select an ethnical group for their case study client, then discuss cultural considerations (include beliefs, values, family, and their views on disabilities). Students will also discuss how, as the counselor, these considerations will be addressed. Use an ethic/racial group other than your own. Respond to two of your classmates.

select an ethnical group for their case study client, then discuss cultural considerations (include beliefs, values, family, and their views on disabilities). Students will also discuss how, as the counselor, these considerations will be addressed. Use an ethic/racial group other than your own. Respond to two of your classmates.

What is involved in trying to understand emotional experience? How would awareness of our inner world shape our understanding of meeting the child? Choosing any of the case studies in Waddells Inside Lives, describe your understanding of the dilemmas and possibilities. What sort of thinking is involved?

Hello,This paper is to be written from a teachers perspective to be submitted to a course instructor under the faculty of education in the JK- Grade 6 division.
For this assignment complete a 2 question essay that answers each question below
(2 total). Each question has it’s own assigned reading (1 source per question). Please answer each question seperately from one another but each should be 2 pages for a total of 4 pages for the 2 questions. Please use your knowledge of child and youth development from a elementary school teachers perspective.
Please refer to the guidlines below when completing the essay. Please only use the 2 sources as indicated:
Margo Waddell’s Inside Lives
Nguyen Nhat AnhLastly, please only make references to sections of each reading that pertain the question as well as the section specified in each question.
Guidelines: For each essay, discuss one course reading. For each essay: 1) Context: give specific examples from the reading to support your views and include the title, author and page of example 2) Reasons: Give reasons for your observation and say why; 3)Focus: You cannot talk about the entire reading, so you will have to select your main points from the course material. 4) Importance: In the last paragraph of each essay, say why you have chosen that essay to respond to. Say what is important to you that you have made your choice of questions. In other words, why did you select the particular question? Type each question you have chosen as your heading. Then, for each question write two double-space pages of discussion. The questions will give you a strong sense of how to answer them and all of the questions involve commenting on a reading. The more specific you can be in addressing the course material, the better will be your response1. Margo Waddell’s – Inside Lives tells us that in thinking about the human, the emphasis is less on the observable details of any particular interaction than on the possible meaning of the interaction in the inner world. (p. 2). 2. What are the differences between the childs understanding of his/her world and those of adults? What are the conflicts between these worldviews? Is there a ticket to childhood? Why should we want that? What surprised you about this little novel, A Ticket to Childhood by Nguyen Nhat Anh.

Choose a city in a developing country and discuss its planning issues. How can planning interventions improve the economy as well as living conditions in this city?The length should be approximately twelve pages (double spaces, font 12, about 3,000 words of text).

Choose a city in a developing country and discuss its planning issues. How can planning interventions improve the economy as well as living conditions in this city?The length should be approximately twelve pages (double spaces, font 12, about 3,000 words of text).

a research based assessment that identifies the demographic and psychographic characteristics of the target market as the personality/archetype of the brand and its competitors.

The assessment should also address market share among relevant players, positioning and competitive advantages/disadvantages of competitors, as well as competitive activity, competitor strength, and potential strategic actions that these competitors could take against you. Three rounds of research are required as outlined in class. Grading rubric: An outstanding assessment that utilizes key insights from primary and secondary research to identify the position of each brand and its target market, market share among relevant players, and advantages/disadvantages. Provides qualified estimates, even in situations where limited data exists.

Please research the case of The Atlanta Child Murders that occurred during a two year period between 1979 and 1981.

The assignment requires discussion of how criminalistics or forensic science were used to solve the crime and prosecute the accused. In profiling this criminal investigations the major focus of the research and paper must be on the forensic science or sciences used during the investigation and prosecution to convict or acquit the defendant(s). Briefly summarize the investigation or prosecution as background information, however the expectation is a detailed discussion of one or more forensic sciences.The paper must be seven (7) to ten (10) pages in length and written using APA style and formatting. The paper will include a cover page and reference pages, however these pages will not count toward the total page requirement. An abstract is not required. The research paper must include the review of two (2) scholarly, peer reviewed journal articles related to the topic of the research. Each literature review should be no more than one (1) page in length and counts toward the total page requirement.

The Big Myth About Teenage Anxiety

The Big Myth About Teenage Anxiety
Relax: The digital age is not wrecking your kid’s brain.By Richard A. Friedman
Dr. Friedman is a psychiatrist.brain gifWe hear a lot these days that modern digital technology is rewiring the brains of our teenagers, making them anxious, worried and unable to focus.Dont panic; things are really not this dire.Despite news reports to the contrary, (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. there is little evidence of an epidemic of anxiety disorders in teenagers. This is for the simple reason that the last comprehensive and representative survey of psychiatric disorders among American youth was conducted more than a decade ago (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., according to Kathleen Ries Merikangas, chief of the Genetic Epidemiology Research Branch at the National Institute of Mental Health.There are a few surveys (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. reporting increased anxiety in adolescents, but these are based on self-reported measures from kids or their parents which tend to overestimate the rates of disorders because they detect mild symptoms, not clinically significant syndromes.So whats behind the idea that teenagers are increasingly worried and nervous? One possibility is that these stories are the leading edge of a wave of anxiety disorders that has yet to be captured in epidemiological surveys. Or maybe anxiety rates have risen, but only in the select demographic groups the privileged ones that receive a lot of media attention.But its more likely that the epidemic is simply a myth. The more interesting question is why it has been so widely accepted as fact.One reason, I believe, is that parents have bought into the idea that digital technology smartphones, video games and the like are neurobiologically and psychologically toxic. If you believe this, it seems intuitive that the generations growing up with these ubiquitous technologies are destined to suffer from psychological problems. But this dubious notion comes from a handful of studies with serious limitations.Some studies (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. report an association between increased time spent on electronic communication and screens and lower levels of psychological well-being. The problem is that they show only correlation. It is entirely possible that teenagers who are more anxious and unhappy to start with are more drawn to smartphones to deflect their negative emotions than their better-adjusted peers.Another group of studies use M.R.I. to examine the brains of young people who are addicted to internet video games, and report various structural and functional differences. For example, one study (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. reported that a group of 17 teenagers with online gaming addiction had microstructural changes in various brain regions compared with a control group.But, once again, these studies cannot tell us whether the brain abnormalities are the result of excessive internet use, or a pre-existing risk factor for it.What about the claim that smartphones can be literally addicting, like illicit drugs? This appears to be based on a few M.R.I. studies (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. that show that kids with online gaming addiction have enhanced activation in their brains reward pathway when shown gaming images.No surprise there. If I scan your brain while showing you whatever it is that turns you on sex, chocolate or money, say your reward pathway will light up like a Christmas tree. But that hardly means you are addicted to these things.The real question is whether digital technology can produce the enduring changes in the brain that addictive drugs do. There is little evidence that this is the case. And while an alcoholic deprived of his drink can go into life-threatening withdrawal, I have yet to see an adolescent in the emergency room with smartphone withdrawal just a sullen teenager who wants his device back.Considering all this, why do so many parents still insist that their teenager has a problem with anxiety? I fear that it reflects a cultural shift toward pathologizing everyday levels of distress.There is a difference between an anxiety disorder and everyday anxiety. The first impairs peoples ability to function because they suffer from excessive anxiety even when there is little or nothing to be anxious about. The second is a perfectly normal and rational response to real stress. Teenagers and people of all ages will and should feel anxious occasionally.Some would argue that young people today are more worried because the world is now in a more parlous state, what with intense competition for college and the lingering effects of the Great Recession, among other factors. Sure, but then that anxiety is an appropriate response to lifes challenges not a disorder.Of course this is anecdotal, but as a psychiatrist, I havent seen an increase in the number of patients suffering from true anxiety disorders, who need therapy and often medication to keep their affliction in check. What I have noticed is that more of my young patients worry a lot about things that dont seem so serious, and then worry about their worry.A few patients in their early 20s, for example, were under a lot of stress at work, and were alarmed by a few nights of poor sleep. None of them were clinically depressed, yet they were convinced that their insomnia would seriously impair their work or make them physically sick. All were surprised and easily reassured when I told them there was little cause for concern. Why, I wondered, didnt they know this without me?I got a clue when, for the first time a few years ago, I received a phone call from the mother of a teenage patient. She was concerned that her son was unhappy in the wake of a breakup with his girlfriend and asked me to call him to check on him.Since there was nothing more than a vague worry about his unhappiness a perfectly normal response to romantic disappointment I told her that he could always contact me if he needed to.Since then, I have received similar calls from parents worried about their teenagers ability to handle everyday adversity for example, underperforming on a high-stakes exam or failing to get a summer job.These well-meaning parents are conveying to their kids that their emotional responses to difficult but ordinary experiences are not to be taken in stride, but viewed as something needing clinical attention.The truth is that our brains are both more resilient and more resistant to change than we think. The myth of an epidemic of anxiety disorder rooted in a generations overexposure to digital technology reveals an exaggerated idea about just how open to influence our brains really are.Yes, our brain has evolved to learn and extract critical information from the environment, but there are limits to neuroplasticity. Even when we are young and impressionable, our brains have molecular and structural brakes that control the degree to which they can be rewired by experience (and these tighten as we age).This is a good thing; without these limits, we would be at risk of overwriting and losing accumulated knowledge that is critical to our survival, to say nothing of our identity.Its good to keep in mind that the advent of new technology typically provokes medical and moral panic. Remember all those warnings that TV would cause brain rot? Never happened. The notion that the brain is a tabula rasa that can be easily transformed by digital technology is, as yet, the stuff of science fiction.So dont assume that theres something wrong with your kid every time hes anxious or upset. Our teenagers and their brains are up to the challenges of modern life. Choose ONE of the following questions to use for your home writing #3.1. Do you believe that modern technology is making our lives more stressful and causing us to become more anxious people? Why or why not? Use reasons and evidence to support your view.I agree with the fact that technology is not making our lives stressful .

After reading the Aegis case study, respond to the following prompts in three to five sentences: Based on the information in the case (and as of the cases date, 2003) Do you think the strategic alliances with Honeywell & Rockwell were chosen well (evaluate each individually) and explain why or why not?

o This necessitates evaluating the appeal of substitutes to strategic alliances. Do you think the SAs with Honeywell & Rockwell were implemented well (evaluate each individually and explain why or why not)? o Consider Aegiss overall approach, the particulars of each agreement and the mechanisms for creating value in a strategic alliance Evaluate the contract terms for the strategic alliances that the case describes. Were they well drawn to: o Ensure that the financial interests of Aegis its partners will align? o Ensure that the alliances will effectively pursue Aegis’ strategic goals for forming the alliances? ? Is there anything missing in the terms that could generate fiction between Aegis & its partners in the future

Write a Close Reading Essay on one of the following topics: Summarize the Juergensmeyer reading (51-63), and answer the following four questions by giving examples from the text: How does he want the reader to feel?

What images does he use to make the reader feel this way? How exactly does he match his examples up with his category of religious violence? Are the connections between his examples and his category clear? Both Karen Armstrong and William Cavanaugh critique the category of religious violence. By using examples from their writing (Armstrongs article online, Cavanaughs reading 65-76) describe how their arguments are similar and make special note of any differences you may encounter. Conclude by choosing a favourite and explaining your choice. Narrate an imaginary conversation between George Bataille and an animal of your choosing in which both try to answer the questions what is religion? and what is violence? Although you do not need to quote from the Bataille reading, you are required to footnote parts of the dialogue with reference to a page number and line number that connects to what Bataille and the animal are saying to each other (77-93). Summarize Girards theory of the scapegoat and, by referring to specific parts of his essay (95-127), show how it applies to a specific example from a film (ex. Shrek), a news media source (ex. fear of refugees), a play (ex. Matilda), or a novel (ex. Animal Farm). Be sure to summarize your example in detail, and be sure to note ways that Girards theory fails to explain your chosen example (i.e. What does the scapegoating theory miss in your chosen narrative?). What is an example of something violent that has become part of our habitus (common sense world)? With substantial reference to either Martin Saars division of order-practice-subject or Grace Jantzens critique of the western obsession with death, analyze a violent aspect of the current habitus. Be sure to define violence and note any religious influence you observe. With reference to at least three news sources that cover the same violent event, describe and critique both the use of the term terrorism in your news sources and in our reading (139-152). Answer the following questions about your news sources: How is the word terrorist being used? For what purpose is it being used? What definition of the term is being used? How does religion play a role in the use of the term? Describe ten different critical thinking tools that that you have picked up from this class and give examples of how you have used them. Take roughly one page to describe each item in your toolbox and make direct reference to one course text on each page. Some tools to consider: the distinction between descriptive and normative statements, the two lenses of sympathy and suspicion, the concept of the habitus, the definition of violence as a violation of boundaries, the idea that we make our social world, Girards concept of the scapegoat, Jaeggis concept of alienation, Holmqvists definition of modern war, Therborns idea of inequality, and the problematic category of religious violence. Feel free to use other examples from your course notes and readings