprised of a 1500- to 1800-word film analysis and a 300- to 600-word reflection.

Preparation Look for scholarly and professional research articles that deal with the many myths of aging. You will choose one myth to examine, so choose at least two articles that deal with the same myth. Instructions When we think about growing old, what myths and stereotypes come to mind? Our society frequently depicts aging as bad and the elderly as frail, forgetful, grouchy, inflexible, and unable to learn new things. But are these beliefs accurate? Scenario You have been hired to address support staff (certified nursing assistants, many of whom are immigrants from diverse cultures) at a nursing home, as part of their training about working with the elderly population. Write a five-minute myth busting speech (34 pages) that you could give to nursing home support staff. Imagine that the majority of support staff in the nursing home are not native English speakers. Therefore, you are providing a written copy of the speech so they can translate and study it, helping to ensure comprehension. Write your speech using language that is easy to understand for your intended audience. For this assessment, choose one of the following myths about aging to examine: Older people are not interested in the world around them. Older people do not want or need close relationships. Older people make little contribution to society. Older people are more set in their ways and will not change. Mental and physical deterioration are inevitable in older people. Older people are not interested in sex or intimacy. Older people cannot make good decisions about important issues. Older people want to die. Older people are just not capable of learning new things like technology. You should have located at least two research articles that examined the areas of late adulthood functioning for the myth you selected. Now, complete the following: Summarize each of the research articles. Explain both the design and method used in the research. Explain what the researchers found in their studies. Explain how accurate the myth you selected is, using the research as support. Analyze how this research might be used to change the way society perceives older people and reshape social policies related to older people. Explain how this research may change policy and the way the staff interacts with the residents. Additional Requirements Written communication: Your writing should be free of errors that detract from the overall message and is consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions. APA formatting: Format resources and citations according to APA style. Resources: Minimum of three scholarly or professional resources. Note: Popular resources such as Wikipedia or About.com are not appropriate. Length: 34 typed, double-spaced pages, not including title page and reference page.

Describe how the Doctor of Nursing Practice leader accesses primary data sources from credible resources to demonstrate and advocate for a needed change and program development in a community with high public health needs?