Imagine that you were assigned the opposite gender at birth (I am male), but that your race, ethnicity, religion, and social class background remain the same.

Drawing on the information contained in Chapter 11, describe how your life as a member of the opposite sex might differ from your life today.Attached is a Word Document copy-paste of Chapter 11. It is somewhat poorly formatted, so ask if you have questions. Also, you must define at use and define at least 4 of the following terms: Gender roles, Multiple masculinities, Expressiveness, Instrumentality, matrix of domination, Sexism, Institutional discrimination, Glass ceiling, Glass escalator, Second shift.Please use the definitions from the text document.

Explain the communication process applicable to marketing communications (such as the Schramm model), and taking a ‘not for profit’ campaign, review and explain the creative work in the campaign in terms of how the advertiser uses the communication process in terms encoding/decoding a message through advertising appeal, and how the campaign adopts the ‘DRIP’ mnemonic in doing so.

Notes: (including encoding & decoding of promotional
messages highlight the themes of the campaign here rational or emotional content for example the model by Wilbur Schramm) – ensure that you explain how the advertising campaign forms a part of an integrated approach with other elements of the marketing
communications mix ( you may wish to explain the idea of synergy here). DRIP – Differentiate, Remind, Inform Persuade (again see the ebook by Chris Fill regarding this)

1. Is Socrates primary aim to defend himself or to continue to examine the citizens of Athens?

Choose eight of the following questions that you believe are most pertinent to Socrates situation, and answer them as thoroughly as you can. Support your arguments from the text, citing your quotes properly. Your assignment should be no more than three pages.

2. Why doesnt Socrates answer Meletus charge by stating his religious beliefs directly?
3. Is Socrates humble or proud?
4. If human nature is a thing of little worth, why does Socrates insist that his duty is questioning others?
5. Why is it a point of honor with Socrates that he was never compensated for his teaching?
6. Does Socrates oppose the principle of majority rule?
7. Who does Socrates believe is capable of educating the young?
8. Does Socrates think that injustice can be fought only by the private citizen who stays out of politics?
9. Why is Socrates impatient with Meletus?
10. According to Socrates, does wisdom consist solely in recognizing how little we know?
11. Do ridicule and humor serve Socrates search for truth?
12. How does knowing that you dont know anything promote virtue?
13. Would you have condemned Socrates?
14. Does Socrates demonstrate the old adage that a man who represents himself has a fool for a lawyer?
15. Why does Socrates search for truth hurt others and condemn him?
16. If you were Meletus and you had time to think things over, how would you reply to Socrates defense?

Is this employee a problem that cannot be fixed to some extent? If so, describe what the top managers or leaders in the company could do to avoid similar problems in the future.

This assignment asks you to consider a current or past coworker who has low levels of job performance, organizational commitment, or both. You are asked to draw on concepts from the course to explain exactly why this coworker is so ineffective, and how you and his/her supervisors might react, given that knowledge.
Your paper can focus on either a current coworker or a past coworker. The coworker should be a real person, as opposed to an amalgam of multiple individuals. Moreover, some portions of the paper work better if the coworker is of a similar hierarchical level to you–as opposed to a boss or a supervisor. The paper should include the following three sections:BackgroundIntroduce the coworker and describe the coworkers levels of important attitudes (ex: low on organizational commitment and perhaps low job satisfaction) and behavior (task performance, citizenship behavior, counterproductive work behavior). Use specific terminology from the course, not laymens terms with unclear meaning like poor work ethic. Give enough detail that its clear why you feel the way you do about this person, with enough richness that the section brings the person to life for the reader. Feel free to omit or disguise any details that might be sensitive in nature.Explanations-Drawing on and using key terms from Chapters 4-7 and 9, provide an explanation of why, in your estimation, this employees performance and/or organizational commitment. If you say its because they are low on job satisfaction or low in motivation, delve into why using key terms from what youve learned so far in the course. When I say key terms, Im referring to the words that are bolded in the chapters and that appear in the Key Terms section at the end of each chapter. Given the strict word count, youll need to strikea balance between breadth of coverage (i.e., the number of key terms mentioned) and depth of coverage (i.e., how detailed your use of a given key term is in explaining the employees attitudes and behaviors)Recommendations-Flowing out of the key terms discussed in the previous section, describe what the top managers or leaders in the company could do, very specifically, to improve the performance and/or commitment of your coworker. Then describe what you, personally, could do to make this coworker more effective.

Identify the author’s argument and evaluate how persuasive that argument would be to a thoughtful and informed member of its intended audience by examining the text in the light of other arguments made on that same topic.

“The Power of Context: Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City Crime,” is an essay that is in rich evidence. Gladwell uses anecdotes, statistical data, and reports of experiments in order to make what he calls an “environmental argument”. The goal is not to write an agree-disagree paper, but rather to consider how the additional sources can be used to reframe the original text’s position. Three outside sources will be used to extend, complicate, illustrate, qualify, or challenge three of the arguments advanced by Gladwell, drawing on this new understanding to evaluate the strength of the original text. You must use one action per argument and may not reuse a term. I also need a works cited list.

compose a two-paragraph summary of the two sources above the video interview from Miami and the transcript of the interviews from PBS and Sargasso.

View: Interview with Edwidge Danticat at https://umiami.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Interview+with+Edwidge+Danticat/0_giki3lte/16293121 Read: The Dew Breaker Interview with Edwidge Danticat on PBS at http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/entertainment-jan-june04-dew_05-05/ and the Sargasso An Interview with Edwidge Danticat at http://humanidades.uprrp.edu/ingles/pdfs/sargasso/EDanticat.pdf. Write: Hint: Avoid making judgements about the author, interviewer or setting of the interviews. Focus your attention on introducing both interviews appropriately and communicating the purpose and central claims of the interviews. Respond to Peers 1. Respond to two of your peers posts a. Make sure to make connections between your responses and their own; your experiences and those revealed in their posts; and, the general clarity of the ideas presented https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoCdhJsS6Bw and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGWO1ldEhtQ: For additional support with summaries, view