A Criminal Injustice by Richard Firstman and Jay SalpeterThe paper will discuss the experiences of the particular victim and what the research says about the victim or victimization experience.

1. Papers are to be written in APA format
2. Papers should be not less than 7 pages long, not including cover page or
work-cited page.
3. All papers will be submitted in Times New Roman font, 12 point, with
normal margin pre-sets of one inch on top, bottom, left, and right.
In addition to reading the book, you will also find 2 research articles in referenced journals that discuss the same type of victimization. These articles MUST come
from academic journals, NOT Time Magazine, The NY Times, or anything similar. They may NOT be websites. They may not be books or government documents. They must be no older than publications in 2007.

Carefully read Theodore Dalrymples Reader, She Married Him–Alas and type a 750 word (minimum) response in which you address EACH of the following four questions in your own words:What is the author’s main argument?

How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)?
How does the author respond to the theories of cosmopolitanism and anti-cosmopolitalism (discussed in Chapter 7)?
Do you agree or disagree with Dalrymples analysis? Why or why not? (Feel free to include observations from your own experience or that of friends, relatives, or acquaintances.)

U.S. Department of JusticeUnited States AttorneyEastern District of PennsylvaniaRon Swanson, United States Attorney615 Chestnut Street

Suite 1250
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106-4476
(215) 555-8200
Trial Division, Narcotics Bureau
Assistant United States Attorneys
Leslie Knope and Ann PerkinsOCTOBER 18, 2018Mr. Dwight Schrute was indicted yesterday on one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). Specifically, the Defendant is accused of possession of 1000 100 milligram baggies of crystalline methamphetamine hydrochloride (N-methyl-1-phenylpropan-2-amine), commonly known as methamphetamine or crystal meth.We need a memo from you addressing our chances for success in prosecuting this case. We are only interested in the question of whether Mr. Schrute knowingly possessed the methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). Your analysis should be limited to this issue. You should not address any other issues. Specifically, you should not address issues relating to the lawfulness of the stop or search of the car. Additionally, you should note that venue is proper in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.Please give this your immediate attention. We will need the completed memorandum by November 19, 2018. You must keep us updated about your research. We have attached research roadmaps to this memo for you to complete and submit to me as your research progresses.

Fall 2018Research Roadmap Plan, Part II: Secondary Sources and Annotated Statutes
Good faith completion of this assignment is necessary to attend any part of class where this research is discussed.Goals: (a) Use secondary sources to gather background information that will help you formulate and understand your issue, refine your research vocabulary, and possibly generate initial case leads. (If this was an assignment for an actual client, these sources may also help you identify related issues that need to be addressed. For this assignment, however, do not stray from the assigned issue.) (b) Use statutes as a starting point for research and to find additional relevant law applicable to the issue. Using these two kinds of sources will enable you to quickly find the majority of the relevant authority for your Open Memo assignment. In addition to finding primary authority, the secondary sources will give you a good overview of the analysis of this assignment.Instructions: Read through this entire assignment. To the best of your ability, answer the following questions. Unless otherwise indicated, you may use either print or online sources to answer these questions. Bring one copy of this assignment to turn in at the beginning of Class #19 (Oct. 26, 2018). Make sure to keep a copy for yourself. A copy of this Roadmap will be available on the Canvas/TWEN site.Note: You can do the Sections of this Roadmap in any order you like. Remember that legal research is inter-related, so you can start with the secondary sources, annotated statutes, or digests (Roadmap #3) and find all of the relevant material and see the connections. I suggest starting with the secondary sources because these will allow you to get the big picture of how the issues involved in our case are analyzed. Tips as you begin your research:Check pocket parts and supplements when using print resources (books) for your research.
Look at indexes, tables of contents, and guides when using resources.
Refer to your research labs, class notes, in-class research exercises, and the Osbeck text to refresh your memory when using these resources.
When you find West Topics and Key Numbers that appear relevant you must note both the Topic and the Key Number. If you just write down the Key Number you will not be able to use this information later to find cases.
What have you found? What do you still need to find? Which questions are answered? What new questions are raised?

What do people spend money on that they either don’t need or rarely use other than those things mentioned by Singer?

What things might people be most easily convinced to do without, and why?
Consider and discuss whether the Kantian argument for helping the vulnerable is more or less convincing than the traditional utilitarian arguments. What kinds of arguments would be the most likely to persuade people to help those in need?
Does Peter Singer’s greatest moral evil rule require that persons act in heroic ways or go above and beyond the call of duty as Arthur suggests? Explain your answer.

The history and development of a current

You will submit a 78-page paper (not including the title, abstract or bibliography pages), in current APA format on the history and development of a current series of jet transports. At least 5 academic resources such as books, online resources, journals, and articles must be used.

In a paragraph (150 words minimum), please respond to ONE of the following questions:What do people spend money on that they either don’t need or rarely use other than those things mentioned by Singer? What things might people be most easily convinced to do without, and why?

Consider and discuss whether the Kantian argument for helping the vulnerable is more or less convincing than the traditional utilitarian arguments. What kinds of arguments would be the most likely to persuade people to help those in need?
Does Peter Singer’s greatest moral evil rule require that persons act in heroic ways or go above and beyond the call of duty as Arthur suggests? Explain your answer.

How can we treat others as an end in themselves according to O’Neill? In what ways are human beings limited by their finitude?

Write a short reflection statement (350-500 words) after reading Chapter 14. Use complete sentences and correct academic writing to complete this assignment.Respond in writing to these items:Explain the Libertarian view with respect to whether we have a duty to help others. How does Singer argue that wealthy nations and their interests have caused harm to developing nations and their people?
Arthur mentions three ways in which a moral code must be practical. State those three ways. Which of the three do you consider to be the most compelling, and why?

Write a short reflection statement (350-500 words) after reading Chapter 13. Use complete sentences and correct academic writing to complete this assignment.

Respond in writing to these items:How does Sinnott-Armstrong reply to Rodin’s claim that consequentialism is useless in addressing preventive war? Do you agree? Why or why not?
Walzer examines excuses for terrorism while granting that terrorism cannot be morally justified. What is the distinction between a justification and an excuse?
According to Valls, what are the two difficulties that arise when one is trying to define “terrorism”? What final definition of the term does Valls stipulate that he will use in his arguments?