Choosing a disaster that occurred within the past five years, identify, define and discuss the types of communication challenges that were encountered, what impact they had on disaster response and relief efforts and what types of actions and strategies can be taken by authorities to mitigate these challenges in the future.

Note: While public inquiry reports will help to provide much of the background information for your assignment, it is important that your own analysis goes beyond simply paraphrasing and summarizing this information. Draw on at least two academic journal articles to back up your analysis. Please briefly speak about: ? Your chosen research topic/case study. ? Some background info about the disaster you are working with. ? Communication challenges, which were encountered during the disaster. ? What made you choose your individual topics? ? Any challenges and/or strategies finding research/sources/references. Structural Suggestions: First: Introduce your argument, state your thesis or argument in a few sentences. After that, indicate what the reader might learn by exploring your claim with you throughout your essay, or your case study, and the specific communication challenges you identified, such as failures, problematic scenarios, etc. Second: Introduce the back-story and background material (e.g. the historical context or biographical information, a summary of relevant communication theory or criticism, the definition of a key term, etc.) For example: if you want to talk about Katrina: introduce the historical data of that event. Define the terminology you may be using throughout your essay, such as communication technology, risk communication, etc. (but only if it is relevant to the rest of your paper!) Bonus: Potentially raise a counterargument (describe, analyze and interpret it). For example: you may have found statements/information not to be true, or to be in contrast to what has been reported or stated before about a disaster and the communication challenges encountered. Finally: Conclude and come full circle with your essay by answering the overall question of Why? Your reader, I, will want to know what was at stake in your initial claim/thesis: Why does your interpretation of a communication phenomenon matter to anyone besides you? By answering the why, your essay explains its own significance. Although you might gesture at this question in your introduction, the fullest answer to it properly belongs at your essays end. If you leave it out, your reader will experience your essay as unfinished. In addition: ? Use news sources for background/historical claims (be careful about journalistic quality and integrity) ? Use Academic references and scholarly articles for refer to, analyse and make claims to your chosen disaster and communications topics. Format: ? 10-12 pages; double spaced ? Include a bibliography/references; appendix if required ? 6-8 sources (academic/journal articles too) ? Use headings/ subheadings (organization will add to your paper) i’ll be also uploading some papers as an example which you can see to get an idea regarding the assignment.
Hide

Summarize the lawsuit by identifying the parties to the lawsuit and explaining the key facts of how and why the lawsuit arose;

(2) describe the primary legal issues and explain how the court resolved those legal questions; and (3) discuss how the court’s decision will impact urban planning and local government in practice in the future. For this third part of the paper, you will need to consider (and explain) how the decision expands (or contracts) local authority to regulate.

Apply the ethical framework(s) outlined in the Learning Resources or in other scholarly literature that aligns with your reasoning. Explain how your reasoning aligns with those frameworks.

Discussion: Applying Ethical Frameworks Although the Ethics Resource Center conveyed, as of 2013, that 41% of employees reported having witnessed misconduct in the workplacedown from 45% in 2011this percentage remains alarmingly significant (McGregor, 2014). In fact, these statistics seem to indicate an ongoing need to continue to strengthen commitment to ethical business practice. Business professionals and scholars need to know how to face ethical dilemmas and make sound ethical decisions. As a DBA independent scholar and global change agent, you should have a basic understanding of various ethical frameworks and understand how these frameworks influence real-world business decisions. Northouse (2016) stated, Ethical theories that deal with the conduct of leaders are in turn divided into two kinds: theories that stress the consequences of leaders actions and those that emphasize the duty or rules governing leaders actions (p. 333). Business leaders apply their ethical values daily for decision making in business. Understanding and analyzing various ethical frameworks can help you as you work to solve ethical dilemmas. To prepare for this Discussion, consider Case 13.2, How Safe Is Safe? on pages 351352 of Northouse (2016) and review the Albert, Reynolds, and Turan (2015), Lawton and Pez (2015), Hoover and Pepper (2015), and Gustafson (2013) articles provided in this weeks Learning Resources. By Day 3 Post your application of ethical frameworks to the ethical dilemma posed in the case study. In your application, do the following: Justify your proposed solution, and explain the reasoning you used to arrive at your solution. Incorporate the justifications you provided in response to the Case 13.2. Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this weeks Learning Resources and one or more additional scholarly sources. Reading: Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chapter 13, Leadership Ethics (pp. 329362) Albert, L., Reynolds, S., & Turan, B. (2015). Turning inward or focusing out? Navigating theories of interpersonal and ethical cognitions to understand ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 467484. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2236-2 Gustafson, A. (2013). In defense of a utilitarian business ethic. Business & Society Review (00453609), 118(3), 325360. doi:10.1111/basr.12013 Hartog, D., & Belschak, F. (2012). Work engagement and Machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 3547. Hoover, K., & Pepper, M. (2015). How did they say that? Ethics statements and normative frameworks at best companies to work for. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 605617. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2255-z Lawton, A., & Pez, I. (2015). Developing a framework for ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 639649. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2244-2 Prentice, R. (2014). Teaching behavioral ethics. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 31(2), 325365. doi:10.1111/jlse.12018 Skerker, M. (2014). Seeking a variable standard of individual moral responsibility in organizations. Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 17(2), 209222. doi:10.1007/s10677-013-9430-7 Thiel, C., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L., Johnson, J., & Mumford, M. (2012). Leader ethical decision-making in organizations: Strategies for sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 4964. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1299-1 Zubair, A., & Kamal, A. (2015). Authentic leadership and creativity: Mediating role of work-related flow and psychological capital. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 25(1), 150171.
Hide

After reading Daisy Miller, write a character analysis on one of the characters in the story. The analysis should not be a summary about the character; it should be a critical view of the character using evidence from the story to support your view.

Below are some tips to writing a character analysis: Describe the character. What is he/she like? Take a closer look at what the character says during the story and the meaning. Analyze his/her actions throughout the story. What are his/her motives? What do other characters say about him/her? What does the author/narrator say about him/her? After taking a closer look at the character using the questions above, write your analysis on this character. Use evidence such as quotes from the text to support your view.

What is you evaluation of the Remix and RFID initiatives? (2.5 pages) 2- As Johnnie C. Dobbs, what recommendations would you make to the CEO? Where do you see the opportunities for Wal-Mart in its global supply chain? (2.5) pages

What is you evaluation of the Remix and RFID initiatives? (2.5 pages) 2- As Johnnie C. Dobbs, what recommendations would you make to the CEO? Where do you see the opportunities for Wal-Mart in its global supply chain? (2.5) pages

Structural and Functional Analysis of ARHGEF17

this literature review is the first chapter of the dissertation, detail assignment guide is attached. The word limit is 3000words, but it can be +/- 10%.
It will be great if the review can include the general features of this protein family and the features of ARHGEF17. While this protein is quite new and not much specific experiments had been done, so the purpose of this study is going to investigate the structure and functions of ARHGEF17, and hope can help the development of anticancer drugs.

In the world of horror in literature, the fear of science and the evils of knowledge and curiosity are fueled by writers.

They craftily spoon horror stories that invade the heart or readers as they depict the creation of monsters. Three stories that reflect not only science but the longing of man to be God can be seen in Hawthornes Rappaccinis Daughter, Mary Shelleys Frankenstein and The Little Mermaid by Hans Christian Andersen. Choose option 1 to work on .instructions and documents will be provided .and this thesis must be the focus of the paper . Develop paper based on thesis.