Please write a reflection on the learning/ teaching approaches the guy in the video presents. No references needed. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-03-06-dr-christopher-emdin-strikes-us-education-edtech-and-frenemies-at-sxswedu?utm_content=buffer0aaa5&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=EdSurgeBuffer

Please write a reflection on the learning/ teaching approaches the guy in the video presents. No references needed. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-03-06-dr-christopher-emdin-strikes-us-education-edtech-and-frenemies-at-sxswedu?utm_content=buffer0aaa5&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=EdSurgeBuffer

Define and describe conscientiousness Discuss what method of estimating reliability you would recommend for this assessment and why. In your response, identify what would be considered an acceptable reliability coefficient.

Follow all directions. Read all the directions! *Develop a self-report measure designed to assess the personality construct of conscientiousness and an accompanying report. The Topic That You’re Evaluating: Conscientiousness (As A Personality Trait) Measure Specifications Your measure should be made up of 10 self-report items that measure individuals levels of conscientiousness in the context of an Applied Tests and Measures class. Specifically, your items should target how conscientious a person is in the context of this class. Your items should be in a continuous (Likert) scale format. Follow the item writing guidelines presented in the Self-Report Measure Construction lecture (see the link below). Be sure to include appropriate instructions. Include these components in the appendix of your report. Report Specifications For this assignment, imagine that you were contracted to develop a conscientiousness measure for Tests and Measures Testing Corporation to assess students conscientiousness in future Tests and Measures courses. Write a three paragraph report in APA (6th edition) format that addresses the three bullets below: Define and describe conscientiousness Discuss what method of estimating reliability you would recommend for this assessment and why. In your response, identify what would be considered an acceptable reliability coefficient. Discuss at least two types of validity evidence you would seek to obtain. In your response, define each type of validity evidence and explain the process for identifying that evidence. Follow the guide below: Cover table of contents 2-3 pgs of report/process 2 pgs of test form references
Hide

Contrast two classification systems (Abnormal Psychology)

Question: Contrast two classification systems Dear writers, please apply if you have access to the required readings. Contrast- Give an account of the differences between two (or more) items or situations, referring all to both (all) of them throughout. USE 2 STUDIES. NOT sure which studies you should use but use two from this list, they do not all deal with classification systems so you need to look them up. STUDIES HAVE TO DEAL WITH CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS!!! structure: patagraph 1: outline topic, clarify what you need to do. paragraph 2: explain study 1 linked to the command term and topic paragraph 3: explain study 2 linked to command term and topic paragraph 4: command term focus and topic paragraph 5: conclusion

pesticides, should we switch to organic food?

the short essay will address issues regarding the scientific evaluation on the issues and scientific evidence surrounding the issue. the outline should look like this: I. Introduction II. pesticides III. Health effects of pesticides IV. Treatment of pesticide poisoning V. Considering the alternative (organic food) VI. Discussion VII. Conclusion all sources should be from articles only. and try to find studies from Kuwait or GCC Countries if available.

Criterion-referenced tests offer some advantages over tests that may be graded more subjectively. However, they have some specific problems. Discuss these advantages and disadvantages (you may integrate information from previous chapters). How would you improve this situation?

Each question should be answered in you own words. Essay responses must have introduction statements, a response to the exam question, supporting details, and a conclusion statement. Essay responses involve a paragraph or two Start with your course materials, including your primary textbook Include at least one outside source citation, outside of or in addition to your textbook, for each question Only professional, peer-reviewed journal articles should be used as a source material sure to properly cite work and words that are not yours. TEXTBOOK: Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2018). Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues (9th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Lecture about question 3 by Richard Griffith, Ph.D. below: cite https://learningmodules.bisk.com/play.aspx?xml=L0Zsb3JpZGFUZWNoVW5kZXJncmFkL1BTWTQxMTIvR3JpUl8wMjE3MTJfMTAvRGF0YS9tb2R1bGUueG1s Question 2 What are two (2) specific cases that have dealt with affirmative action and what impact have these proceedings had on affirmative action programs? Question 3 Discuss the case of either Griggs v Duke Power Company. Be sure to include (1) the parties involved, (2) the disputed issue, and (3) its influence on employment testing.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome patients are at an increased risk of osteoporosis and related fractures.

Screening measures to identify osteoporosis and prevent fractures are advised. The style should IEEE Style, including an Abstract for the research paper(It should be Descriptive Abstract). Perfect section titles are needed; introduction, discussion, methods, Systematic reviews, meta-analysis, results and conclusion are a MUST. Also graphs, tables and figures are a MUST.

affects of celebrity culture and social media on american youth

Select a subject from the list below, and write a 6-8 page research paper. You need to select a topic within the subject and form an argument about the topic. You need to qualify your argument with real world examples, and you must support your thesis with research and incorporate the research into the paper. The research must be in MLA format and logically support the argument of the paper.

Write a thoughtful, persuasive newspaper or blog editorial that draws from history to support or oppose a policy position on todays opioid crisis

Policy positions may include, for example, increasing criminal penalties for illegal sale/possession of opioids; increasing abstinence-based treatment programs for individuals with addiction; increasing opioid maintenance treatment programs for people with addiction; implementing harm reduction strategies such as needle exchanges and safe injection sites; broader social/political reforms to reduce demand for opioids; etc.This is too short a paper to be comprehensivefocus on what you consider to be the single most important lesson history has to offer about an effective or ineffective response to a drug crisis. Use examples from history (i.e., course lecture and readings) to explain and support your point.Essays should state their position clearly in the first paragraph. Note: this is not a call for simple or simplistic arguments; even complex points can be stated clearly.
The primary purpose of the paper should be to use relevant examples from history to support or oppose a response to todays opioid crisis.
All historical information MUST come from course lectures or assigned readings. Absolutely no use of any non-course information, with no exceptions.
Information from the course should be cited as simply as possible:
If you bring up information from lecture, make a footnote to (Lecture, 9/18)
If you bring up information from a reading (including but not limited to a direct quote), make a footnote to (McClellan, p. 18)

Was the presentation Informative or Persuasive? How do you know? If it was persuasive, odds are it was informative too, so consider the INTENT of the speech to inform, or persuade?

Instructions:Watch the following Ted Talk. Answer the questions belowJamie Oliver: Teach Every Child about Food https://www.ted.com/talks/jamie_oliver?language=en Questions:Speakers Name:
Credentials:
Location/Context of Presentation:
Topic:

2. Comment on the introduction. What was the hook? Did it hook you? What main points were previewed? What were they? Was the intro well done overall? Why or why not?
3. What were the main points, and proofs offered in the presentation? What were they? Were they adequately developed? Were they backed up? How? Was the research solid, and trustable? Were there any fallacies?
4. Comment on the conclusion. Did the speaker signal the end of the speech? Was there a thorough summary? What did the speaker end with? If it was a persuasive presentation, what was the call to action? Did you find the material compelling? Why or why not?
5. Comment on the speakers delivery. What did they do well? What could they improve upon? Comment on things like body language, whether or not they engaged the audience, how confident they looked, how they moved or didnt move, etc. Be thorough and specific. Prove to me you know how to give an excellent presentation.
6. Comment on the visuals (if any). What was done well, what could have been done better? If no visuals what type of visual would you suggest? Why?
7. What did you think overall? Did you learn anything from this presentation? If you were to give it a grade, what grade would you give the presentation and why?

Write a thoughtful, persuasive newspaper or blog editorial that draws from history to support or oppose a policy position on todays opioid crisis.

Policy positions may include, for example, increasing criminal penalties for illegal sale/possession of opioids; increasing abstinence-based treatment programs for individuals with addiction; increasing opioid maintenance treatment programs for people with addiction; implementing harm reduction strategies such as needle exchanges and safe injection sites; broader social/political reforms to reduce demand for opioids; etc.This is too short a paper to be comprehensivefocus on what you consider to be the single most important lesson history has to offer about an effective or ineffective response to a drug crisis. Use examples from history (i.e., course lecture and readings) to explain and support your point. Essays should state their position clearly in the first paragraph. Note: this is not a call for simple or simplistic arguments; even complex points can be stated clearly.
-The primary purpose of the paper should be to use relevant examples from history to support or oppose a response to todays opioid crisis.
– All historical information MUST come from course lectures or assigned readings. Absolutely no use of any non-course information, with no exceptions.
– Information from the course should be cited as simply as possible:
– If you bring up information from lecture, make a footnote to (Lecture, 9/18)
– If you bring up information from a reading (including but not limited to a direct quote), make a footnote to (McClellan, p. 18)
-Writing should be clear, persuasive, and grammatical, but beyond that, freedom reigns.