Author: best-essay

The class I am taking is the Health Care Ethics for Nursing Students. The specific instructions I will provide it to you in an attached document(Assignment criteria). The scholarly paper should be 4 -5 pages excluding the title and reference page. It should include a minimum of 4 peer-review scholarly journal references to support the paper. I will also give you some articles that the writer can use. In case he needs more articles he can also add them. I am also sending a copy of the pages from the book we are currently using in our class. Please read the book first in order to know what direction to take, according to what we spoke in class, that is the same as in the book I am sending you. You can use the book as well as reference. You can use the articles I gave you. In case you need extra material to complete the assignment criteria you can add more articles.

Article: Hillmert, S. & Jacob, M. (2010). Selections and social selectivity on the academic track: A life-course analysis of educational attainment in Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 28(1), 59-76.The study focuses on a single country: Germany. Make sure to at least (briefly) discuss the educational system in both countries.
Home Country: ENGLANDThe subtitle of this article states that a life-course analysis was conducted. To what extent do you think that the authors succeeded in this analysis? Please elaborate your opinion.

Complete the Case Study Four by answering the following questions. Use the reference below as the source to answer the questions.Case 4. Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to ProtectDr. Daniela Yeung, a community psychologist, has been conducting a federally funded ethnographic study of mens attitudes toward intimate partner violence following conviction and release from prison for spousal abuse. Over the course of a year, she has
had individual monthly interviews with 25 participants while they were in jail and following their release. Aiden, a 35-year-old male parolee convicted of seriously injuring his wife, has been interviewed by Dr. Yeung on eight occasions. The interviews have covered a range of personal topics including Aidens problem drinking, which is marked by blackouts and threatening phone calls made to his parents and girlfriend when he becomes drunk, usually in the evening. To her knowledge, Aiden has never followed through on these threats. It is clear that Aiden feels very comfortable discussing his life with Dr. Yeung. One evening Dr. Yeung checks her answering machine and finds a message from Aiden. His words are slurred and angry: Now that you know the truth about what I am you know that there is nothing you can do to help the evil inside me. The bottle is my savior and I will end this with them tonight. Each time she calls Aidens home phone she gets a busy signal.Ethical DilemmaDr. Yeung has Aidens address, and after 2 hours, she is considering whether or not to contact emergency services to go to Aidens home or to the homes of his parents and girlfriend.
1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma? 2. How might the fact that Dr. Yeung is a research psychologist without training or licensure in clinical practice influence the ethical decision? 3. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04; 3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and 10.10a relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?4. What are Dr. Yeungs ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal standards and Dr. Yeungs obligations to stakeholders? 5. What steps should Dr. Yeung take to ethically implement her decision and monitor its effects?Reference:Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Following Federal and State approvals for its new weight loss drug, Cal-Ban 3000, Health Care Products, Inc. began nationally marketing its new drug through newspaper advertisementsAfter seeing an advertisement for the weight loss drug, Cal -Ban 3000, in a North Carolina newspaper, the wife of the plaintiff Douglas Tart, a North Carolina resident, purchased the drug for her husband from an online retail store operated by defendant Prescott Pharmacies, Inc., a North Dakota corporation. No more than a week after the plaintiff’s beginning to take the drug had the plaintiff’s colon ruptured. Seeking remedies for his injury, allegedly as the direct result of his ingesting Cal-Ban 3000, the plaintiff filed suit in a North Carolina state court against defendant Prescott Pharmacies; Health Care Products, Inc., a Florida corporation and maker of Cal-Ban 3000; CKI Industries, the Florida corporation that markets Cal-Ban 3000; and other defendants. In response to the action, defendants Health Care Products and CKI questioned whether the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment precludes the North Carolina court from exercising jurisdiction in this case given that they were not legal residents of North Carolina. Defendant Prescott went further and questioned jurisdiction not only in North Carolina, but also in Florida, presumably if the plaintiff should choose to refile in Florida in the future.Develop an IRAC for Judicial Requirement Issues only. Question 2 Consider Commerce Clause, Dormant Commerce Clause, Supremacy & Preemption issuesGolden is a privately-owned company engaged in the business of disposing toxic waste generated by mining companies. Golden operates pursuant to a license issued by the state of Alpha. This license authorizes Golden to contract with miners to provide the following services: (i) collection of toxic waste at mine sites, and (ii) transportation of that waste to Golden’s disposal station, which is in the State of Alpha Alpha, three miles from the border with the state of Beta.In accordance with the authority granted by its license for the past 10 years Golden has contracted to provide services to miners in Alpha. Recently, Golden expanded its business to serve the miners in Beta and emerging battery businesses across the border in Beta.Shortly after Golden extended its services to the Beta miners and plants, the residents of the town from which the toxic waste disposal station operates started complaining about the rash of skin irritations, and increased illness.Prior to Golden’s expansion of service to the State of Beta miners and the battery business, the U.S. Congress has passed legislation promulgating standards for safe disposal of toxic materials including batteries.The residents petitioned the State of Alpha to close Golden’s disposal station. Golden objected. The Commissioner held open hearings. Following the hearings, the state issued an order that the use of Golden’s disposal station would be limited to toxic waste from Alpha miners only. The Beta miners and battery businesses were barred from disposing of their toxic waste through Golden.Both Golden and the State of Beta have filed suit against State of Alpha seeking to rescind the order. Develop a F-IRAC for the constitutional legal issues.

There is 2 options and you have to choose 1 :
Option 1: Using a pair of cases that deal with the same social issue from the Supreme Court
of Canada, analyze the social aspects of the two decisions. You must explain why the
decision was arrived at, not necessarily using the rationale provided by the judges, but rather
by providing an understanding of the social forces involved. Ideally you will engage the
concepts learned in the course as part of your explanation. You should account for the
interveners: Why these interveners? What was at stake for them? If a decision was not
unanimous, then what did the judges disagree on? Where there social policy aspects to the
decision that led to the disagreement?
Engage as many of theorists encountered in the course in your
analysis as possible. Refer to at least one relevant Supreme Court of Canada case.Supplemental informations: It should be double spaced, 12 point Times New Roman Font with 1 margins on all sides. You must use legal style citations Argument: This component assesses how well you applied the theory to the case, the
sophistication of the analysis and the appropriateness of the case(s) and theories chosen.
Evidence: The component assesses whether you have provided appropriate evidence for your
assertions. Attention must be paid to the quality and appropriateness of the evidence. You must
use the best available evidence. Quality of evidence is assigned as follows: a) Peer-reviewed
academic journals b) Court cases (the higher the court the better) c) Academic books d)
Government reports e) Non-academic books f) Newspaper reports g) Anything else.
Writing: This component assesses the writing in the paper, including grammar and style.
Citations: This component assesses how well you have used legal citations.

Please review the book listed below: Sanders, E. (2016). While the City Slept: A Love Lost to Violence and a Wake Up Call for Mental Health Care in America. New York, NY: Penguin Random House, LLC. The review should be 4 pages long, not including the title page, and reference page, this review should be written in APA 6th edition format. Please also include an abstract and a conclusion, along with reviewing the book, also include material to include coverage of these topics. ? Demonstrate an in-depth understanding of sexual offending across the developmental lifespan. ? Identify risk and protective factors associated with sexual offending. ? Interpret the role of co-occurring disorders and cognitive impairments in sexually offending. ?

Recent development in learning strategies have moved to a self -regulation approach. Synthesis the main arguments for and against this approach using the article below as a starting point.

Using a case study of a student (there is a 10 minute video of the child working in a group). Disect the various accents or anything that Separates the student from standardized school english.

Topic:
Implementation of a new prenatal care model to reduce office visits and increase conectivity and continuity of care.Guidelines
1- Identify the sample population.

“The Goal” Each student will submit a short analysis of “The Goal”. The write-up should be about 1,000 words. It should include: 1. Your opinion of what “the goal” is and a brief description of Goldratt’s measures (T, OE, and I) (~250 words or less) 2. Identify and briefly describe what you feel are the three most important steps Alex’s team took to improve the plant. Identify how the steps affect T, I, and OE (~250 words or less) 3. Finally, discuss how the concepts of the book might be applied in a firm, division, department, or group.