challenges of producing long-term change when organizations have many interdependent parts.

Describe the challenges of producing long-term change when organizations have many interdependent parts. In todays complex organizations it can be hard to limit or remove interdependencies. Please describe a situation where interdependencies were removed or reduced in your organization or describe how you think interdependencies could be removed or reduced in your organization to improve the likelihood of success for change initiatives.

Summarize how your projected work as a counselor will compare to this persons experiences/affiliations. Ideally this interview will occur in person, but may be conducted over the phone. Case file on Wilma and her families essay content.

Psychology APA. Prefer a writer who is familiar with psychology. Interview with a Counseling Practitioner. If you can find an LPC-MHSP, this would be ideal. If you cannot, you can find a professional with a similar career (Psychologist, LCSW, LMFT, LCSW). Ask them specifically about ethical dilemmas, self-care strategies, advocacy experiences, and professional association involvement and publications/presentations. described by. Include these in HEADINGS in your paper.

Gilligan’s gender identity development theory (aka moral voices theory).

The explanation of the gender development theory section of your submission should be 1 full page/specifically 600 (minimum) – 1,200 words (single spaced). This section should be based solely on scholarly sources (NOT your personal opinion). Direct quotations should be used sparingly and appropriately cited using APA format (direct quotations and author/s, year, page number) . Most of the information in this section should be paraphrased with proper APA in-text citations. Note the minimum number of sources is two, but I would suggest using more (3-5). Stronger submission will utilize several scholarly sources and exceed the minimum page requirement. Do not cite the modules/commentary, but use only outside, current, scholarly sources. Make sure that your explanation directly and explicitly relates to gender development. You may NOT use Wikipedia as one of your sources for this paper or any other assignments this semester. (2) The Critique of the Gender-Development Theory The critique section of your submission should be 1/2 of a page in length -specifically 300 (minimum) -600 words. This section should identify BOTH strengths and weaknesses and must be based on BOTH scholarly sources as well as your personal opinion. Be sure to clearly differentiate between your personal opinion and those found in your sources (use proper in-text citations). This assignment must: be typed using a 12-point Times New Roman font be single-spaced (nothing should be double spaced) have one-inch margins on all sides have a title page (that contains only the title, student’s name, and UMUC) -Remember that the title page is numbered page 1 in the upper right hand corner use the American Psychological Association (APA) format for citations (both in-text and reference/bibliography list) error free (no typos, grammatical errors, etc.) contain the following specific headings/subheadings for each section: Explanation Critique
Hide

Identify the various forms/mechanisms of social control operating in the main book and analyze their impact on the lives of study participants

Can you make sure the person who writes this has read the books “In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio and “Righteous Dopefiend by Philippe Bourgois please. Also the person writing needs to be familiar with sociology so part 3 can make sense. MAIN BOOK: In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio by Philippe Bourgois COMPARE and CONTRAST BOOK: Righteous Dopefiend by Philippe Bourgois and Jeffrey Schonberg FORMAT: 12 point font, Times New Roman, double space, one-inch margins. PARTS: 1. Summarize the main book (In Search of Respect) and highlight the authors main points and arguments 3 pages 3. Write one page comparative section comparing and contrasting how social control (informal, legal, and/or medical) affects the lives of participants in both books (In Search of Respect and Righteous Dopefiend) differently.

Respond to DISCUSION below by: Ask a probing question. Share an insight from having read the discussion. Offer and support an opinion. Validate an idea with your own experience. Make a suggestion. Expand the discussion

Introduction According to the UK mergers Assessment Guidelines, competition would mean a process that stimulates rivalry efforts by supplier towards satisfying consumers in order to win their business over time.[1] That competition law has consumers well-being as its primary objective is emphasised by European Commissioner for competition policy, Neelie Keroes, that protection of competition aims, among other things, to enhancing consumer welfare.[2] 2. The single market and competition imperatives Single market focuses on creation of economic integration within the community who submitted or ascended to the European Union. The aim is to be removing internal barriers towards creation of internal market that will facilitate free movement of goods, services, workers, and capital. It facilitates cross boarder business and prohibits any action of a Member State that could prohibits those objectives. Within the context of free movement of goods, protecting consumers and balancing their interest with that of the manufacturers is paramount.[3] It is therefore no doubt that competition law becomes imperative to the EU Single market, preventing potential cartel within nation and ensuring growth of cross-borders transactions;[4] thereby characterising elements of competition, thus, according to the McGowan and Wilks, competition policy is a foundation stone of the European Union.[5] It will be an imperative act to formulate such policies that will discourage business activities that could mitigate or weakened the objective covering the three principle sources of collusion, mergers and predation.[6] 3. Focus on competition As the frontline of market integration, the EU has enacted both primary and secondary law and rules that prohibits any acts that could inhibits free movement of goods and such business practices or national law that would differentiate trade practices and/or inhibits free trading business activities within the community, including agreement on vertical and horizontal integration. 4. The Law Title VII chapter 1 TFEU speaks to the conduct of competition within the community, it prohibits any agreement or coalition that restrict or distort competition within the Union, either through price fixing, supply restriction or control, or other that could threaten competition.[7] Abuse that should be a corollary of an enterprise occupying a dominant position is prohibited, be at an advantage to impose prices, usage of technicality or such endeavour or engagement that could be prejudice to consumers.[8] Envisaging the imperatives of competition in a potentially challenging single market, Article 103 empowered to regulate competition through secondary legislation.[9] 5. The Regulation Council Regulation (EC) No1/2003 This Council Regulation emphatically imposed the supremacy of the community lay over the national law. In its introduction, it illuminates possible conflict between the both laws, subjecting national law to differ any hitherto prohibitive agreements if such agreements are not also prohibited under national law, although, it allows sticker measure on unilateral conduct.[10] Thus the regulation upholds the prohibitions under Article 81(1) of the Treaty as long as they do not satisfy Article 83 of the Treaty. For effective enforcement, Member States are to give relevant authorities and ensure that these primary Articles (81) and (82) of the Treaty (101 and 102 TFEU) are duly applied,[11] and as provided by relevant Directive.[12] It however enjoins consistency in application competition rules and needs for the national to stay proceedings when there is a similar case before the Court of Justice.[13][i] 6. Exemptions The importance of the application of competition of Article (81) of the Treaty (as it was then) has ever been strictly enforced except when the practice or agreement is in the public interest[14] or beneficial to the consumers. Thus, in GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission of the European Communities, it was held that exemption could be granted if an agreement had to contribute to improving the production or distribution of goods or to promoting technical or economic progress. It would become necessary to look at the objectives it sought to attain and the economic and legal context of which it formed a part, with the burden of proof on the one who relies on the exemption. [15] 7. Conclusion The European Union has thrown its weight to actualise effective Single Market and particularly through positive harmonization, which is acclaimed to be less effective to bring about desirable competition in this context, thereby applauding the regulatory regime of competition control. Yet, it is still of view of some scholars that the regulatory policy only wold be insufficient, it should be intertwined with the positive approach of harmonization.[16] [1] Cited in Richard Whish and David Bailey Competition Law Oxford University Press page 4 [2] Ibid page 19 [3] Paul Craig, Grinne Brca, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (6th edition, Oxford University Press) 2015 page 627 [4] n 1 page 24 [5] Lee McGowan and Stephen Wilks The first supranational policy in the European Union: Competition policy European Journal of Political Research (1995) 28: 141-169. Available online: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00808.x [6] Ibid page 141 [7] Article 101 TFEU [8] Article 102 [9] Title VII, section 1, chapter 1 TFEU [10] Paragraph 9 recital Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (2002) [11] ibid recital 35 [12] n 1 page 60 [13] n 10 recital 17 [14] ibid recital 14 [15] [2010] 4 C.M.L.R. 2 [16] Jeanne-Mey Sun and Jacques Pelkmans Regulatory Competition in the Single Market Journal of Common Market Studies Volume 33, No. 1 March 1995 https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1995.tb00517.x
Hide

Select one of the scenarios and consider the skin disorder and underlying alteration associated with the type of rash described.

Identify the pathophysiology of the alteration that you associated with the skin lesion and itching. Consider the following factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Reflect on how the factors you selected might impact the disorder. [See discussion for case scenarios A 27-year-old woman presents to the urgent care clinic complaining of a red, itchy rash developing suddenly the day before on her arms and legs and spreading to the trunk. She denies ulcers in the mouth or genital area. Her medical history is unremarkable except for occasional episodes of genital herpes. The most recent outbreak was approximately two weeks ago. She generally takes oral acyclovir on such occasions, but her prescription has run out, and so she did not take any with her last bout. On physical examination, she has multiple erythematous papules over the arms, legs, and trunk. Many of the papules have a central area of duskiness or clearing, such that the lesions resemble targets. There is no evidence of mucosal involvement. Select one case above for discussion. Identify the case in your initial post. Do not repeat the case verbatim in your post. Identify the most likely condition that best explains the patient’s rash. Describe and explain the pathophysiologic process for the eruption of the patient’s presenting signs and symptoms. Describe the usual clinical manifestations associated with the condition. Identify the causes of the condition and risk factors if applicable. Consider the following patient factors genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Select two patient factors and discuss the influence of the factors chosen on the disorder. 15. Include a minimum of three (3) professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
Hide

Identify the instructional strategies that are evident in the lesson. Be specific and support your assertion with clear examples. Discuss how you would modify the existing lesson to accommodate a range of children’s learning levels and styles.

Provide specific examples. 4.How would you edit this lesson to foster learning across content areas? For example, if this is a language arts lesson, how might you also incorporate science? If the lesson already does this, please explain this and provide the example(s). You must be very specific. You must submit this assignment in a Word document and use APA format.