Choose one of the animals in the attached documents below. What kind of animal is it? What does it look like?

As you write this prompt, youre going to analyze how much time you spend on ONE aspect of your writing process. In order to do so, youll need to follow the methods that Neto uses in his study. (Again, you only need to analyze how much time you spend on ONE aspect of your writing process. You dont need to go through the same attention to detail as Neto did in his article.) Once youre done, send me 3 things: 1) What you wrote about the animal you chose. (This can be of any length.) 2) The transcript of your audio or video recording. 3) Your brief analysis, explanation, and reflection on your results. (This can also be of any length.) Here are the animal documents: Mammals of West Virginia: https://www.wvdnr.gov/Wildlife/PDFFiles/mammalsbrochure.pdf Birds of West Virginia: https://www.wvdnr.gov/publications/PDFFiles/bird%20checklist2.pdf Reptiles and Amphibians of West Virginia: https://www.wvdnr.gov/publications/PDFFiles/amphibian%20checklist2.pdf Fishes of West Virginia: https://www.wvdnr.gov/publications/PDFFiles/fish%20brochure.pdf
Hide

John Dewey and comparing his work to Jane Addams (compare and contrast)

demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of a subject area in which you are interested, and will highlight your ability to critically analyze texts, synthesize arguments, and write in a clear and coherent manner. You may be asked to conduct an in-depth literature review on a particular topic, or conduct original research. At a minimum, your paper must be 25 pages long and include at least 20 references. All papers must meet APA guidelines. This paper should include graph or some form of data added to the paper. The paper should also have 10 quotes from John Dewey and Jane Addams added to the paper.

investigate the applying of an inquiry-based learning (IBL) teaching method on Saudi female undergraduate students critical thinking skills who are enrolled in English language reading and writing course during the preparatory year.

This Qualtative research case study. I did the outline, including (Research questions, participants, research setting data collection, and data analysis) See the attachment and the interview questions – I need 4 pages to present the findings on collecting data (pre and after IBL teaching method reflective papers AND pre and after IBL teaching method individual interviews). The findings should related to Research Questions (1-2).

Read the Entire Extinction Event series, the Ocean Challenge article Write a 1 page paper of your comments – what are your specific takeaways and reflections for each article.

1.Read all three: First, Second, Third Extinction events ( links at the bottom of each article) https://medium.com/wild-without-end/the-three-great-american-extinction-events-a-brief-history-fc1dc00bacf7?sk=f76f01246dad80ea9ed0e8c636b8cbd4 2.What are the Biggest Challenges for Saving the Ocean? https://www.ecowatch.com/oceans-conservation-challenges-2620863428.html 3. US Climate Report Damaged Environment, Shrinking Economy https://nyti.ms/2zmesuU

How much of the topic are they looking at, and how are they framing it (e.g. just looking at one group of actors?

COMBO order 6 slides PPT due in 48 hours Here are a few reminders about the format and nature of your paper, which should be roughly 10-to-12 pages in length. (You can certainly write more, but if you make it to page 18, you have probably written way too much). 1) Your paper(s) will not be about the history of the topic itself but will be a critical history of the manner in which some major historians have approached and interpreted your topic. 2) You would do well to set up the context of your topic in the opening paragraph. 3) In your second paragraph (your thesis paragraph), discuss the way historians have approached your topic over time. You can name-drop all six of them, or just a few, depending on how you see them comparing to each other or if one was enormously more important than the others. But cap this paragraph with a clear overall argument about your six main sources, emphasizing how the historiography has changed over time (or hasnt). Be as specific as you can without letting your writing become cumbersome. 4) Remember to concentrate on the approach and the overall argument of each source, rather than falling down the rabbit-hole of fascinating details about the topic. You also want to give a sense of the scope (what are the range of topics considered in the article/book?) 5) You should make comparisons along the way between historians, in line with your overall argument. You can do this with some stand-alone paragraphs making comparisons, or you can integrate your comparisons into your body paragraphs analyzing each historian. 6) Finally, in your conclusion, you should probably try to make sense of why any of this matters (what does it tell us more broadly?) 7) Writing: a. Do keep in mind all of the notes that I have made on your previous papers. Most of my comments focused on clarity; when in doubt, make your sentences as simple and direct as possible. But also pay attention to the notes I gave all of you about strong topic sentences, mechanical issues (ranging from punctuation to pronouns), transitions (not at the end of paragraphs!), setting up citations, etc. b. Please follow Turabian/Chicago style scrupulously for your paper. This means observing proper footnoting style in the body of the paper itself. -Context paragraph -Thesis paragraph: —Overview of the historiography and how it has changed; the big shifts (major historians); —Argument: whatever it is that youre arguing about either how the field has shifted, or the nature of the field (if its a more recent topic) -Plan of attack paragraph (optional) -Historian 1 (earliest?) –Overall argument; how that argument unfolds (sub-arguments); structure of the book or article –overall approach (kinds of sources? Type of history (political? Intellectual? Social? Cultural?) ? what sort of (methodological) tools is the author using (gender history? Anthropology? Post-structural e.g. Foucault?) Comparing them to another entirely different set? Etc.) For each author: -No summaries; try not to focus on things that are not connected to the paragraph above); do not fall down the rabbit hole of details about the actual topic -dont lose track of your thesis as youre writing -if youre using reviews: make sure that its always clear WHO is speaking -make sure your footnotes are in the correct format -make comparisons as you go forward (with historians 2-6) -Conclusion (revisit the change over time; how the field might move in the future) Works Cited (in Chicago/Turabian style) -Remember: six main historians, 10 sources (this includes book reviews, properly cited of course) Must use book topics in chronological order: 1. Baseballs Great Experiment: Jackie Robinson and HIs Legacy – Jules Tygiel 2.Creating the national pastime: baseball transforms itself, 1903-1953 – Edward White 3.Negro League Baseball: The Rise and Ruin of a Black Institution – Neil Lanctot 4. Making lemonade out of lemons: Mexican American labor and leisure in a California town, 1880-1960- Jose M. Alamillo 5.Playing Americas game: baseball, Latinos, and the color line – Adrian Burgos 1969-2007 6. The integration of the Pacific Coast League: race and baseball on the west coast. -Amy Essignton
Hide

Select TWO characters that we have read about so far this term (one from “The Death of Ivan Ilyich” and the King from Three Questions, both written by by Leo Tolstoy).

Create an argument based on this essay prompt. Discuss what you read about these characters or peoples pursuits of a different life. You are only allowed to use your textbook (NO outside sources are allowed). You may use quotes from the text, but do not include more than 20% quotes or summation of a story or situation. Remember, you want to develop an argument in your introduction that culminates in a strong thesis. The thesis is the idea you want the reader to consider after he or she reads your essay. You will have main points that support your argument throughout your essay. You might use a quote or a summary of a part of your reading to support a main point, but you want most of your essay to be YOU. You have read these stories, memoirs, proposals, so now you are an expert on this subject. Trust yourself. Creating an argument is much like a lawyer arguing a case. You are going to have your introduction that gives the reader an overall view of the essay. Within your introduction is the thesis, the main point you are arguing. You will use main points to support your thesis (body of your essay), and then you’ll have a conclusion that brings you to the point where the “defense rests.” All of our characters we have read about have been in search of something different in their lives. Using the two characters you select and analyze, develop an argument for the one you think was most successful at achieving the “life” he or she desired and why. Use the analysis to help argue your point. Here are some aspects you might analyze for the two characters that you selected. (You do not have use these…you may use others or some of these.) Strengths Weaknesses Morals and Values Respect for others {Analysis may also be called compare and contrast.)

Problem solving report in direct format, recommendation summary in a word document, a Pareto analysis, a cause-and-effect diagram, and a separate excel file containing spreadsheets

The summary doesn’t have a length requirement, but the overall assignment may take a few pages. “Background: Often management may present a problem to us in the form of a question or a request. We need to be prepared to respond with analysis and recommendations clearly communicated in the form of a problem solving report for problems that require some analysis. Assignment: Use the data and scenario of the Southwestern University Case Study found on the attached docment titled “Southwestern University.” You are to write a problem solving report in direct format (after brief intro, the recommendations come first) addressing President Wisners request(s) found in the text. Your report should include the following: – Clear prioritized recommendation summary. – A Pareto analysis of the numerical survey data, focusing on the C-F grades including the graph and brief analysis. – At least one recommendation for making future surveys more useful. – A Pareto analysis of the open-ended comments with graph and brief analysis. – A cause-and-effect diagram of some related problem with diagram and brief analysis. – A Word document with the two Pareto charts and Cause and Effect Diagrams embedded in the appropriate places as jpeg files. A separate Excel file containing your spreadsheets. Be careful about making sweeping recommendations. For instance, I would hesitate to recommend (thats a Southern way of saying there is no way I would do this) installing skyboxes when I do not know (a) how much they cost or (b) how many people are willing to invest. However, I might recommend that we find the answers to questions (a) and (b), but just because someone brought it up does not mean that it necessarily rises to the level of further investigation. A model format for the report is attached.”
Hide

Summarize the main themes of their political philosophy regarding the individual and the kind of political arena they wish to achieve. [40 points]

In commenting on the two great themes of Western political philosophy, Tinder states: This brings us to a position overlooking one of the great chasms in the Western political mind. On one side lies what can be called the politics of redemption [holding] that the goal of politics and of political thought is a life on earth that is altogether good. There are no great, unconquerable evils in human nature or in the essential structure of earthly life. Felicity is not a gift of God, nor is it reserved for a heavenly existence or a time after death. It can be attained through human wisdom and planning here on earth. On the other side of the chasm lies the politics of convenience. This is a politics based either on skepticism about the capacities of human beings and the possibilities of life on earth, or on satisfaction with things as they are. Both attitudes prompt a politics of low expectations and low demands, since the world either cannot or need not be much improved. Government is not called upon to bring salvation but only to enhance the convenience of life. From the list of political thinkers we have taken up in this class, choose one thinker exemplifying the politics of redemption and one exemplifying the politics of convenience. 2) Place your thinker in one or the other category mentioned by Tinder and defend your choice by marshalling arguments from passages (quotes) of the thinker and from commentaries on the thinker you may have gathered from your own research (Be sure to check with your professor that your sources are academically valid and solid sources). [50 points] This paper is not an opinion paper, but rather a research paper, where your arguments need to be supported by quotes and sources. Format and length of paper: Format is MLA with 1 1/2/spacing and 12 point font. Length of paper 10-12 pages and works cited.
Hide

what drives the choice of a third party logistics provider

Title Page APA Statement of authors purpose Application of supply chain management theory relevant to article Background or the issue Managerial implications 2-3 paragraphs Summary Anderson, E. J Coltman, T. Devinney, T.M & Keating, B (2011) What drives the choice of a third party logistics provider. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 472(2) 97-115