The impact of Tourist Personalities and Risk Factors on Backpacking Activities: A case Study on Turkey

Abstract: State very briefly: the aim of the research; methods of inquiry and analysis; the main findings of the study. This is generally best written when the rest of the work is complete. The abstract must be of approx. 200 words. A good abstract should be self-contained, which means that the reader must be able to understand the nature and findings of your research paper without reading the whole paper. Page ii Acknowledgements This is a formal acknowledgement of those who have provided assistance to you in the completion of your assignment, such as people who have provided library/data/technical assistance and if you wish your supervisor, colleagues and family. Page iii Table of Contents The table of contents lists the headings and sub-headings (and page numbers) exactly as they appear in the text. (See table 1.2) Page iv & v List of Figures and List of Tables These list figures and tables that have been used throughout the paper. Figures show information so patterns can be seen, for example diagrams, graphs, models, etc. Tables give statistical information, numbers, counts, etc. Both tables and figures are numbered according to which chapter they appear in. For example if a table appears in chapter 4, the first table is numbered table 4.1; the second one is numbered 4.2 and so on. Each table and figure has a title. (See table 1.3 and 1.4) Page vi List of Appendices This section is used to present information that you want to include for the sake of completeness but would be excessive in the main body of the paper. For example, you have to include a copy of the questionnaire used or interview questions asked. Other examples of appendices are statistics (do not include long lists in the text), some background information, maps, pictures if really necessary, etc. Do not include raw data, or any other unnecessary material to bulk up the paper. Appendices should be referred to in the text as Appendix I, II III, and IV etc. Each item has to be clearly labelled in the text. They should be numbered in the same order as they appear in the research paper. (See table 1.5) Chapter 1: Introduction The Introduction should demonstrate the relevance and importance of your research. The reader should be introduced to the background of the study, the nature of the problem being discussed and why the topic was chosen. You may start from something broad and then narrow it down. A lot of detail is not needed at this stage as the coming chapters will explain that. As part of the Introduction you should state a clear rationale, having identified a knowledge gap in the literature and demonstrate your motivation behind the particular research topic. In other words: You should tell the reader why you feel the researchis worth the effort (Saunders et al. 2003, p.30). All too often these chapters have good literature reviews but the particular questions addressed by the project are scarcely mentioned. At the end of the Introduction, after the appropriate literature has been reviewed and put into context, explicitly state the aims and objectives. This part informs the reader of exactly what you want to achieve with your research paper. An aim is what you want to achieve overall, and objectives are smaller stepping stones taken to achieve the aim. For this size of research paper it should not be more than five objectives. Examples may be: to investigate, to assess, to analyse, to explore, to discuss, etc. Chapter 2: Literature Review This chapter includes comprehensive information and theories of various authors and sources. The purpose is not to describe but to critically review the literature in relation to your chosen topic. In this chapter you will set the scene for the reader while bringing you topic in a broad context. Therefore you will need to evaluate concepts, theories, models, and definitions that apply to your topic and relate to your aim. For example, when your topic is Empowerment application in Hotel Hyatt, then in your literature review you will inform the reader about general motivation theories, about people motivation at work in general, you will review the different concepts of empowerment, and the application of empowerment in other hotel case examples. As much as possible of recent information is needed here (for example if you discuss tourism arrivals to China, the latest statistics are needed, not information from 1998). Chapter 3: Methodology You should address research design issues that would improve the nature of the study and its results. Which approach would you choose for your particular research, quantitative or qualitative? What data collection methods would you adopt to accomplish your objectives? State details regarding such aspects as sampling, reliability/dependability, and validity/credibility. Also reflect on the objectivity/confirmability. Do not just state for example that a bigger sample would be better; the rationale for possible changes should be provided. You may also elaborate on the generalisability/transferability of your research findings and on how your research may be redesigned to achieve a greater span of influence on the research subjects or participants. Ethical issues and limitations concerning the data gathering process and research works in a particular company must also be discussed and specific suggestions for avoiding ethical conflicts should be proposed. Chapter 4: Discussion The chapter allows you to discuss the objectives you have identified at the beginning of your research process. You must discuss what you have found and apply the concepts, theories, models to the subject of your research objectives; all theories as well as tables, figures, and statistical analyses should be referred to in this chapter. In this chapter, while you will discuss your objectives in a focused way, you must also relate back to the literature and empirical studies you have reviewed in chapter 2. Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendations In this chapter your critical evaluation is seen. You should not use any new material here. What overall conclusions can be drawn from your literature review and data (where appropriate)? It is necessary to link to your aim, research question and objectives. Have you reached your aim? Have you answered the research question? Have you achieved the objectives? In this chapter you display originality of thought when elaborating on the significance of your findings and when linking to your arguments. Recommendations might be for someone doing the same study in the future or for the organisation (Hotel Company for example) that you have analysed. Weaknesses in your study can be mentioned and suggestions how to avoid similar weaknesses in the future. You will discuss limitations of your particular study such as the size of sample, the snapshot nature of the research, or the restriction to one geographical area of an organisation (Saunders et al. 2009, p.538). References The reference section must be complete and presented in the correct format, containing all references cited in the paper. If there are references missing it is plagiarism. For sources that you opt not to cite in the paper but which you have however consulted for general information, create another list named Other sources consulted. Do not underestimate the amount of time that a reference section can take to complete and check. Make sure you follow Harvard style throughout the paper and in the reference list. The following web site may be referred to for style, but you will also receive online referencing guides during the semester to help you consult for accurate referencing and citation techniques according to Ulster University. The referencing guide will be given to you as a handout.

Critically Appraising Studies & Reviews (40 points) At this point, you have chosen two possible interventions/models for your P.

For each intervention, review at least three studies/articles that examined the effectiveness of the intervention with your population/problems (or the population that is similar/relevant to your P). [Therefore, in total, you review at least six studies (three for each intervention).] 1. Critically appraise (assess the quality) these studies. 2. Based on the studies you have reviewed, what conclusion can you make about each intervention regarding its evidence? Intervention Selection and Implementation Assignment (20 points) 1. Which intervention do you think has a stronger evidence to treat/work with your P? Explain why. 2. Which intervention is the best fit (better fit) for your P? Measurable Treatment Goals (15 points) 1. Based on the hypothetical discussion with the clients in your population, describe the measurable treatment goals that will best monitor your clients progress. 2. How were these goals chosen? Other grading criteria APA (15 points) Quality and Organization of Writing (10 points) -Length: 4 pages (title and reference pages do not count towards the lengths of the paper) -No abstract required.
Hide

Explain the main arguments presented in the research. Describe the evidence used in the research to support the main arguments. In other words, what evidence did the researchers use to support their perspective? Identify any assumptions made by the researchers.

Example Assessments You may use the assessment examples, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like. Preparation Suppose you work as a counselor in a crisis center. The agency for which you work tries to offer informational sessions presented by staff members on a regular basis. You have been asked to present at the next session, and your topic is the causes of depression. You must decide if you believe the causes of depression stem from biological factors or from cognitive-behavioral factors, present your perspective (either biological or cognitive-behavioral), your position, and provide evidence-based arguments to support your position. To prepare for this, research the causes of depression that have been presented by experts. Links to several websites dedicated to the study of depression have been provided in the Suggested Resources for this assessment, along with a list of journal articles. Based on this research, decide which perspective you believe makes the most compelling argument. In the Capella library, locate at least four peer-reviewed articles that support your position. You may use two of the articles from the resource list provided, but at least two additional resources must come from your own research. In the real world, this type of presentation would likely use PowerPoint or a similar type of technology; however, for this assessment, format your presentation following APA guidelines. This gives you more practice and experience with the professional writing style of the field of psychology. To help you organize your work, you may consider using the Causes of Depression Analysis Worksheet provided in the resources. Do not submit the worksheet as your assessment or with your assessment; this is provided solely to assist you in organizing and writing your assessment. Requirements Prepare a 35 page presentation on the causes of depression in which you first identify the perspective you have chosen, and then: Analyze the research that caused you to choose the perspective you did. Describe the conclusions or findings of the research. Explain how the research findings might influence the way psychology professionals view depression.

critically compare at least 2 different stories using 2-3 outside secondary sources for support through the focused lens of one of these general topics.

Roles and Perceptions of Women
Sense of Justice
Prophesy and Vision
Tricksters
Cultural Heroism
Symbolism
The role of humor/satire
The role of structure
Importance of setting
An analysis of specific characters
Messages/lessons for out time

These are all general starting points, but YOUR specific claim should be unique. For example, you could write an essay called Odysseus Battles the Monkey: Trickery and Heroism in Journey to the Wests and the Odyssey

The sources should be from the SSU library databases or Google scholar, or some other electronic sources that are not simply generic internet sources.

Contextualize the essay critically (how the here and now affects the way we read and understand the document should be addressed in all papers regardless of approach.)

You essay should summarize only what we need to understand your main claims. BE CAREFUL OF TOO MUCH SUMMARY. This is one of the main reasons students lose points.

HERE IS A BREAKDOWN OF POINTS AND A GENERAL RUBRIC-

MLA Documentation: 25 points
Use of secondary source material as support: 50 points
Thesis and Adherence to the topic: 50 points
General Essay conventions (intro, body paragraphs, conclusion) 50pts
Critical Thinking 50 points
Diction and Grammar: 25 points

Here is a general idea of what I am looking for

Rubric for Literary Analysis Papers

The A Paper
Thesis presents a strong assertion or claim, is tightly focused
All quotations or examples clearly demonstrate and support the claim of the paper
Essay displays insightful understanding and analysis of the book
Essay is solidly developed
Quotations or examples are contextualized, explained, or woven smoothly into the discussion
Exhibits strong diction and skillful use of language
Uses MLA citation format correctly
Few, if any errors in literary conventions

The B Paper
Thesis is clear, though not a strong assertion or claim
Good quotations or examples, but less than complete analysis of or comment on the quotations
Essay shows understanding of the book, but lacks depth of analysis
Occasional generalizations and vague word choice (e.g. interesting, important)
Generally follows literary conventions (e.g. present tense verbs, underlines or italicizes book titles, correct quotation citation information)

Do you agree or disagree with the action? Explain your reasoning and support it with the materials from this week.

1) There are three (3) primary inventory costing methods used by companies: LIFO, FIFO, and Weighted Average. With each method comes a number of pros and cons that a company must consider when implementing its inventory management strategy. Select a company below and discuss the advantages associated with its chosen inventory costing method. Amazon – Uses FIFO
Article:
https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/100/1188_henryhand/ARTICLES/W6DQ_Amazon.pdf2) According to a recent article from Forbes, retail operations in the United States are experiencing over $60 billion a year in losses primarily due to employee theft. Imagine you have been hired as a loss prevention specialist for a large retail chain and your first assignment is to identify and address the current problems with inventory shrinkage. Select and discuss one of the following internal controls below you would implement to help prevent future employee fraud/theft? Be sure to provide your rationale.https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/100/1188_henryhand/ARTICLES/W8DQ_RetailTheft.pdf
Option B: Tighter security controls (i.e. video surveillance, random inventory/cash audits, computer system audits, segregation of duties)3) Leveraging technology is a concept that is not going anywhere anytime soon. How does your organization guard against a breach of your personal information? Provide at least 2 examples and support them with evidence.4) Describe an action a regulatory agency took against a business in the past 6 months. Post a link to your source.