Discussion topics support this units objective and should be completed after reading all materials. Your responses should include original evaluation, synthesis, or analysis of the topic and contribute to the weekly discussion in a meaningful way.Refer to the Discussion Board Rubric in Course Resources for additional requirements.
personal reflection on the learning experience. Title
Acknowledgements
Introduction: background information about the work environment and the scope of
the project.
Opportunities for problem solving and other new skills acquired.
Personal reflection: particularly focus on your strengths and weaknesses in relation
to your work on the project.
Conclusion: final thoughts on the learning experience
Bibliography
Write a 1100-1500 word (3-5 page double spaced) argumentative paper on something related to class content. This is a Bioethics Class! Topic: Affirmative Action in Relation to the Biases of African Americans patients preferring to see White Doctors over Black Doctors. (DIG DEEP) – I need a Thesis that involves what I have wrote for the topic ABOVE Requirement: Include an abstract for the paper, which will have one numbered sentence summarizing each paragraph of the paper (these sentences will be numbered and the numbers will indicate which paragraph they refer to). Each sentence should summarize the corresponding paragraph (it is ok if these sentences appear in the paragraph in question) with lots of content (no, I talk about stuff nonsense). Use your thesis to summarize your introduction (assuming you have one). Formatting spelling (APA), and grammar are tools for you to use to help communicate your point. I have no rules for formatting and will not evaluate you based on it. You will be evaluated on how you use formatting to convey your content. References are a way of supporting your claims. I do not require a specific number. I do not restrict the sources that you can use but treat them for what they are. If you make a claim that is better with a reference, show me. The grading of this paper will be based on: Organization based on your thesis Focusing on the interesting path, not the easy one Clarity Quality of argument (plausibility, identifying implications and assumptions, showing knowledge of limits, and identifying foundational support) Depth, not breadth Originality “PLEASE DO NOT JUST FOCUS ON JUST FACTS”!!! THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX “STANDARDS.” How well the abstract mirrors the paper Some generalized grading benchmarks (neither conclusive nor exhaustive): If you dont have a thesis (a point to the paper that you support and use to filter out information), your paper will be a C at best. If you have a thesis but say things that do not show more than cursory thought, your paper will be a B at best. THIS IS TO GET AN “A”: If you show rigor, understanding, thought, and awareness that facts are both insufficient and need to be filtered, then we can start talking about an A. PLEASE NO repetitive word usage, words that are different BUT meaning the same thing.
Hide
Research methods in IT -Literature Reviews and Annotated Bibliographies – 4Looking for assistance with the discussion below and assignment
Format requirements and grading criteria:PREPARATION OF TEXT
Your text must be typed be in 1.5-spaced form with a font size of 12 Times New Roman with justified 1 inch margins. Ensure that each new paragraph is clearly indicated. Present tables and figure legends on separate pages at the end of the paper. Number all pages consecutively. Provide the following data on the cover page (in the order given):
1. Title. Concise and informative, avoid abbreviations and formulae.
2. Author first and last name.
3. Course number and semester.
4. Date.
Organize your paper as follows:
1 Abstract.
A concise and factual abstract is required, (suggested length between 150 and 200 words). The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and major conclusions. An abstract must be able to stand alone to represent the paper content. References and abbreviations should therefore be avoided in the abstract.
2. Keywords.
Immediately after the abstract, provide 3-4 keywords that reflect the content of your paper, avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts, articles and propositions. Example of key words: demographics, agriculture, food security, Kazakhstan.
3. Introduction.
State the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background of the topic.
4. Study area.
Provide sufficient detail on your study area and its geography.
5. Problem background and literature analysis
Provide detailed analysis of the paper topic based on thorough discussion of the bibliography used in the paper.
6. Discussion and Conclusions.
7. Figures
Place all figures immediately after the text, avoid including more than 2-3 figures. All figures should have captions, clearly indicating their source (e.g. Source: Lioubimtseva, 2009)
8. Tables
Include any tables (if you use any), make sure that each table has its number and title.
9. REFERENCES
Suitable articles appear in journals like the Central Asian Survey, Central Eurasian Studies Review, the Geographical Review, the Geographical Journal, the Professional Geographer, Political Geography Quarterly, Economic Geography, Current History, or International Affairs.
Discuss the relevance of spirituality as a mindbody medicine.
Write an essay where you compare and contrast the particular values,beliefs,or convictions expressed in Annie Dillard’s “Living Like Weasels” and Henry David Thoreau’s “Why I went to the woods”. Use examples from the essays to support your ideas
using 8 sources explain the philosophical concept of “nothingness” and argue how the characters in The Sun Also Rises confront”nothingness”
Outside sources must be researched and connected to “a tale of two cities.” An unlimited number of sources can be used, the more the merrier.Page requirements: (min) 4-6 Additional Info: In my past essay I connected the novel to the injustices of gender roles. Examples of topics could be religion, spirituality, class, politics, etc ( these are just ideas, do whatever themes you feel are strong and that you feel comfortable connecting to).
What this short essay should be: A complex examination of an article/documentary/book using peer-reviewed journals.
What this short essay should not be: A summary of four different pieces.
4-5 pages double spaced-12pt font-cited with a works cited section that does not count as a page.My ideas-
essay to be about the documentary “13th” which covers the subject of african american race and class issues in America. Then include three peer reviewed journals that relate to the film and back it up. And with that expand on the topic of african american oppression in America. ( I dont use very advanced vocabulary and my writing is is a mixture between formal and informal)