chris, Author at Premium Research Writers

Ethical and Unethical Organizations

Discussion 1

Ethical and Unethical Organizations

Organizations can be considered “ethical” or “unethical.” Ethical organizations are those in which leaders adhere to ethical guidelines and engage in ethical conduct while encouraging employees to do the same. When an organization’s leaders do not engage in ethical conduct or encourage employees to do so, the organization may be considered unethical. For example, in 2010, leaders and employees at Toyota committed ethical breaches by failing to disclose and address safety concerns regarding some of their automobiles. Given the unethical conduct of Toyota leaders and employees, many considered Toyota to be an unethical organization.

Pay attention to the need to focus on results, and to commit the organization to achieving those results, in nonprofit organizations.

Read the Panel on the Nonprofit Sector report Principles for Good Governance and Ethical Practice: A Guide for Charities and Foundations. Focus on the guidelines for good governance and ethical practice in nonprofit organizations. https://www.independentsector.org/uploads/PrincipleResources/The_33_Principles.pdf

Think about an institution that fits what these resources and your own assessment would consider to be an ethical institution. Think about what makes it ethical.

Identify an organization (public or private) with which you are very familiar. This organization could be one in which you worked or one with which you are familiar from the news.

Think about the extent to which the organization is ethical.

Submit 150 – 500 word response: Due by Wednesday 11/04/15. a brief description of the organization you selected. NOTE: Do NOT state the name of the organization. Then explain the extent to which the organization is ethical. Provide specific examples to illustrate your explanation.

Support your work with specific citations from the Learning Resources. You are allowed to draw from additional sources to support your explanation, but you must cite using APA standards. All quoted material must be identified, cited, and referenced per APA standards.

Journal

Assume you are a leader in a government or nonprofit organization. Explain your role, as a leader, in building and maintaining an ethical culture in the organization. Be specific. (1 page)

How would a university research team evaluate one of your deeply-held beliefs?

How would a university research team evaluate one of your deeply-held beliefs?

Apply at least three of James Lett’s six rules of evidential reasoning (here) to something in your own life that you hold dear.

For help coming up with something to examine with Lett’s rules, check out the Whitbourne article about “Our Superstitious Minds.” Even the heartiest critical thinkers employ “magical thinking” to their lives. It is part of our human condition.

Using fewer than 700 words:

1. Share a practice, belief, or tradition that is important to you. Describe it well enough so that the reader will have no trouble identifying what you are examining.

2. “Attack” your idea using Lett’s rules (at least three of them.)

3. Conclude with a paragraph or two describing how this exercise affected your perspective on the practice/tradition/belief you chose.

Choose your own approach for finding the differences between the two entities. For instance, look at the public entity and draw the conclusion that their organizational mission might be protecting lives or public health, while the privately held organization may have a more central focus on mitigating liability.

Project description
Using the Internet as your primary medium for collecting information, you will be selecting a public and a private entity that you will explore. The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with both a governmental entity, such as a city, county, or state government, and a privately owned entity, such as a private university or large corporate employer.

This paper is meant to identify their organizational approach to risk management and to compare the two entities. Choose your own approach for finding the differences between the two entities. For instance, look at the public entity and draw the conclusion that their organizational mission might be protecting lives or public health, while the privately held organization may have a more central focus on mitigating liability. Using readings from the text chapters 1&2 (Broder, J. F., & Tucker, E. (2012). Risk analysis and the security survey (4th ed.). Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.) compare and contrast at least three separate areas of their respective risk management approaches. The purpose of this assignment is to get you to think about how things may look very similar and may have similar titles on activities like risk management, yet there really are differences that can be compared.
This paper must be in APA format and include a COVER PAGE, ABSTRACT (WITH KEYS WORDS), Discussion, Conclusion, and References. This paper should go beyond the obvious, be written at a graduate level, and must be at least 1,200 words in length. Three resources must be used to support your position. Remember, all resources including, but not limited to, journals, magazines, and/or books must be properly cited using APA style.

write a 500-750 words or 2 to 3 page paper that analyzes the work by discussing how the principles of design are used in it.

Visual Analysis: Choose one of the following works from the textbook and write a 500-750 words or 2 to 3 page paper that analyzes the work by discussing how the principles of design are used in it. For a thorough discussion be sure to include what you’ve learned about the visual elements. To begin, you might make a list of the principles of design and explain how each is used in the work you’ve chosen, then work up your list into essay form.

7th edition:
fig. #8-17, p. 163; Las Meninas by D. Velázquez 1656
fig. #4-25, p. 74; The Death of Socrates by J.L. David 1784
fig. #7-15, p.145; No. 29,1950 by J. Pollock 1950

Chapter content:
Repetition and Rhythm
Although the idea of repetition may at first sound boring, it can actually be a dynamic element in a work of art. In two- or three-dimensional art repetition of design elements is a frequently used principle that activates and articulates the surface. In performance arts, such as music, dance, and theatre, repetition is a presentation, or re-presentation (representation), of the themes of the work. And since performances can be repeated, there is a continual re-presentation of the performance itself. Each re-presentation is different, which means the work is perpetually changing. Therefore repetition in the performing arts equates with dynamic change. It can work much the same in the visual arts with the activation that repetition brings to the composition, resulting in a quality that is much more dynamic than static.

In visual art the repetition of lines, shapes, colors, or patterns creates a visual rhythm that keeps the viewer’s eye moving around the composition. Visual rhythm, which is the repetition of accented elements, works much the same way as rhythm in music: it helps to bind the work together; rhythm creates a thread of unity. Rhythm can be regular or irregular, these terms working somewhat the same as the terms symmetry and asymmetry work when speaking of balance. If the repetition of elements is equal throughout the composition, the rhythm is regular. If the repetition of elements is not equal, then the rhythm is irregular. Besides regular and irregular, some other terms used to describe rhythm are: simple rhythm, alternating rhythms, and progression. All of these terms could apply to music as well.
Unity and Variety
As a principle of design, unity and variety work together. Unity gives the work of art a sense of oneness, of coherence. If a work is unified then the viewer has the feeling that all elements in the composition belong together and make a harmonious whole. In other words, it works. Variety is the differences among elements. Variety is used to avoid the sense that everything is the same or bland, and to provide enough difference so that there are areas of interest and a focal point. There shouldn’t be so much variety that there is disorder or dissonance in the composition.

Unity is achieved in many ways when creating a composition. The first is repetition, the topic at hand. Another is by having one or two elements remain constant while other elements are varied. For example, one shape is repeated, but in a number of different colors and textures. Artists can also create unity by using enclosure, a surrounding element. This can be the edge of the composition or a frame. Enclosure can also mean that the elements of a composition do not direct the eye beyond the frame. If this happens, then the work might loose its unity, but does not necessarily do so. Unity can also be achieved by limiting the number of elements. Simplicity is usually more conducive to unity than complexity.

Variety as a design principle is, in many ways, much easier to accomplish by artists. Introducing variety is simply a matter of varying the colors, shapes, line, textures, and so on. Not only is variety the easier half of the unity-variety principle for the artist, for the viewer it is almost effortless to recognize. For an excellent example of unity and variety look at fig. #6-20, p. 113 Black Face and Arm Unit by Ben Jones.

write a report about the importance of Indoor Environmental quality ( IEQ ) and why is it important.

Write on review of Comparative Labor Law in Relation to that Saudi Arabia

i want to ask who has an access to academic sources and E-Resources including LexisNexis and can help me writing 10 pages
the topic will be any of the following:
– Review of Comparative Labor Law in Relation to that Saudi Arabia
– Review of Comparative Criminal Law in Relation to that Saudi Arabia
– Review of Comparative Constitutional Law in Relation to that Saudi Arabia
– Review of Comparative administrative Law in Relation to that Saudi Arabia
– Review of Comparative Family Law in Relation to that Saudi Arabia

Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Research Paper

The final assignment for the course will be a research paper. The Research Paper will contribute 25% to the course grade.

Focus of the Research Paper

This final research paper must demonstrate the understanding of new learning in the field of project management and how it relates to purchasing and supply management. This is an assignment with a length of 10 – 12 pages that should integrate the reading, multi-media, and class discussion boards. It is mandatory to have research from the classroom text as well as at least five sources from reputable sources or online library to support your views.

Consider the validity of your resources carefully before using them in academic papers. It is recommended to use examples from your professional experience where possible or build from your learning in the discussion boards. Use at least one project of which you have been a team member or a project manager as an example to describe the topics below:

The following topics must be included in order for the paper to be complete:

Summarize the concepts of procurement and contract management and the importance to the business world.
Evaluate RFP selection tools and how to improve the assessment of proposals.
Summarize the concept of procurement planning and evaluate the various strategies necessary for project success.
Assess how to select the most qualified vendor in a proposal.
Appraise the contract and in particular, the legal aspects of procurement within the contract.
Compare the critical elements of a contract including relationships between the client, supplier, completion terms and payment terms.

The final Research Paper for the course must be submitted by to the instructor by 11:59 p.m. of the time zone in which you reside on the last day of the class.

Writing the Research Paper

The Paper:

Must be 10 – 12 double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide.
Must include a cover page that includes:

Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph.
Must use at least four scholarly sources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford Online Library, in addition to the textbook.
Must use APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide to document all sources.
Must include, on the final page, a Reference Page that is completed according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide.

Grading Rubric

Description:

Total Possible Score: 25.00
Summarizes the Concepts of Procurement and Contract Management and the Importance to the Business World
Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively summarizes the concepts of procurement and contract management and the importance to the business world. Incorporates detailed examples and concepts from the text and other scholarly sources.

Proficient – Summarizes procurement the concepts of procurement and contract management and the importance to the business world. Incorporates examples and concepts from the text and other scholarly sources. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Partially summarizes the concepts of procurement and contract management and the importance to the business world. Incorporates limited use of examples and concepts from the text or other scholarly sources. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Incompletely summarizes the concepts of procurement and contract management and the importance to the business world. Does not incorporate examples and concepts from the text or other scholarly sources. Significant details are missing.

Non-Performance – The summary of the concepts of procurement and contract management and the importance to the business world is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Evaluates RFP Selection Tools and Describes How to Improve the Assessment of Proposals
Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Thoroughly evaluates RFP selection tools and comprehensively describes how to improve the assessment of proposals. Uses scholarly sources to support the evaluation.

Proficient – Evaluates RFP selection tools and describes how to improve the assessment of proposals. Uses scholarly sources to support the evaluation, but the improvement of the assessment is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Evaluates RFP selection and partially describes how to improve the assessment of proposals. Limited use of scholarly sources to support the evaluation and the improvement of the assessment is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to evaluates RFP selection and describe how to improve the assessment of proposals; however, does not use scholarly sources to support the description and the description is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The evaluation of RFP selection tools and how to improve the assessment of proposals is either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Summarizes the Concept of Procurement Planning and Evaluates the Various Strategies Necessary for Project Success
Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively summarizes procurement planning and thoroughly evaluates the various strategies necessary for project success. Effectively incorporates examples and concepts from the text and other scholarly sources.

Proficient – Summarizes procurement planning and evaluates the various strategies necessary for project success. Incorporates examples and concepts from the text and other scholarly sources. The summary or the evaluation are slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Partially summarizes procurement planning and somewhat evaluates the various strategies necessary for project success. Limited use of examples and concepts from the text or other scholarly sources. The summary and/or the evaluation are underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to summarize procurement planning and evaluate the various strategies necessary for project success; however, the summary and evaluation of the various strategies necessary for project success do not incorporate examples and concepts from the text or other scholarly sources and the summary and/or evaluation are significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The summary of the concept of procurement planning and evaluation of the various strategies necessary for project success is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Assesses How to Select the Most Qualified Vendor in a Proposal
Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively assesses how to select the most qualified vendor in a proposal. Uses scholarly sources to support the assessment.

Proficient – Assesses how to select the most qualified vendor in a proposal. Uses scholarly sources to support the assessment. The assessment is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Partially assesses how to how to select the most qualified vendor in a proposal. Uses minimal scholarly sources to support the assessment. The assessment is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to assess how to select the most qualified vendor in a proposal; however, does not use scholarly sources to support the assessment and the assessment is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The assessment of how to select the most qualified vendor in a proposal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Appraises the Contract and in Particular, the Legal Aspects of Procurement Within the Contract
Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively appraises the contract and the legal aspects of procurement in a contract. Effectively uses scholarly sources to support the assessment.

Proficient – Appraises the contract and the legal aspects of procurement in a contract. Uses scholarly sources to support the assessment. The assessment is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Partially appraises the contract and the legal aspects of procurement in a contract. Limited use of scholarly sources to support the appraisal. The appraisal is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to appraise the contract and the legal aspects of procurement in a contract; however, does not use scholarly sources to support the appraisal and the appraisal is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The appraisal of the contract and the legal aspects of procurement in a contract is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Compares the Critical Elements of a Contract Including Relationships Between the Client, Supplier, Completion Terms and Payment Terms
Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Provides a thorough comparison of the critical elements of a contract including relationships between the client, supplier, completion terms and payment terms.

Proficient – Provides a comparison of the critical elements of a contract including relationships between the client, supplier, completion terms and payment terms. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Provides a limited comparison of the critical elements of a contract including relationships between the client, supplier, completion terms and payment terms. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a comparison of the critical elements of a contract including relationships between the client, supplier, completion terms and payment terms. Significant details are missing.

Non-Performance – The comparison of the critical elements of a contract including relationships between the client, supplier, completion terms and payment terms is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Total: 5.00

Distinguished – Paper is logically organized with a well-written introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion.

Proficient – Paper is logically organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One of these requires improvement.

Basic – Paper is organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One or more of the introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require improvement.

Below Expectations – Paper is loosely organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. The introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require much improvement.

Non-Performance – The introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 0.34

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient – Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.