Author: best-essay

In your paper, specify the TED Talk you have selected. Isolate and identify the main conclusion(s) and major premise(s) of the authors argument. Then, assess the quality of the talks premises. Is there compelling evidence presented? Do the premises logically lead to the conclusion?
Following the intentions and objectives of this course, this essay must be presented as an argumentative essay. As you now know, an argument has a conclusion and at least one premise. You should present your argument about the TED Talk in your introduction. You must specify what your argument is and how you will argue it (that is, what your conclusion is and what your supporting premises are). The best way of presenting this in your Introduction is as follows: I argue ‘x’ (about the TED talk) {your conclusion/thesis}. Followed by, I argue this because of a, (b), and (c) {your premises}.
This thesis statement reflects how you want to discuss the TED talk and what you want to signal as significant. It is your ARGUMENT.Video:
Esther Duflo: Social experiments to fight poverty
Alleviating poverty is more guesswork than science, and lack of data on aid’s impact
raises questions about how to provide it. But Clark Medal-winner Esther Duflo says
it’s possible to know which development efforts help and which hurt — by testing
solutions with randomized trials.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zvrGiPkVcsCRITERIA understanding of the subject
utilisation of proper academic [or other] style (e.g. citation of references, or use of proper
legal style for court reports, etc.)
relevance of material selected and of the arguments proposed
planning and organisation
logical coherence
critical evaluation
comprehensiveness of research
evidence of synthesis
innovation / creativity / originality
The language used must be of a sufficient standard to permit assessment of the above criteria.
These minimum core criteria form a part of the Schools core academic standards, applied to all coursework and as such they would not usually be subject to any modification, even as a reasonable adjustment for students with disabilities.- shows clear evidence of wide and relevant reading and an engagement with the conceptual issues
– develops a sophisticated and intelligent argument
– shows a rigorous use and a confident understanding of relevant source materials
– achieves an appropriate balance between factual detail and key theoretical issues
– provides evidence of original thinking

Requirements:
Your paper must be at least 1000 words.
Please double space your paper and use standard 12-point font.
Make sure to proofread your paper before submitting.
Please follow APA format when referencing information from outside sources.
Please include your word count at the end of your assignment.

Lets look at ways that an attacker can disassociate us from an access point. First, why would an attacker want to disassociate us from an access point? Second, how does an attacker accomplish this?2. Lightweight access points are what you will find in medium to large sized businesses. What is Ciscos current solution for Lightweight APs and what is their solution for controlling the WLAN?3. Explain the importance of the Wireless Zero Configuration on Windows machines. 3. What Voice Over WiFi systems are regarded as the industry leaders?

Part OneYou will need at least one quoted passage from the text or one specific reference from the film for each set of questions. For example, you would need to include a specific sentence from the readings to support your answer for Where and When. Then, you could use a specific scene from the movie Thor to support your answer to Who.You may find it easier to address the questions in the following order and in relation to the course and module learning outcomes: Where and When This gives us an opportunity to examine the artifacts, ideas, beliefs, practices, and values that inform the myths in the Prose Edda.

What Is Happening Again, we are in the act of examining our readings and films to identify common themes in mythology, such as the Heros Journey. Why and How Answering these questions gives us the opportunity to define and identify terms and references from mythology that will serve as the foundation for further study of the connection between mythology and various fields, including but not limited to art, religion, literature, and humanities.Part TwoAfter you have answered these questions, you will complete Part Two, your reflection, in which you consider the importance of your answers. Your reflection can be your ideas about the passage or a specific detail, or about the myth as a whole, or, it can consist of questions leading to deeper analysis. Your reflection should be a minimum of 150 words. Use either APA or MLA for your in-text citations and for your References/Works Cited page.

1000 words. Writing an investment policy statement for Shake Shack company.
Check the requirement, sample paper and rubric on the additional files.

Hopes on Wheels is our organization, it will be held at a friends indoor basketball court. Its a league that will hold event once a year. The project for the course involves applying the concepts and principles learned from the course and incorporating those items into your organization. You are to create a hypothetical recreational or sport organization and explain and describe in full detail the below characteristics of this organization.A description of the chosen organization in terms of its goals, structure, and processes

Is there a hierarchy in the organizations decision making process? Explain how the organization is structured.
Who is your competition and how will your business thrive in comparison to other businesses similar to yours?
A description of the jobs and their design
Identify main duties, responsibilities, working conditions, and the needed human characteristics of each unit of the organization.
How do you view the entire operation of the organization?
An outline of staffing procedures including recruiting, hiring, and training
What are the steps of the organizations hiring process?
How does the organization train their employees? Any specific training procedures?
A description of the performance appraisal and reward systems
How does the organization evaluate organizational performances at the individual level, individual programs unit level, & organizational level?
Does the organization have any specified performance appraisal and reward systems? What are they?
A description of the threats and risks associated with this type of business
How does the organization minimize risk?
Your group is expected to profile your respective sport organization, providing interesting and relevant information that will tell the story of the organization. A professionally bound report on the organization is expected at the end of the semester. Information the group should provide includes but is not limited to the mission statement, objectives, vision, a general view of and expenses revenue (where applicable),and an organizational chart among other functions.The goal here is to provide you with information on the inner workings of sport organizations and allow you to develop and display critical thinking skills and the ability to present all sides of a policy or issue and its impact. The groups will be self-selected, NOT instructor-assigned.A LARGE PART OF THIS ASSIGMENT IS WORKING AS A TEAM. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMMUNICATION WITHIN YOUR GROUP AND INSTRUCTOR WILL NOT HELP FACILITATE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MEMBERS. I WILL DEDUCT POINTS IF YOU TURN IN THIS ASSIGNMENT WITHOUT THE REQUIRED FOUR (4) MEMBERS. NO EXCUSES, NO EXCEPTIONS.Due Date: by 11:59pm NO EXCEPTIONS
Length and Format: You will present organizational project as a 12-15 page research paper with a minimum of 5 sources that allowed you to compare your hypothetical organization to other REAL organizational findings, similar to yours. In addition, students may attach other material from the organization (e.g., statement of goals, organizational chart, job advertisements, rules and procedures, etc.). If your project has less than 12 pages, points will be deducted.

Annotated bibliography: Students will submit an annotated bibliography as part of the researched essay assignment. The bibliography will demonstrate knowledge of the research process and the ability to evaluate source materials.
INSTRUCTIONS:
The second major writing assignment (essay) of the semester is the Researched Essay (RE). Students will research a socially significant issue being debated in the US today, complete an annotated bibliography (AB) of their sources, and develop a rhetorically sophisticated argument about how to address the issue. The essay will take the form of a thesis- driven, researched argument that takes part in an existing conversation, and will clearly demonstrate the validity of its claim using reasoned argumentation, rhetorical appeals, detailed support, and purposeful organization. It will not simply be a report on, or summary or description of, the existing debate. It will have to be focused on the thorough development of a single idea, and this idea will be one with high stakes a significant matter of concern.
Instructor approval: Students must submit a list of five topic summaries, in order of personal preference, to the instructor for approval. As indicated on the schedule in our syllabus, this is due in class on Thursday 10/11. In order for your topic to be approved, your list must be complete (according to instructions in the syllabus), and your topic must be SPECIFIC climate change, cancer, immigration, economy, etc., are too broad; you must work to narrow your focus so as to have a clear direction for pursuing your research. I will also not approve topics that are already overdone (legalization of marijuana, lowering the drinking age, etc.), nor those that are based in bias or ignorance rather than substance (climate change is a hoax, abortion is murder, etc.).
Annotated bibliography: The AB documents sources relevant to the RE. Like any bibliography or works cited list, it includes bibliographic information for each source. However, it is also annotated, meaning that it also includes a brief summary and evaluation of the contents of each source along with its bibliographic information. The Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) has lots of helpful information about annotated bibliographies. You can access this information at https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/index.html.
Sources: Sources must be reputable: academic, journalistic, governmental, scientific, and the like. Things like Wikipedia, amateur blogs, propaganda, and similar sources MAY NOT be used. We will discuss this matter (information literacy) in class on the research day. If you have additional questions regarding the appropriateness or reputability of any sources you wish to use, speak to me about them well ahead of the AB and/or RE due dates. The AB must include at least 12-15 annotated entries; at least 8-10 of these sources must be meaningfully incorporated into the content of the RE.
SUGGESTIONS ON HOW TO PROCEED:
Your greatest resources for the AB and RE are your sources, this handout, the On Research handout, the Rhetorical Appeals handout, the Purdue OWL, and (above all) your They Say, I Say text, which not only provides helpful rubrics to aid you in elaborating your argument, but also contains lots of important discussion about how to understand researched academic writing as entering a conversation. Study these resources carefully and frequently.
REQUIREMENTS:
Word count: 2500-3000 words
Formatting: MLA. For MLA formatting guidelines, go to the Purdue Online Writing Lab here: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_style_introduction.html.

Submission: Each student will have to complete a rough draft for an in-class workshop, and will then be responsible for submitting a first draft and a final draft to designated online drop-boxes on Turnitin. Details about how to do this will be discussed in class and Blackboard announcements.
Due dates:
R 10/11: Topic list due in class
T 10/16: Research question and 4-5 AB entries due in class R 10/18: 4-5 additional AB entries due in class
F 10/19: COMPLETE AB due (Turnitin)
R 10/25: Draft of thesis statement and introductory paragraph for RE due for in-class workshop T 10/30: Complete RE draft printed for in-class workshop
F 11/2: Revised first draft of RE due for instructor feedback and grading (Turnitin)
F 11/9: First draft of RE returned with feedback and grade (Turnitin)
F 11/20: Revised final draft of RE due for final grading (Turnitin)
RUBRIC (next page)Researched Essay: Rubric (COMP 100)
A
B
C
D
SUBSTANCE (50%)
Material challenges intelligence and sophistication of college audience. A thesis that is clear, specific, original, debatable, and clearly part of an established conversation. A single, narrow focus, developed with significant and interesting details, examples, and discussion. Sources are relevant, clearly introduced, and meaningfully synthesized and integrated into the discussion. The writing artfully fulfills assignment criteria.
Material is thoughtful and engaging to a college audience. A single focus runs through the paper, and is developed with appropriate details, examples, and discussion. Sources are relevant and clearly and purposefully used. Writers argument is clear, but may lack originality, or may not entirely demonstrate meaningful engagement with an established conversation. Writing clearly fulfills assignment criteria.
Material may not fully engage a college audience. A single focus is evident, but may be too broad, and parts of the essay may wander. Focus is generally developed with details, examples, and discussions. Sources are generally relevant, although not always clearly introduced or integrated. Argument may be lacking in originality, strength, clarity, or debatability. Writing reasonably fulfills most assignment criteria.
Material does not fully engage the abilities of a college audience. No single focus runs through the paper. Topic is likely too broad. Ideas are stated, but not developed with details, examples, and discussions. Sources, if used at all, are not clearly introduced or integrated. May read more like a report, with little or no argument or personal voice in the conversation. The writing fails to fulfill several assignment criteria.
APPEALS (20%)
Essay makes clear, purposeful, and effective use of all types of rhetorical appeal
Essay makes clear use of some forms of rhetorical appeal, but may be missing others or may sometimes use them ineffectively
Essay is noticeably lacking, inconsistent, or ineffective in its use of rhetorical appeals
Essay is almost entirely lacking, inconsistent, or ineffective in its use of rhetorical appeals
ORGANI- ZATION (20%)
Essay is clearly purposefully organized, following the internal logic of the argument and developing it consistently; sentences and paragraphs are purposefully structured and flow well; transitions tie everything together smoothly
Essay demonstrates a clear attempt at purposeful organization, but includes some inconsistency and/or lack of development; sentence- and paragraph-level structure is apparent but inconsistent; some transitions may be weak
Essay demonstrates only a weak attempt at organization, and sometimes seems jumbled, disjointed, repetitious, and/or scattered; little evidence of purposeful sentence/paragraph structure; some transitions weak or missing
Essay is severely lacking in purposeful organization, and seems carelessly thrown together, disjointed, repetitious, scattered, and/or jumbled; lacking smoothness, flow
STYLE AND MECHANICS (10%)
Sentence structure varies according to content and purpose. Sentences are clear and enjoyable to read. Word choice is precise, interesting, and appropriate. Language is mature and idiomatic. Tone complements purpose and suits the audience. References to sources are appropriately cited and documented. Problems in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or usage are minor and rare, and do not interfere with communication.
Sentence structure varies, only occasionally choppy or repetitive. Sentences are generally clear and readable. Word choice and vocabulary are appropriate. Language is idiomatic. Tone is appropriate to purpose and audience. References to sources are generally cited and documented properly. Problems in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or usage may interfere with communication.
Sentences tend to be basic, choppy, or structurally repetitive. Generally readable, but ideas may be hard to follow. Most words are well-chosen, and language is generally idiomatic. Tone is generally appropriate to purpose and audience. References to sources generally follow accurate formatting. Problems in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or usage occasionally interfere with communication and impair the writers credibility.
Sentences frequently basic, choppy, or repetitive. Sentence problems impede effective communication. Frequent word choice and idiom problems. Tone frequently inappropriate to the writers purpose and audience. References to sources are not properly formatted in- text. Many errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and usage impede communication and damage writers credibility.
E/F: Does not fulfill basic criteria (word count, off-topic, source requirements, etc.)

Describe the advanced practice nursing role in the pharmacological management of patients with viral diseases, infectious diseases.

A written review will be submitted by Monday November 19, 2018 at 11:55 PM. 5 points will be deducted for every day the paper is late. The review will be no more than one page of one and a half spaced typed text. Any review over 1 page in length will be marked down at the rate of 5 points per extra page. The point of a scientific review paper is to write clearly and concisely. Spelling and grammatical errors will also result in point deductions.
Do not use first person language (I, you, us, etc.)
Do not use colloquialism or opinionated language. Stay way from words that are
dramatic in tone or or superfluous. Write clearly and scientifically.
Do not use contractions
Do not directly quote the authors. Write anything relevant in your own words.
Summarize the information clearly and concisely.
Do not include external citations. Do not cite the current paper, in text.
You may use any proper citation format that you are comfortable with.
Use active voice. The link below helps describe the difference.
https://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/CCS_activevoice.html
You do not need to include any heading; simply begin your review on the first page. I know my name, the course, etc. Save your file as your full name and the date.
You can number the pages if you wish.
Upload the file to the assignment tab in Moodle as a word document. I will review the
paper, make corrections and comments, and re-upload the file in Moodle with the final grade.
The student is responsible to ensure the material is relevant to topic covered in the environmental science course, otherwise points will be deducted. You are also responsible to make sure that the paper is a peer-reviewed journal article. Make absolutely sure that it includes a method, results and discussion of the results. Review papers, opinion papers, new paper articles, summary papers, etc. are not peer-reviewed. Points will be deducted if it is not in the peer-reviewed format. If you are unsure if the topic or paper is appropriate, email the citation or PDF to a TA (e-mails are in the syllabus) or the instructor. We will give you an affirmation on your review publication.
The review paper should include:
1. Authors and publication title, cited correctly. This should be on the second page alone.
The title and authors should not be mentioned in the body of the paper.
2. Include a clear and concise summary of the methods used to collect and analyze the
data. It should be 3-4 sentences in length band by the end of your summary, I should have a good understanding of what the scientist actually did.
a. WHERE did they sample if they were in the field?

c. WHAT analysis were conducted? What was measured? What statistics or
models were used?
3. Include a clear and concise summary of the results and this should also be 3-4
sentences. It is important that you convey to me what the results mean. This is the whole point of scientific research
a. What did all of the data collected in the methods actually tell us?
b. What was the significant finding or findings?
4. Include a concise summary of the overall purpose (take home message) of the scientific
endeavor. Go to the discussion portion of the paper for this information. Read it carefully and summarize in a few sentences. This is for me to understand the point of the paper you read.
Spend most of your time and most of the body of the paper, on the methods, data and results and discussion. You may need 1-2 sentences by way of introduction and finally summary. The rest should be a clear summary of the research conducted in the paper and what it means. These papers are not easy to read but do your best. Read slowly, make notes, and summarize what you understand. Tell me what you learn!

Articles must be found in reputable professional and/or scholarly journals and/or informational venues that deal with the content of the course (i.e., not blogs, Wikipedia, newspapers, etc.). After reading the articles, select the 1 article that you wish to discuss.
It is highly recommended that you use Liberty Universitys Jerry Falwell Library online resources. For more details on what constitutes a scholarly journal (and what does not), visit Jerry Falwell Librarys “Scholarly Journals What Are They?” page.