You are asked to reflect on your own experiences and engage with ideas from the literature. One of the more effective ways to learn, however, is to apply these ideas to new settings. This is what you re asked to do in this assignment. You have two options to write about: Option 1: Think of an organisation that you are a part of that would benefit from the addition of a mentoring program. In this recommendation, include: A description of the context of the organisation. An evidence- based explanation for how mentoring would be beneficial in this context. An outline for what the mentoring program would look like, and a justification for why this structure was selected. A reference list. Option 2: Think of a mentoring program that you are currently (or have previously) been a part of. Given what youve learnt, what changes would you suggest to this program? Write a recommendation to the mentoring program organiser suggesting your change and outlining the reasons why. This recommendation should include: A description of the current mentoring program . An outline for your suggested changes, including an evidence- based justification for the changes. A reference list Maximum length: 1000 words (+/-10%, excluding the reference list, title, and subheadings). Marking Criteria (It would be very thankful if you can especially focus on these four elements) 1. Description of mentoring and the orgainisational context. – The description of the organisational context and/or existing mentoring program highlights the key features that will be discussed in the recommendation question. That is, there is some alignment between the description of the existing context, and the recommendations. – The description of the organisational context and/or existing mentoring program is completely aligned with the recommendations provided. 2. Evidence- based discussion of mentorship recommendations – Recommendations are provided, and these recommendations are supported by scholarly sources. The research is described and explicitly linked to the recommendations. – The sources used are recent (i.e. published in the last ten years), and all scholarly. There is an attempt at critical analysis either by evaluating the quality of the evidence, or considering potential limitations about how it might not be able to be applied in the organisational context. – All the sources used are scholarly. There is at least one clear example of critical analysis that acknowledges the limitations of the research, and suggests how it could be tailored to the context of the organisation. For example, Smith (2020) suggests that mentors and mentees develop organic relationships. This is difficult in large-scale mentoring for first year students, so one way of adapting this research to the current context is to…. 3. Referencing – APA 6th referencing formatting is used consistently and correctly both in-text and in the reference list. All claims are referenced. 4. Communication – Ideas are expressed clearly. Australian spelling and grammar is used. The language is appropriate. The explanation of the argument could be improved. Some steps are missing explain each step of the argument to the reader. There are no typographical errors in the assignment. – Assignment is clearly written and there is a logical flow of ideas. Australian spelling and grammar is used. Writing is succinct and critical without using sensationalised language or unnecessarily long words.
Hide
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]