Literary Review on any area in the field of Psychology. Must be a peer-reviewed article from a Psychology Journal.

Literature Review: (500 points). This is a major written undertaking. Generally, a literature review is used to introduce a particular research project. It provides the theoretical and methodological basis for the research as well as a critique of previous studies that explains the need for the current project (e.g., extending norms, applying theory to a different population, etc.). You will pick a SPECIFIC area of research within psychology (DIFFERENT FROM YOUR DISCUSSION TOPIC) to provide a comprehensive (not exhaustive) review of the extant literature with an eye toward the quality, quantity, and applicability of the research. Your job is to lay out the previous research in such a way that the reader understands the topic, can see where the research strengths and limitations are, and can ultimately see where the next stage in the research should go. This is not an annotated bibliography, so merely listing findings of previous research is not acceptable. You need to present the information in a narrative form using elements of scientific writing. Scoring will utilize the following format: 100 points: Depth of research Do not omit studies with significant findings (using only peer reviewed journals) 100 points: Breadth of research Include studies that may indicate generalizability 100 points: Critical thinking your ability to explain why the literature is adequate/inadequate, applicable/narrow, how it may direct future research etc.

Dallas Buyers, Schindlers List

A critical synthesis essay revolves around two main types of methodology: criticism and synthesis. This kind of paper is an appropriate place to discuss a topic from different points of view. Critical in this instance refers to critical thinkingthe analysis and evaluation of a topic, issue, text, etc. Synthesis is a method which is related to integration of different points of view and different sides of one issue. In contrast with analysis, synthesis starts from the particulars and concludes with universal statements (but they are not dogmatical).Assignment DetailsFor this assignment, you will consider how two or three films have treated themes, issues, or aspects we have discussed in class. You can choose from the following topics.

Many people never really try to take time to study the Bible because they believe it is much too hard. They leave such work to pastors and theologians. That is very unfortunate, since studying the Bible really is not a difficult task at all. Think about it, if the Bible is truly Gods way to reveal Himself to us, why would he make it so difficult?

Over the next couple of weeks we will be exploring some basic tools that you can use to engage your own journey of discovery in the Bible.This week we will focus on Observation. You can read a brief explanation by visiting the following site: http://www.walkwiththeword.org/Aids/HowTo/Inductive_2-Observation.html.We will use a small passage in John. If you have a Bible, find John 1:1-14. If you do not have Bible, you can look up the passage at http://www.blueletterbible.com. In a separate document, complete a basic observation of the passage. Your response should include:1. Ask the 5 Ws and an H. You may not be able to answer every question. That is okay, just do what you can.
2. There at least two key words used in this passage (though they really are synonymous with each other). Choose a term or two and record as many observations as you can. Do not try and go too deep with this assignment. Simply write down what you observe. Be sure to include pronouns associated with the term.Format Requirements
Document TypeMS WordPaper Size8.5 X 11″Length1-2 pagesMargins1″FontTimes or Times New Roman, 12 pt.Line SpacingDouble. No extra double space between paragraphs please.In-text Citations & Reference List StyleAPAPaper StructureIntroduction

How does the parenting styles differs from different generations.

Write a 1,000 word research paper (minimum length), excluding the title page and reference page.
Your paper must adhere to the APA 6th edition writing format. If your paper does not comply with this format you will lose points. Recognized scholarly sources must be presented to support the students findings. Please double-check your APA 6th edition formatting. Please explore this site http://apastyle.org/
You should use a minimum of two professional sources. All sources must be properly cited with reference page. Remember for every reference you use, you must have at least one citation in the body of your paper. Failure to cite and reference your sources will result in no credit for references.
The paper will be prepared in a manner acceptable for college-level work; i.e., neatly typed, double-spaced with proper citations as required with APA formatting.

Visit the Metropolitan Museum of Art, in New York City, on Google Art Project.

Scroll through the collection and click on images, or use the museum viewer, to look at the different works of art on display. From the gallery, select the work Queen Mother Pendant Mask: Iyoba and respond to the series of questions provided to explore it in depth. Use the filter function to locate the image more readily within the collection. Complete this activity after you have explored the Metropolitan Museum of Art, in New York City, site through the Google Art Project.1. Describe the work by providing the following information:a. Who is the artist?b. When was the work created?c. What medium is the work (e.g., sculpture, painting)?d. What materials were used (e.g., clay, bronze, oil, acrylic)?e. How large is the work? Provide dimensions.2. How does the Queen Mother Pendant Mask relate to what you’ve learned about African art in this chapter? In your response, consider:a. The use of the object.b. The significance of the materials used.c. The social and political systems of African cultures during the period.3. Does there seem to be a specific message or feeling conveyed by the work? What might the intended message be, and how did the artist convey it? Consider aspects such as:a. The materials used.b. The formal structure of the composition (i.e., scale, proportion, symmetry).c. The style of the work of art (i.e., realism, abstraction, idealization, exaggeration).d. Distinguishing attributes – elements of the work that identify the subject as a particular person or belonging to a particular kingdom or culture.e. The function of the object.4. Impressions of the work:a. What were your first impressions of the Queen Mother Pendant Mask?b. Did these impressions change with more careful looking? How?c. What other works of art, from this chapter or others, does the Queen Mother Pendant Mask work bring to your mind?

Do you believe that lack of female leadership in top executive positions is a problem in our countr

y? What do you–as a woman OR a man–take away from this talk?
For your research paper,
you will need to choose one TED talk that we have watched this semester that presents
an idea that you feel reveals a problem that is worth exploring at greater length.
After selecting your talk, you will then need to identify a problem that is raised in the talk
and pose a feasible solution that will either solve OR improve the problem.
Your goal is not to argue the same thing as the speaker but rather to build upon the
topic by offering a more specific claim.
For example, I would not want to argue that women should sit at the table in order to
improve their chances of working their way up the corporate ladder, as that is
Sandbergs argument; however, I might want to propose that womens leadership
courses be instituted in public high schools (or even Broward County high schools!) as a
way of preparing women to enter male-dominated fields.
Your proposal should clearly identify a problem and pose a viable solution. The TED
talk should serve as one source for your essay. Please do not choose the same
TED talk that you worked with in the first essay.

Compare and contrast the two works 1. As I Walked Out One Evening – W.H. Auden & 2. Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night – Dylan Thomas.

2. A compare-and-contrast essay requires a strong ground for the comparison. In this case, you will need
to focus on the THEME of TIME that connects the two works.3. From this you will need to develop a thesis. You might choose to begin this process by making a list of similarities and differences between the two works, but eventually you will need to settle on a thesis that makes an argument about why these similarities and differences are significant. Your thesis should be clear, arguable and answer the so what? question. Your thesis requires a purpose. Be as SPECIFIC as you can.4. In order to support your argument, you will need to find evidence in the two texts. It is not sufficient to just quote the textyou should use quotations AND analyze your quotations as well. You’re essentially doing a close reading. And the foundation of close reading is the consideration of how a texts form
reflects its meaning. So, please ensure that the essay devotes some space to analyzing how the text is
constructedfor example, point of view, symbols, figurative language, sound, imagery, irony, etc.5. Attempt to answer questions that help solidify your argument. Such as – How is time represented? Does love actually have the ability to conquer time? What about art? Can art suspendor at least extendthe unfolding of time? Or you might consider questions
about memory. To what extent is memory fallible? What role does memory play in our understanding of who we are? How do the two works attempt to capture the slippery operations of memory? What role does art play in memorializing a loss? Death and time? Love and time? Feel free to make and answer questions of your own that you think are important to note here as well.-MLA format
-no other sources are necessary but the two required readings
-5-6 pages, Times New Roman, double-spaced