Discuss how you major or career can contribute to improving our environment. Make this essay personal make this apply to you and your goals not just general description.
">
Over its history, the Texas government has had many conflicts with the national government as part of the dynamics under a federal system of governance (federalism).Completing this activity is a mandatory component of this course. It serves as the standard course assessment for all GOVT 2306 students. Failure to submit and complete this project in its entirety will result in a failing grade for the course. There are three steps to completing this project.Step 1 Identifying the IssueIdentify an issue that involves federalism, then conduct research on how both the US federal government and Texas state government addressing it (this requires examining the history, application and effectiveness of laws at both levels). Pick one of the following topics:Womens rights and funding for family planningFamily rights and Child Protective ServicesPublic education policy and fundingPublic education policy and Common CoreEnvironmental policy and air pollutionEnvironmental policy and hydraulic frackingAffordable Care Act and Medicaid fundingJoint law enforcement efforts to combat drug traffickingJoint law enforcement efforts to combat human traffickingSentencing minimums, public defenders, and minority groups in state prisons
Step 2 – Gathering SourcesConduct research to locate three peer-reviewed academic journal articles (aka: scholarly sources) that specifically address the policy issue that you selected and meet the following criteria:The articles must be no more than ten (10) years old.The article must have more than five (5) pages of actual content (without graphs, charts, footnotes, citations, etc.).Books will not count toward the minimum research requirements.Carefully choose those sources that provide a variety of perspectives on your selected topic.In addition to the minimum research requirements, you should offer supplemental sources for essential current events information relevant to your topic. These may include academic sources that are not peer-reviewed (position papers), newspaper articles, magazine articles, and other quality or reputable sources.Textbooks, Dictionaries, Encyclopedias (including Wikipedia), Almanacs, or an Atlas are reference materials and are not to be listed as sources on the collegiate level.Provide the formal MLA citation for each source, both in the essay and on the works cited page. Step 3 The ProposalSubmit a one-page proposal to the appropriate dropbox by the date specified in the course calendar. The proposal is to contain the following:Identify the topic in a single paragraph by:
Include a bibliography listing the three primary sources. The citations are to be formatted using MLA citation style.
Summarize the policy topic you will be addressing.
Describe the current status of the policy or topic.
Describe why the policy is important.
A model proposal has been provided in eCampus.Revise and Resubmit Policy: The purpose of the proposal process is for your instructor to confirm that 1) you have selected three appropriate peer-reviewed journal articles and 2) that you have selected an appropriate topic. Additionally, it allows your instructor to give you feedback on your writing (grammar, sentence composition, punctuation, and spelling) as well as your use of proper MLA citation formatting. Should you submit a proposal that does not address a topic that meet the criteria, or does not have three peer-reviewed journal articles, you will be asked to revise and resubmit the assignment. In such cases, each revision will be deducted 10 points and after 4 attempts the assignment will earn a zero and will be considered incomplete. The instructor will inform you of the due date and conditions of resubmission. Failure to resubmit the revision before the provided due date, or failure to correct the identified issues in need of revision, will result in a zero for the proposal grade.Failure to complete the proposal or a requested revision will result in the entire assignment being incomplete.Step 4 The Policy PaperYour task will be to prepare a formal research paper regarding the selected policy. The assignment is to be around 5-6 pages with in-text citations for your research. The minimum writing requirement is a 1000 of your own words or around 3 pages of a word document (excluding the cited information). The essay is to discuss each of the following prompts:An introduction and brief overview of the policy relationship.What are the major issues facing each level of government?What are the reasons for initiating changes to the policy?What are the options to be considered (discuss several)?What are the pros and cons of each potential reform (costs v. benefits)?Which is the best option moving forward (pick one)?A summary and conclusionSpecial Notes:The grading standards used to assess the quality of your work for this project will be detailed in a grading rubric, which will be provided during the semester. It is strongly suggested that every student read ahead and use the library database during the first week of the course to begin researching a topic. This project requires carefully planning throughout the semester.Refer to the course calendar for the specific due date. The final product is to be submitted as a single file via the submission guidelines identified by the instructor.Procrastination on this project has resulted in some students, who were otherwise passing, having to fail and repeat the course.
*Your paper should forcefully demonstrate your original argument/position/perspective regarding one of the given development challenges. You must develop an argument and present your position analytically, logically, and empirically. You will be evaluated based on your ability to develop an original and insightful argument that is sustained by the literature.**In your essay, you must do the following.
(a) Demonstrate explicit interconnections between the broader development theme and the specific development problem you are going to discuss.
(b) Discuss key factors as well as actors that cause/exacerbate the development problem.
(c) Identify overarching dilemmas/obstacles that are inherent in the specific development problem.
We all think we know what we mean by these terms, but you should use your extended definition to comment on or add to social perceptions. For example, you might say that education is commonly perceived as something formal that happens in an institution, but that there are other forms of education.
Introduction:
Is my essay topic clear to my reader in the first few sentences of the paragraph?Does my introduction lead the reader to expect specific stages in the developmental section of the paper?Does this paragraph match the tone of the rest of the essay?Is there a strong, full, suitably narrowed and clearly worded thesis statement?Developmental Paragraphs:
Does each paragraph include a clear topic sentence?Have I fully analyzed the topic under study?Have I used a variety of rhetorical methods, as appropriate?Is each paragraph nicely unified and linked to the essay as a whole?Conclusion:
Does this paragraph signal that the essay is complete?Does this paragraph suggest the larger significance of my ideas?Does this paragraph unify the essay into an artistic whole?Does this paragraph match the tone of the rest of the essay?
Writing Your Critique
Your paper should be three full pages in length (approximately 280 words per
page), double-spaced, written in 12 pt font, and must conform to MLA
guidelines. Do not use extra spaces between paragraphs
Consider your paper a reaction paper that chronicles the history of your
attendance from an experiential standpoint. You can include information on
your thoughts and feelings about the event as you prepared to attend,
attended, and returned from the event. Your experiences as you transitioned
from home to the event are of interest to your readers, providing a sense of
“being there.”
You should describe the setting for the event. Your work should detail the
type of venue you attended and include information related to the purpose
of the event. You should think about the journalistic questions of “who,
what, when, where, and why,” for this part of your work. Be specific about
when and where the event occurred.
You should describe the performers and include information about
instrumentation, setting, costuming, and stage behavior. Here are some
things to think about:
Were the musicians “engaged” or did they appear to be going through the
motions of performing. Did they communicate subtly with each other while
performing. Did they simply provide music or did they actively communicate
with their audience. Did they seem polished and skilled?
Describe the makeup and behavior of the audience. Did they attend to
the music or treat it indifferently? With regard to the event, was the
music the primary or secondary focus?
Did you enjoy the event? What was it that made it enjoyable or not
enjoyable? What do you recall most vividly about the experience? You may
find it helpful to reflect upon the event for a few days, prior to completing
your paper.
Title:
China’s Systematic Inequality Issue:
The “Superiority” of a Beijing Hukou In ChinaPlease help me to reduce the word count to around 2300. Meanwhile, please help me to rewrite and proofreading to make it better.*Your paper should forcefully demonstrate your original argument/position/perspective regarding one of the given development challenges. You must develop an argument and present your position analytically, logically, and empirically. You will be evaluated based on your ability to develop an original and insightful argument that is sustained by the literature.**In your essay, you must do the following.
(b) Discuss key factors as well as actors that cause/exacerbate the development problem.
(c) Identify overarching dilemmas/obstacles that are inherent in the specific development problem.
Other questions to consider include: Who collects these data and how frequently? Are measures collected for every function? How are measures reported? Are measures tied to the budget or to a strategic plan? Are citizens involved in the process? If so, how are citizens involved? After describing this system of measuring performance, analytically critique it. Is this an effective system? Why or why not? What would you do differently?