Author: best-essay

A two-part 2000 word portfolio evidencing academic and study skills acquired by reflection, as well as a demonstration of learning on how research is used for social enquiry. Part one:
The first part of the portfolio is a 500 word reflective piece on what the student has learnt about types of academic writing and why academic writing styles are important for university purposes.Question- What are the key academic writing styles and why are they important? (Approx. 350 words)This is followed by an introduction to their topic of interest, which the student will be investigating over the course of the semester (approx. 150 words). Chosen topic: Juvenile DelinquencyPart two:
The second part of the portfolio will be 1500 words evidencing the students understanding of how research is used for social enquiry. This requires the student to use the topic chosen in part one and from the list of articles supplied, identify 3 articles that are positivistic (quantitative) in style and 3 journal articles that are interpretative (qualitative) in style.
Structure Section 1 (approx. 300 words)
Using the articles that are positivistic (positivism) in style, the student is expected to write a descriptive summary of each of the articles clearly highlighting the following:
1) The type of research i.e. is positivistic or anti-positivistic?
2) Introduce the research
3) Describe the methods used
4) Describe the results
5) Describe the conclusionSection 2 (approx. 300 words)
Using the articles that are interpretative (anti-positivism/qualitative) in style, the student is expected to write a descriptive summary of each of the articles clearly highlighting the following:
1. The type of research i.e. is positivistic or anti-positivistic?
2. Introduce the research
3. Describe the methods used
4. Describe the results
5. Describe the conclusionYou will need to:
a) Use concepts accurately,
b) Follow the rules of grammar, punctuation and spelling
c) Reference correctly throughout using the Harvard referencing style
Please note that you are not expected to use bullet points but rather, you are expected to write in prose form. The bullet points above are just a clear illustration of everything you must include in your description of the articles.Section 3-
Discussion The contribution of research to the topic area.
In the section, the student is expected to discuss how the studies used have enhanced their understanding of the ways in which research contributes to knowledge on their topic. They are expected to draw on other sources on the topic evidencing their ability to search for and correctly use academic literature (approx. 750 words). Section 4- Conclusion (approx. 150 words).Reference list:
As a minimum requirement you are expected to draw on 10 academic sources (if you do not use 10 ACADEMIC sources, you will lose marks and risk failing this assignment). Examples of academic sources include books found in the library, e-books that are specific to the subject of sociology/the topic you are discussing, journals books, Article book chapter, official web pages that end in .ac .org .gov, policy papers and papers found on Google scholar. Word-processed, double spaced, Arial 12 Font and number the pages. You must also include a word count.Do NOT cite
1) Your lecture/seminar slides, or lecturers.
2) Online blogs/webpages/essay writing sites/online student rooms.
3) General pages found on google (unless they are policy papers/.org/.ac/.gov).
4) Articles from the tabloid newspapers (the Sun/the mirror/the Daily Mail)
5) Un-official web pages that are general discussions without being peer reviewed/from a university / from an academic source
You are reminded that plagiarism of any type will be penalised and result in a fail.Marking criteria:
Knowledge and understanding of aspects of researching and investigating social life.
Ability to research the questions and to describe and summarise findings.
Demonstrate an understanding of positivistic and interpretative research.

Demonstrate the ability to present information and argument in a logical form, follow the rules for writing a descriptive project.
Use concepts accurately and following the rules of grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Harvard referencing.Key initial* reading and resources Recommended Reading
Core text
Cottrell, Stella. The study skills handbook. Macmillan International Higher Education, 2013.
Punch S., Marsh, I., Keating, M. and Harden, J. (2013) Sociology: Making Sense of Society 5th edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Available as an EbookGuided reading
Bryman, A (2016) Social Research Methods. Oxford. OUP,
Bauman Z. & May T. (2001) Thinking Sociologically Malden MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Graziano, A,M. and Raulin, M (2014) Research methods [electronic resource] : a process of inquiry
Jones P., Bradbury L., & Le Boutillier S. (2011) Introducing Social Theory 2nd edition, Cambridge: Polity
May, T (2011) Social research [electronic resource]: issues, methods and process. Maidenhead : Open University Press
Neuman, W. (2014). Social research methods [electronic resource]: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Harlow, Essex : Pearson
OByrne D. (2011) Introducing Sociological Theory Harlow: Pearson
Rosenau, P,M. (1992) Post-Modernism and The Social SciencesIndependent study –
To receive high grades you will need to demonstrate your wider reading. The following journals provide useful background reading for the material in this unit:
British Journal of Sociology
Current Sociology
Developments in Sociology
Identity – An International Journal of Theory and Research
Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies
Journal of Social Issues
Sociological Research Online
Sociology: The Journal of The British Sociological Association
Sociological Review
Work, Employment and Society

Specific assessment guidance
1. An introduction that details the construction of the essay and informs the reader of what to expect to find within the essay2. A conclusion where you draw the threads of your discussion together and show how you have addressed your aims and objectives.3. As a minimum requirement you are expected to draw on 10 academic sources (if you do not use 10 ACADEMIC sources, you will lose marks and risk failing this assignment)
You cannot just rely on the core text books; you will need to search for other books/ journals/articles to help you answer the question. You will need to source articles in the library, especially journal articles, as they will provide you with the latest research evidence/arguments. You must use the Harvard referencing system to identify the source of all the information used in your assignment. You will find a copy of the latest referencing guidelines on the units BREO site. Also read the section headed Plagiarism and Bad Academic Practice in your handbook. For guidance on referencing sources go to the following webpage: http://lrweb.beds.ac.uk/guides/a-guide-to-referencing.Write an essay of 2000 words on one of the following topics:
You are reminded that plagiarism of any type will be penalised and result in a fail.

Outline for Project Three Assignment
OUTLINING PROJECT THREEThis assignment is the culmination of our work this semester. You have written arguments using your experience as well as data and quotes from a text. In this essay, you will deconstruct and evaluate two TED speakers arguments, looking at the way each makes their argument. You will then compare the strategies the speakers have used to make their arguments. And even though the example does not include citations I want you to be sure to include citations in your outline as the turn around time for your final draft is going to be very short!The AssignmentYou have watched TED talks on three different topics: global poverty and equality, racial equality, and internet equality. Your job first is to choose two TED talks within one of these topics. You might, for example choose two talks about global poverty and equality, or you might choose two talks about internet equality. The choice is yours, but you must choose two TED talks that are about the same topic.Next, watch the two TED talks of your choice again. While you are watching, think about the big picturewhat is the author trying to argue overall. Then, watch the two talks again. This time, write down the rhetorical strategies the speaker uses to make their point and how they employ this strategy. Do they use pathos by telling a heart wrenching story? Do they use pathos by describing their experience in the field? Do they use logos by showing graphs and discussing statistics? These are just a few ideas; you may want to review the rhetorical strategies before you start this part. Take good notes because they will be useful when you start to write the essay.Next, think about how the speakers in the two TED talks you chose used similar and different strategies. Think about both the strategies and the arguments the speaker tried to make. How are they alike and how are they different? Use your ideas here as the starting point for your essay. What you should do in this essay is compare the way the speakers used different and/or similar rhetorical strategies to make their arguments.Be sure to come up with a thesis for your essay that not only states that you are comparing these two TED talks and how they use rhetorical strategies, but also captures why your comparison is important. That is, you need to also come up with a so what as part of your thesis statement. Why would it be important to notice that one speaker is using different strategies from another? Which speaker is more successful? Your outline should contain complete sentences because it is a graded assignment. It should follow this general pattern:I. Introduction (4-6 sentences long)Introduce the general topicIntroduce both TED Talks and the arguments they makeEnd your introduction with a thesis sentence (which rhetorical strategies you are comparing and why this comparison is important) II. Body Paragraph One (10 18 sentences) Start the paragraph with a topic sentence that introduces the rhetorical strategy from the rhetorical triangle you are using to critique the speakers arguments (The main idea of the paragraph and one that develops the thesis)Provide a quote from the first TED talk that shows this rhetorical strategy in action.Explain how that quote from the first TED talk shows this rhetorical strategy.Provide a quote from the second TED talk that shows this rhetorical strategy in action. And why does this matter? III. Body Paragraph Two (10 18 sentences) Start the paragraph with a topic sentence that introduces the rhetorical strategy from the rhetorical triangle you are using to critique the speakers arguments (The main idea of the paragraph and one that develops the thesis)Provide a quote from the first TED talk that shows this rhetorical strategy in action.Explain how that quote from the first TED talk shows this rhetorical strategy.Provide a quote from the second TED talk that shows this rhetorical strategy in action.Explain how that quote from the second TED talk shows this rhetorical strategy.Tell how the use of this strategy helps or hurts the speakers arguments. How are they different? And why does this matter? IV. Body Paragraph Three (10 18 sentences) Start the paragraph with a topic sentence that introduces the rhetorical strategy from the rhetorical triangle you are using to critique the speakers arguments (The main idea of the paragraph and one that develops the thesis)Provide a quote from the first TED talk that shows this rhetorical strategy in action.Explain how that quote from the first TED talk shows this rhetorical strategy.Provide a quote from the second TED talk that shows this rhetorical strategy in action.Explain how that quote from the second TED talk shows this rhetorical strategy.Tell how the use of this strategy helps or hurts the speakers arguments. How are they different? And why does this matter? V. Conclude you paper with a short paragraph (4-5 sentences) that does not start with the phrase IN CONCLUSION. Below are links to an example outline, as well as a template for your outline. When you have finished the outline, post it to the link called “Post Project Three Outline” in the course.Example Outline Link

Activists draw on the narrative power of sports and the cultural power of celebrity, among other rhetorical tools, to seek social change. In this paper, you will have the opportunity to examine the narrative strategies employed by your subject, Muhammad Ali, the symbolic acts they employ, the reconstruction of a sports narrative (or narratives) they create, and the use of celebrity as social symbol, to achieve social change. The paper should follow a classic research paper, with a strong thesis supported by evidence later in the text. Opinions are also welcomed to be included in this paper, but they also must be supported with evidence.

On a scale of 1-10, how would you rank your own health? In what ways do you think that your physical health (exercise, nutrition) has contributed to or harmed your own well-being? Do you personally see the ways in which a healthy body contribute to happiness, or do you see these as separate and unrelated areas of wellness?

Watch the movie (I am Sam), focusing specifically on the family unit featured in the film. Address each characteristic including specific examples from the movie to validate your analysis. You must use references (textbook, class notes, others), and these must be cited throughout your paper. Submit your analysis in this document, typed using APA format (double-spaced). Limit is five (5) content pages. Explore developmental characteristics of the family as a unit across the lifespan. Examine health patterns and practices transmitted across generations. Introduction Movie Setting and Story Assessment of Movie Family Family processes Values Socialization and Child Rearing Healthcare Beliefs and Practices Adaptations Genogram Economic Comparison to Beavers System Model Summary and Conclusion

The full details of the requirement are uploaded in the Order Files under the title “Assignment Order”. The file contains the requested structure as well as my input on initial thoughts related to the main points, ideas and aims of the topic that the research is investigating and exploring, including items for consideration in developing the sections related to methodology and approach, references, etc. There is an example of a research proposal to be used as a guide (uploaded in the Order Files with the title “RP Example”), that follows the structure required, using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies.

Vocal cord paralysis, how can a stroke affect communication

Global Health Security & Preparedness for Aggressive Communicable DiseasesThe Final Project Product Proposal is a written submission in which students identify and discuss the issue(s) surrounding their chosen themes/topics and propose a program, initiative, or activity that will address those issues. For example, a student from a previous semester chose the theme of Climate Change and Natural Disasters for his project package. For the Final Project Product Proposal, he discussed how climate change affects agriculture in South and Central America. Within the proposal, he identified the issue and causes, prior attempts and deficiencies in addressing the issue, and proposed the solution of enhancing global awareness through art (making information pertaining to climate change more appealing and interesting for a targeted audience).

Please this assignment has a power point attached after the written assignment, it should be an 8 typed doubled space paper only, title page, reference page not included in 8 pages. ,The power point should be done separately when you are done with written assignment. Note** Prepare a slide presentation in Microsoft PowerPoint format. The presentation should have a maximum of 6 typed slides with a minimum 24-point font. A list of resources used is to be provided in APA format at the end of the presentation title slide and resource slide(s) are in addition to the 6 slide limit. One slide should be devoted to lessons learned from design, preparation, feedback, follow-up, dissemination.

Literature Review on EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION of scholarly literature that must be a minimum of ten (10) complete pages of typed narrative, using 12 point Times New Roman fonts on all pages (including the title page and references list), one-inch margins on all four sides, and double-spacing. Submitting 9.9 pages of typed narrative or less will result in a substantial grading penalty. The required title page, abstract, and required references page do not count toward the minimum page count. 4) Structure of the Literature Review o Always begin written assignments with a title page, typed in 12-point Times New Roman fonts. This must include the title of paper, your name, course number, course name, university name, professors name, and date submitted. o An abstract is required for the literature review. This must be placed on its own separate page, and must follow the title page and precede the Introduction section. An abstract is a concise summary of the key points of your research. Write the abstract last. o The Introduction, Conclusion and all remaining sections of the Literature Review must be organized under Level 1 headings (centered, boldface, with uppercase and lowercase letters see pp. 62-63 of the APA manual about Level 1 headings). o Current literature only: In terms of academic scholarship, articles published within the past five years are considered current. For the literature review, you must find articles dated 2013 or later. Much has changed in o The References list (beginning on a new, separate page following the narrative) must include at least ten scholarly references, dated 2013 or later, including the Bible. (Note: According to page 179 of the APA manual, the Bible is considered a Classical Work and, as such, must not be placed in the references list. However, in-text citations for Bible chapters and verses should be provided. This means that you will have at least 10 sources, including the Bible, but only nine will appear on the references list.) o Center the word References at the top of the references list (not Works Cited or Bibliography) in 12 point Times New Roman fonts. Each row of each reference must be double-spaced, and references must be typed with a hanging indent. o Do not include course textbooks as a references. o The APA format requires that you insert in-text citations at the correct places in the narrative each and every time someone else influenced your work, and when you use the ideas, statistics, terms or information of others. Peer-reviewed journal articles only; current articles only– Articles from peer-reviewed, scholarly journals only. No books, textbooks, dot.coms, blogs, conferences proceedings, newspapers, magazines, etc. Use scholarly sources only
Hide