This final paper will be an expository presentation and evaluation of one argument/theory from any of the readings we have done this semester.
Your paper should focus on:
1) briefly introducing the topic and your thesis in the introduction,
2) reconstructing and presenting an argument or theory from a selected primary text, and
3) evaluating the argument/theory (i.e., take issue with, or defend, some aspect of the argument/theory).
(1) the evaluation is not based on a misunderstanding of the original argument (and should explain, or at least hint at, why the original argument has some degree of plausibility);
(2) the evaluation makes assumptions that the original author would (or consistently could) accept; (3) the evaluation discusses compelling reasons why the original argument is problematic or
successful;
(4) the evaluation considers possible responses to the objections or defenses it has raised (and replies
to these possible responses)Additional Guidelines:
– You must have a thesis and argue for it. The thesis you will end up defending should be made
clear early in the paper (i.e., in the introductory paragraph). I will discuss Xs paper or I will discuss whether or not Xs position is too demanding is not a thesis statement. I will defend Xs claim/argument for Y, or I will argue that the Xs objection to Y fails is a thesis statement.
– Before you argue for your thesis, you will have to carefully explain the relevant background.
– Arguing for your thesis requires giving premises that together support your thesis, and giving
reasons for the truth of the premises. You will have to use your own judgment in determining
which of your premises require more support or motivation than others.
– You must consider at least one response/objection to your argument and reply to it.
Note:
an objection to your argument need not purport to show that your thesis is false; it need only purport to show that the argument you give for your thesis is problematic: it has a false or implausible premise, a fallacious step in reasoning, etc..
– In your reply, be careful not to just repeat your argument for your thesis. Address the objection itself; make clear why, initial appearances to the contrary, the objection is mistaken, confused, turns on a misunderstanding of the original argument, or can be avoided by an appropriate or reasonable qualification or amendment in your argument.You will be evaluated on the basis of:
1. Your explanation of the relevant background i.e., the main theory, problem, or argument that that you are writing on, and the secondary literature you are responding to. (Accuracy, Completeness, Clarity)
2. Clarity of your thesis, and the cogency of your argument for your thesis. 3. Your consideration of (at least one) objection, and your response to it. 4. The general clarity of the paper structure and writing.
5. Originality. Feel free to use the following to outline the structure and arguments for your paper:
My thesis is:Summary of primary text argument/theory:The main premises of my argument for my thesis are:The central response/objection to my argument that I will consider is:This response/objection attacks which part, or step in reasoning, in my argument?My reply to the objection is:
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]