Describe at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in the articles. Justify your response with specific references to at least 2 of the articles.

Now that you have located available research on your PICOT question, you will examine what the research indicates about nursing practices. Connecting research evidence and findings to actual decisions and tasks that nurses complete in their daily practice is essentially what evidence-based practice is all about. This final component of the Course Project asks you to translate the evidence and data from your literature review into authentic practices that can be adopted to improve health care outcomes. In addition, you will also consider possible methods and strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to your colleagues and to the broader health care field. To prepare: Consider Parts 1 and 2 of your Course Project. How does the research address your PICOT question? With your PICOT question in mind, identify at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in two or more of the articles from your literature review. Consider what the evidence indicates about how this practice contributes to better outcomes. Explore possible consequences of failing to adopt the evidence-based practice that you identified. Consider how you would disseminate information about this evidence-based practice throughout your organization or practice setting. How would you communicate the importance of the practice? To complete: In a 3- to 4-page paper: Restate your PICOT question and its significance to nursing practice. Summarize the findings from the articles you selected for your literature review. Explain how the evidence-based practice that you identified contributes to better outcomes. In addition, identify potential negative outcomes that could result from failing to use the evidence-based practice. Outline the strategy for disseminating the evidence-based practice that you identified throughout your practice setting. Explain how you would communicate the importance of the practice to your colleagues. Describe how you would move from disseminating the information to implementing the evidence-based practice within your organization. How would you address concerns and opposition to the change in practice? Note: In addition, include a 1-page summary of your project.
Hide

What political or social ramifications are interesting to you about the reading? Does it remind you of anything that you have experienced or read about in another context?

Authors usually write books or articles in order to convince the reader of something. As you read, keep asking yourself, What is the main point? What is the author trying to convince me of? No matter how complicated and long the argument is, there is always amain pointthat can be summarized briefly. Caution: Telling me what the text isaboutis not the same as telling me what the author isarguing!Second,reactto the argument in some thoughtful manner. Your reaction can take many forms. For instance: Does the argument have political implications that are interesting to you? Are there parts of the argument you strongly agree or disagree with? If so, explain why and how you agree/disagree. What other questions are raised by the argument, sub-arguments, or proposals? Explain.In short, what I am asking you to do is (1) to figure out what the author is saying, (2) to reallythinkabout it, then (3) to make a written report on the explaining what you thought about.

what did indigenous groups, for the most part, all share in common? What ultimately united them? what are some issues that hindered early collective political oganization in british columbia?https://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/elejeune/critique.htm).

what did indigenous groups, for the most part, all share in common? What ultimately united them?
what are some issues that hindered early collective political oganization in british columbia?https://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/elejeune/critique.htm).

Develop a background & analysis for the situation (based material from Howell & Griffiths & lecture, (cite pages or dates).

I. Introduction (page 1) 1. Purpose of the paper 2. Summary of paper and findings 2. The Foundation for your project (page 2-3) Select a news story about a specific gang-related Issue or event in California. Published after September 1, 2018. List the news source and date. List separately, the facts of the story. Current Situation on which your paper is based. (page 4) Indicate how the story you have selected reflects current gang trends nationally & locally. (National Gang Threat Assessment.) Develop a question about the news story The question should be based on the information drawn from the discussion on Foundation. Select and explain a Theory discussed in class to serve as the foundation for your answer to the question. (Page 5) The Answer (Based on the material you have developed) a. List your assumptions & support for your assumptions (2 Ref.) b. Consider your personal limitations (e.g. Age, education, etc.) Conclusion (Page 6) a. Explain your conclusion b. Explain how you reached your conclusion. c. Background and supporting data Required References 1. James C. Howell & Elizabeth Griffiths, Gangs in Americas Communities, 2ed Ed. 2. National Gang Threat Assessment 3. OJJDP materials. (2 min,) 4. Reference list (Four minimum for background information) 5. Lecture (subject and date) 6. Journal Articles (Two minimum, within previous three years. 7. Interview (optional, give name, date, and contact number) Appendix. 1. Include notes, drafts 2. Include any draft previously submitted 3. Other materials researched but not used

Explain the relevance of your key topic to Gods law and how it can be applied in a Christian context.

The total amount of words needs to be 700 words excluding the title page and the reference page. After you have reserved your key topic, use the Internet to search for at least 5 scholarly resources that relate to the topic and have been published within the last 5 years. Academic articles and journals must be reputable and obtained from professional websites that address the content of this course. Popular magazines and online sources such as Wikipedia are not permissible. After reading the articles, select 1 article relating to your key topic that you wish to use in your thread. Your thread must be posted in the text box where you originally reserved your key topic; do not submit a second thread. In the event that the formatting could be lost from the text box, attach a Word file to your thread, and adhere to the following format: 1. Key Concept Explanation: Define your key topic by using a source other than the textbook. Give a clear, concise overview of the essential elements relevant to understanding your key topic. In addition, explain why you are interested in this topic (e.g., academic curiosity, application to a current issue related to employment, or any other professional rationale). 2. Comparison: Compare your research with what you have studied during the module/week in which the key topic/thread is assigned. Note differences or commonalities about your key topic, providing evidence that you have extended your understanding of this topic beyond the textbook readings. This is an opportunity for you to cite the additional articles you originally researched. This section must be at least 200 words. 3. Article Summary: In your own words, provide a clear and concise summary of the article you selected. This section must be at least 200 words. 4. Biblical Integration: Include at least 3 appropriate biblical references. This section must be at least 100 words. 5. Application: Specifically state how your key topic has been applied to real-world businesses or describe the potential your key topic has to influence todays business world. Your application must possess a professional rationale that demonstrates the significance of your key topic. This section must be at least 100 words. 6. Annotated Bibliography: Cite the articles you researched in current APA format. An annotation must accompany each citation. Each annotation will consist of a descriptive and evaluative paragraph that is at least 100 words. The annotations are designed to help your classmates in their understanding of your topic. In addition, provide a persistent link for each article.
Hide

What information was the book based on, and how was the information for the book obtained?

Prof. Neufeld SOC-K210 Sociology of the Family BOOK REVIEW DIRECTIONS I. Purpose A book review is a summary and critical discussion of a book that highlights its methods, main points, and themes, and assesses its success, strengths, and limitations. In order to critically assess a books success, strengths and limitations, relevant literature and research needs to be referred to and included in the discussion. II. Assignment Instructions Your book review will focus around a full-length book of your choosing. You can choose a book from the list provided (some of which are in the library), or choose a book of your own choice. The book should ideally be a social science book, although other types of books, such as histories or personal biographies may be acceptable. If you choose a book not on the list, you need to confirm with me that it is appropriate. In addition to your paper having an introduction and a conclusion, the body of the paper should have two main sections. First, you should describe and summarize the book you have read. You should begin by describing the focus or aims of the book. You should also identify the type of book it is and the nature of the information that was used in the book. For example, is it a historical account? Is it biographical? Is it a sociological study? You should then provide an overview of the main points, arguments, and themes in the book. This part of the body of your paper should take approximately 3 pages. Second, you should provide a critical discussion of the book where you discuss your thoughts and reactions to it and discuss its strengths and limitations, including how effectively it makes its case or achieves its aims. This can include things such as identifying explicit or implicit assumptions that are made in the book, assessing the quality and limitations of the evidence used, and whether you felt the book seems to bring new and/or important information to light. For this part of the book review, you should do additional background research and find five additional sources that you can incorporate as supporting evidence as appropriate. For example, if you read a book that makes arguments about day care, the consequences of divorce for children, or the effectiveness of gay families, you should try to find additional sources that pertain to these points. While you can incorporate course material and course readings in your critical discussion, the five sources must come from outside the course. This part of the paper assessing your book should be approximately 2-3 pages in length. Your paper overall should be approximately 6-7 pages, double-spaced, including the introduction and conclusion. For assistance writing a critical book review, please feel free to consult the following on-line sources: https://www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets/book_reviews.pdf https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/704/1/ https://www.lavc.edu/library/bookreview.htm For your background research, I encourage you to use the electronic databases available on the TRCC Library home page (just click on Find Articles under Electronic Resources.) You should ask a librarian if you need any assistance searching your topic. If you find information on the internet, the information must be from official publications or papers with a clearly identified author and publication date, whether from an individual or an organization. You should cite all sources in the text as appropriate and include a bibliography for all sources including internet sources that follows APA style. For assistance using APA style, please refer to https://www.apastyle.org/ or https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/. IV. Grading Criteria Your paper will be graded on the following criteria: Quantity and quality of sources Effective use of sources Grammar and syntax Quality of introduction Paragraph construction Clarity of ideas and arguments Effective conclusiondo not omit this!! SIX SOURCES: THE BOOK BEING REVIEWED + 5 ADDITIONAL SOURCES BOOKS YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM BOOKS FOR THE FINAL PROJECT The following books are in the TRCC library: Amato, Paul, et al. Alone Together: How Marriage in America Is Changing (2009). Blankenhorn, David. The Future of Marriage (2007). Cherlin, Andrew. The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage and the Family in America Today (2010). Coontz, Stephanie. The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap (1992) and The Way We Really Are: Coming to Terms with Americas Changing Families (1998). Crittendon, Ann. The Price of Motherhood : Why the Most Important Job in the World Is Still the Least Valued (2001). Douglas, Sharon and Michaels, Meredith. The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How It Has Undermined Women (2004). Edin, Kathryn. Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage (2005). Hackstaff, Karla B., Marriage in a culture of divorce (1999). Karen, Hansen. Not So Nuclear Families: Class, Gender, and Networks of Care (2005). Kennedy, Randall. Interracial intimacies: sex, marriage, identity, and adoption (2004). Lewin, Ellen. Gay fatherhood : narratives of family and citizenship in America (2009). Lindsay, Duncan. Child poverty and inequality: securing a better future for America’s children (2009). Mintz, Steven. Huck’s raft: a history of American childhood (2004). Popenoe, David. War over the family (2005). Mello, Michael. Legalizing gay marriage (2004). Schor, Juliette. Born to Buy: the Commercialized Child and the New Consumer Culture (2004). Stack, Carol. All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community (1997). Nardi, Peter M. Gay Mens Friendships: Invincible Communities (1999). Townsend, Nicholas W. The package deal: marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives (2002). Some other appropriate books not in the TRCC library: Marriage, a History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage (Hardcover) by Stephanie Coontz The Divorce Culture : Rethinking Our Commitments to Marriage and Family (Vintage) (Paperback) by Barbara Dafoe Whitehead The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially (Paperback) by Linda Waite, Maggie Gallagher Domestic Revolutions : A Social History Of American Family Life (Paperback) by Steven Mintz Growing Up With a Single Parent : What Hurts, What Helps (Paperback) by Sarah McLanahan, Gary Sandefur Divided Families: What Happens to Children When Parents Part (Family and Public Policy) (Hardcover) by Frank F. Furstenberg, Andrew J. Cherlin Fatherneed: Why Father Care is as Essential as Mother Care for Your Child (Paperback) by Kyle Pruett Throwaway Dads: The Myths and Barriers That Keep Men from Being the Fathers They Want to Be (Hardcover) by Ross Parke, Armin Brott Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem (Paperback) by David Blankenhorn Climbing Jacob’s Ladder: The Enduring Legacies of African-American Families (Paperback) by Andrew Billingsley A New Look at Black Families (Paperback) by Charles Vert Willie The Strengths of African American Families (Paperback) by Robert B. Hill Black Families in Therapy: Understanding the African American Experience (Paperback) by Nancy Boyd-Franklin, The Guilford Press, 2006. From This Day Forward: Committment, Marriage and Family in Lesbian and Gay Relationships (Paperback) by Gretchen A. Stiers Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement (Paperback) by Cheshire Calhoun No Place Like Home: Relationships and Family Life Among Lesbians and Gay Men (Paperback) by Christopher Carrington Putting Children First: How Low-Wage Working Mothers Manage Child Care by Mary Jo Bane (Foreword), Ajay Chaudry. Russell Sage, 2004. Strangers and Kin: The American Way of Adoption by Barbara Melosh, Harvard University Press, 2006. American Dream: Three Women, Ten Kids, and a Nation’s Drive to End Welfare by Jason Deparle, Viking, 2004. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life (Paperback) by Annette Lareau, University of California Press, 2003. Parenting Out of Control: Anxious Parents in Uncertain Times [Hardcover] Margaret Nelson, 2010. Why Marriage: The History Shaping Today’s Debate Over Gay Equality by George Chauncey (Dec 13, 2005) Gay Marriage: for Better or for Worse?: What We’ve Learned from the Evidence by William N. Eskridge Jr. and Darren R. Spedale (Jul 10, 2007) Life without Father: Compelling New Evidence That Fatherhood and Marriage Are Indispensable for the Good of Children and Society by David Popenoe (Mar 15, 1999) Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society by David Popenoe (May 27, 2009) Covenant Marriage: The Movement to Reclaim Tradition in America by Steven L. Nock, James D. Wright and Laura Ann Sanchez (Jul 16, 2008) Marriage in Men’s Lives by Steven L. Nock (Sep 3, 1998) American Manhood: Transformations In Masculinity From The Revolution To The Modern Era – E. Anthony Rotundo Manhood in America: A Cultural History – Michael Kimmel Unlocking the Iron Cage: The Men’s Movement, Gender Politics, and American Culture – Michael Schwalbe Politics of Masculinities: Men in Movements (Gender Lens Series) – Michael A. Messner Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage: Valuing All Families under the Law (Queer Ideas) by Nancy D. Polikoff and Michael Bronski (Jan 1, 2009) Family Consequences of Children’s Disabilities (American Sociological Association’s Rose Series in Sociology) (Volume in the American Sociological Association’s Rose Series) [Paperback]; Denis P. Hogan (Author) (2012) The Unfinished Revolution: Coming of Age in a New Era of Gender, Work, and Family [Paperback] Kathleen Gerson (2011) Child Custody, Law, and Women’s Work [Paperback], Susan B. Boyd, 2003. Far From the Tree: Parents, Children and the Search for Identity Paperback, Andrew Solomon, 2013. Hooking Up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus [Paperback], Kathleen A. Bogle, 2008.
Hide

What is the meaning of this work? What is the message that this work or artist sends to the viewer?

Formal Analysis Writing Assignment
Due: Oct 25, 2018 at 11:59 PMFormal Analysis Writing Assignment: This formal analysis is a written paper where you analyze a work of art based upon its formal elements and your own impressions of the work. It is an investigation of the forms appearing in the work you have chosen. These forms contribute to the works expression, message, or meaning. To aid in writing a formal analysis, you should think about it as if you were describing the work of art to someone who has never seen it before. When your reader finishes reading your analysis, she/he should have a complete mental picture of what the work looks like. Yet, the formal analysis is more than just a description of the work. You are not required to but may find it useful to compare the work to either a contrasting or similar artwork, if it will help your analysis. It should also include a thesis statement that reflects your conclusions about the work. The thesis statement may, answer a question like these: What is this work all about? The thesis statement is the most important element. It sets the tone for the entire paper, and sets it apart from being a merely descriptive paper.Format for the Paper: The written portion of your paper must be a minimum of 800 words in length (this should be about 2.5 pages.) The 800 word written section does not include your heading, your image(s), title page or work cited page. You will use black ink, double spaced, 12-point type, Times New Roman, Helvetica, Cambria, or a similar, normal size font with a one inch margin. (If you attempt to use a large atypical font to gain length from your paper, I may deduct points.)Your paper should be broken into three sections, an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion. Make sure you set forth your Thesis Statement in the Introduction section of your paper. You must include at least one image of the work. If you cite someones work you must make citation within the body of the paper and you must include a work cited page formatted to MLA guidelines. As stated above, the image and work cited page are NOT counted toward the 800 word text of the paper. Your grade will reflect not only the content of the paper but also your ability to follow ALL of these format guidelines.Introduction: Your first paragraph is your introduction and must include the following components related to the work(s) you have chosen to write about:Artist name (if known), title (which is italicized every time you use the title in your paper), date, and medium (if known).
A brief description of the work
What you think this work means.
Thesis Statement (typically this is the last line or so of your first paragraph). Example: Donatellos David, includes A,B, and C, which make its subject X,Y, and Z. The following analysis will explain how.
Body: After your Introduction, you should begin the body of your formal analysis. This is where you develop the basis for your thesis statement or the central argument for your paper. To accomplish this, you will need to not only describe the work, but discuss those details of the work that have led you to come to your thesis. This should not be a random flow of ideas about the work (i.e. stream of consciousness writing). Rather, your paper should have a sense of order, moving purposefully through your description with regard to specific elements (ex: one paragraph may deal with composition, another with a description of the figures, another with the background, another about use of color, etc.).Conclusion: Your conclusion (the final paragraph) you should end your paper with a restatement of your thesis statement that informs your reader of the essential elements that led you to this analysis.Note: It is important to remember that a formal analysis is not a research paper. The purpose is to show your ability to describe the formal elements of an art work AND express your thoughts and impressions of the work. In other words, you are strictly relying on your ability to visually read a work of art and make interpretations about it based on your analysis of it. Remember too that your analysis should not be just a mechanical, physical description, but an explanation of what the work makes you think, feel, etc. Please use descriptive language and adjectives to describe your work. Begin with a general description of the work and then move on to the more specific elements.Proofreading: Proofreading is an essential part of submitting your final paper. When proofreading, look for all of the common mistakes such as grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc., but also pay careful attention to ensure you fulfilled the content requirements set forth in the description.Plagiarism: In addition, please refer to your syllabus concerning my policy on plagiarism do not share your thesis statement or paper with other students and please do not work on your paper with another student. This is considered plagiarism.Images: You will include an image of the work or works that you discuss. Also, be sure you include the pertinent information about the image as you see listed below. Artist, title (italicized), and date. XXXXXXJoyce Kozloff, Hidden Chambers, 1975-76Submission Instructions: You are required to submit your writing assignment through Canvas. Papers not submitted through canvas will not be accepted. There will be a grade reduction of 10% every day the paper is late. Refer to Canvas for your due date.

Discuss how she writes the articles that make them successfully persuasive. Explain your reasons based on the articles features (description/use of language, narrative introduction, facts/explanations, recommendations).

The book your going to write about is call Sustainability, A Reader for Writers (Carl G. Herndl, Editor/Oxford, What makes Annie Leonards articles on bottled water and electronics convincing? Discuss only one article. State a clear thesis; then, defend it. Integrate quotations from the article into your essay and cite them correctly.
The article is on page 62
Very important: you need to you use this book as your ONLY source. You also need to use at less 3 quotes from the article Annie Leonards articles on bottled water and electronics convincing