Imagine your reader is a fellow student who has not been keeping up with readings or with attending class, and asks you to explain the main argument in one of these excerpts. How would you show them?

Remember that the goal of this is to highlight the arguments and explain the views in question, and then to state a critical opinion on them. Also remember to show, not merely tell: dont just summarize the arguments, use direct references back to the texts to show the arguments of philosophers, and use clear examples to explain your own arguments which may be obvious to you, but wont be as obvious to your reader until you make them so!
The critical aspect of your paper can take one of a few different forms. For example:
o Refutation using counterexamples, or counterarguments, show why you think certain arguments (or certain philosophers) are mistaken. In response, offer the alternate argument that you think is better or more correct. When you attempt to refute a philosopher, make sure to include what you think that philosopher would say in response to your critique, and how you would respond in turn.
o Friendly critique if you agree with the position or argument in question, you can show your critical understanding of it by defending it against what critics do say about it (or what you imagine Some critics might argue….). Offering additional arguments that the philosopher would likely use if pressed, or bringing new examples to the table that help illustrate (and support) the point you are defending is a good way to do this.
o Fence-sitting you may be unsure whether you agree with the philosopher in question or not, in which case you can simply explain in detail the source of your ambivalence, by citing both some strengths and weaknesses of the argument. You can note obvious objections to the argument, and also note obvious responses to those objections. Remember that sitting on the fence is a little bit cheap, so if you are going to make that your conclusion, make sure that you have some really good reasons why non-committal is the best, most sensible option in this case.
TOPICS: Your paper can be on one of the three attached excerpts:
1. JJC Smart Sensations and Brain Processes
2. Thomas Nagel What is it Like to be a Bat?
3. Andy Clark & David Chalmers The Extended Mind

Describe the performance-expectations gap evident in this case what were the stakeholders concerns and how did their expectations differ from the companys performance? (15 marks)

Business Ethics assignment word limit
Part A- Should be 600 words.
Part B- must be 2500 words.
Required 5 reference and the reference sheet required at the end.
Work should be cited.Assignment 1: Forces and Public Issues in Industry (15%; 100 marks total)
Your progress
Introduction
In this module, we explored business, government, and society as an interrelated system made up of primary and secondary stakeholders. In additional to stakeholder forces, we also introduced some of the broader forces influencing this system. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding of stakeholder relationships and influences (including that of government and the media) on industry and public issues.
This assignment will comprise 15% of your total course mark. Part A is a case study involving an important public issue regarding the environment, and Part B is a report on public issues relating to the tobacco industry. Each question carries the marks as stated for a total of 100 marks.
Part A: Instructions
Read Discussion Case: Coca-Colas Water Neutrality Initiative on pages 43 and 44 of your textbook.

Question 2: If you applied the strategic radar screens model to this case, which of the eight environments would be most significant? Support your position. (5 marks)
Question 3: In your opinion, did TCCC respond appropriately to this public issue? Why or why not. (10 marks)
Part B: Instructions
The tobacco industry is constantly in the media. Choose one or more public issue(s) relating to the tobacco industry (banning of smoking in public places, secondary smoke health issues, controls on tobacco advertising and corporate sponsorship, youth or women as a tobacco industry target markets, etc.) Write a 2,500-word, double-spaced report containing the following:
Section 1. Context: Introduce the issue(s) you have selected and list primary and secondary stakeholders influencing or influenced by this issue(s). Be specific in naming individuals, groups, associations, and/or government bodies and describe these stakeholders’ roles. (15 marks)
Section 2. What does this mean to my family?: Identify your own stakeholder role(s) in relation to the tobacco industry and cigarette smoking in our society. Describe the biases, perspectives, or experiences that may influence your position on this public issue. (10 marks)

There is no right or wrong perspective, but it is important to recognize your own stakeholder positions and how they influence your perspectives.
Section 3. What does this mean to my company?: Imagine yourself as a tobacco industry executive and describe management of the public issue(s) from this perspective. (15 marks)
Section 4. What does this mean to my country?: Discuss the role(s) of government in this issue(s) and how it is influencing both the industry and the public. (15 marks)
Section 5. Media impact: Describe the media’s role in this issue(s) and the perspective it is presenting to the public. Discuss industry-sponsored media communications, as well as government communications and reporting in the popular press. Cite specific examples, using references. (15 marks)

Write a report providing a fully justified Asset Management Strategy and outline asset plans for the Keythorpe local authority schools programme (4000 words)

Note: In order to carry out part B you need to look at resources outside the lectures. You are expected to consult ISO 55000 to understand the key concepts. There is an expectation that you will research the relevant strategy areas to develop your answer. You are advised to read the AAMCOG(2011), PAS55 and ISO 55000 guides. The report should be a coherent report and each section should not be treated in isolation. You must present a logical response. The key to this report is how you link clients requirements (services/business) to the physical asset strategy and plans. Your reasoning and justification should be explicit. If you wish to include an appendix they must be no more than 1000 words.All conventions with regard to referencing and citations must be followed. Tables, diagrams or pictures that do not directly contribute to the work should not be included.

Using knowledge of urban economic development and sustainability, you will examine 2 cities in different regions of the world.

Your examination should consider the impacts of globalization effects on the economy, landscape and culture. You will compare 2 countries of the world. One of the countries must be the USA. Your analysis will examine the effects of globalization on urban places and society. First, choose a country from the region listed below. You will compare this country to the United States.The Greater Middle EastSouth Asia

How bad college students consume alcohol

demonstrate how to input data, analyze the data, and finally evaluate the output of a statistical analysis. These skills will allow the student to become competent in data analysis, which is necessary for obtaining a job in the psychology field or for entering graduate school. In PSY 460, each student will have a topic to empirically investigate in the field of psychology and will develop a literature review, hypothesis, and method section. After this study has been approved by the IRB committee, the student will begin to collect data and then analyze the data. Students will then analyze their data and finally demonstrate that they can disseminate their findings in a complete APA empirical paper.Specifically, the assignment will be in APA format, have a title page, abstract, literature review, method section, results section, discussion section, reference section, appendix, and complete IRB proposal.Specific Guidelines in conducting the experiment:Have a 10-page empirical paper in APA format
Use peer-reviewed literature to support their research hypothesis
Demonstrate the correct sections of an APA empirical paper
Conduct research under the APA ethical guidelines
Analyze data using statistical software
For your final paper you will be conducting an experiment from a data set your professor has provided. You must perform the following analysis:One Relational Analysis (e.g., Correlation or Regression analysis)Two Parametric Analysis with at least one that has an Experimental manipulation of an independent variable(e.g., t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Two-Way ANOVA, MANOVA)One Non-Parametric Analysis (e.g., Chi Square)You will be completing the 3 analysis and the writing the complete paper. The order in which you complete this study should follow these 3 stages: Stage 1:Once your decide on your study you should first write your proposal. This will be the part of the paper that included the title page, lit review, purpose, hypothesis, Method section and Reference section. Stage 2: After your propose your study you will analyze the data and determine if your hypotheses are supported or not.Stage 3: For the final stage you will complete the paper by writing the Results and the Discussion section along with Tables and Figures in the Appendix.This paper should be 10-15 Pages.You must have at least 20 Peer review sources.You need SPSS software to access the datahttps://lynn.instructure.com/courses/4695/files/542735/download?download_frd=1

What do you believe about your topic (what is your main argument)? Why? What steps did you take to arrive at this topic? What is your personal connection to it?

Law Enforcement should be stripped of lethal weapons for the safety of citizens in places of high murder rate by police will be my topic For the rest of the semester, we are working on your classical argument essay, an essay in which you are making a clear argument that is backed up with research. One of the most important steps in this process is choosing your topic. You want a topic that you feel passionately about (or at least that you are interested in). In your essay, you will be addressing and engaging the opposing view. You want to choose a topic that will allow you to find credible and recent research/statistics/interviews with relevant sources that back up your point-of-view. You want to be able to know what claims the opposing side makes so that you can refute/prove wrong those claims. You may integrate personal anecdote/relevant experience too, but most of the essay should utilize research/statistics/interviews to prove your point. Specific is good. Example of an argument that is too broad and not effective: Healthcare is good for everyone. Example of an effective topic, one that is narrow enough that you can write a 6-10 page classical argument essay: Medicaid should be expanded in Nebraska. It is effective because you’d be able to back up that argument with specific reasons and research. Reasons: because many people fall in the gap between qualifying for Medicaid and qualifying for an Affordable Care Act plan, it would prevent unnecessary death and severe illness due to lack of insurance, and it would save taxpayers money. Assignment: For your topic proposal, you will write a one- to three-page double-spaced explanation of your topic choice. This will include answers to the following questions: 2. What kinds of reasons might support your claim? And what kind of evidence will best support your reasons? What kind of research will you need to find to help you succeed at making your argument? What would your ideal sources look like? 3. Who do you think would be the main audience for your argument? Who are the stakeholders/people invested in your topic? How do you know? 4. What might opponents say in response to your argument? How will you respond to them? What else might pose challenges with your topic? 5. What questions do you have about your topic? What is puzzling or unknown? What would you like to discover over the course of this assignment?
Hide

What is the purpose of this historical site or museum? How does the site fulfill that purpose? Describe two items or collections that you observed at this location and what you learned from the items/collections (try to pick items/collections related to California or Los Angeles History).How does this place enhance your knowledge of California and/or Los Angeles History?

What is the purpose of this historical site or museum? How does the site fulfill that purpose? Describe two items or collections that you observed at this location and what you learned from the items/collections (try to pick items/collections related to California or Los Angeles History).How does this place enhance your knowledge of California and/or Los Angeles History?