Author: best-essay

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4106601/ Part I: Pre-write Refer to the following strategies discussed in your textbook and choose either o Free-writing o Clustering o Listing o or Questioning Your prewriting MUST be substantive. Show that you have seriously considered all aspects of your topic. Make sure that you also label the technique (freewriting, clustering, listing, or questioning) you have used and dont limit yourselflet your ideas flow! There are no right or wrong concepts or ideas in prewriting. You can use the samples given in your text or use the sample in this weeks lesson to help guide your writing. Remember: In the coming weeks, you narrow your approach as you continue developing the ideas that you begin in this week. Part II: Audience Analysis and Diction As you work on your pre-write, consider your approach to your essay, who is your audience? Note: Avoid a simple response such as everyone. You would want to choose a response that is well-thought out, such as, My audience is kids who are ages 58 years and who have never known their father. They have been living primarily with. They live in an area of town that. Their home situation is Their schooling situation is Write a paragraph to address all of the following questions (at minimum: 5-7 sentences) while applying the grammar concepts you learned this week: o Profile your reader. Who are they? How do you plan on presenting them? o How will you approach more technical/difficult concepts in your paper? o Describe how you plan to integrate a formal academic tone into your essay (What might be some of the formal characteristics you would use?). Part I: Pre-write [Begin your pre-writing here] Please, read the instructions correctly, write Part 1 and part 2, using the instructions correctly, use the questionning strategy or the freewriting, only one. Write a half page only following the guidelines precisely.
Hide

Case Readings (read all of the following before you begin your analysis): Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB). (2014). Lac-Mgantic runaway train and derailment investigation summary. TSB Railway Investigation Report R13D0054. https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/rail/2013/r13d0054/r13d0054-r-es.asp Mackrael, K. (2018, May 15). Investigating a tragedy: Piecing together the events of Lac-Mgantic. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/investigating-a-tragedy-piecing-together-the-events-of-lac-megantic/article25588529/ Quigley, K. (2018, January 22). Post Lac-Megantic, bureaucracy and safety remain at odds. Montreal Gazette. https://montrealgazette.com/opinion/opinion-post-lac-megantic-bureaucracy-and-safety-remain-at-odds Questions: 2. Who or what should have been on trial for the Lac-Megantic Disaster? Defend your response from a business ethic’s point-of-view. Case Analysis Guidelines Make sure you include an introduction in your document. This should provide a brief overview of the situation. Your case study analysis should be 3,000 words, excluding graphs, figures, references, and appendices. You must follow the APA style throughout for all citations and the References page. Please note that since this is a relatively short case, and not a report, there is no need for an Executive Summary. *** It is very important to reference some from the textbook "Canadian Business and Society by Robert Sexty if possible. **Additionally, some of the course content that has been covered on ethics is as follows: Please try to tie some of it in to the paper. eight fundamentals of capitalism four perspectives of Wicks The Olander stakeholder impact analysis public policy implications and business lobbying endowments and ethics for sale? dynamic stakeholder analysis globalization and sustainability, CSR, and ethical considerations We have provided two questions to help you focus the analysis in your case. **As you develop the case, consider the perspective of those injured in the crash. There are several individuals or groups that could theoretically be brought to trial as a result of this crash. Identify three such stakeholders or groups and describe why they are complicit in the crash and where the ethical failure occured. (these are the "options" that you would identify under a case-based analysis). Based on this analysis, identify the stakeholder group you feel is most liable (this is the option you are choosing upon which to complete your analysis). After you have done this, craft a list of specific recommendations that you would make to this group (option) to help them avoid such risks in the future. Then prepare a brief implementation plan. There are as many ways to write a case as there are individuals analysing them. One thing we don’t want to see is that you simply answer the questions, with no "case analysis" component in your document. To give you some guidance that will ensure you answer the questions while also providing a good analysis, I have provided a sample structure that you can follow. This is not the only way to write your case – but do make sure you have included the items I identify here. Introduction – Provide a quick overview of what the case is about, the purpose of your document, and how you will approach it. This should be no more than two paragraphs. Background – What happened as a result of the event(s)? Here you will describe in general the ethical issues and consequences, as well as the stakeholder group responsible for each. Don’t just describe the case (this is a mistake many people make – they spend too much time describing the case and not enough time actually analysing it). Make sure you are describing issues in the context of ethical decision-making. You should relate the chain of ethical failures in this tragedy to such business concepts as capitalism, economics, perceptions of value, strategy, sustainability, social license, social responsibility, etc. This is a general section that allows us to see how you have diagnosed some of the foundations of ethical failures. Options for Prosecution – Identify three stakeholders or groups and describe more specifically why they are complicit in the crash and where the ethical failure occurred. (these are the "options" that you would identify under a case-based analysis). Most Liable Option – Identify the stakeholder you believe is most at fault. Describe why, providing some NEW information to supplement your earlier analysis (don’t simply repeat observations from earlier sections of your paper). Recommendations Craft a list of specific recommendations that you would make to this group (the most liable option) to help them avoid such risks in the future. Keep in mind that "Develop a CSR plan" is not a recommendation; it is far too general. Put yourself in the role of a consultant for this section – what specific action items could you suggest to help them make a meaningful change? Then prepare a brief implementation plan – this could be in the form of a table or graph. Conclusion There is an excellent review of how to write a good conclusion here – I strongly recommend you take a look. https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/conclusions/ I would add one thing, and that is that you include a sentence or two about the limitations of your particular approach to this case analysis. Again, in addition to doing some research and citing your references, make sure you spend time on proof reading, grammar, sentence structure, and clarity. Treat this as though it were a report being handed in to your own manager – you would want to ensure that it is professional, credible and easy to read. I can’t emphasize enough how important it is to write well – it is becoming a rare communication skill that can really set you apart. I hope this helps. Marking is as follows to help with Course content and layout: Criterion A to A+ (90-100) Completeness 10 10 marks maximum Reflects all requirements (i.e. answers all questions, includes intro, conclusion, limitations etc) Understanding 18-20 20 marks maximum Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of topic and issues. Integration of course concepts to date 18-20 20 marks maximum Makes meaningful connections between the issues identified and strategic concepts in the readings. Demonstrates complete command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective. Presents detailed, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by research and readings. Supplements case study with relevant and extensive research. Recommendations and analysis 27-30 30 marks maximum Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues. Writing, grammar, and references 18-20 20 marks maximum Writing is well-organized, clear, concise and correct; includes thorough details and relevant data. Uses APA referencing guidelines accurately and consistently. Integrates at least 6 new academic references.
Hide

Reading folder and identify the elements discussed in the chapter. What are the similarities / differences experienced by the elderly and what are the social policies, intervention services provided to protect them.

Use the universal themes to expand your definition of the human condition. You MUST reference A&P and Araby. Do not use contractions, I, we, in my opinion, etc. Reference various literary devices to support your perspective.

How can we improve the public Epidemics and advocate its effectiveness.

Discuss a situation where you came into contact with each type of leader. What lessons on leadership did you learn? What did you appreciate about their leadership styles? Would you have done anything differently for a more successful experience? This paper should be 3-4 pages, not including title page and references, and should be formatted according to current APA guidelines. You may use sources from the learning activities, but you must use at least two references not included in this course. Competency: 4. Apply principles of leadership, governance, and management, which include creating a vision, empowering others, fostering collaboration, and guiding decision making. Learning Objectives: 1. Compare and contrast leadership styles 2. Discuss lessons learned from experiences with different leaders. I need to also use the following websites as 2 of 3 of my references: 1. https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_84.htm 2. https://www.forbes.com/sites/deeppatel/2017/03/13/6-ways-to-figure-out-what-type-of-leader-you-are/#35fa86d762d3
Hide

Assignment 1: Presidential Examples Due Week 2 and worth 160 points On 3 August 1990, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 600 condemning the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and demanding that Iraq unconditionally withdraw all forces deployed in Kuwait. After a series of failed negotiations between major world powers and Iraq, President George H.W. Bush conducted a one way negotiation, in front of the full support of Congress and the Senate, stating the requirements for a peaceful resolution to the invasion. Please watch the terms of the negotiation as presented in the video. Watch the video mentioned in Chapter 1 of the text titled, President George H.W. Bush – Address Before Congress on Iraq, (6m 03s), located at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll_GjnDCbjk. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: Discuss the specific negotiation skills that President Bush utilized in his one-way negotiation session with Saddam Hussein that he addressed in front of Congress. Provide specific examples of these negotiation skills to support your rationale. Debate whether or not you believe President Bushs approaches to the negotiation process were effective or ineffective in achieving his desired results. Justify your response. Indicate who you believe was in control of the outcome of the negotiation attemptsBush or Hussein. Provide concrete examples of this control to support your position. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the students name, the professors name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Write clearly and concisely about issues in contracting and purchasing negotiation techniques.
Hide

The intent of your effort is to alert Troop B communities about the dangers of household toxins. When doing this, do not underestimate the intelligence of the population nor their desire for a well-founded explanation of the risks of household toxins. All modes of communication must discuss the associated toxicokinetics of at least one family of common household toxins. all briefs should be written at or below the 8th grade reading level. Group C will create research briefs on the topic of Biotransformation (Phase II) Conjugation Exposure frequency . The research briefs should be aimed at pre-hospital and health care professionals. You should assume these professionals have at least a two year degree, five years of experience in the health care field, and a 12th-grade reading level. The research brief must present and discuss the research and findings of primary research. Be sure to include a full link to the journal article you are reviewing within the text of the research brief. A research brief is designed to make information more accessible to professionals. It is similar to a book review, except it reviews a research study. You would expect a book review to include the title of the book, the authors, the characters, the plot, and a critique of the book. Similarly, a research brief contains an introduction to the topic and then substantive material appropriate for working professionals who average five years in the field. In addition the brief needs to include the title of the research article, the authors, the issue studied, background information, the research method used (including a review of the sample, design, statistics, findings, and conclusions), and your critique of the article and study. To this you should add a substantive critique of the research. The brief must. It is assumed you will summarize research findings and present this in an accessible format. As such, you will be evaluated on how well you summarized the study and how well you presented it. For more information on writing a research brief, refer to pages 4, 15, and 16 of Beyond Scientific Publication: Strategies for Disseminating Research Findings For all projects, links to additional information must be included. QR codes need to be included in all trifolds and research briefs. The QR Codes do not need to be active, but you must indicate to which website it is linked. Competencies: 3. Interpret results of data analysis for public health research, policy, or practice. 7. Select communication strategies for different audiences and sectors. 8. Communicate audience-appropriate public health content, both in writing and through oral presentation. 9. Describe the importance of cultural competence in communicating public health content. 10. Perform effectively on interprofessional teams. Learning Objective: 1. Describe the direct and indirect human, ecological, and safety effects of major environmental and occupational agents.
Hide

Provide a detailed sentence outline of the theory and/or hypotheses of your proposed research project. Again, your literature review/Theory must include Concepts and/or definitions of dependent and independent variables that ultimately answer your research question. It should contain no fewer than ten journal article references. Please begin your research in the following journals: Public Administration Review, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Public Performance Management Review, Local Government Studies, Urban Affairs Review and Administration & Society.

Structure a policy argument or claim that is definitive, designative, evaluative, and advocative, using one of these terms: (a) crime, (b) pollution, (c) terrorism, (d) quality of life, (e) global warming, (f) fiscal crisis, (g) human rights, and (h) unemployment. Convert the argument in the first discussion into a policy debate by providing an objection and a rebuttal.