What exactly, then, is the relationship between celebrity and divinity? Is Rojek right to insist on kinship between the two concepts? If so, why might people resist this argument so much? If not, whats wrong with his logic?

In his book Celebrity, Chris Rojek observes, Anthropological studies of comparative religion and shamanism demonstrate that all cultures possess rites, myths, divine forms sacred and venerated objects, symbols, consecrated men, and sacred places (53). In our ostensibly secular contemporary culture, Rojek finds that celebrities often assume some of these sacralized functions. He explains, A peculiar tension in celebrity culture is that the physical and social remoteness of the celebrity is compensated for by the glut of mass-media information, including fanzines, press stories, TV documentaries, interviews, newsletters, and biographies, which personalize the celebrity, turning a distant figure from a stranger into a significant other. The tension has inescapable parallels with religious worship, and these are reinforced by the attribution by fans of magical or extraordinary powers to the celebrity (52-53).

Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]