2. What was the end result of each incident (What is now done, is there a law, rule, policy?)
3.How has it changed the way law enforcement does what it does?-Marsys Law?
-Amber Alert?
-Megans LawAll three can be on the same document.Part 2 – Does Plea Bargaining undermine due process and the criminal justice system, or is it a necessary means to administer justice? Use your reading to support your answer in a few paragraphs.
Case StudySara is in her last semester of nursing school. She works as a student nurse twice a week with the local hospice to fulfill her community health rotation course requirement. Hospice offers bereavement counseling to the family members of deceased patients. The hospice director asks Sara to prepare an educational lesson to present at the next bereavement group meeting.A. Normal griefB. Anticipatory griefC. Disenfranchised griefD. Ambiguous grief2. Sara further explores the concept of grief. Suicide is a risk for people who experience masked grief.A. TrueB. False3. Sara teaches the bereavement group Kbler-Ross five stages of dying. Rank them in order.A. BargainingB. DenialC. DepressionD. AcceptanceE. Anger4. Sara teaches the bereavement group the Grief Tasks Model by Worden. Rank in order the tasks of this grief theory.A. Emotionally relocate the deceased and move on with life.B. Experience the pain of grief.C. Accept the reality of the loss.D. Adjust to a world in which the deceased is missing.
Discuss women rights emerges within the antislavery movement 1830-1870
1. What is philosophy?
3. What kind of philosophical parameters/theories do you use to determine your actions, your thoughts, in
summary, the kind of life you live?
4. You live the kind of life you live because you think it is the best life possible, right? Do you think that if
other people lived your kind of life, the world would be a better place? Why or why not?
For this third and final task you will write a script for an oral presentation. Imagine that you are the director of the movie that you watched in Task 2. You have decided to add one more scene at the very beginning of the movie immediately following the opening credits. The purpose of the scene will be to clue the audience on whether this is going to be an existentialist, modernist, or postmodernist movie. It should be abundantly clear from what you say how your creative ideas would reflect an existentialist, modernist, or postmodernist approach to this particular movie.Write a script, jotting down some big ideas that you dont want to miss. Your script must include at least one visual aid (a graphic, or a slide).
Your script will be for a presentation of about 2-3 minutes in length.
Submit only a script, not a recording. Be imaginative, creative, engaging, and detailed.
Write an opinion paper of 500-600 words. Be sure to identify your texts and your examples clearly by citing your sources and creating a Works Cited page. You must submit both a rough draft with edits and a final copy. Save your work until you submit it at the end of Lesson 15. Remember, these are topics not thesis statements. You must decide for yourself how to take the topic and turn it into a thesis that you can defend.topic will be on:
Mad Men and The Waste Land as Modernist Texts.
Use specific examples from the text to support your opinion. Also consider how someone else might see things differently, that is, include some reference to a different interpretation that you dont support but that others might. For example, might someone else say that these two texts are more postmodernist than modernist?
The purpose of the second written assignment is to continue your practice at your scientific thinking about psychological issues. We will ask you to read another research description and: (1) think about how the principles of scientific thinking and warning signs of pseudoscience apply to it, as you did for the first assignment, but also (2) critique the research methods used in the research description.For the first part of the written assignment, you should analyze the claims being madeaccording to 1 of the 6 principles of scientific thinking and 1 of the 3 warning signs related to pseudoscientific claims (see Written Assignment 1 for a list of these). You should use the feedback provided for your Written Assignment 1 to help write this section. It is up to you to select the most relevant principles but in every case, if you think the research description does a good job of following one of the principles, provide a detailed response as to why you think that. If you think the research description does not do a good job of following one of the principles, provide a comprehensive answer and also say what would need to be done to make sure the research description follows the principle.For the second part of the written assignment, analyze the research description and the claims it makes in relation to 2 different aspects of the research methods discussed in class and/or in Lilienfeld et al. in Chapter 2. In the lecture and textbook, a number of issues related to research methods have been discussed. Below are some examples of things you might look for in the research description. Remember though that not every point will relate to the research description.(1)Reactivity – refers to the often-social nature of data collection in psychology and how the act of observation might impact the data. I If participants react to being observed, then researchers may no longer be observing the kind of behaviour that they really wanted to observe.(2)Social desirability bias/positive impression management this refers to the possibility that people may not always tell the truth when asked questions, or may attempt to improve their performance on a task to impress the experimenter.In other words, is it possible that participants in the research description gave untruthful answers in response to questions in order to look good? Alternatively, do you think participants in a study may have tried extra hard at something in order to impress the experimenter? If so, perhaps the experimenters will obtain results that wont reflect peoples behaviour outside of their specific study.(3)Unrepresentative or biased sample this refers to the possibility that the sample of participants in the research description may not reflect the full range ofpeople about whom we are interested in making conclusions (i.e. the population).In other words, is it possible that the researchers studied only a small and/or biased sample of people? Was there something about the sample of people that made them different from the general population of people? If so, try to think about how the biased sample may have affected the results that the researchers found
(4)Confounding variables when conducting an experiment, a confounding variable is something that systematically differs between the experimental and control groups, which confounds (or confuses) our interpretation of the study. In other words, the presence of a confounding variable means that we cant be surewhether the independent variable (the thing we deliberately manipulated betweenthe experimental and control groups) or the confounding variable (something thatalso varies between the experimental and control groups, but which we did not mean to vary) is responsible for the results of the study. If the research description describes an experiment, does that experiment contain a confoundingvariable? If it does, could the confounding variable be an alternative explanation for the results of the study?(5)Lack of a control group remember that in an experiment, we create an experimental group for whom we have manipulated an independent variable (e.g.we increase the amount of violent TV a group of children watches) to try to determine the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable (e.g. we look to see if watching more violent TV increases aggression in this group of children). However, we also need to study a control group for whom the independent variable has not been manipulated (in this case, a group of children who do not watch more violent TV than usual). It is the comparison of the experimental group with the control group that tells us the effect of the manipulation of the independent variable.(6)Validity of the measures this refers to the idea that even though we might have a measure that is highly reliable (i.e., a set of weighing scales) this measurewould be inappropriate for measuring certain psychological characteristics (for example, intelligence or perfectionism). The degree of validity then is the degree to which the measure we are using has some relationship with the thing we are trying to measure.(7)Ethics There are many issues surrounding ethics and the study of human (andanimal) behavior. One of the key features is to safe-guard the well-being and dignity of the individuals taking part in the investigation. This includes making sure the individual has the opportunity to provide voluntary informed consent, hasthe right to withdraw from the investigation and is fully debriefed as to the nature and purpose of the investigation after data collection.Apply two aspects of research methods to the research description. When you identify flaws in the research methodology, provide a comprehensive explanation of the flaw and also say what would need to be done to improve the research methodology in the research description
the doctor wants a specific way and frame for analysing the case , i will provide you with all the needed information.
The purpose of the second written assignment is to continue your practice at your scientific thinking about psychological issues. We will ask you to read another research description and: (1) think about how the principles of scientific thinking and warning signs of pseudoscience apply to it, as you did for the first assignment, but also (2) critique the research methods used in the research description.For the first part of the written assignment, you should analyze the claims being madeaccording to 1 of the 6 principles of scientific thinking and 1 of the 3 warning signs related to pseudoscientific claims (see Written Assignment 1 for a list of these). You should use the feedback provided for your Written Assignment 1 to help write this section. It is up to you to select the most relevant principles but in every case, if you think the research description does a good job of following one of the principles, provide a detailed response as to why you think that. If you think the research description does not do a good job of following one of the principles, provide a comprehensive answer and also say what would need to be done to make sure the research description follows the principle.For the second part of the written assignment, analyze the research description and the claims it makes in relation to 2 different aspects of the research methods discussed in class and/or in Lilienfeld et al. in Chapter 2. In the lecture and textbook, a number of issues related to research methods have been discussed. Below are some examples of things you might look for in the research description. Remember though that not every point will relate to the research description.(1)Reactivity – refers to the often-social nature of data collection in psychology and how the act of observation might impact the data. I If participants react to being observed, then researchers may no longer be observing the kind of behaviour that they really wanted to observe.(2)Social desirability bias/positive impression management this refers to the possibility that people may not always tell the truth when asked questions, or may attempt to improve their performance on a task to impress the experimenter.In other words, is it possible that participants in the research description gave untruthful answers in response to questions in order to look good? Alternatively, do you think participants in a study may have tried extra hard at something in order to impress the experimenter? If so, perhaps the experimenters will obtain results that wont reflect peoples behaviour outside of their specific study.(3)Unrepresentative or biased sample this refers to the possibility that the sample of participants in the research description may not reflect the full range ofpeople about whom we are interested in making conclusions (i.e. the population).In other words, is it possible that the researchers studied only a small and/or biased sample of people? Was there something about the sample of people that made them different from the general population of people? If so, try to think about how the biased sample may have affected the results that the researchers found
(4)Confounding variables when conducting an experiment, a confounding variable is something that systematically differs between the experimental and control groups, which confounds (or confuses) our interpretation of the study. In other words, the presence of a confounding variable means that we cant be surewhether the independent variable (the thing we deliberately manipulated betweenthe experimental and control groups) or the confounding variable (something thatalso varies between the experimental and control groups, but which we did not mean to vary) is responsible for the results of the study. If the research description describes an experiment, does that experiment contain a confoundingvariable? If it does, could the confounding variable be an alternative explanation for the results of the study?(5)Lack of a control group remember that in an experiment, we create an experimental group for whom we have manipulated an independent variable (e.g.we increase the amount of violent TV a group of children watches) to try to determine the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable (e.g. we look to see if watching more violent TV increases aggression in this group of children). However, we also need to study a control group for whom the independent variable has not been manipulated (in this case, a group of children who do not watch more violent TV than usual). It is the comparison of the experimental group with the control group that tells us the effect of the manipulation of the independent variable.(6)Validity of the measures this refers to the idea that even though we might have a measure that is highly reliable (i.e., a set of weighing scales) this measurewould be inappropriate for measuring certain psychological characteristics (for example, intelligence or perfectionism). The degree of validity then is the degree to which the measure we are using has some relationship with the thing we are trying to measure.(7)Ethics There are many issues surrounding ethics and the study of human (andanimal) behavior. One of the key features is to safe-guard the well-being and dignity of the individuals taking part in the investigation. This includes making sure the individual has the opportunity to provide voluntary informed consent, hasthe right to withdraw from the investigation and is fully debriefed as to the nature and purpose of the investigation after data collection.Apply two aspects of research methods to the research description. When you identify flaws in the research methodology, provide a comprehensive explanation of the flaw and also say what would need to be done to improve the research methodology in the research description
(i.e., despite race/ethnicity being a social construct, how may race/ethnicity effect individuals? How may this apply to the development of the self and social institutions? )To help with this Essay: watch the documentary True Colors (it is available on YouTube.) Here, Diane Sawyer and her news crew stage what is basically a “match study” experiment by pairing John, a white male, and Glen, a Black male. She follows them with a series of hidden cameras and exposes racism in a variety of settings.Feel free to use other outside sources as long as they are properly cited. The paper has to be 100% plagiarism free. This essay is 30% of the final grade. Professor is serious about plagiarism. The assignment will be submitted on safe assign through blackboard on CUNY system.