2. What is the authors (s) credibility?
3. What is the main focus/purpose/thesis of the authors work?
4. Briefly describe the contents of the work!
5. Who is the possible audience for the authors work?
6. What are the authors aims or research methods in the work?
8. What are the authors major conclusions or observations he or she reaches in the work?
9. Will you use this source in your research paper?
10. Why does or does not this source meet your expectations, meaning you probably will use a different source in your research?
See below to view my example:
Source 1: Rasenberger, Jim. Nightmare on Austin Street. American Heritage. 57.5 (2006): 65-66. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. TCC Library, Portsmouth, VA. 12 Nov. 2008. .
1. What is the authors(s) background?
a. Jim Rasenberger is an author and journalist for the New York Times.
2. What is the authors (s) credibility?
a. The writer works or writes for the New York Times.
3. What is the main focus/purpose/thesis of the authors work?
a. He asserts that the events as described by Gansberg in 38 Who Saw Murder could not have happened the way Gansberg described them.
4. Briefly describe the contents of the work!
a. Rasenberger states that although 38 people may have heard or seen the initial attack, Genovese was attacked three times.
5. Who is the possible audience for the authors work?
a. Rasenbergers assumes his audience is familiar with Gansbergs famous and widely published article.
6. What are the authors aims or research methods in the work?
a. The most serious attack occurred in the back foyer of her apartment building, and could have been witnessed by five or six people at most.
7. Does the authors work have any defects, weaknesses, suspected bias, fallacies; or limitations?
a. He seems pleased that the initial and most famous account was flawed.
8. What are the authors major conclusions or observations he or she reaches in the work?
a. He concludes his article by saying that if Gansbergs account had been accurate, countless articles and books would never have been written about the incident and Americans apathy would not have been studied as thoroughly.
9. Will you use this source in your research paper?
a. Rasenbergers article is interesting, but contains few facts and little research to support his assertions.
10. Why does or does not this source meet your expectations, meaning you probably will use a different source in your research?
a. The article is helpful as a starting point for a critical view of Gansbergs account of events.
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]