Analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the actions of the protagonists in resolving the conflict, and provide recommendations for improving the outcomes of the conflict, drawing on conflict resolution references from this unit The video clip selected is this one, but if you know of a better one feel free to use it: https://www.criticalcommons.org/Members/duboisad/clips/doubtfir-12-1.avi/view
Travis Hirshis social bonding theory is a form of social control. While other criminological theories attempt to explain why crime occurs, social bonding theory explains why people conform to the norms of society and away from deviant and antisocial behaviors. Many argue the threat of punishment as being a deterrent. However, Travis Hirshi, in his contentions, believes there are other factors beyond punishment that are responsible for conformity. Review Chapter 7 in your primary text, and watch The Social Bond Theory (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.video, which provides examples of the four elements of the theory (Siegel, 2015; Hiemstra, 2013). In your paper,Discuss how the social bonding theory affects conformity in America.Discuss the relationship between social bonding theory and the various sociological schools of crime causation.
Introduction
You may decide to start with a hook that introduces the issue you will focus on and captures your audiences attention (e.g. shocking statistic, personal anecdote, controversial statement, rhetorical question).
State your thesis. This single statement should directly respond to the task and make your argument clear. Be sure to include the title of the novel and the author in your thesis.
Outline your two or three key points in the same order you will discuss them. This signposts your argument for your audience.First body paragraph: one recent event that demonstrates the relevance of the novel to Australian society today
Point sentence stating the recent event
Explanation of this event, including quotes if relevant
Evidence of the insight into this issue that Wyndham gives us in The Chrysalids. Consider how he influences us to think about this issue through characters values, attitudes and beliefs. Include at least one quote from the novel here.
Link back to your thesis about the relevance of the novel to Australian society today.Second body paragraph: another recent event that demonstrates the relevance of the novel to Australian society today
Point sentence stating the recent event
Explanation of this event, including quotes if relevant
Evidence of the insight into this issue that Wyndham gives us in The Chrysalids. Consider how he influences us to think about this issue through characters values, attitudes and beliefs. Include at least one quote from the novel here.
Link back to your thesis about the relevance of the novel to Australian society today.Third body paragraph (optional) use the same structure as previous body paragraphs Conclusion
Restate your thesis.
Review your two or three key points.
Leave your audience with a thought-provoking statement about the value of literature in giving us insight into our world today.
– What is the argument of the book?
You can summarize the overall book in a paragraph, but make sure you clearly state the overall argument/thesis of the book:
This should include a brief summary of the authors methodology (i.e., approach and sourcesused). You can also include information on how the book is organized. Evaluate the book.
Was the author successful in making and supporting her/his argument? Was he/she convincing? What did the author do well? What, if anything, could they have done better- Do NOT copy a review on the internet
Summave Assignment Guidance Essenal Skills for Higher Educaon and HealthcareSeptember 2018.
Assessment Brief: Write a 1,500 word reflective account on your role both as astudent in higher educaon, and future healthcare practioner, including an aconplan to address an iden!ed developmental need to be achieved by the end of your first year (can be included as an appendix). Relevant evidence based literature will be required to support your work, using the Harvard System of Referencing. Module Learning Outcomes (you must meet all the learning outcomes to pass themodule) Learning Outcome 1: Be able to describe and evaluate your role as a student in higher educaon and a future healthcare praconer. Learning Outcome 2: Reect on, and evaluate own learning strengths, styles and needs as an adult learner in higher educaon. Learning Outcome 3: Develop an acon plan to address a developmental need to be completed by the end of year 1. 1. Introduction (150 words). An introduction generally needs to answer thefollowing 3 questions.a. What? The introduction must begin by clearly explaining what theessay is about. This section needs to explain in your own words what is required in the assignment brief given above.b. How? The second part of the introduction needs to outline how thereflection will be structured. You need to summarise the details given in point 2 below.c. Why? An introduction needs to articulate why the topic underconsideration is of significance (this can include references). 2. Discussion (1200 words)
a. Discuss learning in general at Higher Education and in particularstudying nursing at Higher Education and your future role as ahealthcare practitioner (learning outcome 1). b. c. Explore your initial reflections on entering higher education (this canlink to an appendix including a reflective cycle if you wish) (learning outcome 2). d. Discuss and explore your academic profile, for example prior learning experiences in education. Identify your learning style and the impact this has on your learning (learning outcome 2). e. Discuss your identified area of development in relation to Essential Skills in higher education, for example, writing development, time management, IT skills etc. Reflect on the significance of the chosen development area in your future practice as a student and future nurse(learning outcome 3). 3. Conclusion (150 words)a. Summary: Summarise the key learning points that have emerged fromyour discussion above.b. Recommendations: Make recommendations on what needs to be done in light of your findings and conclusions.4. References: Harvard Referencing Guide Appendices: Appendices serve both the writer, and the reader of your essay. In an appendix, you can include material that complements your
work but that would be distracting or too long in the text of the essay. Itshould not however, be information that does not complement what isalready in the text. Examples of Appendices for your reflection: reflection using a Reflective cycle on your initial reflections as a student, SWOTanalysis, SMART development plan to address identified needs, Learning Styles Questionnaire. 6. General points: formatting – font 12pt, line spacing 1.5Anonymity: please use your student number rather than you name for identification purpose on the script. Word count: 1500 +/- 10% which gives a range of 1350-1650 words. Quality Handbook Assessment Supplement Generic Marking Scheme Undergraduate % Descriptor 86 – 100 The standard achieved is exceptional and the work provides clear evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a levelappropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at an exceptional standard. 76 – 85 The standard achieved is outstanding and the work provides clear evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a levelappropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at an outstanding standard. 70 – 75 The standard achieved is excellent and the work provides clear evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a levelappropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at an excellent standard. 65 – 69 The standard achieved is very good and the work provides clear evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a levelappropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at a very good standard. 60 – 64 The standard achieved is good and the work provides evidence thatthe knowledge, understanding and skills are at a level appropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning
outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at a good standard. 55 – 59 The standard achieved is satisfactory and the work provides evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a levelappropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at a satisfactory standard. 50 – 54 The standard achieved is acceptable and the work provides evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a levelappropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved mostly at an acceptable standard. 45 – 49 The standard achieved is acceptable and the work provides evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a levelappropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved thoughquite a few are only achieved at a basic standard.40 – 44 Marginal passThe standard achieved is basic and the work provides evidence thatthe knowledge, understanding and skills are at a level appropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved mostly at a basic standard.35 – 39 Marginal fail The standard achieved is weak and the work provides evidence of insufficient knowledge, understanding and/or skills appropriate to the level of study, although some of the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved. 30 – 34 The standard achieved is very weak and the work provides evidence of insufficient knowledge, understanding and/or skills appropriate to the level of study. The evidence shows that some of the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved OR that none is achieved but there is evidence that many of the learning outcomes may be almost achieved. 20 – 29 The standard achieved is unacceptable and the work provides little evidence of the knowledge, understanding and/or skills appropriate to the level of study. The evidence shows that few, if any, of the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved. 10 – 19 The standard achieved is unacceptable and the work provides very little evidence of the knowledge, understanding and/or skills appropriate to the level of study. The evidence shows that very few, if any, of the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved. 0-9 The standard achieved is unacceptable and the work provides negligible or no evidence of the knowledge, understanding and/or skills appropriate to the level of study. The evidence fails to show that any of the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved.
You should identify the authors main point and examine how they defended their position. NB: you are not expected to incorporate all of the sources listed, just those relevant to your approach to the paper prompt.No secondary sources, other than the Cengage text, should be integrated into this paper’s analysis. Your paper should briefly introduce your paper’s topic or question and provide a thesis statement. In a paper of this size, your introduction and thesis statement should appear on the first page, in the paper’s first paragraph.
Your paper should show that you reasoned through the evidence in a fair-minded way. In other words, you should state (paraphrase) what your evidence says and not what you wish it said or think it should say. You need to state the evidence fairly, even if you think it is wrong or offensive.
Your paper should use evidence to answer the historical question. You need to explain how the evidence answers the question.
Your paper should develop and organize your thoughts clearly and logically. Outlining is probably necessary, but not a required, step in writing a well-organized paper.
Your paper should draw a conclusion that addresses the paper’s chief topic or question and that states your answer to the question or your contribution to the topic. Common Style:Typewritten, double-spacedLength: 750 wordsDocumentation: Chicago Style
Introduction ( back massage, foot reflexology, breathing, and antenatal exercise) not more half a page writing because I have a lot of information about it) 2. background overview of the article 3. Research purpose 4. Research questions 5. Significant research 6. method is a qualitative research approach ( interview focus group and questioner o recruitment o study population ( obstetric in the Maternity hospital ) o consent 7. data collection 8. Data analysis 9. Findings/ results 10. The timeline/projection of research study 11. Preliminary findings (if any) 12. Discussion 13. Conclusion 14. References
Assignment 4: (Part I) Plan for Implementation and Evaluation Hide Assignment Information Instructions This assignment assesses the following intended course outcomes: Apply the nursing process and evidence-based practice to accurately assess family and community health systems. Apply systematic research practices to identify family and community health system needs. Discuss the multi-dimensional role of the community health nurse in risk reduction and health promotion. Discuss the multi-dimensional role of the community health nurse in risk reduction and health promotion. In this assignment you will use the health promotion/risk reduction education or intervention plan based on the need identified in Assignment 3 Part 1. Develop/explain the process of implementation and evaluation for your Assignment 3 Part 1 health plan. Part of the development of the health promotion/risk reduction plan development is to include the implementation and evaluation phases of the plan. Support your processes with examples from studies you have read in this course. In the Introduction State the recommendations from the plan you developed in Assignment 3 Part 1. In the implementation process, you are required to include the following: Timeline for implementation and duration of the plan/intervention: state a reasonable amount of time for both based on findings from the literature. Be sure to cite your sources and explain the rationale behind the timeline. Resources needed to implement: staffing (including level of education of required staff), physical space needed, location, sources of funding available. Delivery of the plan: who are the community partners/stakeholders needed to implement the program? What is the point of delivery (an individual or community)?In the evaluation process, you are required to include or identify the following: Data description: How will you measure the outcome (what tool will be used; include an example if possible)? How will data be collected/aggregated/stored? Who should receive the outcome data? How will the outcome data be used in additional planning? Resources needed to conduct evaluation process: staffing needed (specialists needed to evaluate outcomes); what possible sources of funding for evaluation phase; what community partnerships and stakeholders should be involved in evaluation? Summary/Conclusion: include expected outcomes based on the literature. This assignment will be evaluated on the following criteria: Introduction/summary of the plan developed in Assignment 3 Part 1 10% Implementation 30% Timeline for implementation and duration of the plan (10%) Resources: space, physical location, staffing needs, and funding (10%) Delivery: community partners and stakeholders, point of delivery, and special interventions (10%) Evaluation 30% Description of the data collection and tool used to measure the outcome; future use of data for planning (10%) Resources needed for evaluation: staffing and funding needed (10%) Description of the community partners involved in the evaluation (10%) Summary/conclusion, including expected outcomes based on the findings from the literature 20% APA, spelling, grammar, and organization 10% Due Date Dec 9, 2018 11:59 PM Hide Rubrics Rubric Name: Implementation and Evaluation of Health Promotion Plan Proposal This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Introduction 10 points (9-10 points) Clearly summarizes developed community plan 8 points (6-8 points) Summarizes developed community plan 5 points (3-5 points) Summarizes developed community plan, omits recommendations 2 points (0-2 points) Incomplete summary, omits recommendations / 10 Timeline for Implementation 10 points (9-10 points) Reasonable timeline for implementation and duration of intervention based on findings from the literature 8 points (6-8 points) Describes timeline for intervention and duration, does not describe basis for the timeline 5 points (3-5 points) Does not include information for implementation or duration of intervention. 2 points (0-2 points) Unclear regarding timeline for implementation and duration, does not state basis for the stated timeline. / 10 Resources for Implementation 10 points (9-10 points) Clearly describes needs for resources, staffing needs and funding and provides justification for these resources 8 points (6-8 points) Describes the needs for resources, staffing and funding, does not provide a clear justification for these resources 5 points (3-5 points) Incomplete description of the needed resources, ambiguous regarding the justification for these resources 2 points (0-2 points) Incomplete/minimal description regarding needed resources, no justification for stated resources / 10 Delivery 10 points (9-10 points) Clearly identifies community partners and stakeholders, point of delivery and describes special interventions that may be needed 8 points (6-8 points) Identifies community partners and stakeholders, incomplete description of point of delivery or special interventions that may be needed 5 points (3-5 points) Ambiguous description of community partners, incomplete description of point of delivery or special interventions that may be needed 2 points (0-2 points) Does not identify community partners. Incomplete or omits description of point of delivery or special interventions that may be needed / 10 Data description 10 points (9-10 points) Clearly describes the recommended data collection tool to measure the outcome based on the literature, and makes recommendations for future use of data for planning 8 points (6-8 points) Describes the recommended data collection tool, recommendation not based on the literature. Some recommendations made regarding the future use of data for planning 5 points (3-5 points) Incomplete description of the data collection tool. Unclear regarding basis of recommendation. Little to no recommendations regarding future use of data for planning 2 points (0-2 points) Little to no description of the data collection tool, no basis given for recommending the data collection tool, no recommendations given regarding future use of data for planning / 10 Resources for Evaluation 10 points (9-10 points) Clearly delineates resources needed for evaluation including staffing and funding needed for the evaluation process 8 points (6-8 points) Describes needed resources, incomplete information regarding staffing or funding for the evaluation process 5 points (3-5 points) Incomplete description of the resources needed. Information regarding staffing or funding for the evaluation process 2 points (0-2 points) Little to no information regarding the needed resources / 10 Community Partners needed for evaluation 10 points (9-10 points) Clearly describes the community partners involved in the evaluation, their stake in the program and how they will benefit 8 points (6-8 points) Describes the community partners involved in the evaluation, some information missing regarding their stake in the program and how they will benefit 5 points (3-5 points) Incomplete description of the community partners, information regarding their stake in the program or how they will benefit is missing. 2 points (0-2 points) Little to no information regarding community partners needed for the evaluation. / 10 Summary/Conclusion, including expected outcomes based on the findings 20 points (16-20 points) Completely summarizes the implementation and evaluation of the plan and expected outcomes based on findings from the literature 15 points (11-15 points) Summary is missing the implementation, evaluation of the plan, or expected outcomes based on findings from the literature 10 points (6-10 points) Incomplete summary of the implementation, evaluation with little information regarding expected outcomes based on the literature 5 points (0-5 points) Little to no summary of the implementation, evaluation and expected outcomes based on the literature / 20 APA, spelling, grammar, organization and references 10 points (9-10 points) Excellent use of APA in formatting and referencing. Excellent spelling and grammar throughout the paper. Excellent organization and easy to read. References relevant, current and from peer-reviewed journals 8 points (6-8 points) Minimal (1-2) mistakes in APA formatting. Appropriate referencing. Minimal mistakes in spelling a grammar. Well written and easy to read. References relevant, current not from peer-reviewed journals 5 points (3-5 points) Some APA (more than 2 types) and referencing mistakes. Some spelling and grammar errors. Generally well written and easy to read. Minimal organization problems. References somewhat relevant, but are not current or not from peer-reviewed journals. 2 points (0-2 points) Many APA, spelling, and grammar mistakes throughout the paper. Difficult to read with very little organization. References not relevant or current, not from peer-reviewed journals / 10 Total / 100 Overall Score Level 4 80 points minimum Level 3 51 points minimum Level 2 22 points minimum Level 1
Hide
Challenges and Considerations for ICT (information and communication technology) and pedagogy in teacher development programs
1. Introduction 2. Findings and analysis 2.1 critically evaluate the impact of emerging themes in event sector 2.2 critically evaluate on the key themes in 5 years 2.3 recommendation course of action 3. conclusion(2/3 paragraphs) Subheadings for the point 1. 2. 3. 4. 4. Reference list (Harvard style referencing) WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT This assignment requires students to research into the emerging themes within the business sector related to their programme of study and use the evidence gathered to inform operational and strategic decisions. Students should apply their critical understanding of relevant emerging themes to formulate alternative courses of action necessary. The following case studies provide the necessary background required for you to complete this assessment task. Read case study that is relevant to your specialism of study (as provided below): Case study For students undertaking the programme: BSc (Hons) Events and Entertainment Management; Link to case study: https://chatbotsmagazine.com/chatbots-and-ai-the-key-event-tech-trends-for-2018-7b45cbc723a COURSEWORK TASK 3000 words Students should review the case study provided and undertake the following: Your critical discussion should include a critical analysis of the ways in which those themes might affect the appropriateness of existing organisational policies and practices. Areas of focus should include any combination of TWO of the following: 1. Political environments 2. Technological advancements 3. Demographic changes 4. Social trends and shifts 5. Industry globalisation 6. Legal transformations 7. Global economic issues 2. Critically evaluate how those themes identified could affect the operational and/or strategic decision-making necessary to shape organisations within the broad sector over the next five years. Your answer should use contemporary examples of how those emerging themes have started to be addressed within your business sector. 3. Provide justified recommendations for courses of actions that organisations within the broad sector can take to ensure that they are able to manage the effects of those emerging themes effectively. ? The assignment contains three tasks, which you are required to answer after reading the article provided as link in your respective degree programme area of your Assignment Brief. ? An exceptional piece of assignment will attract marks of 70% and above. 1. Introduction A REPORT should have an INTRODUCTION section. Your Introduction should ideally Describe the four pillars of emerging themes Summarize the given article Summarize the tasks your report will cover. 2. Task One Critically evaluate the case study, outlining the ways in which the identified relevant emerging themes might impact on the current business strategies relating to the identified organization or sector. Your discussion should include a critical analysis of the ways in which those themes might affect the appropriateness of existing organizational policies and practices. An exceptional report will: Clearly identify any emerging themes highlighted in the article e.g. artificial intelligence, etc; and describe, with examples, the impact that these themes have or may have on the relevant event sector) for example, the student may have identified artificial intelligence such as drones and may decide to discuss the impact that these devices may have on certain areas of business such as delivery services. Critically discuss the impact each identified emerging theme is having on organizations within a relevant Industry/Discipline for example, the student may choose to refer to a business such as UPS as an example of a business (with regards to drones) that may be directly affected by such an emerging technology. A critical discussion will ideally consider merits and demerits of the emerging theme identified. APPROACHING TASK ONE ? Clearly identify any emerging themes highlighted in the article e.g. artificial intelligence. ? Describe, with examples, the impact of the themes on the relevant sector. ? Critically discuss the impact each identified emerging theme is having on organisations within a relevant Industry/Discipline. ? A critical discussion will ideally consider merits and demerits of the emerging theme identified. 3. Task Two Task – Critically evaluate how those themes identified could affect the operational and/or strategic decision-making necessary to shape organizations within the broad sector over the next five years. Your answer should use contemporary examples of how those emerging themes have started to be addressed within your business sector. An exceptional report will: Widen the critical discussion in Task 1 by reflecting on possible futuristic impact. This area should include a critical evaluation of future impacts on organisational objectives, operations and practices; as well as its wider impact on the economy, society, the Industry/sector, customers, government, competitors and any other relevant stakeholders. APPROACHING TASK 2 ? Widen the critical discussion in Task 1 by reflecting on possible futuristic impact. ? This area should include a critical evaluation of future impacts on ? organisational objectives, ? operations and practices; ? the economy, ? society, ? the Industry/sector, ? customers, ? government, ? competitors and any other relevant stakeholders. 4. Task Three Task – Provide justified recommendations for courses of actions that organizations within the broad sector can take to ensure that they are able to manage the effects of those emerging themes effectively. An exceptional report will: Consider the present and futuristic impacts discussed in Tasks 1 and 2, and make relevant recommendations which managers will find useful to mitigate against or maximize the identified impacts of the relevant emerging themes. APPROACHING TASK 3 ? Consider the present and futuristic impacts discussed in Tasks 1 and 2, and make relevant recommendations which managers will find useful to mitigate against or maximise the identified impacts of the relevant emerging themes. CONCLUSION REFERENCE Overall Your work would be exceptional if it: Present a logical flow of narrative Use relevant in-text citations throughout the argument Use relevant academic frameworks or concepts where necessary Be free of typo/grammar errors Well paragraphed and structured
Hide