Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD)

Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD)/Marijuana Addiction (10-12 pg. paper) – Master’s Level (SOCIAL WORK in CANADA)- symptoms and possible progressions of issue (2 pages +-)
– risk and protective factors of issue (2 p. +-)
– impacts on Person, Family & Community (2 p. +-)
– primary professional & non-professional interventions (2 p. +-)
– dominant theoretical perspectives (two and to be provided) informing intervention (2 p. +-)
– possible outcomes (discuss the range of possible outcomes & the issue and factors that influence each (1-2 p. +-)
___________________________________________
– present the definition, symptoms, and progression of a single disorder based on recognized professional literature- describe how this disorder impacts individuals, their families, and their communities- analyze the effectiveness of formal & informal interventions for this disorder as reported in the literature – analyze the outcomes with and without formal or informal interventions, using a critical analysis that considers how a different perspective may better explain the disorder and it’s interventions.
___________________________________________
Some resources to be provided. Please keep in mind that this paper is for a Social Work student in Canada at a Master level. Therefore, a lot of Canadian resources to be utilized (i.e. Canadian Mental Health Association, Canadian Health Association, Canadian Centre for Addictions, Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse and Addiction, etc.)Social Work(ers) writers will be preferred the most! Thank you everyone in advance for your time. =)

It is a 4 page history paper answering the following question(How did events in Missouri and the nation as a whole affect Celias trial?) and using evidence from the book McLaurin, Melton A. Celia, A Slave: A True Story. New York: Avon Books, 1991.

It is a 4 page history paper answering the following question(How did events in Missouri and the nation as a whole affect Celias trial?) and using evidence from the book McLaurin, Melton A. Celia, A Slave: A True Story. New York: Avon Books, 1991.

Write a brief topic summary as introduction. This will serve as a background and context; it will show how the work you plan adds to the current body of knowledge on the topic.

Write a 1,500 word proposal for further analysis and research on the topic you wrote about in the persuasive essay. If you do not wish to investigate further sources for this topic, pick another topic, but be sure to get your instructors approval before you go ahead with the work.
Please note that this proposal is academic in focus; it is the kind of proposal that many professors ask for as preparation for writing a full length research paper. Thus, practice in using this format and this approach to long term research based on published sources (mostly in written form) will help you to succeed in other courses.
Recall the definition of a proposal as a plan for further work; you do not necessarily have to read the sources on your list of references but you do not to have some working knowledge of the topic. The plan is to do some reading and research (based on questions that have already emerged in your reading of the topic). As yourself: what have I done already on this topic? What could I do to extend that? Are there further solutions to a problem that need to be assessed? Are there related topics that should be investigated?
Format:
a) Provide a title that reflects the topic and the work you plan to do.

c) Write a purpose statement for the proposal; add a statement or a questions that sums up a problem you want to analyze.
d) Explain why you are the right person to do this project and express enthusiasm for the task.
e) Indicate a time line that would be appropriate for completing the work.
f) Present a list of references; aim for about ten sources.
Provide some headings for each section of the proposal.

Birth to Womanhood: Life in the System

Where are they now and the crimes they participate in. Im giving the statement of the problem and the questions that need to be addressed. I would like you to address the questions as well as be creative with the paper. The research paper will take the form of a literature review, which will include a statement of the problem, a review of the major issues covered in previous research, as well as a discussion of the relevant policy/program issues related to the topic. Each of these sections should be clearly identified in your paper.
o Statement of the problem
In the statement of the problem, you should define what you are
studying and why it is important to do so.
Often, this section ends with posing a few questions that will be
answered by the paper.
This is intended to hook the reader this is where you get the
readers interest and convince them that this topic is worth
consideration and why.
Questions that might be relevant are:
What have others said about this topic?
What theories have been used to account for this issue?
What research has been done?
Are the findings consistent or inconsistent?
What flaws exist in the previous research?
A literature review should NOT include your opinion or thoughts on the topic this is only about what others have said or researched on the topic.
The literature review should be organized in some meaningful fashion that is appropriate to your topic. Dont just detail one study after another try to integrate the studies together somehow. Possible ways to organize a literature review are: by date of the studies being reviewed if there has been some change in the topic historically or if research on the topic is different in one time period than another, this might be a good way to organize your literature review by themes the research if there are a few themes that consistently emerge in the research, then this might be a good way to organize your literature review
o themes could be the kinds of variables that are examined by context if there are a few different contexts in which the previous research takes place, it might make sense to organize the literature review around thosecontext could be the research methodology used or the place that is studied by findings if there are inconsistent findings in the past literature, you might want to organize the literature review around findings that are supportive, not supportive, and neutral (or whatever groupings might be relevant).
When discussing a study in your literature review, you want to be sure to include the key findings and the methodology used in the study.
Try to be current in your literature review while older studies can be informative and are often essential, you always want to make sure to have the most current studies included in your review as well.
o Policy/program issues
Based on the literature that you have reviewed what suggestions have
been made by others in regards to policies or programs related to your topic? What suggestions would you make in regards to policies or programs related to your topic? All suggestions should be somehow tied to the theories used to account for your topic and your literature review dont contradict your literature review in making suggestions.
References
Greenwood, P. W., & Welsh, B. C. (2012). Overview of: ‘Promoting Evidence-Based Practice in Delinquency Prevention at the State Level: Principles, Progress, and Policy Directions’. Criminology & Public Policy, 11(3), 491-492. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00825.xMarotta, P. L. (2017). Childhood Adversities and Substance Misuse Among the Incarcerated: Implications for Treatment and Practice in Correctional Settings. Substance Use & Misuse, 52(6), 717-733. doi:10.1080/10826084.2016.1261899Rolfe, A. (2008). You’ve got to grow up when you’ve got a kid: Marginalized young women’s accounts of motherhood. Journal Of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18(4), 299-314. doi:10.1002/casp.925Seita, J. (2012). Reclaiming Family Privilege. Reclaiming Children & Youth, 21(2), 34-39.Sisto, G. W. (1985). Therapeutic Foster Homes for Teenage Mothers and Their Babies. Child Welfare, 54(2), 157-163.

the cultural politics of sexuality

The Cultural Politics of Sexuality
At this point in the semester (i.e., at its end), we’ve seen authors use a variety of analytical
strategies and tools to tease out assumptions about sexuality and ideologies of sexuality in their
various “research objects,” i.e., Meese Commission hearings (Vance 1997), family values
campaigns (Stacey 1997), travesti prostitution (Kulick 1998), representations of genitals (Laqueur
1997), narratives of biological reproduction (Martin 1991), studies of the Hottentot Venus
(Somerville 1997), and many others.
The point of this final Short Assignment #2 is to give you some practice at identifying cultural
assumptions and ideologies about sexuality that circulate on the underbelly of U.S. American
popular culture today (i.e., beneath the surface features), and to give you some practice at
making those – our – assumptions visible (i.e., articulating them) since they are normally hidden
from view. In anticipation of this, Id encourage you to do a thought experiment in which you come
up with examples for each of Rubin’s (1984) axioms.
For this Short Assignment, your “research object” needs to be a specific kind of cultural text: a
recent article that focuses on U.S. American society and that was published in print in a
mainstream newspaper (such as: The New York Times, Washington Post, San Francisco
Chronicle, L.A. Times, USA Today or other major daily newspaper) or major news magazine
(Time, Newsweek, The Nation, etc.) and published, specifically, published between
January 1, 2018 and now.
After carefully choosing your research object, your task is to tease out the assumptions about
sexuality that inform, animate, or otherwise underpin the story that the article’s author is either
telling or on which s/he is reporting. Note you will need to carefully choose a research object
that is amenable to such an analysis; that requires some thought and selectivity. Note too that
your research object (the article) and your analysis (your Short Assignment write-up) must focus
on sexuality – be very careful you do not get confused and mistakenly focus on gender.
You might think of the assumptions about sexuality as particular ideological positions on or buried
claims about some aspect of sexuality. Usually, such positions or claims are being assumed by
the author and being treated as the ‘natural backdrop’ to the positions the author takes up on the
surface of the text (or reports on the surface of the text). It is that ‘natural backdrop’ that you want
to identify and analyze.
Your primary task, then, is to identify and discuss the assumptions about sexuality that inform the
article. It is NOT enough to name the cultural assumptions or axioms (Rubin 1984) buried in the
logic of the article you choose. Rather, when I say you are to “discuss the assumptions” I mean
that your task in this Short Assignment is not only to identify the cultural assumptions but to
explain how those particular cultural assumptions, ideologies or axioms are informing and
shaping the subject matter of the article. Thus, in addition to
(1) identifying the cultural assumptions/axioms, it is also necessary that you
(2) explain and analyze how they are being used in relation to the specific subject of the article
you’ve chosen.
Please see the document (attached to this Short Assignment posting) entitled, “SA02Addendum”
for a listing of many of the conceptual tools we’ve been identifying and working with throughout
the course. Lastly, note that you must choose an article about the U.S. because the conceptual
tools we have been focusing on most recently (including Rubin [1984], Stacey [1997], and Vance
[1997]) were explicitly (and only) developed for American society: these tools are not intended for
cross-cultural use.
One of the key parts of your work for this assignment is to pick a newspaper or news magazine
article that is amenable to this kind of analysis: some articles are easier objects for the teasing
out project than are others; some articles are very difficult as research objects. Choose well. You
will be graded in part on your ability to choose an amenable research object.
Finally, this assignment will require that you provide a brief introductory summary of the article
(generally, a summary of what its about) at the outset of your write-up before you move on to
your main task of teasing out and explaining the articles assumptions about sexuality. In other
words, you need to provide an opening introduction so that your reader (hello) has a sense of the
ground youll be digging under.
LENGTH/FORMAT: 550 words (+/- 25 words without penalties)
DUE: Thursday (12/6/2018)
GRADE VALUE: 100 points
SUBMISSION: Your Short Assignment #2 (including Bibliography) is due in hardcopy form at
beginning of class on 12/6/2018; the e-copy of that hardcopy must be submitted no later than
11:59 p.m. that same date to the Turnitin Submission Site for SA#2 which will appear directly
below.
BIBLIOGRAPHY: As with your first Short Assignment, you must provide the full source
bibliographic reference for the article you choose as your research object as well as full
references for any readings on which you draw to analyze it (including course readings). Use the
Social Science Citation and Reference Formats document (in the Syllabus &c folder) as the
authority for formatting your in-text citations as well as the references in your bibliography and
take stock of feedback you may have received on SA#1 on poorly formatted citations. As part of
this, while your primary source must have been published in print form, I anticipate most of you
will use internet reprints or cross-prints: in your bibliography be sure to provide a properly
formatted full reference for the print version, followed by the active URL for the article (and
the date you accessed it, per the Citation Guidelines). Again, the specific guidelines for how to
cite and reference articles you find reprinted on the internet are available in the Social Science
Citation and Reference Formats document.
OTHER RULES: Your source article must be drawn from mainstream print news media:
news stories in newspapers (The New York Times, Washington Post, other major dailies), in
mainstream news magazines (Time, Newsweek, other mainstream national newsmagazines). Op
ed. pieces published in such major print media are also acceptable. Films, TV news reports, and
any other visual media are NOT acceptable sources. Internet-only publications are also NOT
acceptable sources. Lastly, be attentive to the timeframe Ive stipulated: the article you choose
must have been published 1/1/2018 or later.

To thoroughly research Blockchain technology, learn about its creation, development, current and potential benefits and problems, uses, governmental regulations, cost effectiveness, potential applications and where it could be headed. Once the research is completed, write a paper to analyze and discuss those research findings.

To thoroughly research Blockchain technology, learn about its creation, development, current and potential benefits and problems, uses, governmental regulations, cost effectiveness, potential applications and where it could be headed. Once the research is completed, write a paper to analyze and discuss those research findings.

Plato and Locke both provide compelling descriptions of the savage behavior that results from the temptations of absolute, tyrannical power. What is the distinctive emphasis of each account, and what political conclusions does each philosopher draw from it?

Plato and Locke both provide compelling descriptions of the savage behavior that results from the temptations of absolute, tyrannical power. What is the distinctive emphasis of each account, and what political conclusions does each philosopher draw from it?

What incentives are included in the plan? How will it motivate the employees?

This is a powerpoint presentation: Not an essay paperCompensation Strategy for Knowledge WorkersTo prepare for this assignment, review Warings article about employee compensation, which is also listed in the required reading section of the Unit IV Study Guide. Note: both links contain the same information; only one needs to be reviewed.Waring, D. (2013). How to design an employee compensation plan [SlideShare slides]. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/FitSmallBusiness/how-to-design-a-compensation-plan-dave?ref=http://fitsmallbusiness.com/how-to-pay-employees/Waring, D. (2013). How to pay employees The ultimate guide. Retrieved from http://fitsmallbusiness.com/how-to-pay-employees/You are the director of compensation for a midsized organization. Prepare a PowerPoint presentation that justifies the implementation of a new compensation strategy that will support the motivational needs of knowledge workers and reinforce the real-time performance appraisal system that the organization has embraced. While your goal is to retain, motivate, and grow the current workforce of multi-generational knowledge workers, you must also justify to your senior management that this compensation strategy is competitive in the marketplace.Your presentation should describe a compensation program for knowledge workers. The title of the knowledge workers position is entirely up to you (e.g., sales executive I, systems engineer III, etc.). You may use various sources (including the lesson materials), but you must use at least one additional resource from the CSU Online Library. Include a reference slide, and cite any sources used in proper APA format. Your presentation should be a minimum of 12 slides in lengthnot counting the title and reference slides. You may also use the slide notes function to explain slide contents as necessary, but this is not required.Be sure to address the questions below in your presentation.1. What is the compensation strategy being proposed?
2. Did employees provide input?
3. Who else provided input?

5. How will employees determine fairness of the pay structure?
6. Why do you believe the employees will be satisfied with this plan? Justify the compensation strategy that supports the motivational needs of knowledge workers.
7. What is your communication plan for rolling out the new program?

Did your attitude toward reading change during this course? Why or why not?

Reading Autobiography: Part 2 (End of the Course Reflection)Reflect on the development of your relationship with reading during your time in this class. Respond to the following questions in your response (1-2 pages max): 2. What did you learn about yourself as a reader and/or a future teacher of reading?3. How will you support and nurture reading in your future classroom?Be sure to support your claims with specific examples from the course texts and your own experiences with reading this summer (personally and/or with kids in the field).