Write a rationale paper describing the artifacts in the portfolio and how they demonstrate skills, knowledge, understanding of theory, professional disposition, real-world application, and mastery of the program objectives.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed: I.To begin this project, you will identify and summarize the contemporary social issue which is bullying and find at least one scholarly source, citing resources to strengthen your summary. Who is affected? What do people think about it? Are there any debates surrounding the issue? Also, provide a brief history of how the issue began.
2. Analyze and critique the hospitals current online nurses ad. How would you improve on it? Your critique should include guidelines from the textbook.
3. Prepare in outline form a complete nurses recruiting program for this hospital, including all recruiting sources your group would use.
Also address the impact which the
war had upon the representation of conflict given the contributions of figures like
Matthew Brady and Eastman Johnson. Finally, how do you find that this conflict
contributed to the development of more ferocious wars such as WWI and WWII in the
20th century?
Topic Pediatrics A well-written advocacy letter is a powerful tool that should focus attention on a health issue that you are passionate about. Your letter can focus attention on a health concern in your community, support/oppose the legislation, highlight a program in need of funding, etc., that directly affects the vulnerable population you have selected. Advocacy letters are written to political leaders, elected officials, heads of corporations, newspapers, funding sources; grassroots organizations, academic heads, etc.The letter must be written clearly and state what action you propose and why.In a succinct manner, provide background information to assist the reader to understand your position. The reader will be looking for both the facts and the humanity of what is at stake and why you are advocating for this group and topic.Who do you plan to send this advocacy letter to (person, people, agency select one receiver and describe why you selected this person/people/agency, etc.Statement of issues and data to support advocacy position you have taken. The issue is relevant, timely and urgent (how do you define urgency?) as supported by the data you have chosen to share.Data presented support advocacy need in your opinion (subjective) -The proposed action to be taken is clearly stated. -The steps (including necessary funding) are outlined so one may gauge feasibility of proposed action.Benefits to society (community, individuals, etc.) of your proposed plan of action (how will this move in the direction of improvement).
Professional format including, but not limited to (5 points): Clear, concise written language -Correct usage of grammar -Correct usage of academic stylistics
2. Create one alternate hypothesis and its associated null hypothesis related to your research area.
3. Briefly describe whether you think your area of interest is more conducive to experimental or correlational research. What are the costs/benefits of each as it relates to your research area?
4. Reliability vs. Validity. Considering your area of research interest, discuss the importance of reliability and validity. Can you have one without the other? Why or why not?
5. Sample vs. Population. Considering your area of research interest, describe the difference between a sample and population. Why is it important to understand the difference between a sample and population in a statistics course?
6. Measures of Central Tendency. Below is a set of data that represent weight in pounds for a particular sample. Calculate the mean, median and mode. Which measure of central tendency best describes this data and why? You may use Excel, SPSS, some other software program, or a hand calculator for this problem.
Statement of personal career history and objectives for the future: Please describe your work experience, making it relevant to the WFED program (300-400 words):What do you aspire to do upon completing the WFED Ph.D. program at Penn State? Describe the steps you have taken to find out what it takes to be successful after graduating with a PhD (such as interviewing mentors in the job you aspire to do upon graduation, 300-400 words)?
Written statement of research interests: Describe your research interests that are relevant to Workforce Education and Development. Feel free to cite relevant literature and relate your research interests to your career goals (300-400 words).
Which faculty members in the WFED program do you believe can promote your research interests? Why? (300-400 words)
Proposed activities during the PhD study: What do you plan to do while in the doctoral program, in addition to taking courses and passing required exams, that will contribute to making you competitive in achieving the career goal(s) that you have set for yourself? (In other words, what publications, presentations, research projects, or other work do you propose to do while in the doctoral program? (300-400 words)
How do you know, based on interviews with mentors or other professionals, that the work you propose to do in the program will meaningfully enhance your qualifications and make you more competitive in securing your desired career expectations upon graduation? (300-400 words)
A description of research studies conducted: Please list, describe, and cite scholarly or applied research (e.g. literature review, empirical study, reports, etc.) that you have completed which are relevant to your career goals and/or research interests. Describe your contribution to that research. Be sure to cite any research in APA style. (300-400 words)
Should the educational system be responsible for teaching immigrant children English? Why or why not?
Assignment Overview As a healthcare professional, it is your responsibility to be ethically sound. You have an essential responsibility to effectively apply ethical reasoning to crucial decisions. One method of elevating your ethical reasoning abilities is through the practice, reading, and understanding of case studies. While every case is not identical, the review of ethical case studies prepares you for similar incidents that may arise. Case Assignment For the Module 1 Case Assignment, you are to review 2 cases from the AMA Journal of Ethics (http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/site/cases.html). In a 2- to 3-page paper complete the following: 1.Identify each case that you have selected. 2.Explain in detail the ethical issue of each case. 3.Identify the ethical principle(s) that are relevant in the cases. 4.Explain from a healthcare professional perspective what you would have done differently in the case, or if you agree with how it was handled, explain your reasoning. This should not be opinion but a supported ethical analysis. You are to support your analysis and views with at least 3 scholarly references (e.g., peer-reviewed journals). Assignment Expectations 1.Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your analysis. 2.Limit your response to a maximum of 3 pages. 3.Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals: http://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php 4.You may use the following source to assist in your formatting your assignment: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.
Before you begin this assignment, read through the Home page and the required readings. Specifically, view the E-learning course Introduction to epidemiology video. As a health officer, you have been asked to discuss the subject of epidemiology to high school students getting ready to enroll in Winterton College. Your task is as follows: 3.Explain the terms outbreak and epidemic. 4.The Introduction to epidemiology video discussed the Legionnaires disease outbreak in 1976. Briefly describe the case in terms of time, place, and person; and, what should have been the first step the Pennsylvania Department of Health should have followed? Length: 23 pages, excluding title page and references. File format: Your work should be prepared using Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, or Excel depending upon the assignment instructions. For assignments requiring video or voice recordings, use media formats that are supported by MyTLC Courses as noted in our Trident Support page. In-text citations and references: Be sure that all information and ideas in your papers are supported by in-text citations and corresponding references at the end of the paper. Scholarly sources: Online sources must be limited to credible professional and scholarly publications such as peer-reviewed journal articles, e-books, or specific webpages on websites from a university, government, or nonprofit organization (these have extensions .edu, .gov, or .org). Presenting consumer sources such as e-magazines, newspapers, Wikipedia, WebMD, or other commercial websites (these have extensions .com) as references is not appropriate. Scholarly writing: Use an academic paper format, not an essay based on your opinions or experience. Avoid using the first person in writing. Synthesize what you learned from the sources you read; write papers in your own words; and cite sources within the text, as well as include a properly formatted reference list. Use of your own words: Your paper should be written in your own words to enable faculty to assess your level of understanding. Avoid the use of direct quotes. Only use direct quotes when preserving the exact words of an author is necessary. In the rare instance that directly quoted material is used, it must be properly cited (with quotation marks and page numbers in the in-text citation); quotes should not exceed 5-10% of the total paper content.